离子液体和氯代溶剂分散液-液微萃取/高效液相色谱法联用富集和分析环境水样中酞酸酯类污染物的对比研究

以4种室温离子液体和4种氯代溶剂为萃取剂,与高效液相色谱(HPLC)联用,对比研究了分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)对5种痕量酞酸酯类化合物(PAEs)的富集分离性能。以1-辛基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐([OMim][PF6])和建议研究四氯化碳替代品为典型萃取溶剂优化了萃取条件。结果表明,在1.00～100μg/L范围内色谱峰面积与PAEs浓度成良好的线性关系(相关系数>0.995);对于10.0μg/L加标混合样品,平均加标回收率88.2%～103.3%,RSD在2.1%～6.8%之间(n=5),LOD在0.01～0.08μg/L范围内(S/N=3)。与四氯化碳相比,[OMim][PF6]作为DLLME的萃取溶剂对PAEs的富集倍数较高,水相盐效应影响较小。超声波辅助微萃取(USA)可在2 min达到平衡,建立的USA-DLLME-HPLC方法可用于黄河水样和城生活区污水样品中痕量PAEs的富集分离和测定。     

分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A

建立了分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A的分析方法.通过交互正交试验和混合型优化实验设计对影响因素(萃取剂体积、分散剂类型及其体积、水样体积、pH值及离子强度)进行了优化.优化后的分散液液微萃取条件为:60 μL萃取剂,0.4 mL分散剂(甲醇),pH 4.0;优化后的柱前衍生化条件:0.1 mL 2.0 g/L衍生剂(对硝基苯甲酰氯)、衍生化时间30 min;方法的线性范围:0.002～0.2 mg/L(r=0.9997),检出限0.007 μg/L(S/N=3);不同浓度双酚A的萃取率为59.0%～63.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)2.5%～9.2%(n=5);水样中双酚A的加标率为86.5%～107.1%,RSD为4.0%～11.9%(n=5),其它雌激素(雌酮、雌二醇、雌三醇和17α-乙炔基雌二醇)对双酚A的测定无干扰.本方法可以对水环境中的痕量BPA进行检测,具有操作简便、快速等优点.     

分散固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定西瓜中氟唑菌酰羟胺残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取联用的方法,建立了高效液相色谱快速检测西瓜中氟唑菌酰羟胺残留的分析方法。使用乙腈和水混合溶液作为萃取溶剂,经N-丙基-乙二胺硅烷(PSA)固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将目标物富集到1,1,2,2-四氯乙烷溶剂中,采用高效液相色谱进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐浓度等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明:分析物的质量浓度在0.01~5 mg/L范围内与峰面积的线性关系良好,相关系数(r)为0.999 9,定量下限(S/N=10)为0.01 mg/kg。加标水平为0.01、0.1、1 mg/kg时,平均回收率为89.2%~94.5%,相对标准偏差(n=5)为3.0%~8.7%。该方法简单、高效、灵敏度高,适用于西瓜中氟唑菌酰羟胺的残留检测。     

基于低共熔溶剂的涡旋辅助悬浮固化-分散液液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定水中三氯生与三氯卡班

建立了基于低共熔溶剂的涡旋辅助悬浮固化-分散液液微萃取(VA-DLLME-SFDES)结合高效液相色谱测定水样中三氯生和三氯卡班的新方法。合成了6种疏水性低共熔溶剂(DES)并测定其密度、熔点和辛醇-水分配系数(K_(OW))。选取其中低密度、合适凝固点的DES作为萃取剂,样品经涡旋辅助萃取后冷冻,萃取剂固化附着于离心管内壁,弃去水相后,融化离心进样。最佳萃取条件为:选取由薄荷醇∶十二醇(摩尔比为1∶2)制备的DES作为萃取剂,萃取剂用量为70μL,水样pH值调至5.0,涡旋时间为1 min。在最优条件下,三氯生和三氯卡班分别在0.59～100μg/L和0.26～100μg/L质量浓度范围内线性关系良好(r~2=0.999 8),方法检出限(S/N=3)为0.08～0.18μg/L,富集倍数为141～148倍,回收率为86.0%～115%,日内精密度(n=6)和日间精密度(n=6)均不大于5.4%。该方法简便、快速,且萃取相易于收集,适用于水中三氯生和三氯卡班的测定。     

