固相微萃取活性炭涂层萃取头对水中有机物的定性分析

对自制的固相微萃取（SPME）活性炭（AC）涂层萃取头进行了评价。该涂层富集能力强，对苯系物（BTEX）的富集率达到14．5～19．2倍；热稳定性好，最高使用温度可达290℃；使用寿命长，260℃解吸条件下可反复使用140次以上。其与聚二甲基硅氧烷（PDMS）涂层相比，尽管萃取量略小，但其具有更高精密度和准确度，而且其萃取和解吸平衡时间减少为聚二甲基硅氧烷（PDMS）涂层的一半以上。应用AC涂层SPME法和液-液萃取（LLE）法对松花江水进行了气相色谱-质谱（GC-MS）定性比较分析。两种方法分别检测到50种（主要是挥发和半挥发性的弱极性和非极性）和44种（主要是挥发性差、与正己烷相容性较强）化合物。     

固相萃取-紫外光谱法测定水样中咪唑类离子液体的含量

为了消除无机盐对紫外法测定离子液体的干扰,采用固相萃取(SPE)预富集,再利用紫外光谱法测定了水样中3种离子液体[C4mim][PF6]、[C6mim][PF6]、[C4mim][BF4]的含量。在波长190～300 nm范围内研究了3种离子液体的最大吸收波长,同时还考察了几种常见无机盐对离子液体紫外光谱吸收的影响。采用SPE方法富集100 mL水样时,富集倍数F=100/3,对三种离子液体的富集率分别为90%,91%和51%,并且溶液的pH与盐的浓度对富集率有一定的影响。当离子液体加标浓度分别为0.01、0.05和0.10 mg/L时,该方法的回收率大于90%。     

固相微萃取法和液液萃取K-D浓缩法对化妆品香气的分析

分别利用固相微萃取法和液液萃取K-D浓缩法对化妆品调理水中的香气提取物进行分析比较。用这两种方法从化妆品调理水中提取、鉴定出30个化合物,从固相微萃取法提取物中鉴定出23个化合物,液液萃取K-D浓缩法提取物中鉴定出16个化合物,其中相同的化合物有9个。结果表明,两种提取方法得到的香气成分有明显差异,其香气特征成分主要集中在固相微萃取法所富集部分,因此采用固相微萃取法能够快速、高效、全面地对香气的香型进行定性分析。     

昆仑雪菊挥发物GC-MS分析

比较了水蒸气蒸馏法和固相微萃取法对昆仑雪菊发挥性成分萃取能力和萃取物种类的区别。分别利用水蒸气蒸馏法(HD)和顶空―固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)对昆仑雪菊挥发物进行萃取富集,用气相色谱―质谱法分析测定。结果表明,两种方法共提取、鉴定出65种化合物,其中水蒸气蒸馏法鉴定出49个化合物,顶空固相微萃取方法鉴定出35个化合物;两种方法相同的化合物共19个,占水蒸气蒸馏法鉴定化合物的78%,占固相微萃取法鉴定化合物的91%。两种提取方法得到的挥发物组分有部分差异,因此同时采用两种方法能够更加全面、完整地对昆仑雪菊的挥发性组分进行分析。     

气相色谱-质谱联用法测定烟用香精成分——烟草用香精前处理方法比较

采用同时蒸馏萃取(SDE)、超声辅助液液萃取(ULLE)和固相微萃取(SPME)3种前处理方法提取HMT-3烟用香精成分,用气相色谱-质谱联用法(GC-MS)进行分析.对3种萃取方法鉴定出的组分作出比较,考察了方法的各自特点.选取了15种烟用香精为代表,分别采用3种萃取方法对不同类型的烟用香精进行提取.结果表明:ULLE操作简便、快速、节能、萃取效率高;SDE法和ULLE法的重现性明显好于SPME法,适合于香精的定量分析,而SPME有较高的灵敏度,更适合香精的定性分析.根据定性和定量的需要、方法的适用性和香精的物理状态,应选取不同的提取方法,从而能够快速、准确地获得样品信息.     

