吡啶-2,5-二羧酸钐(Ⅲ)、镝(Ⅲ)配合物的合成、结构及性质

以Sm(NO₃)₃·6H₂O、Dy(NO₃)₃·6H₂O、吡啶-2,5-二羧酸(H₂pydc)为原料, 用水热合成法合成了2个新的稀土金属配合物[Ln(pydc)₂(H₂O)₅]·4H₂O(Ln=Sm (1), Dy (2)), 单晶结构经X单晶衍射仪分析确定, 两种配合物的晶系均为单斜晶系, C2/c空间群。对晶体的性质进行元素分析、热重、红外光谱, 荧光等分析。结果表明, 配合物1和2在常温下表现出稀土离子相应的特征荧光发射。另外, 本文对两种配合物进行了热稳定性及动力学分析。     

两个苯甲羟肟酸有机锡配合物的合成、结构及抗癌活性

合成了2个苯甲羟肟酸有机锡配合物：[(o-Cl-C₆H₄CH₂)₂Sn (C₆H₅CONO)₂](1)和[(o-CH₃-C₆H₄CH₂)₂Sn (C₆H₅CONO)(C₆H₅COO)](2)。通过元素分析、红外光谱、核磁共振氢谱、热重分析、单晶X射线衍射等方法对配合物进行了结构表征,对其结构进行量子化学从头计算和体外抗癌活性研究。结果显示：配合物均为单锡核结构,配合物1为六配位的畸变八面体构型,配合物2为五配位的畸变三角双锥构型;配合物1对人宫颈癌细胞(HeLa)、肝癌细胞(HuH-7)和肺腺癌细胞(H1975)显示出比临床使用的顺铂强的抑制活性,而配合物2的抑制活性要弱得多。     

两个2,6-二氨基-3,5-二硝基吡嗪-1-氧化物含能配合物的合成、晶体结构及催化性能

合成了2,6-二氨基-3,5-二硝基吡嗪-1-氧化物(LLM-105)₂种含能配合物[Cu₄O₂(C₄N₆O₅H₂)₂(CH₃COO)₂(DMF)₂]·DMF(1)((C₄N₆O₅H₂)^2- 为配体LLM-105失去2个H⁺)和[Co(C₄N₆O₅H₃)₃]·7H₂O(2)((C₄N₆O₅H₃)^- 为LLM-105失去1个H⁺),用X射线单晶衍射法测定了其分子结构。配合物1属正交晶系,空间群为Pbca,配合物2属三斜晶系,空间群为R3。用DSC,TG-DTG技术对配体和2个配合物的热分解进行了研究。用Kissinger法和Ozawa-Doyle法对配合物热分解过程中放热峰的表观活化能进行了计算。同时研究了2种配合物对AP热分解催化效果的影响,结果表明,2种配合物使AP的高温分解峰温分别提前117.42和71.85℃,分解放热量增加1916.97和1433.76J·g^-1,对AP热分解具有非常显著的催化效果。     

钒卤代过氧化物酶构象模型分子的设计、合成及仿生催化活性

基于钒卤代过氧化物酶(V-HPOs)活性中心的N、O配位环境及活性中心与氨基酸残基、水分子之间的氢键作用的模拟, 我们设计、合成了两种钒氧配合物: (C₃H₅N₂)₂[(VO)₂(μ₂-C₂O₄)(C₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂] (1)和(VO₂)₂(μ₂- C₂O₄)(C₂H₄N₂)₂ (2), 并通过X射线单晶衍射方法确定了它们的结构. 晶体结构分析表明上述钒氧配合物的配位环境与(V-HPOs)活性中心十分相似, 且在配合物的三维堆积结构中具有类α-螺旋结构. 溴化反应活性研究发现这些钒氧配合物在仿生催化实验中表现出较高的催化活性.     

