分散液液微萃取技术的研究进展

分散液液微萃取是一种基于传统液液萃取的新型样品前处理技术。该文以分散液液微萃取技术中萃取剂的筛选为出发点,综述了低密度萃取剂、辅助萃取剂、反萃取剂和离子液体等低毒性萃取剂在该技术中的应用,以及应用自制装置、溶剂去乳化、悬浮萃取剂固化,辅助萃取,反萃取和离子液体-分散液液微萃取等萃取模式;并简要评述了该技术与液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、分散固相萃取、基质固相分散萃取、超临界流体萃取、超声辅助萃取等其他样品前处理技术的联用特性。     

分散液液微萃取技术在食品分析中的应用进展

近年来,分散液液微萃取作为一种新型液相微萃取(LPME)技术受到广泛关注。该技术具有操作简单、有机溶剂用量少、富集倍数高等显著优点,已被广泛用于各类样品基质中无机和有机分析物的提取。但由于传统分散液液微萃取技术的萃取剂以高毒性有机溶剂为主,且选择性差,从而严重限制了该技术的应用。为此,最近几年发展了许多操作模式,如低密度萃取剂分散液液微萃取、悬浮固化分散液液微萃取、调节萃取剂密度的分散液液微萃取、离子液体-分散液液微萃取、水溶液作为萃取剂的反相分散液液微萃取等。该文综述了分散液液微萃取技术原理、萃取过程和影响因素(如萃取剂与分散剂种类和体积、p H值、离子强度、萃取时间等),并对其在食品分析中的应用进展进行了系统总结。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中甲拌磷农药

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/氢火焰离子化检测器对水样中痕量的甲拌磷农药进行了测定。考察了影响分散液液微萃取的因素包括萃取溶剂、分散剂、样品体积、萃取温度和离心速度等。在最佳实验条件下,对甲拌磷的富集倍数达到300倍;检出限为0.001μL/L;方法的线性范围为0.01~10μL/L,R2为0.9986;相对标准偏差为6.65%;回收率为104%。将分散液液微萃取法与单滴液相微萃取和离子液体-液相微萃取方法进行了对比,结果表明,分散液液微萃取技术具有操作简单、快捷(前处理时间小于5 min)、富集效果好、回收率高等优点。同时预言,将离子液体与分散液液微萃取结合,将会产生更加满意的结果。     

分散液-液微萃取技术在污染物分析中的应用

分散液-液微萃取技术是一种新型的、具有巨大潜力的样品前处理技术,已经越来越多地被应用到多种污染物的富集过程中。此方法具有简单、快速、价格低廉、环境友好、回收率和富集倍数高等优点。近年来,作为一种可行的分析技术,分散液-液微萃取技术获得了持续的关注和广泛应用。该文综述了分散液-液微萃取技术的研究进展及其在不同介质污染物分析中的应用。     

分散液-液微萃取在有机化合物和金属离子分析中的应用进展

综述了分散液-液微萃取的基本原理和萃取过程,介绍了萃取剂、分散剂、螯合剂的浓度、萃取时间、pH值、盐效应、共存离子等因素对萃取效果的影响,评述了分散液-液微萃取技术在有机化合物和痕量金属离子分析中的应用情况,引用文献42篇。     

分散固相萃取-超声辅助分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定土壤中溴氰菊酯残留

建立了以分散固相萃取-超声辅助分散液液微萃取为样品前处理技术,结合高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定土壤中溴氰菊酯。样品用甲醇∶水(1∶4,V/V)提取,经布氏漏斗减压抽滤,滤液经N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)、C18、石墨炭黑粉(GCB)净化后,用氯仿萃取,超声,离心后沉积相进行HPLC测定。对分散固相萃取吸附剂的选择及影响分散液液微萃取的因素进行了优化,在最优条件下,溴氰菊酯的富集倍数达到565倍,线性范围为0.005~2.5mg/kg,线性相关系数为0.9998,检出限为0.001mg/kg,平均加标回收率为70.3%~94.5%,相对标准偏差为2.5%~4.7%。该方法具有简便快速、准确灵敏、萃取效率高等特点,可用于土壤中溴氰菊酯残留检测。     

