分散固相萃取/分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定甘蓝中的拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取方法,建立了气相色谱法快速检测甘蓝中氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯及氰戊菊酯4种拟除虫菊酯农药残留量的分析方法。使用乙腈作为萃取溶剂,经乙二胺-Ｎ-丙基硅烷固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将农药富集到50 μL二甲苯中后,采用气相色谱-电子捕获检测器进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐效应等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明：除氟氯氰菊酯在 0.01~0.1 mg/L范围外,其余3种拟除虫菊酯农药均在 0.01~5.0 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数为0.997 9~0.999 2;加标浓度为0.02~0.5 μg/g时,除氟氯氰菊酯外其他拟除虫菊酯农药的平均回收率为81.9%~93.5%,相对标准偏差为9.5%~20.7%。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于甘蓝中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

分散固相萃取/分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定甘蓝中的拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取方法,建立了气相色谱法快速检测甘蓝中氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯及氰戊菊酯4种拟除虫菊酯农药残留量的分析方法。使用乙腈作为萃取溶剂,经乙二胺-N-丙基硅烷固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将农药富集到50μL二甲苯中后,采用气相色谱-电子捕获检测器进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐效应等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明:除氟氯氰菊酯在0.01~0.1 mg/L范围外,其余3种拟除虫菊酯农药均在0.01~5.0mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数为0.997 9~0.999 2;加标浓度为0.02~0.5μg/g时,除氟氯氰菊酯外其他拟除虫菊酯农药的平均回收率为81.9%~93.5%,相对标准偏差为9.5%~20.7%。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于甘蓝中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

分散固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/气相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜中19种有机磷农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取联用方法,建立了气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)同时测定蔬菜中19种有机磷农药残留量的分析方法。分散固相萃取方法以乙腈为萃取液,以N-丙基-乙二胺(PSA)和C18为吸附剂。对影响分散液液微萃取效率的因素(萃取溶剂种类及体积、分散剂体积等)进行优化,同时分析了实验过程中添加掩蔽试剂L-古洛糖酸γ-内酯(AP)对基质效应补偿作用的影响。在最佳实验条件下,19种有机磷在辣椒和大葱中3个添加水平(0.05,0.1,0.5 mg/kg)的回收率为76.9%~126.8%,相对标准偏差为0.6%~7.3%,检出限(S/N=3)为0.10~0.50μg/kg。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于蔬菜中有机磷农药的快速检测。     

温控离子液体分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法检测脐橙中染色剂残留

建立了QuEChERS-温控离子液体分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法快速检测脐橙中5种染色剂残留的分析方法。QuEChERS前处理步骤:样品用乙腈快速提取,NaCl和无水MgSO4除水后,经N-丙基乙二胺净化。温控离子液体分散液液微萃取步骤:QuEChERS前处理的净化液(1 mL)为分散剂,1-辛基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐离子液体(60μL)为萃取剂,55℃水浴12 min,将目标物富集。用高效液相色谱-紫外检测器分析,检出样品用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱确证。在0.01和0.05 mg/kg的添加水平下,5种染色剂的平均回收率为70.3%~93.6%,相对标准偏差为3.5%~9.2%,定量限为1.1~2.8μg/kg。     

分散固相萃取-超声辅助分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定土壤中溴氰菊酯残留

建立了以分散固相萃取-超声辅助分散液液微萃取为样品前处理技术,结合高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定土壤中溴氰菊酯。样品用甲醇∶水(1∶4,V/V)提取,经布氏漏斗减压抽滤,滤液经N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)、C18、石墨炭黑粉(GCB)净化后,用氯仿萃取,超声,离心后沉积相进行HPLC测定。对分散固相萃取吸附剂的选择及影响分散液液微萃取的因素进行了优化,在最优条件下,溴氰菊酯的富集倍数达到565倍,线性范围为0.005~2.5mg/kg,线性相关系数为0.9998,检出限为0.001mg/kg,平均加标回收率为70.3%~94.5%,相对标准偏差为2.5%~4.7%。该方法具有简便快速、准确灵敏、萃取效率高等特点,可用于土壤中溴氰菊酯残留检测。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中甲拌磷农药

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/氢火焰离子化检测器对水样中痕量的甲拌磷农药进行了测定。考察了影响分散液液微萃取的因素包括萃取溶剂、分散剂、样品体积、萃取温度和离心速度等。在最佳实验条件下,对甲拌磷的富集倍数达到300倍;检出限为0.001μL/L;方法的线性范围为0.01~10μL/L,R2为0.9986;相对标准偏差为6.65%;回收率为104%。将分散液液微萃取法与单滴液相微萃取和离子液体-液相微萃取方法进行了对比,结果表明,分散液液微萃取技术具有操作简单、快捷(前处理时间小于5 min)、富集效果好、回收率高等优点。同时预言,将离子液体与分散液液微萃取结合,将会产生更加满意的结果。     