基于轻质萃取剂的溶剂去乳化分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中多环芳烃

以密度小于水的轻质溶剂为萃取剂,建立了无需离心步骤的溶剂去乳化分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱(SD-DLLME-GC)测定水样中多环芳烃的新方法。传统分散液-液微萃取技术一般采用密度大于水的有机溶剂为萃取剂,并需要通过离心步骤促进分相。而本方法以密度比水小的轻质溶剂甲苯为萃取剂,将其与丙酮(分散剂)混合并快速注入水样,获得雾化体系;然后注入乙腈作为去乳化剂,破坏该雾化体系,无需离心,溶液立即澄清、分相;取上层有机相(甲苯)进行GC分析。考察了萃取剂、分散剂、去乳化剂的种类及其体积等因素对萃取率的影响。以40 μL甲苯为萃取剂,500 μL丙酮为分散剂,800 μL乙腈为去乳化剂,方法在20～500 μg/L范围内呈现出良好的线性(r2=0.9942～0.9999),多环芳烃的检出限(S/N=3)为0.52～5.11 μg/L。用所建立的方法平行测定5份质量浓度为40 μg/L的多环芳烃标准水样,其含量的相对标准偏差为2.2%～13.6%。本法已成功用于实际水样中多环芳烃的分析,并测得其加标回收率为80.2%～115.1%。     

凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法同时测定自来水中氯代多环芳烃与多环芳烃

建立了自来水中6种氯代多环芳烃和15种多环芳烃的凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取高效液相色谱分析方法,并探讨了萃取剂种类和用量、分散剂种类和用量、氯化钠含量及涡旋振荡时间等因素对萃取效率的影响。优化后的萃取实验条件为:10μL十二醇为萃取溶剂,500μL甲醇为分散溶剂,6%NaCl,涡旋振荡时间2 min。目标化合物经多环芳烃专用柱(SUPELCOSILTMLC-PAH,150 mm×4.6 mm,5μm)分离后,外标法定量。结果表明,21种目标化合物在一定质量浓度范围内线性良好,相关系数均不低于0.999;在低、中、高3个加标水平下的回收率为70.6%～98.7%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为2.0%～10%;方法的检出限(LOD,S/N=3)为0.000 7～0.009μg/L,定量下限(LOQ,S/N=10)为0.002 2～0.028μg/L。可用于自来水中氯代多环芳烃和多环芳烃的分析检测。     

涡旋辅助分散液液微萃取-悬浮固化/高效液相色谱法测定水样中7种萘二酚

建立了水样中7种萘二酚的涡旋辅助分散液液微萃取-悬浮固化/高效液相色谱(VA-DLLMESFO/HPLC)测定方法。以乙醚-十二醇为二元微萃取剂,通过涡旋分散方式协同萃取水样中的目标化合物,采用C18色谱柱分离,HPLC测定。优化了萃取剂及用量、萃取时间、氯化钠用量等条件。最佳萃取条件为:萃取剂为100μL乙醚和50μL十二醇,氯化钠用量为0.2 g/m L,涡旋萃取3 min。在优化条件下,7种萘二酚在一定质量浓度范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.997,方法检出限(S/N=3)为1.7~6.0μg/L;3个加标水平下的平均回收率为82.1%~106.0%,日内相对标准偏差(RSD,n=5)为1.2%~4.1%;中间添加水平的日间RSD(n=5)为2.5%~5.7%。该方法前处理简单,涡旋分散大大提高了物质传质速率,增大了萃取效率,缩短了萃取时间,是一种适用于水样中萘二酚类物质富集检测的绿色方法。     