空气辅助分散液液微萃取-数字成像比色法检测水体中阴离子表面活性剂

建立空气辅助分散液液微萃取-数字成像比色法快速检测水环境中阴离子表面活性剂(LAS)的方法。优化选择了空气辅助分散液液微萃取过程中萃取剂种类及其含量、萃取次数以及比色法定量的参数。实验结果表明,LAS的质量浓度在0.10~0.80 mg/L范围内与分析信号值具有良好的线性关系,检出限为0.01 mg/L。测定结果的相对标准偏差为1.0%~3.3%(n=10),加标回收率为95.7%~99.5%。该方法操作简便,灵敏度高,大大降低了有机萃取剂的使用,可快速检测水环境中LAS的含量。     

离子液体-分散液液微萃取-比色法测定水样中痕量铁

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)-数字成像比色(DIC)法测定水样中Fe的方法。在乙酸-乙酸钠缓冲溶液中,Fe(Ⅲ)被盐酸羟胺还原成Fe(Ⅱ)后与邻菲罗啉作用生成橙红色络合物。以离子液体[C6M IM][PF6]为萃取剂,乙腈为分散剂,采用涡旋辅助的分散液液微萃取方法对该络合物进行萃取和富集后,直接通过手机比色装置对Fe进行测定。优化了手机比色装置参数和分散液液微萃取的萃取剂种类及用量、分散剂种类及用量等条件。结果表明,在最佳条件下,方法的线性范围为24～200μg/L,相关系数(r~2)为0.9973,检出限为3μg/L,加标回收率为90.0%～108.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.8%～1.8%。该方法可用于测定环境水样中痕量Fe。     

固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定椰子汁中酸性植物激素

本文通过固相萃取结合分子络合物-分散液液微萃取,与高效液相色谱联用,建立了一种测定椰子汁中酸性植物激素的新方法。选择了几种典型酸性植物激素吲哚乙酸、水杨酸、脱落酸和吲哚丁酸作为分析物,考察了该方法的萃取性能。在固相萃取与分子络合物-分散液液微萃取联用模式中,椰子汁中分析物首先吸附在C18萃取材料上,待解吸完成后,解吸液又可用作分散液液微萃取的分散剂,大大简化了萃取步骤。该方法的富集倍数可达319～478倍,线性关系良好,具有良好的精密度和准确度,有望用于植物激素的检测。     

分散固相萃取/分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定甘蓝中的拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取方法,建立了气相色谱法快速检测甘蓝中氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯及氰戊菊酯4种拟除虫菊酯农药残留量的分析方法。使用乙腈作为萃取溶剂,经乙二胺-Ｎ-丙基硅烷固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将农药富集到50 μL二甲苯中后,采用气相色谱-电子捕获检测器进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐效应等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明：除氟氯氰菊酯在 0.01~0.1 mg/L范围外,其余3种拟除虫菊酯农药均在 0.01~5.0 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数为0.997 9~0.999 2;加标浓度为0.02~0.5 μg/g时,除氟氯氰菊酯外其他拟除虫菊酯农药的平均回收率为81.9%~93.5%,相对标准偏差为9.5%~20.7%。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于甘蓝中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

分散液相微萃取技术研究的最新进展

分散液相微萃取(DLLME)作为一种新型样品前处理技术,具有操作简便、快速,富集效率高,萃取剂使用量少等优点。本文对近年来该技术在分离科学领域应用的最新进展进行了简要评述。主要讨论了以下3个方面:(1)DLLME与其他净化或萃取技术的结合;(2)萃取剂的拓展;(3)萃取装置的改进。     

A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction using a switchable polarity dispersive solvent. Automated HPLC-FLD determination of ofloxacin in chicken meat

In this article, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), based on the use of so-called switchable polarity dispersive solvent (SPDS) for microextraction, is presented for the first time. The new extraction technique makes use of a mixture of extraction solvent (dichloromethane) and the SPDS (acrylic acid). This mixture is injected into the aqueous sample solution, which was previously fortified with the alkaline agent (NaOH). The SPDS is dissolved in aqueous phase and a cloudy solution consisting of fine droplets of extraction solvent fully dispersed in the aqueous phase is observed. Simultaneously, as a consequence of the fast neutralization reaction, the SPDS investigated is converted into water-soluble salt and phase separation is achieved because the SPDS switches its polarity. Conversion of the SPDS excludes the negative influence of the conventional dispersive solvents used in DLLME on the solubility of target analytes in aqueous phase and, as a result, increases the DLLME efficiency.     

