分散液相微萃取-气相色谱联用分析水样中菊酯类农药残留

将分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)与气相色谱-电子俘获检测(GC-ECD)技术相结合,建立了高灵敏度测定水样中7种菊酯类农药残留的新方法。对影响萃取富集效率的因素进行优化,萃取条件选定为:在5.0mL样品溶液中加入10.0μL氯苯和1.0mL丙酮,分散混匀后,以5000r/min离心5min,吸出萃取溶剂氯苯直接进样分析。在优化条件下7种菊酯类农药的富集倍数高达708～1087倍。以α-六六六为内标,7种菊酯类农药在0.8～600μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,线性相关系数在0.9990～0.9999之间;检出限为0.04～0.10μg/L(S/N=3)。本方法已应用于自来水、井水及河水等实际水样的分析,平均加标回收率在76.0%～116.0%之间;相对标准偏差在3.1%～7.2%之间。方法具有操作简单、富集效率高和灵敏度高等特点,可满足水样中菊酯类农药残留的检测要求。     

磁性多壁碳纳米管固相萃取-气相色谱-质谱法检测水样中的13种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物

建立了磁性多壁碳纳米管(MWCNTs)固相萃取结合气相色谱-质谱检测水样中13种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物(PAEs)的方法。优化了萃取时间、水样pH值、解吸溶剂的种类和用量、解吸时间等影响萃取效率的主要条件。最终确定萃取时间为10 min,水样pH 5～7,解吸溶剂为2 mL丙酮,解吸时间为5 min。在优化的条件下,各组分的萃取回收率为89.7%～100.5%。方法具有较高的灵敏度,检出限(信噪比(S/N)为3)为0.08～0.47 μg/L。3种实际样品的加标回收率为84.5%～107.5%,相对标准偏差为1.9%～12.8%。该方法操作简便、省时,准确、灵敏、环保,可用于水样中PAEs的检测,并成功地应用于自来水、瓶装饮用水和湖水样品的分析,13种PAEs均未检出。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水中苯、甲苯和二甲苯

以CHCl3为萃取剂,丙酮为分散剂,建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)结合气相色谱测定水样中苯、甲苯和二甲苯含量的新方法。实验对影响萃取效率的因素进行优化,萃取条件为:在1.0mL含有50g/LNaCl的样品溶液中加入40.0μLCHCl3和0.16mL丙酮,振荡分散均匀后,以400r/min离心5min,取萃取溶剂1.00μL直接进样分析。本方法线性范围为0.8～200μg/mL,相关系数r0.9980,检出限为0.1μg/mL,回收率分别在93.5%～102.1%之间。将该方法与液液萃取法、单滴微萃取相比较,具有操作简单、富集效率高和灵敏度高等特点。     

分散液-液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定水样中的痕量双酚A

建立了分散液-液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定水样中痕量双酚A(BPA)的方法. 通过对实验条件的筛选及优化, 得到最佳条件: 22.5 μL氯苯作萃取剂、0.5 mL丙酮作分散剂、0 min静止萃取时间、调节pH 3.2左右、10%离子强度及9 mL水样体积. 此条件下方法的线性范围为0.5~100 μg/L(R2=0.9941), 检出限为0.10 μg/L. 在BPA质量浓度为1 μg/L条件下, 方法回收率为87.8%~111.0%, 相对标准偏差8.3%(n=5), 富集倍数范围1905~2527. 对添加不同BPA浓度的自来水、地表水及回用中水进行分析, 回收率分别为(108±11.1)%, (107±13.2)%及(81.2±6.2)%(n=3). 在既定的色谱条件下, BPA的测定不受乙炔基雌二醇、雌二醇、雌三醇、雌酮和壬基酚等雌激素的干扰.     

环境水样中己烯雌酚与双烯雌酚的离子液体分散液-液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定

以离子液体([Omim][PF6])为萃取剂,采用冷诱导分散液-液微萃取对环境水样中的己烯雌酚和双烯雌酚残留进行富集.优化后的萃取条件:在pH 3.0的条件下,以50 μL离子液体为萃取剂,0.8 mL甲醇为分散剂,采用反相 Extend-C18柱(5 μm, 250 mm×4.6 mm),流动相为水-甲醇(体积比40 ∶ 60),流速:1.0 mL/min,柱温:35 ℃,检测波长:245 nm.在优化的萃取条件下,己烯雌酚和双烯雌酚的线性范围均为2.5 ～200 μg/L,检出限(S/N=3)为80 ng/L.应用于环境水样中己烯雌酚和双烯雌酚的检测,加标回收率为93% ～98%,相对标准偏差为3.0% ～5.4%,建立的方法简单、环保.     

