Temperature‐controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction for the sensitive determination of triclosan and triclocarban in environmental water samples prior to HPLC‐ESI‐MS/MS

A novel dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction method without dispersive solvents has been developed for the enrichment and sensitive determination of triclosan and triclocarban in environmental water samples prior to HPLC‐ESI‐MS/MS. This method used only green solvent 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate as extraction solvent and overcame the demerits of the use of toxic solvents and the instability of the suspending drop in single drop liquid‐phase microextraction. Important factors that may influence the enrichment efficiencies, such as volume of ionic liquid, pH of solutions, extraction time, centrifuging time and temperature, were systematically investigated and optimized. Under optimum conditions, linearity of the method was observed in the range of 0.1–20 μg/L for triclocarban and 0.5–100 μg/L for triclosan, respectively, with adequate correlation coefficients (R>0.9990). The proposed method has been found to have excellent detection sensitivity with LODs of 0.04 and 0.3 μg/L, and precisions of 4.7 and 6.0% (RSDs, n=5) for triclocarban and triclosan, respectively. This method has been successfully applied to analyze real water samples and satisfactory results were achieved.     

基于分子络合的分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂

建立了基于分子络合的分散液液微萃取（DLLME）方法,以磷酸三丁酯为萃取剂,以甲醇为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中麦草畏和2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸（2,4-D酸）2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂,对影响前处理效果的因素（包括水样的pH值、萃取剂的种类和体积、分散剂的种类和体积、反萃液的pH值、反萃液的体积和盐浓度等）进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件下（水样体积10 mL,水样的pH值为0~1.0、100 μL磷酸三丁酯萃取剂、1000 μL甲醇分散剂、0.01 mol/L的氢氧化钾反萃液的体积为80 μL）,2种苯氧羧酸类除草剂在0.50~1000 μg/L范围内具有良好的线性,相关系数不小于0.9985,麦草畏和2,4-D酸的检出限分别为0.44 μg/L和0.49 μg/L,富集倍数分别为85和90,在实际样品中的加标回收率为75.7%~104.0%。该方法基于分子络合反应机理,将新型萃取剂磷酸三丁酯应用于分散液液微萃取,与HPLC联用实现了麦草畏和2,4-D酸的富集与检测,为环境水样中苯氧羧酸类除草剂的检测提供了新的前处理方法。     

漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中的3种烷基苯酚

建立了漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取(DLLME-SFO)方法,以脂肪酸作为萃取剂,以甲醇作为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中3种烷基苯酚。对影响前处理方法的因素进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件(60μL萃取剂辛酸、600μL分散剂甲醇、pH值为2.0~8.0、10 mL水样中加入0.5 g NaCl)下,3种烷基苯酚在20~1 500μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,相关系数不小于0.998 5,3种目标化合物的检出限为0.45~0.61μg/L,富集倍数为145~169,实际样品中3个水平的加标回收率为80.1%~109.9%。该方法将脂肪酸作为萃取剂,与HPLC联用实现了烷基苯酚的富集与检测,为环境水样中烷基苯酚的检测提供了对环境友好的前处理新方法。     

Determination of aromatic amines from textiles using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure coupled with GC‐MS is described for preconcentration and determination of banned aromatic amines from textile samples. Experimental conditions affecting the microextraction procedure were optimized. A mixture of 30 μL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 800 μL ACN (disperser solvent), 5 min extraction time, and 5 mL aqueous sample volume were chosen for the best extraction efficiency by the proposed procedure. Satisfactory linearity (with correlation coefficients >0.9962) and repeatability (<9.78%) were obtained for all 20 aromatic amines; detection limits attained were much lower than the standardized liquid–liquid method. The proposed method has advantages of being quicker and easier to operate, and lower consumption of organic solvent.     

