荧光指示剂载体对荧光法溶氧传感器荧光膜性能的影响

以沉淀白炭黑、气相白炭黑和MQ树脂负载荧光指示剂Ru(dpp)3Cl2,添加到二甲基硅橡胶,制备氧敏感荧光膜,研究指示剂载体和用量对荧光膜荧光输出的影响。结果表明:纯硅橡胶荧光膜的荧光输出很低,SiO2填料可作荧光指示剂的载体提高指示剂的分散和荧光效率,SiO2填料提高荧光效率的能力为MQ树脂>气相白炭黑>沉淀白炭黑。含10%SiO2载体的硅橡胶制备的荧光膜,其荧光输出随指示剂用量线性增加,直至指示剂用量达0.1%,但SiO2填料降低荧光膜的响应速度。     

胺基邻菲咯啉-钌(Ⅱ)反应性荧光指示剂的合成与化学固定的研究

为减少荧光指示剂被水萃取流失,提高荧光膜的使用寿命,将5-氨基-邻菲咯啉与二(4,7-二苯基-邻菲咯啉)二氯化钌(Ⅱ)络合,合成带氨基的荧光指示剂[Ru(dpp)₂(phen-NH₂)]Cl₂,并经氨基键合到有机玻璃表面。以核磁、质谱、红外验证合成荧光指示剂的结构,研究键合条件对染色有机玻璃荧光发射的影响,监测荧光强度随水浸泡时间的变化。合成荧光指示剂的荧光发射峰值波长为570 nm,键合到有机玻璃后发射光谱红移20 nm,荧光强度受溶解氧影响,响应时间约为10 s,氧猝灭比达4。染色有机玻璃的荧光稳定性好,在50 ℃水中浸泡7个月,荧光强度下降小于1%。     

基于钌配合物荧光猝灭原理的新型氟化有机改性溶胶-凝胶氧传感膜的研究

选用3,3,3-三氟丙基三甲氧基硅烷为前驱体,制备氧光化学传感膜材料.利用4,7-二苯基-1,10-邻菲咯啉钌(Ⅱ)([Ru(dpp)3(ClO4)2])为氧荧光猝灭指示剂,通过优化制备条件获得对氧浓度变化具有敏感响应的传感膜.研究结果表明:所制备的氧传感膜对水体中的溶解氧的线性响应范围为0.5～16.0 mg/L,最...     

包埋Ru(bpy)3Cl2非线性光催化薄膜在图像处理中的应用

用sol-gel法以正硅酸乙酯、乙醇和蒸馏水为原料,以盐酸为催化剂,包埋三联吡啶钌[Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂]制备催化 Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ)反应的非线性光催化薄膜,并利用紫外分光光度法测定了在薄膜中Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂的包埋量.通过投影图像的方法光激发BZ反应,在包埋Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂的薄膜上产生化学波图像.在薄膜中演化形成的图像具有相当高的图像清晰度.在图像的演化过程中,具有图像反转、边界增强、图像分割等图像处理能力,并可以通过改变BZ反应条件来调控增强某些图像处理能力.     

过渡金属钌、铑配合物在室温离子液体中催化硅氢加成反应的研究

研究了在室温离子液体以及室温离子液体/有机溶剂复合介质体系中, Rh(PPh₃)₃Cl, Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂等催化烯烃与三乙氧基硅烷的硅氢加成反应. 实验结果表明, 在乙二醇二甲醚/离子液体1-丁基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐(BMImBF₆) (V/V＝1/4)介质中, 于90 ℃下, 己烯与三乙氧基硅烷反应的转化率为100%, β加成物的选择性可达89.0%. 而用Rh(PPh₃)₃Cl作为反应的催化剂, 在纯离子液体BMImPF₆中, 就可以高效催化烯烃与三乙氧基氢硅烷的加成反应. 过渡金属Rh(PPh₃)₃Cl, Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂催化剂/离子液体BMImPF₆催化体系, 不仅解决了产物与催化剂分离困难这一难题, 同时, 离子液体BMImPF₆的存在提高了过渡金属Rh(PPh₃)₃Cl, Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂催化硅氢加成反应的活性, 特别是β加成物的选择性. 反应结束后, 催化剂/离子液体与产物易于分离, 并且可以重复使用.     