分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A

建立了分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生-高效液相色谱法测定水样中双酚A的分析方法.通过交互正交试验和混合型优化实验设计对影响因素(萃取剂体积、分散剂类型及其体积、水样体积、pH值及离子强度)进行了优化.优化后的分散液液微萃取条件为:60 μL萃取剂,0.4 mL分散剂(甲醇),pH 4.0;优化后的柱前衍生化条件:0.1 mL 2.0 g/L衍生剂(对硝基苯甲酰氯)、衍生化时间30 min;方法的线性范围:0.002～0.2 mg/L(r=0.9997),检出限0.007 μg/L(S/N=3);不同浓度双酚A的萃取率为59.0%～63.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)2.5%～9.2%(n=5);水样中双酚A的加标率为86.5%～107.1%,RSD为4.0%～11.9%(n=5),其它雌激素(雌酮、雌二醇、雌三醇和17α-乙炔基雌二醇)对双酚A的测定无干扰.本方法可以对水环境中的痕量BPA进行检测,具有操作简便、快速等优点.     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中甲拌磷农药

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/氢火焰离子化检测器对水样中痕量的甲拌磷农药进行了测定。考察了影响分散液液微萃取的因素包括萃取溶剂、分散剂、样品体积、萃取温度和离心速度等。在最佳实验条件下,对甲拌磷的富集倍数达到300倍;检出限为0.001μL/L;方法的线性范围为0.01~10μL/L,R2为0.9986;相对标准偏差为6.65%;回收率为104%。将分散液液微萃取法与单滴液相微萃取和离子液体-液相微萃取方法进行了对比,结果表明,分散液液微萃取技术具有操作简单、快捷(前处理时间小于5 min)、富集效果好、回收率高等优点。同时预言,将离子液体与分散液液微萃取结合,将会产生更加满意的结果。     

衍生化-分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法同时测定纺织固体废物中含氯苯酚和邻苯基苯酚

建立了衍生化-分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱(DLLME-GC/MS)方法,并将其用于纺织固体废物中18种含氯苯酚和邻苯基苯酚的分析检测。方法对衍生化体系、乙酸酐用量、衍生化温度和时间、萃取剂种类及用量、分散剂种类及用量进行了筛选和优化。确定最佳条件为:纺织固体废物样品用0.15 mol/L的K_2CO_3溶液超声提取后定容,加入0.12 mL乙酸酐,于温度60℃条件下衍生35 min,取6 mL样品提取液,加入0.7 mL体积比为2∶5的四氯化碳(提取剂)和丙酮(分散剂)的混合溶剂分散萃取后,于8 000 r/min下离心3 min,取下层有机相进行GC/MS分析。18种含氯苯酚和邻苯基苯酚在0.002～0.160 mg/L范围内均呈良好的线性关系,相关系数为0.9991～1.0000,检出限为0.07～0.76μg/kg,定量限为0.28～3.04μg/kg,样品加标回收率在84.2%～105.0%范围,相对标准偏差在0.6%～6.4%之间。该方法简单、灵敏,适用于纺织固体废物中18种含氯苯酚和邻苯基苯酚的分析。     

均相液液萃取-数字成像比色法测定水中痕量六价铬北大核心CSCD

提出了均相液液萃取-数字成像比色法测定水中痕量六价铬的方法。取2.5 mL水样,依次加入0.125 mL十二烷基硫酸钠溶液(20 g·L^(-1))、0.3 mL硫酸溶液(0.5 mol·L^(-1))和0.125 mL含0.04 mol·L^(-1)二苯碳酰二肼的丙酮溶液,摇匀,反应5 min。再用60μL邻苯二甲酸二甲酯和400μL异丙醇的混合液进行萃取,涡旋,离心,通过智能手机比色装置中的Color Grab软件读取萃取层的绿(G)值。结果显示:六价铬标准曲线的线性范围为4~60μg·L^(-1),检出限(3s/k)为1μg·L^(-1);对实际水样进行加标回收试验,本方法所得六价铬测定值与国家标准方法GB 7467-1987的基本一致,回收率为87.8%~109%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)为2.4%~3.7%。     