分散液液微萃取技术的研究进展

分散液液微萃取是一种基于传统液液萃取的新型样品前处理技术。该文以分散液液微萃取技术中萃取剂的筛选为出发点,综述了低密度萃取剂、辅助萃取剂、反萃取剂和离子液体等低毒性萃取剂在该技术中的应用,以及应用自制装置、溶剂去乳化、悬浮萃取剂固化,辅助萃取,反萃取和离子液体-分散液液微萃取等萃取模式;并简要评述了该技术与液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、分散固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、超临界流体萃取、超声辅助萃取等其他样品前处理技术的联用特性。     

基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取测定水中多种痕量环境雌激素

建立了基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/ 上浮溶剂固化-高效液相色谱/荧光法测定水体中痕量雌激素雌三醇(E3)、 双酚A(BPA)、 17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的方法. 利用中心复合实验设计分别对固相萃取和分散液液微萃取条件进行了优化, 通过响应曲面法得到的最佳萃取条件为碳纳米管用量30 mg, 水样体积210 mL, 流速2.0 mL/min, 萃取剂(十二醇)体积50 μL, 分散剂(甲醇)体积0.2 mL以及不添加盐. 在优化的实验条件下, E3, BPA, EE2和E2测定的线性范围分别为0.05~100, 0.05~100, 0.05~50和0.05~50 μg/L, 相关系数为0.9993~0.9999, 检出限分别为48.4, 3.3, 8.1和6.0 ng/L. 对不同加标浓度(0.40和4.00 μg/L)的实验室自来水、 排水沟污水及市售矿泉水3种实际水样进行了分析: E3, BPA, EE2和E2的加标回收率依次为107.5%~120.8%, 92.5%~108.3%, 103.5%~121.0%和102.5%~132.5%, 相对偏差分别为2.47%~13.28%, 1.73%~11.94%, 1.72%~8.36%和3.54%~11.95%, 富集因子平均值分别为461, 1075, 2074和949. 实际水样分析结果表明, 本方法可用于不同基质水样中雌激素的测定. 与其它方法相比, 本方法虽然固相萃取时间长及水样量大, 但检出限低、 富集因子高、 操作简便及费用低, 仍可作为一种可普及的水中痕量雌激素检测方法.     

液液萃取结合分散固相萃取-液相色谱串联质谱检测食品包装纸中的4-氨基偶氮苯

采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法（LC-MS/MS）快速测定食品包装纸中偶氮染料释放的4-氨基偶氮苯.试样在0.5 mol/L氢氧化钠溶液的碱性环境下,用连二亚硫酸钠还原试样中的偶氮染料,用甲基叔丁基醚反萃取还原裂解产生的4-氨基偶氮苯,经氮吹、甲醇复溶后,用液相色谱-串联质谱进行测定,内标法定量.方法优化了色谱分离、质谱、液液萃取和分散固相萃取等条件.最优化条件下方法的检出限为0.13 mg/kg,定量限为0.42 mg/kg,加标回收率在90%~95%之间（添加水平分别为1、10、30 mg/kg）,相对标准偏差小于5%.     

分散固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定玉米和大米中氟虫腈及其代谢物的残留

建立了分散固相萃取-分散液液微萃取与气相色谱/质谱联用测定玉米和大米中痕量氟虫腈及其代谢物残留的分析方法。使用乙腈和水混合溶液作为萃取溶剂,盐析后,提取液经N-丙基-乙二胺硅烷固相萃取材料(PSA)作为吸附剂后,采用分散液液微萃取步骤将目标物从到微量四氯乙烯中。对影响分散液液微萃取效率的因素,包括萃取溶剂种类及体积、盐等条件进行了优化。在0.02~1μg/m L浓度范围内,线性关系良好(r≥0.9987)。在玉米和大米样品中氟虫腈添加浓度为1.0~25.0μg/g时,平均回收率在70.4%~95.1%之间,相对标准偏差(n=5)在2.6%~12%之间,以最低添加浓度1μg/kg作为定量限。     

Dispersive solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction for simultaneous determination of seven succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides in watermelon by ultra high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

In this study, a simple and accurate sample preparation method based on dispersive solid‐phase extraction and dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction has been developed for the determination of seven novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides (isopyrazam, fluopyram, pydiflumetofen, boscalid, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, and thifluzamide) in watermelon. The watermelon samples were extracted with acetonitrile, cleaned up by dispersive solid‐phase extraction procedure using primary secondary amine, extracted and concentrated by the dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction procedure with 1,1,2,2‐tetrachloroethane, and then analyzed by ultra high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The main experimental factors affecting the performance of dispersive solid‐phase extraction and dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction procedure on extraction efficiency were investigated. The proposed method had a good linearity in the range of 0.1–100 µg/kg with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.9979–0.9999. The limit of quantification of seven fungicides was 0.1 µg/kg in the method. The fortified recoveries of seven succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides at three levels ranged from 72.0 to 111.6% with relative standard deviations of 3.4–14.1% (n = 5). The proposed method was successfully used for the rapid determination of seven succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides in watermelon.     