固相萃取-气相色谱法测定纺织品中的邻苯二甲酸酯类环境激素

采用索氏提取法以正己烷为提取溶剂提取纺织品中的邻苯二甲酸酯类物质(PAEs),以强阴离子交换固相萃取(SPE)小柱净化本底杂质并富集待测物,建立了纺织品中10余种PAEs环境激素的同时测定方法。采用的固相萃取条件为:5 mL正己烷活化、3 mL异辛烷淋洗、2 mL含15%乙酸乙酯的正己烷溶液洗脱。SPE能有效地对提取液进行富集浓缩,同时对纺织物提取液中的杂质净化效果突出。该方法准确可靠,重现性好,在5~100 mg/kg 添加水平,PAEs各化合物的回收率为86.3%~102.7%,相对标准偏差（RSD）一般小于5%。检测的10余种PAEs中邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、邻苯二甲酸二丙酯(DPrP)、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二戊酯(DAP)、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄基酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二环己酯(DCHP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯(DNOP)的方法检出限小于1mg/kg,邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)与邻苯二甲酸二异癸酯(DIDP）的方法检出限分别为1.74 mg/kg和1.55 mg/kg。     

竹炭为高效吸附剂的固相萃取分析环境水样中的痕量三氯生

建立了一种由竹炭作为固相萃取高效吸附剂富集环境水样中痕量三氯生的新方法. 研究并优化了几个影响富集效率的参数. 在优化条件下, 三氯生的检测限为0.08 μg/L, 在1～100 μg/L 范围内有良好的线性关系, 相对标准偏差为2.9% (n=7). 方法可应用于实际废水样品的分析.     

在线固相萃取和高效液相色谱法测定卷烟主流烟气中几种芳胺

研究了用在线固相萃取富集和高效液相色谱法测定卷烟主流烟气中的几种芳胺(苯胺、对甲基苯胺、2,4-二甲基苯胺、1-萘胺、2-萘胺和4-氨基联苯)的方法,样品中的芳胺用邻甲氧基酚衍生生成偶氮染料,偶氮染料用WatersXterraTMRP18色谱柱在线固相萃取富集,然后以WatersXterraTMRP18色谱柱为固定相,75%的甲醇(内含0.01mol/LpH=8的四氢吡咯-醋酸缓冲液)为流动相分离,二极管矩阵检测器检测;苯胺、对甲基苯胺、2,4-二甲基苯胺、4-氨基联苯、1-萘胺、2-萘胺的检出限分别为005、0.08、0.08、0.06、0.03和0.03μg/L。几种芳胺的相对标准偏差在2.2%~3.4%之间;标准回收率在89%~106%之间,方法用于卷烟主流烟气中几种芳胺的测定,结果令人满意。     

一种改进的SPME方法提取火场残留物中的促燃剂

对当前国内外用于火场残留物中促燃剂的提取方法进行研究,包括采用活性炭片法(ACS)、固相微萃取(SPME)以及对固相微萃取技术从传统的热解吸模式到溶剂脱附模式的扩展性思考。通过提取3种促燃剂(汽油,煤油和柴油)检材的效能比较与分析,优化了实验条件,确定了SPME的提取和溶剂脱附的方法,实验研究表明,SPME-溶剂脱附法是火场促燃剂残留物分析的有效方法之一。     

固相萃取预富集—液相色谱分离测定痕量钴,铜,汞的研究

本文报道了固相萃取预富集处理样品继以液相色谱分离测定痕量Ｃｏ（Ⅱ）、Ｃｕ（Ⅱ）和Ｈｇ（Ⅱ）的方法。用二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸钠作络合剂及乙醇作洗脱液的预富集系统能在线富集Ｃｏ（Ⅱ）、Ｃｕ（Ⅱ）和Ｈｇ（Ⅱ），富集倍数与富集时间成正比。对实验的最佳条件进行了探讨。用于测定合成水样中Ｃｏ（Ⅱ）、Ｃｕ（Ⅱ）和Ｈｇ（Ⅱ），回收率分别为９７．１％、９７．７％和９６．９％。相对标准偏差为３．５％、２．７％和２．６％     