基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取测定水中多种痕量环境雌激素

建立了基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/ 上浮溶剂固化-高效液相色谱/荧光法测定水体中痕量雌激素雌三醇(E3)、 双酚A(BPA)、 17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的方法. 利用中心复合实验设计分别对固相萃取和分散液液微萃取条件进行了优化, 通过响应曲面法得到的最佳萃取条件为碳纳米管用量30 mg, 水样体积210 mL, 流速2.0 mL/min, 萃取剂(十二醇)体积50 μL, 分散剂(甲醇)体积0.2 mL以及不添加盐. 在优化的实验条件下, E3, BPA, EE2和E2测定的线性范围分别为0.05~100, 0.05~100, 0.05~50和0.05~50 μg/L, 相关系数为0.9993~0.9999, 检出限分别为48.4, 3.3, 8.1和6.0 ng/L. 对不同加标浓度(0.40和4.00 μg/L)的实验室自来水、 排水沟污水及市售矿泉水3种实际水样进行了分析: E3, BPA, EE2和E2的加标回收率依次为107.5%~120.8%, 92.5%~108.3%, 103.5%~121.0%和102.5%~132.5%, 相对偏差分别为2.47%~13.28%, 1.73%~11.94%, 1.72%~8.36%和3.54%~11.95%, 富集因子平均值分别为461, 1075, 2074和949. 实际水样分析结果表明, 本方法可用于不同基质水样中雌激素的测定. 与其它方法相比, 本方法虽然固相萃取时间长及水样量大, 但检出限低、 富集因子高、 操作简便及费用低, 仍可作为一种可普及的水中痕量雌激素检测方法.     

Determination of four aromatic amines in water samples using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with HPLC

A new method for the determination of four aromatic amines in water samples was developed by using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique combined with HPLC-variable wavelength detection (HPLC-VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 25.0 microL tetrachloroethane (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected by a syringe into 5.00 mL water sample. Accordingly, a cloudy solution was formed. After centrifugation for 2 min at 4000 rpm, the fine droplets of the tetrachloroethane containing the analytes were sedimented in the bottom of the conical test tube (7+/-0.2 microL). Then, 5.0 microL of the settled phase was determined by HPLC-VWD. Parameters such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, extraction time, and salt concentration were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors ranged from 41.3 to 94.5. Linearity was observed in the range of 5-5000 ng/mL. The LODs based on S/N of 3 ranged from 0.8 to 1.8 ng/mL. The RSDs (for 400 ng/mL of p-toluidine and o-chloroaniline, 100 ng/mL of p-chloroaniline and p-bromoaniline) varied from 4.1 to 5.3% (n=6). The water samples collected from rivers and lakes were successfully analyzed by the proposed method and the relative recoveries were in the range of 85.4-111.7% and 90.2-101.3%, respectively.     

Permeation associated with three-phase-partitioning method on release of green fluorescent protein

Transformed cells of Escherichia coli expressing recombinant green fluorescent protein (GFPuv) were subjected to two methods of extraction: (1) freezing/thawing/sonication (FTS) cycles prior to the three-phase partitioning (TPP) method, or (2) directly to TPP extraction. The amount of GFPuv released by the FTS plus TPP method varied: 374μg/mL (first cycle), 93–442 μg/mL (second cycle), 32–359 μg/mL (third cycle), 18–115 μg/mL (fourth cycle). The GFPuv yields by the second method (TPP only) were, 23–54 μg/mL for the first extract and 33–91 μg/mL for the second. The FTS plus TPP method released similar amounts of GFPuv to that extracted by TPP; and provided a better mixture elution through the hydrophobic interaction column: 13–63 μg/mL for FTS plus TPP methods, and 2.5–13 μg/mL for TPP. The results showed that although selective permeation is a more laborious methodology, it was more efficient for obtaining of GFPuv in relation to the direct extraction of the cells for TPP.     