分散液相微萃取-气相色谱联用测定葡萄中百菌清、克菌丹和灭菌丹残留

采用分散液相微萃取与气相色谱-电子捕获检测联用技术建立了测定葡萄样品中百菌清、克菌丹和灭菌丹农药残留的新方法.对影响萃取和富集效率的因素进行了优化.萃取条件选定为在10 mL带塞离心试管中加入 5.0 mL葡萄样品溶液,并加入1.0 mL丙酮(分散剂),振荡摇匀后以5000 r/min离心5 min,然后将上层清液转移至另一离心试管中,加10.0 μL氯苯(萃取剂),分散混匀后再以5000 r/min离心5 min,萃取剂氯苯相沉积到试管底部,吸取1.0 μL萃取相直接进样分析.在优化的实验条件下,3种杀菌剂的富集倍数可达788～876倍;检出限在6.0～8.0 μg/kg(S/N=3∶ 1)范围内.以α-六六六为内标,测定3种杀菌剂的线性范围为10～150 μg/kg,线性相关系数在0.9990～0.9995范围内.本方法已成功应用于葡萄样品中百菌清、克菌丹和灭菌丹残留的测定,平均加标回收率在92.3%～106.1%范围内;相对标准偏差在4.5%～7.2%之间,结果令人满意.     

Comparison of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on organic solvent and ionic liquid combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the analysis of emodin and its metabolites in urine samples

In this paper, two methods based on organic solvent dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (OS-DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared for analyzing emodin and its metabolites (aloe-emodin, anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid, rhein, danthron, chrysophanol and physcion) in urine samples. Several important parameters influencing the extraction recoveries of DLLME were carefully optimized. Under optimal conditions, the enrichment factors (EFs) for emodin and its metabolites by OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME were within the range of 90-295 and 63-192 respectively; the relative standard deviations (RSDs, n=3) for intra-day and inter-day precision were lower than 7.2 and 8.7% by OS-DLLME, and lower than 5.7 and 6.4% by IL-DLLME; the recoveries of emodin and its metabolites were from 87.1 to 105% for OS-DLLME and from 94.8 to 103% for IL-DLLME, respectively. There were no significant deviations between the two methods for the determination of emodin and its metabolites. From the results of HPLC/UV of urine sample after DLLME, the metabolites aloe-emodin, rhein, chrysophanol and physcion were identified by comparing the retention times with the standards. From the results of HPLC/MS, anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid and danthron as unreported metabolites of emodin were found.     

分散液液微萃取-数码比色法测定水样中痕量钒

研究了分散液液微萃取-数码比色法测定水样中的痕量钒. 在酸性介质中, 痕量钒(V)和N-苯甲酰-N-苯基羟胺(BPHA)作用, 生成紫红色螯合物, 用乙醇做分散剂, 以三氯甲烷为萃取剂进行分散液液微萃取, 萃取液点样在薄层硅胶板上用数码相机进行数码成像. 成像斑点的灰度值和钒(V)的浓度成正比, 据此建立了测定水样中痕量钒的新方法. 对影响萃取富集效率和数码成像效果的因素进行了优化. 钒(V)浓度在5.0～400 μg•L－1范围内有良好的线性关系(r＝0.9993), 检出限为0.87 μg•L－1. 方法已应用于实际水样分析, 加标回收率在97.4%～102.7%之间, 相对标准偏差在1.7%～3.3%之间. 方法具有仪器成本低、方便快速、灵敏度高、环境友好等特点, 可满足野外现场的检测要求.     

Recent trends in replacement of disperser solvent in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction methods

Since its innovation in 2006, the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) method has attracted the attention of analytical chemists in the field of sample preparation. This method has been successfully applied to determine trace amounts of pollutants in various matrices, but the restriction in the choice of suitable disperser and extraction solvents, and high disperser solvent consumption leading to decreased partition coefficients of the analytes between aqueous phase and extractant are its problems. To solve these drawbacks and develop environmentally friendly techniques, various alternatives for the conventional DLLME have been presented. The current review will begin with an introduction to the sample preparation, implementation of DLLME, and its advantages. Then, we focus on its drawbacks, which result mainly from the use of disperser solvent. Afterward, some of the most interesting approaches that have been employed and published until now are reviewed. Finally, an outlook on the future of these techniques will be given.     