液相色谱-串联质谱法测定小型家用电器塑料部件中双酚A

建立了小型家用电器塑料部件中双酚A的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)检测方法。采用快速溶剂萃取仪对样品进行萃取,以Sep-Pak C18固相萃取柱净化,甲醇-水(含有0.05%氨水)混合液作为流动相,负离子模式下进行MS/MS检测。结果表明: 该方法在5～100 μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数(r2)为0.9991。在10、25和75 μg/kg 3个添加水平下,双酚A的平均回收率为95.2%～109.7%,相对标准偏差均小于3.8%,检出限为10 μg/kg。该方法操作简便,灵敏度高,适用于家用电器塑料部件中双酚A的残留分析。     

Ultrapreconcentration and determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water by solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high‐performance liquid chromatography

Solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed as an ultra‐preconcentration method for the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides (isocarbophos, parathion‐methyl, triazophos and fenitrothion) in water samples. The analytes considered in this study were rapidly extracted and concentrated from large volumes of aqueous solutions (100 mL) by solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and then analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. Experimental variables including type and volume of elution solvent, volume and flow rate of sample solution, salt concentration, type and volume of extraction solvent and sample solution pH were investigated for the solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with these analytes, and the best results were obtained using methanol as eluent and ethylene chloride as extraction solvent. Under the optimal conditions, an exhaustive extraction for four analytes (recoveries >86.9%) and high enrichment factors were attained. The limits of detection were between 0.021 and 0.15 μg/L. The relative standard deviations for 0.5 μg/L of the pesticides in water were in the range of 1.9–6.8% (n = 5). The proposed strategy offered the advantages of simple operation, high enrichment factor and sensitivity and was successfully applied to the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides in water samples.     

Determination of organic pollutants in coking wastewater by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction/GC/MS

A method based on dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with GC/MS was developed for quantitative analysis of the major organic pollutants listed in the United States Environmental Protection Agency method 8270 and the 15 European‐priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coking wastewater. The major parameters such as extraction solvent, dispersive solvent, solution pH, and extraction time were systematically optimized. The optimum extraction conditions were found to be: 15 μL mixture of 2:1 v/v carbon tetrachloride and chlorobenzene as the extraction solvent, 0.75 mL ACN as the dispersive solvent, solution pH of 8, and extraction time of 2 min. For the major pollutants listed in the United States Environmental Protection Agency 8270, the linear ranges were 0.1 to 100 mg/L, the enrichment factors ranged from 452 to 685, and the relative recoveries ranged from 67.5 to 103.5% with RSDs of 4.0–9.1% (n = 5) at the concentrations of 10 mg/L under the optimum extraction conditions. For the 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, the linear ranges were 0.1 to 100 μg/L, the enrichment factors ranged from 645 to 723, and the relative recoveries ranged from 94.5 to 107.6% with RSDs of 4.6–9.0% (n = 5) at the concentrations of 10 μg/L. The usefulness of the developed method was demonstrated by applying it in the analysis of real‐world coking wastewater samples.     

Central composite design optimization of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of organic drop for the determination of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural in orange juice using high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple, rapid and inexpensive dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of organic drop combined with HPLC was developed for the extraction and determination of trace levels of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural in fruit juice. Effect of variables such as extracting and dispersive solvent volume and pH were investigated simultaneously using experimental design. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration graph was linear in the range of 1?200 μg/L with the detection limit of 0.3 μg/L. The optimized method revealed a good precision with relative standard deviation of 2.2%.The performance of the method was evaluated for extraction and determination of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural in orange juice sample.     