两个丁二肟有机锡配合物的合成、结构及抗癌活性

合成了 2 个丁二酮肟有机锡化合物:双(三(2-甲基-2-苯基丙基)锡)丁二酮肟配合物(C₆H₅C(CH₃)₂CH₂)₃Sn(ON=C(CH₃)C(CH₃)=NO)Sn(CH₂C(CH₃)₂C₆H₅)3 (1)和二苄基锡氧氯丁二酮肟多核配合物[μ₃-O-((C₆H₅CH₂)₂Sn)₂(ON=C(CH₃)C(CH₃)=NOH)(O)Cl]₂(2)。通过元素分析、红外光谱、核磁共振(¹H、¹³C、¹¹⁹Sn)、差热分析和单晶 X射线衍射对配合物进行了结构表征, 对其结构进行量子化学从头计算, 并进行了体外抗癌活性研究。结果显示:配合物 1为通过配体丁二酮肟桥联的双锡核中心对称分子, 锡原子均为四配位的畸变四面体构型; 配合物 2 为通过氧原子和丁二酮肟配体桥联的四锡核中心对称多环聚合结构, 锡原子分别为五配位的畸变三角双锥构型和六配位的畸变八面体构型。配合物对人肝癌细胞(HUH7)、人肺癌细胞(A549)、人表皮癌细胞(A431)、人结肠癌细胞(HCT-116)和人乳腺癌细胞(MDA-MB-231)均有较强的抑制活性。     

含α-二亚胺配体的硅(Ⅳ)配合物的合成、晶体结构与性能研究

利用金属单质还原的方法合成了不同取代基的α-二亚胺配体支持的2个硅(Ⅳ)配合物L(SiMe₃)₂(2)(L=[(2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)NC(Me)]₂)和L'(SiMe₃)₂(4)(L'=[(2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)NCH]₂)。通过X-射线单晶衍射测定了配合物的单晶结构,并对其进行了元素分析、¹H NMR、红外光谱表征,以及紫外-可见光谱和荧光光谱分析。结构分析表明,构成这2种化合物中心的NCCN骨架呈之字形分布,骨架上三取代的原子接近平面排布。2种硅配合物在紫外光激发下都具有较好的发光性质。     

羟基羧酸钛(Ⅲ)配合物的合成和热性质研究

三氯化钛分别与苹果酸铵、酒石酸铵和柠檬酸铵反应，制得三种新的固态配合物：苹果酸羟基钛(Ⅲ)、酒石酸羟基钛(Ⅲ)和柠檬酸钛(Ⅲ)(化学式分别为Ti(OH)(C₄H₄O₅)·1.5H₂O、Ti(OH)(C₄H₄O₆)·1.5H₂O和Ti(C₆H₅O₇)·1.5H     

新型手性骨架异核原子簇化合物的合成及表征

首次合成了未见文献报道的两种新的手性簇合物，(μ₃-S)FeCoW(CO)₈C₅H₄C(O)R (R=C₆H₅、C₆H₅C(O)OCH₃)，对其合成、谱学性质及晶体结构进行了研究。     

烃基取代茚基钌羰基化合物的合成及晶体结构

配体C₉H₇R(R=CH₂CH₂CH₃ (1),CH₂(CH₃)₂ (2),C₅H₉ (3),CH₂C₆H₅ (4),CH₂CH=CH₂ (5))分别与Ru₃(CO)12在二甲苯或庚烷中加热回流,得到了6个双核配合物[(η⁵-C₉H₆R)Ru(CO)(μ-CO)]₂(R=CH₂CH₂CH₃ (6),CH₂(CH₃)₂ (7),C₅H₈ (8),CH₂C₆H₅ (9),CH₂CH=CH₂ (10))和[(η⁵-C₉H₆)(H₃CH₂C)CHCH(CH₂CH₃)(η⁵-C₉H₆)] [Ru(CO)(μ-CO)]₂ (11).通过元素分析、红外光谱、核磁共振氢谱对配合物的结构进行了表征,并用X-射线单晶衍射法测定了配合物6,9,10和11的结构.     

