首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 343 毫秒
1.
样品制备与处理的进展——无溶剂萃取技术   总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12  
黄骏雄 《化学进展》1997,9(2):179-191
本文讨论了现代分析化学的重要领域之一, 样品制备及前处理技术的进展--无溶剂萃取技术。包括气相萃取、超临界流体萃取、膜萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取等方法。简述了这些方法的原理及其应用, 探讨了样品制备与前处理技术的发展动向。  相似文献   

2.
固相微萃取涂层制备方法研究进展   总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2  
涂层是固相微萃取技术的核心,近年来出现的各种新型涂层材料和制备技术,进一步拓宽了固相微萃取技术的应用范围.该文介绍了各种新型固相微萃取介质的发展,并综述了各种新型固相微萃取涂层的制备方法,包括直接制备、溶胶-凝胶技术、化学键合与聚合、分子印迹技术、树脂固载技术、电化学沉积等.  相似文献   

3.
固相微萃取新技术   总被引:45,自引:1,他引:45  
马继平  王涵文  关亚风 《色谱》2002,20(1):16-20
 固相微萃取是基于萃取涂层与样品之间的吸附 /溶解 解吸平衡而建立起来的集进样、萃取、浓缩功能于一体的技术。综述了固相微萃取技术的最新发展动态 ,介绍了管内 (in tube)固相微萃取、新型萃取头以及固相微萃取与其他分析技术的联用情况。  相似文献   

4.
分散液液微萃取技术的研究进展   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
分散液液微萃取是一种基于传统液液萃取的新型样品前处理技术。该文以分散液液微萃取技术中萃取剂的筛选为出发点,综述了低密度萃取剂、辅助萃取剂、反萃取剂和离子液体等低毒性萃取剂在该技术中的应用,以及应用自制装置、溶剂去乳化、悬浮萃取剂固化,辅助萃取,反萃取和离子液体-分散液液微萃取等萃取模式;并简要评述了该技术与液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、分散固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、超临界流体萃取、超声辅助萃取等其他样品前处理技术的联用特性。  相似文献   

5.
溶胶-凝胶固相微萃取涂层及其在农药残留分析中的应用   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
利用溶胶-凝胶(sol-gel)技术制备固相微萃取(SPME)涂层材料.通过硅醇盐前驱体与涂层聚合物羟基硅油(OH-TSO)的水解共聚的方法,成功地制备了聚二甲基硅氧烷sol-gel 涂层的SPME 萃取头,并以农药的混合标准水溶液为研究对象,用直接-固相微萃取-气相色谱法(GC)对涂层的性能进行考察,制成的萃取头适用于多种农药残留的萃取分离分析.  相似文献   

6.
新一代萃取分离技术──固相微萃取   总被引:57,自引:2,他引:55  
刘俊亭 《色谱》1997,15(2):118-119
介绍了一种新型样品制备法——固相做萃取(SPME)的原理及其应用。与其它样品制备技术相比,SPME法具有操作时间短、样品量小、无需萃取溶剂、适于分析挥发性与非挥发性物质、重视性好等优点。  相似文献   

7.
分子印迹聚合物固相萃取研究进展   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
李金花  温莹莹  陈令新 《色谱》2013,31(3):181-184
对最新报道的分子印迹聚合物作为固相萃取剂及其在色谱样品前处理方面的应用进行综述和展望,主要包括固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、固相微萃取、搅拌棒吸附萃取和磁性材料萃取,同时总结了分子印迹聚合物制备技术面临的挑战和问题,提出了可能的解决方案。  相似文献   

8.
固相微萃取是一种新型的萃取分离技术. 由于它具有富集能力强、分析速度快、操作简便及便于现场分析和仪器联用等优点,成为痕量物质分离检测分析的重要工具. 固相微萃取技术的核心是固相微萃取纤维. 总结了固相微萃取纤维在稳定性、使用寿命及选择性方面的一些特点,并综述了近年来在这些方面所进行的研究工作及发展方向.  相似文献   

9.
新型无溶剂样品制备方法—固相微萃取法   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7  
固相微萃取法(SPME)是在固相萃取(SPE)的基础上结合顶空分析(Headspace)建立起来的一种新型样品制备方法,具有简便,经济、不使用溶剂等优点,并且能做到提取、净化、浓缩和仪器分析同步完成,文中对固相微萃取的装置,原理、萃取条件等、特点,应用及SPME法今后可能发展的方向作以介绍和进行初步探讨。  相似文献   

10.
以十八烷基三乙氧基硅烷(C18-TEOS)、四乙氧基硅烷(TEOS)、乙醇、盐和水酸为原料,采用溶胶-凝胶法制备了十八烷基(C18)固相微萃取头,利用所制备萃取头实现了水样中11种有机氯农药的检测。在优化条件下,使用该萃取头对有机氯农药(OCPs)萃取后用气相色谱/电子捕获检测器(GC/ECD)测定,检出限为0.01~0.24μg/L,相对标准偏差为3.0%~13.3%。该方法用于鱼塘水、湖水及自来水中OCPs的检测,结果满意。所制备的萃取头在不同溶剂中浸泡后,对有机氯农药的萃取性能无明显变化。使用50次后,C18萃取头的萃取性能未变化。结果表明,所制备的C18固相微萃取头涂层均匀,具有多孔结构,稳定性高,有很好的实用价值。  相似文献   