钯配合物对结核杆菌RecA intein蛋白质剪接的抑制作用

研究了5种钯配合物Pd(bipy)Cl₂, Pd(phen)Cl₂, [Pd(dien)Cl]Cl, trans-Pd(NH₃)₂Cl₂和cis-Pd(NH₃)₂Cl₂对结核杆菌RecA intein蛋白质剪接的抑制作用. 结果表明, trans-Pd(NH₃)₂Cl₂的抑制活性最好, IC₅₀=3.3×10^-5 mol/L. 钯配合物通过与intein的第一个氨基酸(半胱氨酸)配位, 从而抑制蛋白质的剪接活性. 荧光猝灭的动力学数据表明, 配体的大小会明显影响钯配合物与intein的相互作用, 配体越大, 作用越慢.     

Ru-Fe异金属化合物及其在Au表面上SAM的电化学研究

为使不对称Ru-Fe化合物能在表面上自组装形成单分子膜,对trans-RuCl(dppm)₂(C≡CFc)[Fc=C₅H₄FeC₅H₅,dppm=(C₆H₅)₂PCH₂P(C₆H₅)₂](1)进行修饰,得到Ru(dppm)₂(C≡CFc)(C≡CPhOCH₃)(2),[Ru(dppm)₂(C≡CFc)(N≡CCH₂CH₂NH₂)][PF₆](3)和[Ru(dppm)₂(C≡CFc)(N≡CCH₂CH₂NHC(O)·(CH₂)₁₀SH)][PF₆](4),并详细研究了该系列化合物的电化学性质.循环伏安结果显示出Ru周围配体得失电子能力的差别,直接影响了Ru中心的氧化-还原性,但这种影响并没有通过共轭的炔键传递到二茂铁中的Fe中心.化合物4可以在Au表面上自组装形成稳定、有序的单分子膜.还利用循环伏安法研究了单分子膜的形成过程及其表面覆盖率.     

三苯基膦：转换硫醇保护的纳米粒子成[Au25(PPh3)10(SR)5Cl2]2+

我们在此报道了一种未曾发现的有趣现象：尽管[Au₂₃(SC₆H₁₁)₁₆]⁻、Au₂₄(SC₂H₄Ph)₂₀ (Ph:苯环)、Au₃₆(TBBT)₂₈ (TBBTH:对叔丁基苯硫酚)、Au₃₈(SC₂H₄Ph)₂₄、混合Au_x(SC₂H₄Ph)_y团簇及3 nm的金纳米粒子有不同的组成、结构、尺寸和保护性硫醇配体,但它们在三苯基膦(PPh₃)作用下,均能统一地经由亚稳的[Au₁₁(PPh₃)₈Cl₂]²⁺最终转化为稳定的双二十面体[Au₂₅(PPh₃)₁₀(SR)₅Cl₂]²⁺ (SR:硫醇配体)。换句话说,三苯基膦是这些硫醇保护的纳米粒子的统一转化器。然而,聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)/柠檬酸盐(Citrate)保护的金纳米粒子和[Ag₂₅(SPhMe₂)₁₈]⁻ (Me:甲基)在同样的条件下,却不能转化为[Au₂₅(PPh₃)₁₀(SR)₅Cl₂]²⁺或[Ag₂₅(PPh₃)₁₀(SR)₅Cl₂]²⁺,暗示了硫醇保护的金纳米粒子具有与三苯基膦反应的独特性能。另外,我们考察了配体对双二十面体[Au₂₅(PPh₃)₁₀(SR)₅Cl₂]²⁺团簇荧光性能的影响。     