由芳香羧酸和1,3,5-三咪唑基苯为配体构筑的锌、镉配合物的合成、结构和荧光性质

通过水热法得到了2个配位聚合物{[Zn(timb)(BTEC)_0.5]·H₂O}_n(1)和{[Cd(timb)(DPA)]·H₂O}_n(2)(timb=1,3,5-三咪唑基苯,H₄BTEC=均苯四甲酸,H₂DPA=2,2-联苯二甲酸),对它们进行了元素分析、红外光谱分析,并利用X射线衍射测定了它们的单晶结构。 配合物1属于三斜晶系,P1空间群。配合物2属于单斜晶系,C2/c空间群。配合物1拥有一个不寻常的三维框架结构,其拓扑为(4.6³·8⁶)₂(4²·8⁴)(6³)₂;而配合物2具有一维单层纳米管结构。结果说明了金属离子和有机羧酸配体在配合物组装过程中起着非常重要的作用。此外,在室温下对2个配合物进行了荧光性质分析。     

Super‐Bulky Penta‐arylcyclopentadienyl Ligands: Isolation of the Full Range of Half‐Sandwich Heavy Alkaline‐Earth Metal Hydrides

Hydrogenolysis of the half‐sandwich penta‐arylcyclopentadienyl‐supported heavy alkaline‐earth‐metal alkyl complexes (Cp^Ar)Ae[CH(SiMe₃)₂](S) (Cp^Ar=C₅Ar₅, Ar=3,5‐ⁱPr₂‐C₆H_3; S=THF or DABCO) in hexane afforded the calcium, strontium, and barium metal–hydride complexes as the same dimers [(Cp^Ar)Ae(μ‐H)(S)]₂ (Ae=Ca, S=THF, 2‐Ca ; Ae=Sr, Ba, S=DABCO, 4‐Ae ), which were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. 2‐Ca , 4‐Sr , and 4‐Ba catalyzed alkene hydrogenation under mild conditions (30 °C, 6 atm, 5 mol % cat.), with the activity increasing with the metal size. A variety of activated alkenes including tri‐ and tetra‐substituted olefins, semi‐activated alkene (Me₃SiCH=CH₂), and unactivated terminal alkene (1‐hexene) were evaluated.     

Reactions of Cyclohexyl Isocyanide with η5‐Substituted Cyclo‐pentadienyl MoMo Triply Bonded Complexes. Crystal Structure of [Mo(CO)2(η5‐C5H4CO2CH3)]2(μ‐η2‐CNC6H11)

Reactions of one or two equiv. of cyclohexyl isocyanide in THF at room temperature with Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) gave the isocyanide coordinated Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes with functionally substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands, [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂(μ‐η²‐CNC₆H₁₁) ( 1a , R=COCH₃; 1b , R=CO₂CH₃) and [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)(CNC₆H₁₁)]₂ ( 2a , R=COCH₃; 2b , R=CO₂CH₃), respectively. Complexes 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b could be more conveniently prepared by thermal decarbonylation of Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in toluene at reflux, followed by treatment of the resulting Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in situ with cyclohexyl isocyanide. While 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b were characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopy, 1b was further characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Extraction and coordination studies of carbamoyl methyl sulfoxide (CMSO) with uranyl bis(β-diketonates). Synthesis and molecular structure of [{UO2(DBM)2}2C6H5CH2SOCH2CONHC6H5]

The carbamoyl methyl sulfoxide compounds of uranyl bis(β-diketonate) of the types [UO₂(DBM)₂CMSO] and [{UO₂(DBM)₂}₂CMSO] (where HDBM = C₆H₅COCH₂COC₆H₅; CMSO = C₆H₅CH₂SOCH₂CONHC₆H₅ or C₆H₅SOCH₂CONⁱPr₂) have been synthesized and characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopic techniques and elemental analysis. Spectral studies show that CMSO acts as a monodentate ligand in [UO₂(DBM)₂CMSO] compounds and bonds through the sulfoxo oxygen atom to the uranyl group. It acts as a bridging bidentate ligand in [{UO₂(DBM)₂}₂CMSO] compounds and bonds through both the sulfoxo and carbamoyl oxygen atoms to two different uranyl groups. The structure of the compound [{UO₂(DBM)₂}₂C₆H₅CH₂SOCH₂CONHC₆H₅] confirms the bridging bidentate mode of coordination for the CMSO ligand. Extraction studies show an enhancement in solvent extraction for the uranyl ion from nitric acid medium when a mixture of thenoyl trifluoroacetone (HTTA) and CMSO was employed.     