11.
Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis   总被引:21,自引:0,他引:21  
Food analysis is important for the evaluation of the nutritional value and quality of fresh and processed products, and for monitoring food additives and other toxic contaminants. Sample preparation, such as extraction, concentration and isolation of analytes, greatly influences the reliable and accurate analysis of food. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a new sample preparation technique using a fused-silica fiber that is coated on the outside with an appropriate stationary phase. Analyte in the sample is directly extracted to the fiber coating. The SPME technique can be used routinely in combination with gas chromatography (GC), GC–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or LC–MS. Furthermore, another SPME technique known as in-tube SPME has also been developed for combination with LC or LC–MS using an open tubular fused-silica capillary column as an SPME device instead of SPME fiber. These methods using SPME techniques save preparation time, solvent purchase and disposal costs, and can improve the detection limits. This review summarizes the SPME techniques for coupling with various analytical instruments and the applications of these techniques to food analysis.  相似文献   

12.
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a miniaturized and solvent-free sample preparation technique for chromatographic–spectrometric analysis by which the analytes are extracted from a gaseous or liquid sample by absorption in, or adsorption on, a thin polymer coating fixed to the solid surface of a fiber, inside an injection needle or inside a capillary. In this paper, the present state of practical performance and of applications of SPME to the analysis of blood, urine, oral fluid and hair in clinical and forensic toxicology is reviewed. The commercial coatings for fibers or needles have not essentially changed for many years, but there are interesting laboratory developments, such as conductive polypyrrole coatings for electrochemically controlled SPME of anions or cations and coatings with restricted-access properties for direct extraction from whole blood or immunoaffinity SPME. In-tube SPME uses segments of commercial gas chromatography (GC) capillaries for highly efficient extraction by repeated aspiration–ejection cycles of the liquid sample. It can be easily automated in combination with liquid chromatography but, as it is very sensitive to capillary plugging, it requires completely homogeneous liquid samples. In contrast, fiber-based SPME has not yet been performed automatically in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography. The headspace extractions on fibers or needles (solid-phase dynamic extraction) combined with GC methods are the most advantageous versions of SPME because of very pure extracts and the availability of automatic samplers. Surprisingly, substances with quite high boiling points, such as tricyclic antidepressants or phenothiazines, can be measured by headspace SPME from aqueous samples. The applicability and sensitivity of SPME was essentially extended by in-sample or on-fiber derivatization. The different modes of SPME were applied to analysis of solvents and inhalation narcotics, amphetamines, cocaine and metabolites, cannabinoids, methadone and other opioids, fatty acid ethyl esters as alcohol markers, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, benzodiazepines, various other therapeutic drugs, pesticides, chemical warfare agents, cyanide, sulfide and metal ions. In general, SPME is routinely used in optimized methods for specific analytes. However, it was shown that it also has some capacity for a general screening by direct immersion into urine samples and for pesticides and other semivolatile substance in the headspace mode.  相似文献   

13.
Sample preparation is an essential step in analysis, greatly influencing the reliability and accuracy of resulted the time and cost of analysis. Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) is a very simple and efficient, solventless sample preparation method, invented by Pawliszyn in 1989. SPME has been widely used in different fields of analytical chemistry since its first applications to environmental and food analysis and is ideally suited for coupling with mass spectrometry (MS). All steps of the conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) such as extraction, concentration, (derivatization) and transfer to the chromatograph are integrated into one step and one device, considerably simplifying the sample preparation procedure. It uses a fused-silica fibre that is coated on the outside with an appropriate stationary phase. The analytes in the sample are directly extracted to the fibre coating. The SPME technique can be routinely used in combination with gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis and places no restriction on MS. SPME reduces the time necessary for sample preparation, decreases purchase and disposal costs of solvents and can improve detection limits. The SPME technique is ideally suited for MS applications, combining a simple and efficient sample preparation with versatile and sensitive detection. This review summarizes analytical characteristics and variants of the SPME technique and its applications in combination with MS.  相似文献   

14.
Extraction methods applied in analysis of water samples can be named as liquid chromatography. Very often, these techniques are used as sample preparation method before another analytical method such gas chromatography or high performance liquid chromatography. The subject of this review is to compare the extraction techniques of liquid samples and discuss their characteristics in comparison with liquid chromatography. Some new extraction techniques are described, and some characteristic parameters are compared.  相似文献   