取代基对咪唑[4,5-f]-1,10-邻菲罗啉Ru(Ⅱ)配合物的温敏性能影响

合成了3种具有不同取代基的咪唑[4, 5-f]-1,10-邻菲罗啉配体L¹~L³及其Ru(Ⅱ)配合物[Ru(L¹)₃]、[Ru(L²)₃]和[Ru(L³)₃],并进行了表征。这些Ru(Ⅱ)配合物在溶液中具有π→π^*跃迁吸收峰和金属到配体的电荷转移跃迁(MLCT)吸收峰,其发光峰位约为590 nm左右。将Ru(Ⅱ)配合物掺杂到聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)中得到相应的温敏漆。Ru(Ⅱ)配合物在PMMA膜中的吸收峰精细结构消失,且在长波方向663 nm附近有新的发射峰,表明Ru(Ⅱ)配合物在PMMA膜中有聚集。温度升高后,Ru(Ⅱ)配合物在PMMA膜中的发射峰强度逐渐减弱。分别计算了在30~60 ℃和60~90 ℃区间内非辐射活化能E_nr和温度灵敏度S_T。结果表明,具有苯基取代的咪唑[4, 5-f]-1,10-邻菲罗啉配体的[Ru(L¹)₃]配合物,比咪唑[4, 5-f]-1,10-邻菲罗啉Ru(Ⅱ)配合物[Ru(L²)₃]及烷基取代基的咪唑[4, 5-f]-1,10-邻菲罗啉Ru(Ⅱ)配合物[Ru(L³)₃]具有更高的温度灵敏度。     

金纳米团簇在盐酸和十二硫醇刻蚀作用下的原位生长动力学研究

了解金属纳米团簇的形成机制对于进一步发展其化学制备方法是必要的。我们利用盐酸(HCl)和十二硫醇(RSH)共同刻蚀L₃ (L₃: 1, 3-双二苯基膦丙烷)包覆的多分散性的Au_n (15 ≤ n ≤ 60)团簇成功制备出单分散性的Au₁₃(L₃)₂(SR)₄Cl₄纳米团簇,并结合原位同步辐射X射线吸收谱、原位真空紫外-可见吸收光谱和质谱技术,研究了Au₁₃(L₃)₂(SR)₄Cl₄纳米团簇的动力学形成过程。结果表明,Au团簇从多分散到单分散的转变经历了3个明显不同的动力学步骤。首先,尺寸较大的多分散金属团簇Au_n主要在HCl刻蚀作用下,形成尺寸较小的亚稳的中间产物Au₈–Au₁₁团簇。然后,这些中间产物与反应溶液中已有的Au(Ⅰ)-Cl物种反应,并与SR发生部分配体交换,逐渐长大为由SR和L₃保护的Au₁₃团簇。最后,形成的Au₁₃团簇经过一个较缓慢的结构重组过程,最终形成稳定的Au₁₃(L₃)₂(SR)₄Cl₄的纳米团簇。     

Synthesis, structure and properties of ruthenium(II) complexes with quinolinedione derivatives as chelate ligands: Crystal structure of [Ru(CO)2Cl2(6-methoxybenzo[g]quinoline-5,10-dione)]

The reaction of the dimer complex [{Ru(CO)₃Cl₂}₂] with the ligands 4,6-dichloroquinoline-5,8-dione and 6-methoxybenzo[g]quinoline-5,10-dione in ethanol solution led to the neutral mononuclear complexes of general formula [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂(κ²-quinolinedione-N,O)]. The complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and RMN spectroscopy, and the molecular structure of [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂(6-methoxybenzo[g]quinoline-5,10-dione)] was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The redox chemistry of ligands and complexes was investigated by cyclic voltammetry, and their potential antitumor activity was also evaluated.     

Preparation,Characterization, Luminescent and Electrochemical Properties of Ru(bpy)2-functionalized Silica Nanoparticles

Ru(II)-complex functionalized silica nanoparticles(nano-SiO₂) were prepared via a coordination reaction of cis-dichlorobis(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium[Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] complex with poly(4-vinylpyridine)(P4VP)-modified nano-SiO₂ particles. Both the Ru-complex and the functionalized nano-SiO₂P4VP-Ru(bpy) hybrids were doped in poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) to form optically transparent thin films. The composition and spectroscopic properties of the nano-SiO₂P4VP-Ru(bpy) hybrids were evaluated with the help of thermogravimetric and elemental analysis, and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Microscopy images revealed that the nanohybrids were approximately 12 nm in diameter and readily formed aggregates following the functionalization with P4VP and Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂. The as-prepared nano-SiO₂P4VP-Ru(bpy) hybrids produced emissions at approximately 604 and 654 nm under radiation both in solution and in doped thin films. Finally, cyclic voltammetry studies on the nanohybrid-modified electrode revealed a redox couple with the cathodic and anodic potentials at approximately 0.28 and 0.73 V(vs. Ag/AgCl), attributed to the one electron transfer of Ru(bpy)₂^2+/3+ immobilized on the nano-SiO₂ particles.     