分散液液微萃取-上浮溶剂固化/高效液相色谱法测定沉积物中的十溴联苯醚

建立了沉积物中痕量十溴联苯醚的分散液液微萃取-上浮溶剂固化-高效液相色谱-紫外法(DLLME-SFO-HPLC-UV)。以正交试验数据为训练样本,采用BP(Back propagation)神经网络模型优化了分散液液微萃取-上浮溶剂固化条件:分散剂为1.00mL甲醇、萃取剂为35.0μL十二醇、NaCl质量浓度为10.00%、萃取时间10min和pH=5,其萃取率(ER)可达62.22%。方法的线性范围为3.5～1400ng/g(r=0.9960),检出限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别为2.3pg/g(S/N=2)和5.6pg/g(S/N=5),实际样品的加标回收率为97.7%～104.2%。本方法集萃取、富集、分离步骤于一体,简化了沉积物中十溴联苯醚的前处理过程。     

In situ ionic‐liquid‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of Sudan dyes from liquid samples

In situ ionic‐liquid‐dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was introduced for extracting Sudan dyes from different liquid samples followed by detection using ultrafast liquid chromatography. The extraction and metathesis reaction can be performed simultaneously, the extraction time was shortened notably and higher enrichment factors can be obtained compared with traditional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. When the extraction was coupled with ultrafast liquid chromatography, a green, convenient, cheap, and efficient method for the determination of Sudan dyes was developed. The effects of various experimental factors, including type of extraction solvent, amount of 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride, ratio of ammonium hexafluorophosphate to 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride, pH value, salt concentration in sample solution, extraction time and centrifugation time were investigated and optimized for the extraction of four kinds of Sudan dyes. The limits of detection for Sudan I, II, III, and IV were 0.324, 0.299, 0.390, and 0.655 ng/mL, respectively. Recoveries obtained by analyzing the seven spiked samples were between 65.95 and 112.82%. The consumption of organic solvent (120 μL acetonitrile per sample) was very low, so it could be considered as a green analytical method.     

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using extraction solvent lighter than water

For the first time a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method on the basis of an extraction solvent lighter than water was presented in this study. Three organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) were selected as model compounds and the proposed method was carried out for their preconcentration from water samples. In this extraction method, a mixture of cyclohexane (extraction solvent) and acetone (disperser) is rapidly injected into the aqueous sample in a special vessel (see experimental section) by syringe. Thereby, a cloudy solution is formed. In this step, the OPPs are extracted into the fine droplets of cyclohexane dispersed into aqueous phase. After centrifuging the fine droplets of cyclohexane are collected on the upper of the extraction vessel. The upper phase (0.40 μL) is injected into the gas chromatograph (GC) for separation. Analytes were detected by a flame ionization detector (FID) (for high concentrations) or MS (for low concentrations). Some important parameters, such as the kind of extraction and dispersive solvents and volume of them, extraction time, temperature, and salt amount were investigated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors (EFs) ranged from 100 to 150 and extraction recoveries varied between 68 and 105%, both of which are relatively high over those of published methods. The linear ranges were wide (10–100 000 μg/L for GC‐FID and 0.01–1 μg/L for GC‐MS) and LODs were low (3–4 μg/L for GC‐FID and 0.003 μg/L for GC‐MS). The RSDs for 100.0 μg/L of each OPP in water were in the range of 5.3–7.8% (n = 5).     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

液相色谱-串联质谱法测定黄瓜和苹果中氟啶虫酰胺及其代谢产物残留量

建立了黄瓜和苹果中氟啶虫酰胺及其3种代谢产物［N-(4-trifluoromethylnicotinoyl)glycine(TFNG)、4-tri-fluoromethylnicotinic acid(TFNA)和4-trifluoromethylnicotinamide(TFNA-AM)］同时测定的液相色谱-串联质谱分析方法。样品用磷酸盐缓冲液提取两次,调节pH值至1.5～2.0后,再用乙酸乙酯提取,液相色谱-串联质谱分析。采用Acquity BEH C18色谱柱分离,0.1%甲酸水-甲醇作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,电喷雾正离子(ESI+)模式电离,多反应监测(MRM)模式检测,外标法定量。氟啶虫酰胺、TFNG、TFNA和TFNA-AM的检出限分别为0.17、0.20、0.35和0.60 μg/kg。在黄瓜和苹果样品中添加5.0～2000 μg/kg水平的氟啶虫酰胺、TFNG、TFNA和TFNA-AM,其平均添加回收率在82.9%～104.1%范围内,批内分析相对标准偏差(RSD)在3.6%～6.9%之间。4种物质的峰面积与其浓度在0.50～200 μg/L范围内均呈良好的线性关系,线性回归系数均大于0.998。前处理步骤仅用有机溶剂6 mL。整个方法具有高灵敏度、准确、稳定的特点。     

