Optimised accelerated solvent extraction of PCBs and PAHs from compost

This study is the first thorough method optimisation for accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from chemically dried compost. For PCBs, optimised solvent composition, temperature, pressure, number of static cycles, duration, and flush volume were as follows: toluene/acetone 1?:?3 (v/v), 120°C, 2000?psi, 3?×?5?min, and 50%, respectively. Limits of quantification and method precision were between 0.16 and 2.46?µg?kg^?1 dw and 6–17% respectively for individual PCBs. Absolute recoveries of isotope-labelled extraction standards used for each of the analytes ranged from 65 to 105% and relative recoveries were between 85 and 99%. The method proofed to be robust and was successfully applied to different compost samples.

The optimisation of PAHs extraction was performed and resulted in the following conditions: solvent: hexane/acetone 1/3 (v:v), temperature: 140°C, pressure: 1500?psi, extraction time: 3?×?5?min, and 50% flush volume. Limits of detection and method precision for individual PAHs were between 1.1 and 37.2?µg?kg^?1?dw and 12–34% respectively. Absolute and relative recoveries ranged from 24 to 68% and from 85 to 99%, respectively. Optimal extraction conditions for PAHs were more difficult to determine due to the inhomogeneous distribution of PAHs in samples. However, the method appeared to be feasible and suggestions for further improvements are presented.     

A cost effective,sensitive, and environmentally friendly sample preparation method for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in solid samples

A simple, cost effective, and yet sensitive sample preparation technique was investigated for determining Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in solid samples. The method comprises ultrasonic extraction, Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE), and thermal desorption–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to increase analytical capacity in laboratories. This method required no clean-up, satisfied PAHs recovery, and significantly advances cost performance over conventional extraction methods, such as Soxhlet and Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE). This study evaluated three operational parameters for ultrasonic extraction: solvent composition, extraction time, and sample load. A standard material, SRM 1649 a (urban dust), was used as the solid sample matrix, and 12 priority PAHs on the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) list were analyzed. Combination of non-polar and polar solvents ameliorated extraction efficiency. Acetone/hexane mixtures of 2:3 and 1:1 (v/v) gave the most satisfactory results: recoveries ranged from 63.3% to 122%. Single composition solvents (methanol, hexane, and dichloromethane) showed fewer recoveries. Comparing 20 min with 60 min sonication, longer sonication diminished extraction efficiencies in general. Furthermore, sample load became a critical factor in certain solvent systems, particularly MeOH. MAE was also compared to the ultrasonic extraction, and results determined that the 20-min ultrasonic extraction using acetone/hexane (2:3, v/v) was as potent as MAE. The SBSE method using 20 mL of 30% alcohol-fortified solution rendered a limit of detection ranging from 1.7 to 32 ng L⁻¹ and a limit of quantitation ranging from 5.8 to 110 ng L⁻¹ for the 16 US EPA PAHs.     

Extraction optimization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and their determination by HPLC

A sensitive method for the extraction and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (AA-DLLME) and HPLC was developed. The extraction procedure was based on alcoholic solvents for both extraction and dispersive solvents. The effective parameters (type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, amount of salt and stirring time) on the extraction recovery were studied and optimized utilizing factorial design (FD) and central composite design (CCD). The best recovery was achieved by FD using 2-ethyl-1-hexanol as the extraction solvent and methanol as the dispersive solvent. The results showed that volume of dispersive solvent and stirring time had no effect on the recovery of PAHs. The optimized conditions were 145 μL of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol as the extraction solvent and 4.2% w/v of salt (NaCl) in sample solution. The enrichment factors of PAHs were in the range of 310-325 with limits of detection of 0.002-0.8 ng/mL. The linearity was 0.01-800 ng/mL for different PAHs. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for intra- and inter-day of extraction of PAHs were in the range of 1.7-7.0 and 5.6-7.3, respectively, for five measurements. The method was also successfully applied for the determination of PAHs in environmental water samples.     