不同方法提取菟丝子微量元素Fe，Mn和Mg的比较研究

为比较不同提取方法对菟丝子中微量元素含量的影响,采用酸式提取法、碱式提取法、沸水提取法及超声提取法对中药菟丝子中的微量元素进行提取,用原子吸收分光光度法测定了提取液中微量元素铁、锰和镁的含量并进行了比较。结果表明,4种提取方法对微量元素的溶出率由高到低顺序为：铁-酸提,超提,碱提,沸提;锰-酸提,超提,沸提,碱提。镁酸提,沸提,超提,碱提。     

Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organochlorine pesticides from soils: a comparison between Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and accelerated solvent extraction techniques

The methods of simultaneous extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from soils using Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) were established, and the extraction efficiencies using the three methods were systemically compared from procedural blank, limits of detection and quantification, method recovery and reproducibility, method chromatogram and other factors. In addition, soils with different total organic carbon contents were used to test the extraction efficiencies of the three methods. The results showed that the values obtained in this study were comparable with the values reported by other studies. In some respects such as method recovery and reproducibility, there were no significant differences among the three methods for the extraction of PAHs and OCPs. In some respects such as procedural blank and limits of detection and quantification, there were significant differences among the three methods. Overall, ASE had the best extraction efficiency compared to MAE and Soxhlet extraction, and the extraction efficiencies of MAE and Soxhlet extraction were comparable to each other depending on the property such as TOC content of the studied soil. Considering other factors such as solvent consumption and extraction time, ASE and MAE are preferable to Soxhlet extraction.     

中草药化学成分提取新技术

介绍五种提取新技术棗微波萃取技术、超临界二氧化碳萃取技术、超声波提取技术、半仿生提取技术和酶法的原理和特点,以及这些新技术近年来在中草药化学成分提取工艺中的研究应用现状,并展望了它们的应用前景。     

水中有机污染物前处理方法进展

综述了水样中有机污染物前处理方法的进展情况；重点介绍液-液萃取、固相萃取、液相微萃取、膜萃取和顶空处理技术5种前处理方法的一些基本情况及其优缺点。     

A comparative study of solvent extraction of total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil

Three non-specific methods for the extraction of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from soil into organic solvent were compared. The techniques used for sample preparation were Soxhlet extraction, closed-vessel microwave-assisted extraction, and CEN shake extraction. The total concentrations of extracted compounds in the boiling point range of C10–C40 were determined by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The best recovery (99%) and repeatability (±3%) from standard oil mixtures were obtained with microwave-assisted extraction. However, the different extraction methods exhibited different behaviour when spiked soil samples were extracted. The best repeatability was obtained with CEN shake extraction (±6%) but the repeatability values for Soxhlet and microwave-assisted methods were quite high (>20%). However, the larger uncertainties of the latter extraction methods does not necessarily limit the applicability of these methods to the determination of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, as in the assessment of soil contamination the expanded uncertainty of the result is usually not limited by analytical uncertainty, but rather by the uncertainty of the primary sampling stage. However, distinctive variation found in the chromatographic profiles illustrates that discretion should be obeyed when chromatograms obtained after application of different extraction methods on petroleum contaminated samples are to be used in the fingerprinting or age dating studies. Otherwise, misleading conclusions concerning the age of spillage could be drawn.     