Optimization of microwave-assisted solvent extraction for volatile organic acids in tobacco and its comparison with conventional extraction methods

In the present study, a new method using microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) technique followed directly GC analysis was developed for the extraction of volatile organic acids (VOAs) in tobacco. The MASE conditions (heating time, volume of extracting solvent and extraction temperature) were optimized by means of an orthogonal array design (OAD) procedure. The results suggested that extractant, temperature and heating time were statistically the most significant factors. The extracts were directly analyzed with capillary GC operating in splitless-injection mode on an Agilent HP-FFAP capillary column. Under optimum operating conditions, MASE showed significantly better recoveries than those obtained by the conventional extraction method (ultrasonic and reflux extraction), ranging from 90.6% to 103.2%. In addition, a drastic reduction of the extraction time (20 min versus 4 h) and solvent consumption (20 mL versus 100 mL) was achieved with an outstanding reproducibility (CV ≤5%).     

SPE-RP-HPLC法测定羊肉组织中胺菊酯和三氟氯氰菊酯残留量

建立了羊肉组织中胺菊酯和三氟氯氰菊酯的固相萃取-反相高效液相色谱测定法。采用氟罗里硅土固相萃取柱(1000 mg/6 mL)进行固相萃取。以Shim-pack VP-ODS(200 mm×4.6 mm)柱为分析柱,流动相为甲醇:水=95:5(V/V),流速为0.7 mL/min。胺菊酯和三氟氯氰菊酯分别在0.01～6.40μg/mL(r=0.9999)和0.068～7.20ug/mL(r=0.9998)范围内与峰面积呈良好线性关系,检出限分别为0.001μg/mL和0.002μg/mL,胺菊酯和三氟氯氰菊酯的回收率为90.2%～101.4%,相对标准偏差为2.3%～4.0%。该方法可作为羊肉组织中胺菊酯和三氟氯氰菊酯含量监测的控制方法。     

Application of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of methomyl in natural waters

A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC-variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 microL of tetrachloroethane (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected by syringe into a 5.00-mL water sample containing the analyte, thereby forming a cloudy solution. After phase separation by centrifugation for 2 min at 4000 rpm, the enriched analyte in the settled phase (8 +/- 0.2 microL) was at the bottom of the conical test tube. A 5.0-microL volume of the settled phase was analyzed by HPLC-VWD. Parameters such as the nature and volume of the extraction solvent and the dispersive solvent, extraction time, and the salt concentration were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factor could reach 70.7 for a 5.00-mL water sample and the linear range, detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 3-5000 ng/mL, 1.0 ng/mL, and 2.6%, respectively. River and lake water samples were successfully analyzed by the proposed method. Comparison of this method with solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, and single-drop microextraction, indicates that DLLME combined with HPLC-VWD is a simple, fast, and low-cost method for the determination of methomyl, and thus has tremendous potential in trace analysis of methomyl in natural waters.     

SPE coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by GC with flame ionization detection for the determination of ultra‐trace amounts of benzodiazepines

SPE combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextration was used for the extraction of ultra‐trace amounts of benzodiazepines (BZPs) including, diazepam, midazolam, and alprazolam, from ultra‐pure water, tap water, fruit juices, and urine samples. The analytes were adsorbed from large volume samples (60 mL) onto octadecyl silica SPE columns. After the elution of the desired compounds from sorbents with 2.0 mL acetone, 0.5 mL of eluent containing 40.0 μL chloroform was injected rapidly into 4.5 mL pure water. After extraction and centrifugation, 2 μL of the sedimented phase was injected into a GC equipped with a flame ionization detector. Several parameters affecting this process were investigated and optimized. Under the optimal conditions, LODs ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 μg/L, a linear dynamic range of 0.1–100 μg/L and relative SDs in the range of 4.4–10.7% were attained. Very high preconcentration factors ranging from 3895–7222 were achieved. The applicability of the method for the extraction of BZPs from different types of complicated matrices, such as tap water, fruit juices, and urine samples, was studied. The obtained results reveal that the proposed method is a good technique for the extraction and determination of BZPs in complex matrices.     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

Sorptive extraction with in-sample acetylation for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of ethylphenol species in wine samples