A comparison of various modes of liquid–liquid based microextraction techniques: Determination of picric acid

Three modes of liquid–liquid based microextraction techniques – namely auxiliary solvent‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, auxiliary solvent‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with low‐solvent consumption, and ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction – were compared. Picric acid was used as the model analyte. The determination is based on the reaction of picric acid with Astra Phloxine reagent to produce an ion associate easily extractable by various organic solvents, followed by spectrophotometric detection at 558 nm. Each of the compared procedures has both advantages and disadvantages. The main benefit of ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction is that no hazardous chlorinated extraction solvents and no dispersive solvent are necessary. Therefore, this procedure was selected for validation. Under optimized experimental conditions (pH 3, 7 × 10^?5 mol/L of Astra Phloxine, and 100 μL of toluene), the calibration plot was linear in the range of 0.02–0.14 mg/L and the LOD was 7 μg/L of picric acid. The developed procedure was applied to the analysis of spiked water samples.     

Development of an ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction method for the determination of phthalate esters in water samples

Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction (IL-DLLME) was coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) for the determination of four phthalate esters, including butyl benzyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, dicyclohexyl phthalate and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in water samples. The mixture of ionic liquid (IL) and dispersive solvent was rapidly injected into 10 mL aqueous sample. Then, IL phase was separated by centrifugation and was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet. The factors influencing the extraction efficiency, such as type and volume of IL, disperse solvent, extraction time, centrifuging time and ionic strength, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized conditions, the extraction recoveries by the proposed ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction for the four phthalates ranged from 83.0 to 91.7%. The relative standard deviations were between 7.8 and 15%. The limits of quantification for four phthalates were between 10.6 and 28.5 μg/L. The proposed method was successfully applied for the analysis of PAEs in tap, lake and treated wastewater samples.     

Preconcentration and determination of methyl methacrylate by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

This article describes the preconcentration of methyl methacrylate in produced water by the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using extraction solvents lighter than water followed by gas chromatography. In the present experiments, 0.4 mL dispersive solvent (ethanol) containing 15.0 μL extraction solvent (toluene) was rapidly injected into the samples and followed by centrifuging and direct injection into the gas chromatograph equipped with flame ionization detector. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were evaluated and optimized including toluene (as extraction solvent), ethanol (as dispersive solvent), 15 μL and 0.4 mL (as the volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, respectively), pH 7, 20% ionic strength, and extraction's temperature and time of 20°C and 10 min, respectively. Under the optimum conditions, the figures of merits were determined to be LOD = 10 μg/L, dynamic range = 20–180 μg/L, RSD = 11% (n = 6). The maximum recovery under the optimized condition was determined to be 79.4%.     

Development of coupled ultrasound‐assisted and reversed‐phase dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction before high‐performance liquid chromatography for the sensitive determination of vitamin A and vitamin E in oil samples

A new approach based on the ultrasound‐assisted reversed‐phase dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction technique is developed for the extraction and determination of vitamin A and vitamin E from oil matrices before high‐performance liquid chromatography analysis. A methodology based on the full factorial design is carried out to choose the significant parameters. Then the significant factors affecting the extraction efficiency including pH, volume of extraction solvent, and volume of disperser solvent are optimized using a Box–Behnken design. After analyzing the results obtained, the optimum conditions were: pH 4.5, 80–20 μL of the ethanol/water solvent mixture as extraction solvent, 110 μL of 1,4‐dioxane as the disperser solvent, and a sonication time of 10 min. For validation of the developed method, the linear dynamic range, repeatability, limit of detection, and recoveries were obtained under the optimum conditions. The detection limits of the method were 1.6 and 2.3 ng/mL for vitamin A and vitamin E, respectively. The extraction recovery percentages for the studied drugs were above 91%, with acceptable relative standard deviation. The proposed methodology was successfully applied for the determination of the vitamins in different oil samples.     