分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱法快速检测番茄中3种拟除虫菊酯类农药

建立了快速(quick)、简单(easy)、便宜(cheap)、有效(effective)、可靠(rugged)和安全(safe)(QuEChERS)的分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)-气相色谱快速测定番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。样品经乙腈提取,N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)净化,采用DLLME富集,用气相色谱法分析。考察了联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的残留测定,同时考察了萃取剂种类与体积、分散剂体积以及萃取时间等因素对萃取效率的影响,以40 μL氯仿为萃取剂,1000 μL乙腈为分散剂,萃取时间为60 s。结果表明: 3种拟除虫菊酯类农药在番茄中的检出限分别为0.5、0.5、0.3 μg/kg。在1、10和50 μg/kg添加水平下,联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的平均回收率分别为89%～109%、92.5%～105%和90%～108%,相对标准偏差分别为2.5%～7.6%、2.8%～5.7%、3.8%～9.1%。该方法简便、快速、安全、价格低廉,重现性好,可用于番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

Microextraction in packed syringe by using a three-dimensional carbon nanotube/carbon nanofiber–graphene nanostructure coupled to dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of phthalate esters in water samples

Microchimica Acta - Microextraction in packed syringe (MEPS) was combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the extraction of phthalate esters (PEs) from water samples prior...     

分散液液微萃取-数码比色法测定环境及生物样品中亚硝酸根

研究了分散液液微萃取(DLLME)-数码比色(DC)法测定水样中的亚硝酸根.在酸性介质中,亚硝酸根和对硝基苯胺及二苯胺作用,生成红色偶氮化合物.用乙醇作分散剂,以四氯化碳为萃取剂进行分散液液微萃取,萃取液点样在薄层硅胶板上用数码相机进行数码成像.成像斑点的灰度值和亚硝酸根的浓度成正比,据此建立了测定水样中痕量亚硝酸根的新方法.对影响萃取富集效率和数码成像效果的因素进行了优化.亚硝酸根浓度在2.0～80 μg/L范围内有良好的线性关系(r=0.9997);检出限为0.22 μg/L.方法已应用于实际水样及人体体液分析,加标回收率在97.6%～103.4%之间,相对标准偏差在1.7%～3.4%之间;方法具有仪器成本低、方便快速、灵敏度高、环境友好等特点,可满足野外现场的检测要求.     

Low-density solvent-based solvent demulsification dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the fast determination of trace levels of sixteen priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples

For the first time, the low-density solvent-based solvent demulsification dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction was developed for the fast, simple, and efficient determination of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental samples followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analysis. In the extraction procedure, a mixture of extraction solvent (n-hexane) and dispersive solvent (acetone) was injected into the aqueous sample solution to form an emulsion. A demulsification solvent was then injected into the aqueous solution to break up the emulsion, which turned clear and was separated into two layers. The upper layer (n-hexane) was collected and analyzed by GC-MS. No centrifugation was required in this procedure. Significantly, the extraction needed only 2-3 min, faster than conventional DLLME or similar techniques. Another feature of the procedure was the use of a flexible and disposable polyethylene pipette as the extraction device, which permitted a solvent with a density lighter than water to be used as extraction solvent. This novel method expands the applicability of DLLME to a wider range of solvents. Furthermore, the method was simple and easy to use, and some additional steps usually required in conventional DLLME or similar techniques, such as the aforementioned centrifugation, ultrasonication or agitation of the sample solution, or refrigeration of the extraction solvent were not necessary. Important parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated in detail. Under the optimized conditions, the proposed method provided a good linearity in the range of 0.05-50 μg/L, low limits of detection (3.7-39.1 ng/L), and good repeatability of the extractions (RSDs below 11%, n=5). The proposed method was successfully applied to the extraction of PAHs in rainwater samples, and was demonstrated to be fast, efficient, and convenient.