超声辅助分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱测定护肤水中9种荧光增白剂

建立了超声辅助分散液液微萃取技术结合高效液相色谱配荧光检测器(UA-DLLME-HPLC-FLD)同时测定护肤水中9种荧光增白剂(FWAs)残留量的检测方法。考察了萃取剂的种类与体积、分散剂的种类与体积分数、盐效应、pH值、超声时间等因素对萃取效果的影响,确定最佳萃取条件:50μL三氯甲烷为萃取剂,250μL甲醇为分散剂,氯化钠用量为0.20 g,4 500 r/min离心2 min。在优化条件下,9种荧光增白剂在一定质量浓度范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.999 0,方法检出限(S/N=3)为0.06~4.20 mg/kg,定量下限(S/N≥10)为0.2~14.0 mg/kg,方法的平均回收率为84.3%~102.4%。该方法具有有机溶剂用量少、操作简单、快捷、灵敏等优点。     

超声辅助离子液体分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定新型抗艾药ACC007

该文提出了一种基于超声辅助离子液体分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱(HPLC)测定血清及药片中ACC007含量的新方法。在超声辅助下,无需分散剂即可将疏水性离子液体1-辛基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐([C8mimPF6])形成的细小液滴分散于样品溶液中,从而有效萃取ACC007,萃取率在94.0%以上。实验对萃取剂种类、萃取剂用量、溶液pH值、萃取时间、冷却和离心时间等萃取条件进行了考察。在优化条件下,ACC007的线性范围为0.20~10.0μg/mL,检出限分别为0.062μg/mL(药片)和0.068μg/mL(血清)。采用该方法对药片和血清中ACC007进行测定,加标回收率为90.5%~103%,相对标准偏差为2.9%~5.1%,结果令人满意。     

基于分子络合的分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂

建立了基于分子络合的分散液液微萃取（DLLME）方法,以磷酸三丁酯为萃取剂,以甲醇为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中麦草畏和2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸（2,4-D酸）2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂,对影响前处理效果的因素（包括水样的pH值、萃取剂的种类和体积、分散剂的种类和体积、反萃液的pH值、反萃液的体积和盐浓度等）进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件下（水样体积10 mL,水样的pH值为0~1.0、100 μL磷酸三丁酯萃取剂、1000 μL甲醇分散剂、0.01 mol/L的氢氧化钾反萃液的体积为80 μL）,2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂在0.50~1000 μg/L范围内具有良好的线性,相关系数不小于0.9985,麦草畏和2,4-D酸的检出限分别为0.44 μg/L和0.49 μg/L,富集倍数分别为85和90,在实际样品中的加标回收率为75.7%~104.0%。该方法基于分子络合反应机理,将新型萃取剂磷酸三丁酯应用于分散液液微萃取,与HPLC联用实现了麦草畏和2,4-D酸的富集与检测,为环境水样中苯氧羧酸类除草剂的检测提供了新的前处理方法。     

Determination of diflubenzuron and chlorbenzuron in fruits by combining acetonitrile‐based extraction with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography

In this study, a simple and low‐organic‐solvent‐consuming method combining an acetonitrile‐partitioning extraction procedure followed by “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe” cleanup with ionic‐liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high‐performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection was developed for the determination of diflubenzuron and chlorbenzuron in grapes and pears. Ionic‐liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was performed using the ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate as the extractive solvent and acetonitrile extract as the dispersive solvent. The main factors influencing the efficiency of the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction were evaluated, including the extractive solvent type and volume and the dispersive solvent volume. The validation parameters indicated the suitability of the method for routine analyses of benzoylurea insecticides in a large number of samples. The relative recoveries at three spiked levels ranged between 98.6 and 109.3% with relative standard deviations of less than 5.2%. The limit of detection was 0.005 mg/kg for the two insecticides. The proposed method was successfully used for the rapid determination of diflubenzuron and chlorbenzuron residues in real fruit samples.     