天然红色素的提取研究进展

作为天然色素中的一大类,天然红色素在人们的日常生活中日益发挥着重要的作用。国内对天然红色素的提取研究起步较晚,但发展迅速。文章重点介绍了辣椒红色素、番茄红素、桑椹红色素等几种重要天然红色素的性质和提取方法,并比较了有机溶剂法、超临界CO2流体萃取法等提取方法的特点,同时对其效果和应用作了相应的展望。     

Evaluation of the extraction efficiency of thermally labile bioactive compounds in Gastrodia elata Blume by pressurized hot water extraction and microwave-assisted extraction

Our earlier work showed that the stability of the bioactive compounds gastrodin (GA) and vanillyl alcohol (VA) in Gastrodia elata Blume behaved differently with varying compositions of water-ethanol using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) at room temperature. To have a better understanding of the extraction process of these thermally labile compounds under elevated temperature conditions, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) methods were proposed. PHWE and MAE showed that GA and VA could be extracted using pure water under optimized conditions of temperature and extraction time. The extraction efficiency of GA and VA by the proposed methods was found to be higher or comparable to heating under reflux using water. The marker compounds present in the plant extracts were determined by RP-HPLC. The optimized conditions were found to be different for the two proposed methods on extraction of GA and VA. The method precision (RSD, n=6) was found to vary from 0.92% to 3.36% for the two proposed methods on different days. Hence, PHWE and MAE methods were shown to be feasible alternatives for the extraction of thermally labile marker compounds present in medicinal plants.     

烟用香精中风味成分的提取条件的优化与测定

分别采用溶剂萃取、同时蒸馏萃取、固相微萃取和水蒸汽蒸馏等4种方法提取烟用香精B3样品中的挥发性和半挥发性风味成分，并采用信息量和重现性两个指标考察最优提取方案。正己烷溶剂萃取法具有相对较高的信息量和理想的重现性。通过GC和GC-MS进行定性定量分析，共鉴定了34种成分，定性了的成分占总成分的85．4％。     

Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for simultaneous mass-spectrometric analysis of complex lipids and primary metabolites from human blood plasma

Metabolomic results on human blood plasma largely depend on the sample preparation protocols employed for protein precipitation and metabolite extraction. Five different extraction methods were examined, which can be grouped into two categories, liquid-liquid extraction and protein precipitation methods, including long-standing protocols such as the Folch extraction and Bligh-Dyer extraction in comparison to modern methods such as the Matyash protocol and two global metabolite extraction methods. Extracts were subjected to analysis of blood plasma lipids and primary metabolites by using chip-based direct infusion nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry, respectively. Optimal extraction schemes were evaluated based on the number of identified metabolites, extraction efficiency, compound diversity, reproducibility, and convenience for high-throughput sample preparations. Results showed that Folch and Matyash methods were equally valid and robust for lipidomic assessments while primary metabolites were better assessed by the protein precipitation methods with organic solvent mixtures. Graphical Abstract

Schematic workflow of five extraction methods and subsequent mass spectrometry analysis using GC-TOF MS and nanoelectrospray direct-infusion ion trap MS/MS?     

Comparison of Liquid–Liquid Extraction,Simultaneous Distillation Extraction,Ultrasound-Assisted Solvent Extraction,and Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Volatile Compounds in Jujube Extract by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Jujube extract has a unique flavor that has been used as a common fragrance due to the volatile compounds. In this study, the volatiles of jujube extract were isolated by liquid–liquid extraction, simultaneous distillation extraction, ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, and headspace solid-phase microextraction, and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Altogether 92 compounds were identified by the four methods, of which 53 components were identified for the first time; however, only 21 compounds were identified by all these methods. The performance characteristics of the four pretreatment techniques were compared by principal component analysis which showed that the volatile compounds obtained by liquid–liquid extraction and ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction were similar both in categories and in content; whereas, the volatiles extracted by simultaneous distillation extraction, ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, and headspace solid-phase microextraction greatly varied. The results indicated that a multi-pretreatment technique should be adopted in order to obtain the most complete information about the volatile compounds in jujube extract. The ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction method exhibited excellent repeatability and recoveries, and was very suitable for quantitative analysis. Although the recoveries and reproducibility of headspace solid-phase microextraction were inferior to the other methods, it was more sensitive than other methods.