快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法分析海洋沉积物中16种多环芳烃

建立了快速溶剂萃取（ASE）-气相色谱-串联质谱（GC-MS/MS）分析海洋沉积物中16种多环芳烃（PAHs）的分析方法。样品由正己烷-丙酮（1∶1,v/v）溶液萃取,经无水硫酸钠脱水、氮吹浓缩后,采用硅胶固相萃取小柱进行净化,然后经HP-5MS色谱柱（30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm）分离,在电子轰击电离源下以多反应监测（MRM）模式进行检测,内标法定量。分析结果表明,16种PAHs在0.01~1.00 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数（R）大于0.997;目标物的加标回收率为75.8%~97.8%;日内与日间精密度（RSD）均小于10%。当取样量为20.0 g时,16种PAHs的方法检出限为0.048~0.234 μg/kg。该法快速、准确、稳定,能够满足海洋沉积物中痕量PAHs的测定。     

在线固相萃取-液相色谱法直接测定水中超痕量多环芳烃

建立了在线固相萃取-液相色谱直接测定水体中16种超痕量多环芳烃（PAHs）的方法。水样经高速离心后，加入适量甲醇，配制成40%（体积分数）甲醇水溶液，直接进样2 mL至在线固相萃取流路，进行萃取富集，再通过阀切换将洗脱的PAHs转移至分析流路进行分离检测。16种PAHs在各自范围内线性关系良好，相关系数均大于0.996；方法的检出限为0.14~12.50 ng/L，其中苯并[a]芘（B（a）P）的检出限为0.38 ng/L。实际水样在10、40和200 ng/L加标水平下的加标回收率为76.1%~134.9%，RSD为0.3%~16.6%。B（a）P在1 ng/L加标水平下的回收率为71.8%~92.7%，RSD为3.9%。结果表明，该方法操作简单，灵敏度高，溶剂消耗量少，可满足水样中PAHs，尤其是B（a）P的超痕量分析要求。     

Continuous Pressurized Solvent Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons From Biosolids. Assessment of Their Lability in Soils Amended with Biosolids

An extraction method of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from biosolids, based on continuous pressurized solvent extraction (PSE), was developed and optimized through an experimental design and followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination. From multivariate analysis, the optimum values for extraction variables were: extraction temperature, 110°C and dynamic extraction time, 42 min, by using a mixture of dichloromethane and acetone (1:1, v/v) as the extraction solvent at a flow rate of 1 ml min^?1. Under optimum extraction conditions, the detection limits for the analytes were between 0.01 and 0.14 mg kg^?1 with recoveries of between 50 and 126%, which were determined by analysis of certified reference material (Sewage Sludge PAH, LGC6182). The method was applied to assess the lability of PAHs in soils amended with biosolids. It was confirmed that a fraction of these compounds undergoes strong retention in the soil, probably due to interaction with humin material. On the other hand, the amount of PAHs extracted was significantly lower after the 30-day incubation process, which is clearly exacerbated in PAHs with molecular weight lower than 228. This effect observed in the four soils under study can be attributed to degradation of these compounds by soil and biosolid microorganisms.     

A Simple Extraction Method for Determination of High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

A simplified extraction method was developed for extracting high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from river sediments. The samples were extracted 3 times with 5 mL of solvent (toluene:methanol, 9 : 1, v/v) at 100 °C, 10 minutes for each extraction. After clean‐up and concentration, extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer (GC‐MS). The extraction efficiency and accuracy was evaluated by the standard reference material (SRM‐1941b). Comparing to certified values, the average recoveries of high molecular weight PAHs with 3, 4, 5 and 6 fused benzene rings were 72.9∼113.2 % (R.S.D. 2.3∼6.3 %) except those of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (206.2±4.6 %). The average recoveries for PAHs spiked sediment samples were comparable with accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and Soxhlet methods. The simple extraction method consumes less solvent, fewer amount of sample than those of conventional methods. The lowest quantitation limit of PAHs is 1.1 μg/kg.     

加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-质谱测定海洋沉积物中的痕量多环芳烃

沉积物是多环芳烃(polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,PAHs)在环境中迁移归趋的一个重要的汇[1]。沉积物中多环芳烃的提取方法主要有索氏提取、超声波提取、微波萃取、加速溶剂提取及超临界流体萃取等。其中加速溶剂提取(accelerated solvent extraction,ASE)由于提取速度快,溶     

加速溶剂萃取-磁固相萃取净化-气相色谱-质谱法测定土壤中16种多环芳烃和23种有机氯残留

建立了加速溶剂萃取（ASE）、磁固相萃取净化（MSPE）、气相色谱-质谱（GC-MS）测定土壤中多环芳烃和有机氯残留的方法。ASE萃取溶剂为丙酮-正己烷（1：1，v/v），萃取温度为100℃，萃取压力为11.032 MPa，加热时间为5 min，静态萃取时间为5 min，循环萃取3次，冲洗体积为60%萃取池体积，氮气吹扫100 s。然后采用室温制备法自制ZIF-8/nZVI磁性材料用于净化萃取液，将净化液浓缩定容后进行GC-MS测定。多环芳烃和有机氯的线性范围为5~200 μg/kg，线性相关系数（r²）均大于0.99；目标物的检出限（LOD，S/N=3）为0.04~1.21 μg/kg。所建方法成功用于土壤样品中16种多环芳烃和23种有机氯的测定，在3个加标水平下得到的加标回收率为63.9%~112.1%，相对标准偏差（RSD）为0.4%~26.2%。研究结果表明，该方法具有灵敏度高、重现性好、回收率高等特点，适用于土壤中多环芳烃和有机氯残留的检测。     

微波萃取-GC/MS联用法测定橡胶及其制品中多环芳烃

建立了微波萃取-GC/MS联用法测定橡胶及其制品中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的方法,通过实验优化了萃取溶剂、萃取时间、萃取温度等微波萃取条件和16种PAHs的分离和测定条件。用加标回收方法试验确定方法的准确度。结果表明:16种PAHs检出限(S/N=5)为0.002~0.01 mg/L,平均回收率为63.58%~100.5%,RSD为1.9%~9.9%。该方法可以满足橡胶及其制品中多环芳烃的检测要求。     

Solid-Phase Extraction and LC with Fluorescence Detection for Analysis of PAHs in Rainwater

The efficiency of extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from rainwater by solid-phase extraction (SPE) with three different types of cartridge, and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, are discussed in this paper. Three cartridges were investigated but only one was suitable. After equilibration in a desiccator for 65–80 h or in ambient air for 90–100 h the SPE cartridges were activated with 5 mL dichloromethane then 5 mL 2-propanol. The volume of sample passed through the cartridges was 50 mL; after loading of the sample the cartridges were dried under vacuum for approximately 20 min by application of a pressure of 15 mbar to the SPE manifold. The PAHs were eluted with 5 mL dichloromethane–hexane, 50:50 (v/v). The flow rate used for conditioning, sample loading, and elution was 2.5 mL min⁻¹, achieved by application of a pressure of 6 mbar. For analysis of PAHs in rainwater, recovery was between 67 and 99%, the relative standard deviation varied between 2 and 5%, and the detection limits of the method were less than 16.9 ng L⁻¹ for several PAHs. These optimum conditions were used for analysis of rainwater collected between June 2002 and May 2003 at two sites in Alsace (eastern France) and 17 PAHs were quantitatively determined. Concentrations varied between 1.6 and 968.1 ng L⁻¹.     

Improved ultrasonic extraction procedure for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments

The aim of this work was to optimize an ultrasonic extraction procedure for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments and to compare it with the reflux procedure using methanolic potassium hydroxide. Sample extracts were purified with a miniaturized silica gel chromatographic column and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Ultrasonication using n-hexane-acetone (1:1, v/v) solvent mixture on dried homogenized marine sediment gave better precision (smaller relative standard deviation (RSD) values) and comparable quantities of individual PAH's compared to the reflux procedure. Ultrasonication with the n-hexane-acetone (1:1, v/v) mixture, utilizing four 15 min extraction cycles, was found to be sufficient for extracting PAHs from wet sediments. The optimized ultrasonic extraction procedure extracted aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons from the National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM 1941a with recoveries greater than 90%. The major advantages of ultrasonication compared to the reflux method are the lower extraction times, simplicity of the apparatus and extraction procedure. The optimized ultrasonication procedure has been used in our laboratory to extract hydrocarbons from naturally wet sediments from rivers, and coastal and marine areas.     

Headspace single drop microextraction combined with HPLC for the determination of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental samples

A new method by combining headspace single drop microextraction (HS-SDME) with HPLC fluorescence detection for the determination of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental samples was developed. Aqueous solution of saturated beta-cyclodextrin was used as extraction solvent and five PAHs were employed as target analytes. The factors affecting the extraction efficiency were studied in detail and the optimal extraction conditions were established. Beta-cyclodextrin was found to play two important roles, one is the improvement of extraction efficiency of target analytes and the other is the enhancement of their fluorescence intensities in HPLC fluorescence detection. The detection limits for the target analytes were found to be in the range of 0.004-0.247ng/ml and the relative standard deviations (R.S.D.s) of 5.1-7.1% were obtained. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of trace PAHs in environmental samples with satisfactory results.     

固相萃取搅拌棒萃取-气相色谱分析海水中的多环芳烃

利用固相萃取搅拌棒（SBSE）萃取海水中的多环芳烃，然后用热解吸脱附-气相色谱分析。研究了萃取时间、添加NaCl浓度对萃取效率的影响。实验结果表明，SBSE方法对16种多环芳烃的萃取回收率分别在33．5％～122．4％之间；对标准样品的检出限为2．74-13．5ng／L；方法RSD为3．8％～13．1％。用此方法测定了大连海岸海水中的多环芳烃含量。     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments using a new ASE-SFE extraction technique

In order to determine PAHs in marine sediment samples by GC/MS(SIM) a new extraction approach of ASE-SFE was evaluated using combined accelerated solvent extraction (ASE, dynamic and static mode) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE, dynamic mode) without further purification of the sample. The solvents used for ASE-SFE were methylene chloride and carbon dioxide. The recovery data, precision and accuracy of the whole method were evaluated statistically. The average recoveries of PAHs, based on deuterated internal standards were 77% for 2-3-ring PAHs, 85% for 4-ring PAHs, 88% for 5-ring PAHs and 97% for 6-ring PAHs. The extraction time required for the ASE-SFE technique was 30 min, which is longer than in the case of independent use of ASE and shorter compared to SFE. ASE-SFE recoveries of PAHs from SRM marine sediment are comparable for (2-3-ring, 4-ring PAHs) or higher (5-ring, 6-ring PAHs) than reported for the conventional extraction methods of ASE and SFE. Method detection limits of (MDL) were statistically estimated. MDL values obtained for 15 PAHs compounds vary between 0.06 ngg(-1) and 3.54 ngg(-1).     

苯基修饰二氧化硅纳米片纤维的制备及其对多环芳烃的固相微萃取

采用水热处理和溶胶-凝胶法在镍钛合金（NiTi）纤维表面组装了二氧化硅纳米片（SiO₂NFs）,成功制备了新型SiO₂纤维涂层,并用苯基三氯硅烷进行了自组装表面修饰,得到了可用于固相微萃取（SPME）的NiO/TiO₂@SiO₂NFs-Ph纤维。将制备的SPME纤维与高效液相色谱联用,通过对典型芳香化合物的分析评价了所制备纤维的萃取性能。该纤维对多环芳烃（PAHs）具有较高的萃取率和良好的萃取选择性。实验优化了pH值、搅拌速率、萃取温度、萃取时间和离子强度对PAHs萃取率的影响。在优化条件下,5种PAHs在各自的范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数（r）大于0.999,检出限为0.013~0.108 μg/L。使用单根纤维对含有50 μg/L PAHs的加标水样进行萃取,其含量的日内及日间RSD分别为4.1%~5.9%和4.8%~6.8%。实际环境水样中5种PAHs在10 μg/L和30 μg/L加标水平下的加标回收率分别为90.8%~105.7%和93.6%~103.1%。该法制备的NiO/TiO₂@SiO₂NFs-Ph纤维稳定性高、制备重现性好,适用于环境水样中目标PAHs的富集和测定。     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments using a new ASE-SFE extraction technique

In order to determine PAHs in marine sediment samples by GC/MS(SIM) a new extraction approach of ASE-SFE was evaluated using combined accelerated solvent extraction (ASE, dynamic and static mode) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE, dynamic mode) without further purification of the sample. The solvents used for ASE-SFE were methylene chloride and carbon dioxide. The recovery data, precision and accuracy of the whole method were evaluated statistically. The average recoveries of PAHs, based on deuterated internal standards were 77% for 2–3-ring PAHs, 85% for 4-ring PAHs, 88% for ¶5-ring PAHs and 97% for 6-ring PAHs. The extraction time required for the ASE-SFE technique was 30 min, which is longer than in the case of independent use of ASE and shorter compared to SFE. ASE-SFE recoveries of PAHs from SRM marine sediment are comparable for (2–3-ring, 4-ring PAHs) or higher (5-ring, 6-ring PAHs) than reported for the conventional extraction methods of ASE and SFE. Method detection limits of (MDL) were statistically estimated. MDL values obtained for 15 PAHs compounds vary between 0.06 ngg^?1 and 3.54 ngg^?1.     

石墨烯固相萃取测定水中稠环芳烃

建立了石墨烯固相萃取柱萃取和高效液相色谱法检测8种稠环芳烃的方法。采用紫外检测器进行定性和定量分析。对包括吸附剂的种类、洗脱剂的种类和用量、样品溶液的pH和样品体积等实验参数进行了详细优化。在优化条件下,8种稠环芳烃在0.0200～150μg/L浓度范围内与峰面积呈良好的线性关系,相关系数为0.990～0.996。信噪比为3时,稠环芳烃的检出限为0.0020～0.080μg/L。方法的精密度为1.30%～4.65%。将该方法用于环境水样分析,回收率为82.50%～106.5%。     

超声提取-气相色谱-质谱法测定本草香中16种颗粒态多环芳烃含量及其排放特征分析

本草香颗粒态多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析对探究人体健康和环境安全的影响具有重要意义,但目前相关研究主要针对竹签香,对于配方更为复杂、日常使用更为频繁的本草香颗粒态PAHs定量分析研究十分有限且缺少针对性。为了研究本草香颗粒态PAHs的排放因子和排放特征,在自制的试验舱内采集5种本草香燃烧后的颗粒物,通过优化萃取溶剂、超声时间和仪器分析条件,建立了超声提取-气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)测定本草香燃烧后颗粒物上所吸附的16种PAHs的方法。通过采集0.8 g样品,切取整片滤膜样品,使用正己烷-二氯甲烷(1∶1, v/v)进行超声萃取,经浓缩定容过滤后使用气相色谱-质谱分析,内标法定量。结果表明,16种PAHs在0.1~5.0 μg/mL范围内线性良好(相关系数r²>0.998),方法检出限(MDL)为0.4~3.8 ng/g;低、高2个水平的加标回收率分别为77.4%~99.5%和82.0%~101.3%;相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.7%~7.2%。5种本草香颗粒态PAHs的排放因子为4.60~11.89 μg/g。本草香的16种颗粒态PAHs中菲(Phe)的含量均为最高,所占比例为24.85%~42.59%,其次为荧蒽(Flu)、芘(Pyr)、 \stackrel{艹}{屈} (Chr)、蒽(Ant)。本草香颗粒态PAHs中Phe的含量稳定且占比明显高于其他室内燃烧源,可将Phe作为本草香的颗粒态特征PAHs。颗粒态PAHs主要分布在3环和4环上,3环和4环PAHs占比之和为83.84%~96.31%。颗粒态的Phe/Flu比值可作为辨别不同室内燃烧源中燃香释放源的特征比值。该方法所需样品量少,灵敏度高,前处理操作简便,适用于燃香类产品中PAHs的快速检测,同时为了解本草香颗粒态PAHs分布规律和健康危害提供科学数据。     

Flocculation-ultrasonic assisted extraction and solid phase clean-up for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water rich in colloidal particulate with high performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet-fluorescence detection

In the present work, a simple method of sample preparation for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water rich in colloidal particulate was developed. The technique was mainly based on the effect of the flocculation of aluminum sulfate and the adsorption of the flocculation aid florisil. The method contained three steps: flocculation, ultrasonic extraction, and solid-phase extraction cleanup. Major parameters of the procedure were optimized with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation and ultraviolet-fluorescence detection. When 250 mL model sample containing 16 EPA PAHs was processed, the developed method provided detection limits in the range of 0.02–5 ng/L. Both spiked and non-spiked polluted river water samples rich in suspended particles and organic matters were analyzed. Recoveries and relative standard deviations for the 16 PAHs were in ranges of 86–94% and 3–13% (n = 5), respectively.