Bis­(1‐acetonyl­pyridinium) pyridinium hexa­iodobismuth(III)

The crystal structure of the title complex, (C₈H₁₀N)₂(C₅H₆N)[BiI₆], contains discrete [BiI₆]^3? anions, and (HNC₅H₅)⁺ and (CH₃COCH₂NC₅H₅)⁺ cations separated by normal van der Waals contacts. The [BiI₆]^3? anion has the Bi atom on an inversion centre. The (HNC₅H₅)⁺ cation also lies about an inversion centre and is disordered. The (CH₃COCH₂NC₅H₅)⁺ cation lies in a general position.     

Crystal structure and luminiscent properties of 2,2-difluoro-4-(9H-hluorene-2-YL)-6-methyl-1,3,2-dioxaborine

The crystal structure of 2,2-difluoro-4-(9H-fluorene-2-yl)-6-methyl-1,3,2-dioxaborine (C₁₃H₉COCH × COCH₃BF₂) (1) is determined. The structural and spectral luminescent characteristics of 1 are compared to those of its electron analogue: 2,2-difluoro-4-(4-phenylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,3,2-dioxaborine (C₆H₅C₆H₄ × COCHCOCH₃BF₂).     

Oxidative addition of different electrophiles with rhodium(I) carbonyl complexes of unsymmetrical phosphine–phosphine monoselenide ligands

Dimeric chlorobridge complex [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ reacts with two equivalents of a series of unsymmetrical phosphine–phosphine monoselenide ligands, Ph₂P(CH₂)_nP(Se)Ph₂ {n = 1( a ), 2( b ), 3( c ), 4( d )}to form chelate complex [Rh(CO)Cl(P∩Se)] ( 1a ) {P∩Se = η²‐(P,Se) coordinated} and non‐chelate complexes [Rh(CO)₂Cl(P～Se)] ( 1b–d ) {P～Se = η¹‐(P) coordinated}. The complexes 1 undergo oxidative addition reactions with different electrophiles such as CH₃I, C₂H₅I, C₆H₅CH₂Cl and I₂ to produce Rh(III) complexes of the type [Rh(COR)ClX(P∩Se)] {where R = ? C₂H₅ ( 2a ), X = I; R = ? CH₂C₆H₅ ( 3a ), X = Cl}, [Rh(CO)ClI₂(P∩Se)] ( 4a ), [Rh(CO)(COCH₃)ClI(P～Se)] ( 5b–d ), [Rh(CO)(COH₅)ClI‐(P～Se)] ( 6b–d ), [Rh(CO)(COCH₂C₆H₅)Cl₂(P～Se)] ( 7b–d ) and [Rh(CO)ClI₂(P～Se)] ( 8b–d ). The kinetic study of the oxidative addition (OA) reactions of the complexes 1 with CH₃I and C₂H₅I reveals a single stage kinetics. The rate of OA of the complexes varies with the length of the ligand backbone and follows the order 1a > 1b > 1c > 1d . The CH₃I reacts with the different complexes at a rate 10–100 times faster than the C₂H₅I. The catalytic activity of complexes 1b–d for carbonylation of methanol is evaluated and a higher turnover number (TON) is obtained compared with that of the well‐known commercial species [Rh(CO)₂I₂]^?. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Über Cyanatverbindungen und deren reaktives Verhalten. X. 14N-NMR-Untersuchungen an einigen diamagnetischen Metall- und Triphenylzinnthiocyanatverbindungen sowie Kaliumselenocyanat

Chemical shifts and line-widths of the following soluble diamagnetic ¹⁴N-compounds are given: (NH₄)₂[Hg(SCN)₄], Sr(SCN)₂, K₂[Zn(NCS)₄] · 2 CH₃COCH₃, K₂[Zn(NCS)₄], K₄[Cd(NCS)₆], (C₆H₅)₃SnNCS, C₇H₇NH₃[(C₆H₅)₃Sn(NCS)₂], K[(C₆H₅)₃Sn(NCSe)₂] und KSeCN. Types of bonding of the NCY group (Y = S, Se) in these compounds are discussed and correlated to the measurements. Dependences of the line-widths upon different concentrations and temperatures are given for aqueous KSCN solutions.     