An inexpensive and effective sample preparation procedure for the determination of three ethylphenolic off-flavours (4-ethylphenol, 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylcathecol) in wine samples is presented. Analytes were in situ acetylated and concentrated using a disposable silicone sorbent (DSS) exposed to the diluted sample. After that, the analytes were recovered with ethyl acetate and determined by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. The influence of different parameters (volume of acetic anhydride, basic catalyst, ionic strength, sorbent format, sampling mode and extraction time) on the efficiency of derivatization and extraction steps is discussed. Under optimized conditions, 2 mL of wine were diluted with 15 mL of an aqueous solution of potassium bicarbonate (5%, m/v) in a 22 mL vessel, containing 2 g of sodium chloride. The volume of acetic anhydride and the extraction time were set at 90 μL and 2 h, and the extraction was carried out at room temperature (20±2°C). Analytes were concentrated using a silicone disc (5 mm diameter × 0.5 mm thickness) and further desorbed with 0.2 mL of ethyl acetate. The achieved limits of quantification (LOQs), defined as the concentration of each compound providing a signal 10 times higher than the baseline noise, stayed between 5 and 15 ng mL(-1). The method provided a linear response range of up to 5000 ng mL(-1) and relative recoveries from 91% to 116%. The 4-ethylphenol off-flavour was detected in most red wine samples at concentrations of up to 2700 ng mL(-1).     

Analysis of estrogens in environmental waters using polymer monolith in-polyether ether ketone tube solid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple, rapid and sensitive on-line method for simultaneous determination of four endocrine disruptors (17beta-estradiol, estriol, bisphenol A and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol) in environmental waters was developed by coupling in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (FLD). A poly(acrylamide-vinylpyridine-N,N'-methylene bisacrylamide) monolith, synthesized inside a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) tube, was selected as the extraction medium. To achieve optimum extraction performance, several parameters were investigated, including extraction flow-rate, extraction time, and pH value, inorganic salt and organic solvent content of the sample matrix. By simply filtered with nylon membrane filter and adjusting the pH of samples to 6.0 with phosphoric acid, the sample solution then could be directly injected into the device for extraction. Low detection limits (S/N=3) and quantification limits (S/N=10) of the proposed method were achieved in the range of 0.006-0.10 ng/mL and 0.02-0.35 ng/mL from spiked lake waters, respectively. The calibration curves of four endocrine disruptors showed good linearity ranging from quantification limits to 50 ng/mL with a linear coefficient R(2) value above 0.9913. Good method reproducibility was also found by intra- and inter-day precisions, yielding the RSDs less than 12 and 9.8%, respectively. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of these compounds in several environmental waters.     

Electromembrane extraction combined with cyclodextrin-modified capillary electrophoresis for the quantification of trimipramine enantiomers

A sensitive, simple and reproducible method was developed for preconcentration and determination of trimipramine (TPM) enantiomers in biological samples using electromembrane extraction combined with cyclodextrin‐modified capillary electrophoresis (CE). During the extraction, TPM enantiomers migrated from a 5 mL sample solution through a thin layer of 2‐nitrophenyl octyl ether NPOE immobilized in the pores of a hollow fiber, and into a 20 μL acidic aqueous acceptor phase presented inside the lumen of the fiber. A Box–Behnken design and the response surface methodology (RSM) were used for the optimization of different variables on extraction efficiency. Optimized extraction conditions were: NPOE as supported liquid membrane, inter‐electrode distance of 5 mm, stirring rate of 1000 rpm, 51 V potential difference, 34 min as the extraction time, acceptor phase pH 1.0 and donor phase pH 4.5. Then, the extract was analyzed using optimized cyclodextrin (CD)‐modified CE method for the separation of TPM enantiomers. Best results were achieved using 100 mM phosphate running buffer (pH 2.0) containing 10 mM α‐CD as the chiral selector, applied voltage of 18 kV and 20°C. The range of quantitation for both enantiomers was 20–500 ng/mL. The method was very reproducible so that intra‐ and interday RSDs (n=6) were <6%. The limits of quantitation and detection for both enantiomers were 20 and 7 ng/mL, respectively. Finally, this method was successfully applied to determine the concentration of TPM enantiomers in plasma and urine samples without any pre‐treatment.