New rhodium---ruthenium heterobimetallic complexes with bridging bi- or tri-dentate phosphine ligands

The mononuclear chelated complex [RuCl(Cp)(η²-dppa)] has been synthesised and reacted with [Rh₂Cl₂(CO)₄] to form the heterobimetallic complex [(Cp)Ru(μ-CO)₂{(μ-Ph₂PN(H)PPh₂}RhCl₂]. Complexes of [RuCl(Cp){(PPh₂)₂CHCH₂PPh₂}] have been reacted with [Rh₂Cl₂(CO)₄] or [RhCl(CO)₂(p-toluidene)]. Characterisation of these new ruthenium complexes was carried out using ³¹P-NMR, FAB mass spectroscopy, elemental analysis and IR spectrophotometry.     

Preparation and structure of a ruthenium dicarbonyl derivative of the P2N4S2 ring

The reaction of Ru(CO)₄(C₂H₄) or Ru(CO)₅ with 1,5-Ph₄P₂N₄S₂ in CH₂Cl₂/hexane at 23°C produces the dimer [Ru(CO)₂(Ph₄ P₂N₄S₂)]₂ (2), which was shown by X-ray crystallography to have a centrosymmetric structure in which the P₂N₄S₂ ring is attached to one ruthenium atom through two (geminal) nitrogen atoms and the remote sulfur atom and serves as a bridge to the other ruthenium atom via the second sulfur atom. Crystals of 2 ·2(CH₂Cl₂) are triclinic, space group P (No. 2), a = 12.901(1) Å, b = 13.072(1) Å, c = 10.123(1) Å, = 100.88(1)°, β = 98.90(1)°, γ = 67.50(1)°, V = 1542.4(3) Å, Z = 1 with final R and R_w values of 0.040 and 0.027, respectively.     

Interaction of antitumor drug Sn(CH3)2Cl2 with DNA and RNA

Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ exerts its antitumor activity in a specific way. Unlike anticancer cis-Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂ drug which binds strongly to the nitrogen atoms of DNA bases, Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ shows no major affinity towards base binding. Thus, the mechanism of action by which tinorganometallic compounds exert antitumor activity would be different from that of the cisplatin drug. The aim of this study was to examine the binding of Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ with calf thymus DNA and yeast RNA in aqueous solutions at pH 7.1–6.6 with constant concentrations of DNA and RNA and various molar ratios of Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂/DNA (phosphate) and Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂/RNA of 1/40, 1/20, 1/10, 1/5. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and UV–visible difference spectroscopic methods were used to determine the Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ binding mode, binding constant, sequence selectivity and structural variations of Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂/DNA and Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂/RNA complexes in aqueous solution. Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ hydrolyzes in water to give Sn(CH₃)₂(OH)₂ and [Sn(CH₃)₂(OH)(H₂O)_n]⁺ species. Spectroscopic evidence showed that interaction occurred mainly through (CH₃)₂Sn(IV) hydroxide and polynucleotide backbone phosphate group with overall binding constant of K(Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂–DNA)=1.47×10⁵ M⁻¹ and K(Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂–RNA)=7.33×10⁵ M⁻¹. Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂ induced no biopolymer conformational changes with DNA remaining in the B-family structure and RNA in A-conformation upon drug complexation.     

Monomeric ruthenium carbonyls containing 2-substituted pyrazines: From synthesis to catalytic activity in 1-hexene hydroformylation

Synthesis and catalytic properties of a series of ruthenium carbonyl complexes with 2-substituted pyrazine ligands (pz–R; R = Cl, OMe, SMe, CN, NH₂) have been studied. Reactions between the [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ and the pyrazines led mainly to mononuclear compounds of the type [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂(R–pz)]. All of these ruthenium pyrazine compounds showed activity in 1-hexene hydroformylation. With an exception of NH₂, addition of the substituent to the pyrazine ring was found to improve the catalytic activity compared to the unsubstituted pyrazine. The catalytic cycle was studied by computational DFT methods. The results suggest that the key step in the formation of the active species involves release of one of the carbonyl in the cis position with respect to the pyrazine ring.     