Comparison of dual solvent-stir bars microextraction and U-shaped hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction for the analysis of Sudan dyes in food samples by high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet/mass spectrometry

Two sample preparation methods, dual solvent-stir bars microextraction (DSSBME) and U-shaped hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction (U-shaped HF-LPME), are proposed and critically compared for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-ultraviolet (UV)/mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of Sudan dyes in this paper. In DSSBME, the organic solvent was confined to a pair of hollow fiber membrane fixed on a stir bar, which can stir by itself, while the hollow fiber in U-shaped HF-LPME was fixed by two microsyringes. The significant factors affecting the microextraction of Sudan dyes in both microextraction techniques have been examined and no obvious difference in the effect of extraction solvent, pH and salt concentration on the extraction efficiency of Sudan dyes was observed except extraction time and stirring speed. Both microextraction techniques were similar in terms of analytical performance from aqueous solutions (LODs ranged from 0.09 to 0.95 microgL(-1) by HPLC-UV and 2.5-6.2 microgL(-1) by HPLC-MS; the absolute LODs ranged from 0.9 to 11.25 pg by HPLC-UV and 5-21.2 pg by HPLC-MS), however, DSSBME was more stable (lower stirring speed required), less sample consuming and much shorter time required to reach extraction equilibrium; while U-shaped HF-LPME was easier to operate and no more special device required. The two microextraction techniques combined with HPLC-UV/MS were successfully applied to the analysis of real samples including strawberry sauce, capsicum oil, salted egg, and two kinds of chilli sauce. Although the LODs of HPLC-UV are lower than that of HPLC-MS by a factor of 10 in this work, the absolute LODs for both HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS are comparable. HPLC-UV cannot identify the suspicious peaks at the same retention time as that of Sudan II and III in salted egg, while HPLC-MS can give exact information of Sudan I-IV in real sample analysis and is more reliable. The sensitivity of HPLC-MS is enough for real sample analysis.     

液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水产品中麻醉剂MS-222残留

建立了液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水产品中麻醉剂3-氨基苯甲酸乙酯甲基磺酸盐(MS-222)残留量的方法。提取液为50%的甲醇及乙酸-乙酸钠缓冲溶液,提取液经C18固相萃取柱净化处理后用液相色谱-串联质谱仪进行测定,外标法定量。流动相为0.5%的甲酸溶液和乙腈(V:V=60:40),流速为0.2 mL/min。该方法的线性范围为0.001～1.0 mg/L,相关系数大于0.999,检出限为1μg/kg,定量限为2μg/kg。加标回收率可以达到80%～110%。     

Determination of three estrogens and bisphenol A by functional ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction coupled with ultra‐high performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection

A hydroxyl‐functionalized ionic liquid, 1‐hydroxyethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, was employed in an improved dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction method coupled with ultra high performance liquid chromatography for the enrichment and determination of three estrogens and bisphenol A in environmental water samples. The introduced hydroxyl group acted as the H‐bond acceptor that dispersed the ionic liquid effectively in the aqueous phase without dispersive solvent or external force. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that the hydroxyl group of the cation of the ionic liquid enhanced the combination of extractant and analytes through the formation of hydrogen bonds. The improvement of the extraction efficiency compared with that with the use of alkyl ionic liquid was proved by a comparison study. The main parameters including volume of extractant, temperature, pH, and extraction time were investigated. The calibration curves were linear in the range of 5.0–1000 μg/L for estrone, estradiol, and bisphenol A, and 10.0–1000 μg/L for estriol. The detection limits were in the range of 1.7–3.4 μg/L. The extraction efficiency was evaluated by enrichment factor that were between 85 and 129. The proposed method was proved to be simple, low cost, and environmentally friendly for the determination of the four endocrine disruptors in environmental water samples.