分散固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/气相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜中19种有机磷农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取联用方法,建立了气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)同时测定蔬菜中19种有机磷农药残留量的分析方法。分散固相萃取方法以乙腈为萃取液,以N-丙基-乙二胺(PSA)和C18为吸附剂。对影响分散液液微萃取效率的因素(萃取溶剂种类及体积、分散剂体积等)进行优化,同时分析了实验过程中添加掩蔽试剂L-古洛糖酸γ-内酯(AP)对基质效应补偿作用的影响。在最佳实验条件下,19种有机磷在辣椒和大葱中3个添加水平(0.05,0.1,0.5 mg/kg)的回收率为76.9%~126.8%,相对标准偏差为0.6%~7.3%,检出限(S/N=3)为0.10~0.50μg/kg。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于蔬菜中有机磷农药的快速检测。     

液-液-液三相液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法检测尿样中的安非他明和氯胺酮

建立了液-液-液三相液相微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定尿样中的安非他明和氯胺酮的方法。考察了萃取溶剂、料液相pH值、搅拌速度、萃取时间和接受相HCl浓度等因素对富集因子的影响,得到了萃取溶剂为300 μL甲苯,料液相pH值为11,接受相为1.0 μL 0.1 mol/L HCl,搅拌速度为600 r/min,萃取时间为50 min的最佳实验条件。在该条件下,获得了较高的富集因子;方法的线性范围为安非他明0.01～10 μg/mL,氯胺酮0.01～5 μg/mL,相对标准偏差均小于2%,检测限均为5 ng/mL (S/N=3)。建立的三相液相微萃取方法能有效地去除复杂基体的干扰,有机溶剂消耗少,萃取效率高,是一种有效、灵敏的样品前处理方法,适合于尿样中安非他明和氯胺酮的测定。     

基于超声辅助原位生成低共熔溶剂的分散液-液微萃取-悬浮固化结合毛细管电泳测定环境水样中氟喹诺酮

基于超声辅助原位生成低共熔溶剂（DES）的分散液-液微萃取-悬浮固化（UA-IF-DLLMESFDES）并结合大体积样品堆积毛细管电泳,建立了对环境水样中加替沙星、洛美沙星、环丙沙星和氟罗沙星4种氟喹诺酮类药物（FQs）进行萃取和测定的新方法。实验筛选出甲基三辛基溴化铵作为氢键受体（HBA）,庚酸为氢键供体（HBD）,以原位生成方法制备的DES为萃取剂,并对DES的种类及用量、原位生成条件、盐用量、涡旋时间等影响萃取效率的实验条件进行了优化。结果表明,在最佳实验条件下,4种目标物的检出限（S/N=3）和定量下限（S/N=10）分别为0.6～5.5μg/L和2.0～18.3μg/L,富集倍数为89～129,日内和日间相对标准偏差（RSD）分别为3.5%～5.9%和4.5%～7.1%,加标回收率为75.6%～110%。所建立的方法成功应用于实际水样中4种FQs的检测。     

漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中的3种烷基苯酚

建立了漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取(DLLME-SFO)方法,以脂肪酸作为萃取剂,以甲醇作为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中3种烷基苯酚。对影响前处理方法的因素进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件(60μL萃取剂辛酸、600μL分散剂甲醇、pH值为2.0~8.0、10 mL水样中加入0.5 g NaCl)下,3种烷基苯酚在20~1 500μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,相关系数不小于0.998 5,3种目标化合物的检出限为0.45~0.61μg/L,富集倍数为145~169,实际样品中3个水平的加标回收率为80.1%~109.9%。该方法将脂肪酸作为萃取剂,与HPLC联用实现了烷基苯酚的富集与检测,为环境水样中烷基苯酚的检测提供了对环境友好的前处理新方法。     

浮动液滴固化分散液相微萃取-火焰原子吸收光谱法测定环境样品中的镉

建立了以十一醇为萃取剂,吡咯烷二硫代甲酸铵(APDC)为螯合剂的浮动液滴固化分散液相微萃取-火焰原子吸收光谱法(DLLME-SFO-FAAS)测定环境样品中痕量镉的分析方法;优化了分散剂、萃取剂的类型和体积,考察了溶液pH值、APDC浓度以及萃取温度和时间对萃取效率的影响.结果表明,该法检出限(3σ)为0.14μg/L...     