Electron transfer in organometallic clusters : XI. Redox chemistry of M3(CO)12(M = Ru, Os) and PPh3 derivatives; mechanism of catalysed nucleophilic substitution

The generality of a two-electron reduction process involving an mechanism has been established for M₃(CO)₁₂ and M₃(CO)₁₂−n(PPh₃)_n (M = Ru, Os) clusters in all solvents. Detailed coulometric and spectral studies in CH₂Cl₂ provide strong evidence for the formation of an ‘opened’ M₃(CO)₁₂²⁻ species the triangulo radical anions M₃(CO)₁₂^−· having a half-life of < 10⁻⁶ s in CH₂Cl₂. However, the electrochemical response is sensitive to the presence of water and is concentration dependent. An electrochemical response for “opened” M₃(CO)₁₂²⁻ is only detected at low concentrations < 5 × 10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³ and under drybox conditions. The electroactive species ground at higher concentrations and in the presence of water M₃(CO)₁₁²⁻ and M₆(CO)₁₈²⁻ were confirmed by a study of the electrochemistry of these anions in CH₂Cl₂; HM₃(CO)₁₁⁻ is not a product. The couple [M₆(CO)₁₈]^−/2− is chemically reversible under certain conditions but oxidation of HM₃(CO)₁₁⁻ is chemically irreversible. Different electrochemical behaviour for Ru₃(CO)₁₂ is found when [PPN][X] (X = OAc⁻, Cl⁻) salts are supporting electrolytes. In these solutions formation of the ultimate electroactive species [μ-C(O)XRu₃(CO)₁₀]⁻ at the electrode is stopped under CO or at low temperatures but Ru₃(CO)₁₂^−· is still trapped by reversible attack by X presumably as [η¹-C(O)XRu₃(CO)₁₁]⁻. It is shown that electrode-initiated electron catalysed substitution of M₃(CO)₁₂ only takes place on the electrochemical timescale when M = Ru, but it is slow, inefficient and non-selective, whereas BPK-initiated nucleophilic substitution of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ is only specific and fast in ether solvents particulary THF. Metal---metal bond cleavage is the most important influence on the rate and specificity of catalytic substitution by electron or [PPN]-initiation. The redox chemistry of M₃(CO)₁₂ clusters (M = Fe, Ru, Os) is a consequence of the relative rates of metal---metal bond dissociation, metal-metal bond strength and ligand dissociation and in many aspects resembles their photochemistry.     

Synthesis and properties of some diruthenium acetate compounds

The compound [Ru₂(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄(THF)₂]BF₄ (I) containing the Ru₂⁵⁺ unit was prepared by reaction of Ru₂Cl(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄ with AgBF₄ in THF. This compound, in contrast with Ru₂Cl(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄, is soluble in several polar organic solvents and reacts in THF with OPPh₃ and PPh₃ giving [Ru₂(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄(OPPh₃)₂]BF₄·CH₂Cl₂ (II) and [Ru(μ-O₂CCH₃)(O₂CCH₃)(PPh₃)]_n (III), respectively. The complex II has been also obtained as hexafluorophosphate [Ru₂(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄(OPPh₃₂]PF₆·CH₂Cl₂ (IV) by treatment of Ru₂Cl(μ-O₂CCH₃)₄ with an excess of NOPF₆ and PPh₃ in methanol. In this reaction the triphenylphosphine oxide is generated by oxidation of the triphenylphosphine.     

Stabilization and electron spin resonance characterization of Ru(bpy)3 and Ru(bpy)3 by radiolysis of Ru(bpy)3 adsorbed on silica gel

Ru(bpy)₃³⁺, which is important in artificial photosynthetic systems due to its high reduction potential, is stabilized together with its counter anion, Ru(bpy)₃⁺, by radiolysis of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ adsorbed on silica gel at 77 K. Both species are characterized by electron spin resonance.