15.
针对复杂样品的分析和痕量目标物的检测,样品前处理是必不可少的,高效的样品前处理技术不仅可以去除或减小样品基质干扰而且能够实现分析物的富集,提高分析检测的准确性和灵敏度。近年来,固相萃取、磁分散固相萃取、枪头固相萃取、搅拌棒萃取、固相微萃取等高效的样品前处理技术已在环境污染物分析检测中获得广泛关注,萃取效率主要取决于萃取材料,所以新型的高效萃取材料一直是样品前处理研究领域的重要发展方向。该文总结和讨论了近年来新型样品前处理材料在环境污染物分析检测中的研究进展,主要聚焦在石墨烯、氧化石墨烯、碳纳米管、无机气凝胶、有机气凝胶、三嗪基功能材料、三嗪基聚合物、分子印迹聚合物、共价有机框架材料、金属有机框架材料以及它们的功能化萃取材料等。这些材料已经被应用于环境样品中不同类别污染物的萃取富集,如重金属离子、多环芳烃、塑化剂、烷烃、苯酚、氯酚、氯苯、多溴联苯醚、全氟磺酸、全氟羧酸、雌激素、药物残留、农药残留等。这些样品前处理材料具有高的表面积、大量的吸附位点,并涉及多种萃取机理如π-π、静电、疏水、亲水、氢键、卤键等相互作用。基于这些萃取材料的多种样品前处理技术与各类检测方法如色谱、质谱、原子吸收光谱、荧光光谱、离子迁移谱等相结合,已广泛应用于环境污染物的高灵敏分析检测。最后,该文总结了样品前处理发展中存在的问题,并展望了其未来在环境分析中的发展趋势。  相似文献   

16.
Liquid-liquid extraction or solid-phase extraction followed by gas chromatography (GC) or high-performance liquid chromatography are traditional herbicide residue determination methods for environmental samples. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a solventless, fast, and sensitive alternative herbicide residue extraction method that can be applied to numerous environmental matrices. The objective of this paper was to review SPME literature regarding extraction theory, extraction modes, fiber types, and method optimization in conjunction with present and future SPME applications for herbicide determination in environmental samples.  相似文献   

17.
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a rapid and simple analytical technique which uses coated fused-silica fibers to extract analytes from aqueous samples. This study develops a method of SPME analysis for seven pyrethroids, including fenpropathrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, permethrin, tau-fluvalinate and bifenthrin in groundwater samples using high performance liquid chromatography combined with post-column photochemically induced fluorimetry derivatization and fluorescence detection (SPME-LC-PIF-FD). To perform the SPME, a 60 microm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber was used for the extraction of the pesticides from groundwater samples. The main factors affecting the SPME process, such as extraction time, stirring rate, extraction temperature, pH and the desorption process were studied. The use of photochemically induced fluorescence for detection improved sensitivity and selectivity. The limits of quantification (LOQs) obtained in the matrix, with respect to EURACHEM Guidance, varied between 0.03 and 0.075 microgL(-1). Relative recoveries ranged from 92 to 109% and relative standard deviations values ranged from 2 to 9%.  相似文献   

18.
Sample preparation is important for the isolation and concentration of desired trace components from complex matrices. Sample preparation is the most labor-intensive and error-prone process in analytical methodology, and greatly influences the reliable and accurate determination of analytes. The integration of sample preparation with various analytical instruments is most conveniently achieved by using microextraction techniques and/or microdevices. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is both simple and effective, enabling miniaturization, automation and high-throughput performance. Moreover, SPME has reduced analysis times, as well as the costs of solvents and disposal. This review describes current developments and future trends in novel SPME techniques, including fiber SPME, in-tube SPME and related new microextraction techniques. Especially innovative SPME approaches, including multi-well high-throughput sampling, ligand-receptor binding study for pharmacokinetics, direct in vivo sampling, chip-based microfluidic system, and new sampling techniques using intelligent carbon nanotube and temperature-response polymer in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis are focused items.  相似文献   

19.
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a simple and effective adsorption and desorption technique, which eliminates the need for solvents or complicated apparatus, for concentrating volatile or nonvolatile compounds in liquid samples or headspace. SPME is compatible with analyte separation and detection by gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography, and provides linear results for wide concentrations of analytes. By controlling the polarity and thickness of the coating on the fibre, maintaining consistent sampling time, and adjusting other extraction parameters, an analyst can ensure highly consistent, quantifiable results for low concentration analytes. To date, about 400 articles on SPME have been published in different fields, including environment (water, soil, air), food, natural products, pharmaceuticals, biology, toxicology, forensics and theory. As the scope of SPME grew, new improvements were made with the appearance of new coatings that allowed an increase in the specificity of this extraction technique. The key part of the SPME fibre is of course the fibre coating. At the moment, 27 variations of fibre coating and size are available. Among the newest are a fibre assembly with a dual coating of divinylbenzene and Carboxen suspended in poly(dimethylsiloxane), and a series of 23 gauge fibres intended for specific septumless injection system. The growth of SPME is also reflected in the expanding number of the accessories that make the technology even easier to use Also available is a portable field sampler which is a self-contained unit that stores the SPME fibre after sampling and during the shipment to the laboratory. Several scientific publications show the results obtained in inter-laboratory validation studies in which SPME was applied to determine the presence of different organic compounds at ppt levels, which demonstrates the reliability of this extraction technique for quantitative analysis.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号