有机悬浮固化分散液-液微萃取测定水样中痕量铅

建立了以二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸钠为配位剂,十二醇为萃取剂,乙醇为分散剂的悬浮固化分散液-液微萃取—火焰原子吸收光谱法测定水样中痕量铅的方法。详细探讨了影响萃取效率的因素。优化条件为:二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸钠的用量为10-6 mol,十二醇体积为90.00μL,乙醇体积为1.00 mL,pH为7.00。在最佳条件下,铅的检出限为1.12μg/L,富集倍率为16.00,线性范围5.00～600.00μg/L,对含有20.00μg/L和600.00μg/L Pb的标准溶液平行萃取测定11次,测定结果的RSD分别为3.73%和2.62%。本方法应用于自来水、河水及海水中痕量铅的分析,加标回收率为90.10%～100.70%。     

Determination of zearalenone in maize products by vortex‐assisted ionic‐liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with high‐performance liquid chromatography

A novel method has been developed for the analysis of zearalenone in maize products by vortex‐assisted ionic‐liquid‐based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with HPLC and fluorescence detection. Maize samples were extracted with methanol/water (80:20, v/v) and the extraction solution was then used as the dispersive solvent in the microextraction procedure. The analyte was rapidly transmitted to a small volume of ionic liquid and was determined by HPLC. Various parameters affecting the recovery of the mycotoxin were investigated, such as the type and volume of the extraction solvent, the type and volume of the dispersive solvent, the pH of the aqueous phase, the salt addition, and the time of vortex and centrifugation. Under the optimal experimental conditions, a good linearity of the analyte was obtained in the range of 1.0–1000.0 μg/L with the correlation coefficient of 0.9998. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) and quantification (S/N = 10) were 0.3 and 1.0 μg/kg, and the mean recoveries ranged from 83.5 to 94.9%, with a relative standard deviation less than 5.0%. The proposed method was demonstrated to be simple, cheap, quick, and highly selective and was successfully applied to the determination of zearalenone in maize products.     

Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in soil by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and gas chromatography

In this article, a rapid and sensitive sample pretreatment technique for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in soil samples is developed by using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with gas chromatography-flame photometric detection. Experimental conditions, including the kind of extraction and disperser solvent and their volumes, the extraction time, and the salt addition, are investigated, and the following experiment factors are used: 20 μL chlorobenzene as the extraction solvent; 1.0 mL acetonitrile as the disperser solvent; no addition of salt; and an extraction time of 1 min. Under the optimum conditions, the linearities for the three target OPPs (ethoprophos, chlorpyriphos, and profenofos) are obtained by five points in the concentration range of 2.5-1500 μg/kg, and three replicates are used for each point. Correlation coefficients vary from 0.9987 to 0.9997. The repeatability is tested by spiking soil samples at a concentration level of 5.0 μg/kg. The relative standard deviation (n = 3) varied between 2.0% and 6.6%. The limits of detection, based on a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 3, range from 200 to 500 pg/g. This method is applied to the analysis of the spiked samples S1, S2, and S3, which are collected from the China Agriculture University's orchard, lawn, and garden, respectively. The recoveries for each target analyte are in the range between 87.9% and 108.0%, 87.4% and 108.0%, and 86.7% and 107.2%, respectively.     

Application of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of methomyl in natural waters

A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC-variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 microL of tetrachloroethane (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected by syringe into a 5.00-mL water sample containing the analyte, thereby forming a cloudy solution. After phase separation by centrifugation for 2 min at 4000 rpm, the enriched analyte in the settled phase (8 +/- 0.2 microL) was at the bottom of the conical test tube. A 5.0-microL volume of the settled phase was analyzed by HPLC-VWD. Parameters such as the nature and volume of the extraction solvent and the dispersive solvent, extraction time, and the salt concentration were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factor could reach 70.7 for a 5.00-mL water sample and the linear range, detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 3-5000 ng/mL, 1.0 ng/mL, and 2.6%, respectively. River and lake water samples were successfully analyzed by the proposed method. Comparison of this method with solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, and single-drop microextraction, indicates that DLLME combined with HPLC-VWD is a simple, fast, and low-cost method for the determination of methomyl, and thus has tremendous potential in trace analysis of methomyl in natural waters.     