分散液-液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定水样中的痕量双酚A

建立了分散液-液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定水样中痕量双酚A(BPA)的方法. 通过对实验条件的筛选及优化, 得到最佳条件: 22.5 μL氯苯作萃取剂、0.5 mL丙酮作分散剂、0 min静止萃取时间、调节pH 3.2左右、10%离子强度及9 mL水样体积. 此条件下方法的线性范围为0.5~100 μg/L(R2=0.9941), 检出限为0.10 μg/L. 在BPA质量浓度为1 μg/L条件下, 方法回收率为87.8%~111.0%, 相对标准偏差8.3%(n=5), 富集倍数范围1905~2527. 对添加不同BPA浓度的自来水、地表水及回用中水进行分析, 回收率分别为(108±11.1)%, (107±13.2)%及(81.2±6.2)%(n=3). 在既定的色谱条件下, BPA的测定不受乙炔基雌二醇、雌二醇、雌三醇、雌酮和壬基酚等雌激素的干扰.     

漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中的3种烷基苯酚

建立了漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取(DLLME-SFO)方法,以脂肪酸作为萃取剂,以甲醇作为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中3种烷基苯酚。对影响前处理方法的因素进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件(60μL萃取剂辛酸、600μL分散剂甲醇、pH值为2.0~8.0、10 mL水样中加入0.5 g NaCl)下,3种烷基苯酚在20~1 500μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,相关系数不小于0.998 5,3种目标化合物的检出限为0.45~0.61μg/L,富集倍数为145~169,实际样品中3个水平的加标回收率为80.1%~109.9%。该方法将脂肪酸作为萃取剂,与HPLC联用实现了烷基苯酚的富集与检测,为环境水样中烷基苯酚的检测提供了对环境友好的前处理新方法。     

分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱法快速检测番茄中3种拟除虫菊酯类农药

建立了快速(quick)、简单(easy)、便宜(cheap)、有效(effective)、可靠(rugged)和安全(safe)(QuEChERS)的分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)-气相色谱快速测定番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。样品经乙腈提取,N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)净化,采用DLLME富集,用气相色谱法分析。考察了联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的残留测定,同时考察了萃取剂种类与体积、分散剂体积以及萃取时间等因素对萃取效率的影响,以40 μL氯仿为萃取剂,1000 μL乙腈为分散剂,萃取时间为60 s。结果表明: 3种拟除虫菊酯类农药在番茄中的检出限分别为0.5、0.5、0.3 μg/kg。在1、10和50 μg/kg添加水平下,联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的平均回收率分别为89%～109%、92.5%～105%和90%～108%,相对标准偏差分别为2.5%～7.6%、2.8%～5.7%、3.8%～9.1%。该方法简便、快速、安全、价格低廉,重现性好,可用于番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by reversed phase HPLC for the determination of decabrominated diphenyl ether in natural water

A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), has been developed for the extraction and preconcentration of decabrominated diphenyl ether (BDE-209) in environmental water samples. The factors relevant to the microextraction efficiency, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, the extraction time, and the salt effect, were optimized. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: tetrachloroethane, volume, 22.0 microL; dispersive solvent: THF, volume, 1.00 mL; extraction time: below 5 s and without salt addition), the most time-consuming step is the centrifugation of the sample solution in the extraction procedure, which is about 2 min. In this method, the enrichment factor could be as high as 153 in 5.00 mL water sample, and the linear range, correlation coefficient (r(2)), detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 0.001-0.5 microg/mL, 0.9999, 0.2 ng/mL, and 2.1%, respectively. This method was successfully applied to the extraction of BDE-209 from tap, East Lake, and Yangtse River water samples; the relative recoveries were 95.8, 92.9, and 89.9% and the RSD% (n = 3) were 1.9, 2.7, and 3.5%, respectively. Comparison of this method with other methods, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME), and single-drop microextraction (SDME), indicates that DLLME is a simple, fast, and low-cost method for the determination of BDE-209, and thus has tremendous potential in polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) residual analysis in environmental water samples.     

Sensitive determination of three aconitum alkaloids and their metabolites in human plasma by matrix solid‐phase dispersion with vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and HPLC with diode array detection

A simple and sensitive method for determination of three aconitum alkaloids and their metabolites in human plasma was developed using matrix solid‐phase dispersion combined with vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high‐performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The plasma sample was directly purified by matrix solid‐phase dispersion and the eluate obtained was concentrated and further clarified by vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Some important parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, such as type and amount of dispersing sorbent, type and volume of elution solvent, type and volume of extraction solvent, salt concentration as well as sample solution pH, were investigated in detail. Under optimal conditions, the proposed method has good repeatability and reproducibility with intraday and interday relative standard deviations lower than 5.44 and 5.75%, respectively. The recoveries of the aconitum alkaloids ranged from 73.81 to 101.82%, and the detection limits were achieved within the range of 1.6–2.1 ng/mL. The proposed method offered the advantages of good applicability, sensitivity, simplicity, and feasibility, which makes it suitable for the determination of trace amounts of aconitum alkaloids in human plasma samples.