Die Kristallstruktur von p-Tolylbis(diethyldithiocarbamato)-thallium(III) und Phenylbis(methylxanthogenato)bismut(III)

Crystal Structure of p-Tolylbis (diethyldithiocarbamato)thallium(III) and Phenylbis-(methylxanthogenato)bismut(III) The crystal structure of 4-CH₃(C₆H₄)? Tl(S₂CN(C₂H₅)₂)₂ (P2₁/c, a = 11.973(3), b = 10.692(3), c = 19.232(4) Å, β = 114.02(2)°, Z = 4) and C₆H₅-Bi(S₂COCH₃)₂ (P2₁/c, a = 6.395(2), b = 24.684(8), c = 9.732(3) Å, β = 101.38(3)°, Z = 4) was solved from X-ray diffraction data of single crystals. From the interatomic distances follows that the dithiocarbamate and xanthogenate ligands coordinate asymmetrically bidentate to the metal as presumed and exclusively through the sulfur atoms. Differences in the coordination sphere of bismut and thallium give evidence for a “stereochemically active lone pair” on the bismut atom.     

Dipicolinate complexes of main group metals with hydrazinium cation

Some new coordination complexes of hydrazinium main group metal dipicolinate hydrates of formulae (N₂H₅)₂M(dip)₂.nH₂O (where, M = Ca,Sr,BaorPb andn = 0, 2, 4 and 3 respectively and dip = dipicolinate), N₂H₅Bi(dip)₂.3H₂O and (N₂H₅)₃Bi(dip)₃.4H₂O have been prepared and characterized by physico-chemical techniques. The infrared spectra of the complexes reveal the presence of tridentate dipicolinate dianions and non-coordinating hydrazinium cations. Conductance measurements show that the mono, di and trihydrazinium complexes behave as 1:1, 2:1 and 3 :1 electrolytes respectively, in aqueous solution. Thermal decomposition studies show that these compounds lose water followed by endothermic decomposition of hydrazine to give respective metal hydrogendipicolinate intermediates, which further decompose exothermically to the final product of either metal carbonates (Ca, Sr, Ba and Pb) or metal oxycarbonates (Bi). The coordination numbers around the metal ions differ from compound to compound. The various coordination numbers exhibited by these metals are six (Ca), seven (Ba), eight (Sr) and nine (Pb and Bi). In all the complexes the above coordination number is attained by tridentate dipicolinate dianions and water molecules. The X-ray diffraction patterns of these compounds differ from one another suggesting that they are not isomorphous.     

Molecular Thorium Trihydrido Clusters Stabilized by Cyclopentadienyl Ligands

Hydrogenolysis of alkyl‐substituted cyclopentadienyl (Cp^R) ligated thorium tribenzyl complexes [(Cp^R)Th(p‐CH₂‐C₆H₄‐Me)₃] ( 1 – 6 ) afforded the first examples of molecular thorium trihydrido complexes [(Cp^R)Th(μ‐H)₃]_n (Cp^R=C₅H₂(^tBu)₃ or C₅H₂(SiMe₃)₃, n=5; C₅Me₄SiMe₃, n=6; C₅Me₅, n=7; C₅Me₄H, n=8; 7 – 10 and 12 ) and [(Cp^#)₁₂Th₁₃H₄₀] (Cp^#=C₅H₄SiMe₃; 13 ). The nuclearity of the metal hydride clusters depends on the steric profile of the cyclopentadienyl ligands. The hydrogenolysis intermediate, tetra‐nuclear octahydrido thorium dibenzylidene complex [(Cp^ttt)Th(μ‐H)₂]₄(μ‐p‐CH‐C₆H₄‐Me)₂ (Cp^ttt=C₅H₂(^tBu)₃) ( 11 ) was also isolated. All of the complexes were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. Hydride positions in [(Cp^Me4)Th(μ‐H)₃]₈ (Cp^Me4=C₅Me₄H) were further precisely confirmed by single‐crystal neutron diffraction. DFT calculations strengthen the experimental assignment of the hydride positions in the complexes 7 to 12 .