Simultaneous determination of tetrahydropalmatine and tetrahydroberberine in rat urine using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in Rhizoma corydalis. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, pH, etc. were evaluated. Under the optimal conditions (extraction solvent: 37 μL of chloroform, dispersive solvent: 100 μL of methanol, alkaline with 100 μL of 1 mol/L NaOH, and without salt addition), the enrichment factors of THP and THB were more than 30. The extraction recoveries were 69.8-75.8% and 72.7-77.6% for THP and THB in rat urine, respectively. Both THP and THB showed good linearity in the range of 0.025-2.5 μg/mL, and the limit of quantification was 0.025 μg/mL (S/N=10, n=6). The intra-day and inter-day precision of THP and THB were <12.6%. The relative recoveries ranged from 95.5 to 107.4% and 96.8 to 100.9% for THP and THB in rat urine, respectively. The method has been successfully applied to rat urine samples. The results demonstrated that DLLME is a very simple, rapid and efficient method for the extraction and preconcentration of THP and THB from urine samples.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by reversed phase HPLC for the determination of decabrominated diphenyl ether in natural water

A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), has been developed for the extraction and preconcentration of decabrominated diphenyl ether (BDE-209) in environmental water samples. The factors relevant to the microextraction efficiency, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, the extraction time, and the salt effect, were optimized. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: tetrachloroethane, volume, 22.0 microL; dispersive solvent: THF, volume, 1.00 mL; extraction time: below 5 s and without salt addition), the most time-consuming step is the centrifugation of the sample solution in the extraction procedure, which is about 2 min. In this method, the enrichment factor could be as high as 153 in 5.00 mL water sample, and the linear range, correlation coefficient (r(2)), detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 0.001-0.5 microg/mL, 0.9999, 0.2 ng/mL, and 2.1%, respectively. This method was successfully applied to the extraction of BDE-209 from tap, East Lake, and Yangtse River water samples; the relative recoveries were 95.8, 92.9, and 89.9% and the RSD% (n = 3) were 1.9, 2.7, and 3.5%, respectively. Comparison of this method with other methods, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME), and single-drop microextraction (SDME), indicates that DLLME is a simple, fast, and low-cost method for the determination of BDE-209, and thus has tremendous potential in polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) residual analysis in environmental water samples.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in water samples

A novel, simple and efficient dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet (DLLME-SFO) technique coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of triclosan and its degradation product 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples. The extraction solvent used in this work is of low density, low volatility, low toxicity and proper melting point around room temperature. The extractant droplets can be collected easily by solidifying it at a lower temperature. Parameters that affect the extraction efficiency, including type and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, salt effect, pH and extraction time, were investigated and optimized in a 5 mL sample system by HPLC-UV. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: 12 μL of 1-dodecanol; dispersive solvent: 300 of μL acetonitrile; sample pH: 6.0; extraction time: 1 min), the limits of detection (LODs) of the pretreatment method combined with LC-MS/MS were in the range of 0.002-0.02 μg L(-1) which are lower than or comparable with other reported approaches applied to the determination of the same compounds. Wide linearities, good precisions and satisfactory relative recoveries were also obtained. The proposed technique was successfully applied to determine triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples.     

Analysis of volatile aldehyde biomarkers in human blood by derivatization and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method by high performance liquid chromatography

A new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method (DLLME-SFO) was developed for the determination of volatile aldehyde biomarkers (hexanal and heptanal) in human blood samples. In the derivatization and extraction procedure, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) as derivatization reagent and formic acid as catalyzer were injected into the sample solution for derivatization with aldehydes, then the formed hydrazones was rapidly extracted by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with 1-dodecanol as extraction solvent. After centrifugation, the floated droplet was solidified in an ice bath and was easily removed for analysis. The effects of various experimental parameters on derivatization and extraction conditions were studied, such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, the amount of derivatization reagent, derivatization temperature and time, extraction time and salt effect. The limit of detections (LODs) for hexanal and heptanal were 7.90 and 2.34 nmol L⁻¹, respectively. Good reproducibility and recovery of the method were also obtained. The proposed method is an alternative approach to the quantification of volatile aldehyde biomarkers in complex biological samples, being more rapid and simpler and providing higher sensitivity compared with the traditional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods.