On the planarity of jump graphs

For a graph G of size m1 and edge-induced subgraphs F and H of size k (1km), the subgraph H is said to be obtained from F by an edge jump if there exist four distinct vertices u,v,w, and x in G such that uvE(F), wxE(G)−E(F), and H=F−uv+wx. The minimum number of edge jumps required to transform F into H is the k-jump distance from F to H. For a graph G of size m1 and an integer k with 1km, the k-jump graph J_k(G) is that graph whose vertices correspond to the edge-induced subgraphs of size k of G and where two vertices of J_k(G) are adjacent if and only if the k-jump distance between the corresponding subgraphs is 1. All connected graphs G for which J₂(G) is planar are determined.     

Covering and independence in triangle structures

Let G be a graph in which each edge is contained in at least one triangle (complete subgraph on three vertices). We investigate relationships between the smallest cardinality of an edge set containing at least i edges of each triangle and the largest cardinality of an edge set containing at most j edges of each triangle (i, j ε {1,2}), and also compare those invariants with the numbers of vertices and edges in G. Several open problems are raised in the concluding section.     

Wings and perfect graphs

An edge uv of a graph G is called a wing if there exists a chordless path with vertices u, v, x, y and edges uv, vx, xy. The wing-graph W(G) of a graph G is a graph having the same vertex set as G; uv is an edge in W(G) if and only if uv is a wing in G. A graph G is saturated if G is isomorphic to W(G). A star-cutset in a graph G is a non-empty set of vertices such that G — C is disconnected and some vertex in C is adjacent to all the remaining vertices in C. V. Chvátal proposed to call a graph unbreakable if neither G nor its complement contain a star-cutset. We establish several properties of unbreakable graphs using the notions of wings and saturation. In particular, we obtain seven equivalent versions of the Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture.     

The chromatic difference sequence of the Cartesian product of graphs

The chromatic difference sequence cds(G) of a graph G with chromatic number n is defined by cds(G) = (a(1), a(2),…, a(n)) if the sum of a(1), a(2),…, a(t) is the maximum number of vertices in an induced t-colorable subgraph of G for t = 1, 2,…, n. The Cartesian product of two graphs G and H, denoted by G□H, has the vertex set V(G□H = V(G) x V(H) and its edge set is given by (x₁, y₁)(x₂, y₂) ε E(G□H) if either x₁ = x₂ and y₁ y₂ ε E(H) or y₁ = y₂ and x₁x₂ ε E(G).

We obtained four main results: the cds of the product of bipartite graphs, the cds of the product of graphs with cds being nondrop flat and first-drop flat, the non-increasing theorem for powers of graphs and cds of powers of circulant graphs.     

Minimal configuration trees

A graph is singular of nullity η if zero is an eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix with multiplicity η. If η(G)=1, then the core of G is the subgraph induced by the vertices associated with the non-zero entries of the zero-eigenvector. A connected subgraph of G with the least number of vertices and edges, that has nullity one and the same core as G, is called a minimal configuration. A subdivision of a graph G is obtained by inserting a vertex on every edge of G. We review various properties of minimal configurations. In particular, we show that a minimal configuration is a tree if and only if it is a subdivision of some other tree.     

Random packing by ρ-connected ρ-regular graphs

A graph G is packable by the graph F if its edges can be partitioned into copies of F. If deleting the edges of any F-packable subgraph from G leaves an F-packable graph, then G is randomly F-packable. If G is F-packable but not randomly F-packable then G is F-forbidden. The minimal F-forbidden graphs provide a characterization of randomly F-packable graphs. We show that for each ρ-connected ρ-regular graph F with ρ > 1, there is a set (F) of minimal F-forbidden graphs of a simple form, such that any other minimal F-forbidden graph can be obtained from a graph in (F) by a process of identifying vertices and removing copies of F. When F is a connected strongly edge-transitive graph having more than one edge (such as a cycle or hypercube), there is only one graph in (F).     

All trees are 1-embeddable and all except stars are 2-embeddable

A graph G with n vertices is said to be embeddable (in its complement) if there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))=. It is known that all trees T with n (≥2) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are embeddable. We say that G is 1-embeddable if, for every edge e, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e};and that it is 2-embeddable if,for every pair e₁, e₂ of edges, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e₁, e₂}. We prove here that all trees with n (3) vertices are 1-embeddable; and that all trees T with n (4) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are 2-embeddable. In a certain sense, this result is sharp.     

On the minor-minimal 2-connected graphs having a fixed minor

Let H be a graph with κ₁ components and κ₂ blocks, and let G be a minor-minimal 2-connected graph having H as a minor. This paper proves that |E(G)|−|E(H)|(κ₁−1)+β(κ₂−1) for all (,β) such that +β5,2+5β20, and β3. Moreover, if one of the last three inequalities fails, then there are graphs G and H for which the first inequality fails.     

ContributionsUpper domination and upper irredundance perfect graphs

Let β(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number, respectively. A graph G is calledΓ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. A graph G is called IR-perfect if Γ(H) = IR(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. In this paper, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of a family of forbidden induced subgraphs, and show that the class of Γ-perfect graphs is a subclass of IR-perfect graphs and that the class of absorbantly perfect graphs is a subclass of Γ-perfect graphs. These results imply a number of known theorems on Γ-perfect graphs and IR-perfect graphs. Moreover, we prove a sufficient condition for a graph to be Γ-perfect and IR-perfect which improves a known analogous result.     

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of a graph

Let G be a finite undirected graph with no loops or multiple edges. We define the Laplacian matrix of G,Δ(G)by Δ_ij= degree of vertex i and Δ_ij-1 if there is an edge between vertex i and vertex j. In this paper we relate the structure of the graph G to the eigenvalues of A(G): in particular we prove that all the eigenvalues of Δ(G) are non-negative, less than or equal to the number of vertices, and less than or equal to twice the maximum vertex degree. Precise conditions for equality are given.     

Bounds on the number of isolates in sum graph labeling

A simple undirected graph H is called a sum graph if there is a labeling L of the vertices of H into distinct positive integers such that any two vertices u and v of H are adjacent if and only if there is a vertex w with label L(w)=L(u)+L(v). The sum number σ(G) of a graph G=(V,E) is the least integer r such that the graph H consisting of G and r isolated vertices is a sum graph. It is clear that σ(G)|E|. In this paper, we discuss general upper and lower bounds on the sum number. In particular, we prove that, over all graphs G=(V,E) with fixed |V|3 and |E|, the average of σ(G) is at least

Full-size image

. In other words, for most graphs, σ(G)Ω(|E|).     

Some results on integral sum graphs

Let Z denote the set of all integers. The integral sum graph of a finite subset S of Z is the graph (S,E) with vertex set S and edge set E such that for u,vS, uvE if and only if u+vS. A graph G is called an integral sum graph if it is isomorphic to the integral sum graph of some finite subset S of Z. The integral sum number of a given graph G, denoted by ζ(G), is the smallest number of isolated vertices which when added to G result in an integral sum graph. Let x denote the least integer not less than the real x. In this paper, we (i) determine the value of ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) for r2n/3−1, (ii) obtain a lower bound for ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) when 2r<2n/3−1 and n5, showing by construction that the bound is sharp when r=2, and (iii) determine the value of ζ(K_r,r) for r2. These results provide partial solutions to two problems posed by Harary (Discrete Math. 124 (1994) 101–108). Finally, we furnish a counterexample to a result on the sum number of K_r,s given by Hartsfiedl and Smyth (Graphs and Matrices, R. Rees (Ed.), Marcel, Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 205–211).     

Odd subgraphs and matchings

Let G be a graph and f : V(G)→{1,3,5,…}. Then a subgraph H of G is called a (1,f)-odd subgraph if deg_H(x){1,3,…,f(x)} for all xV(H). If f(x)=1 for all xV(G), then a (1,f)-odd subgraph is nothing but a matching. A (1,f)-odd subgraph H of G is said to be maximum if G has no (1,f)-odd subgraph K such that |K|>|H|. We show that (1,f)-odd subgraphs have some properties similar to those of matchings, in particular, we give a formula for the order of a maximum (1,f)-odd subgraph, which is similar to that for the order of a maximum matching.     

Harary's conjectures on integral sum graphs

Let N denote the set of positive integers and Z denote all integers. The (integral) sum graph of a finite subset S N(Z) is the graph (S, E) with uv ε E if and only if u + v ε S. A graph G is said to be an (integral) sum graph if it is isomorphic to the (integral) sum graph of some S N(Z). The (integral) sum number of a given graph G is the smallest number of isolated nodes which when added to G result in an (integral) sum graph.

We show that the integral sum number of a complete graph with n 4 nodes equals 2n − 3, which proves a conjecture of Harary. And we disprove another conjecture of Harary by showing that there are infinitely many trees which are not caterpillars but are integral sum graphs.     

The coordinate representation of a graph and n-universal graph of radius 1

Every graph can be represented as the intersection graph on a family of closed unit cubes in Euclidean space Eⁿ. Cube vertices have integer coordinates. The coordinate matrix, A(G)={v_nk} of a graph G is defined by the set of cube coordinates. The imbedded dimension of a graph, Bp(G), is a number of columns in matrix A(G) such that each of them has at least two distinct elements v_nk≠v_pk. We show that Bp(G)=cub(G) for some graphs, and Bp(G)n−2 for any graph G on n vertices. The coordinate matrix uses to obtain the graph U of radius 1 with 3ⁿ⁻² vertices that contains as an induced subgraph a copy of any graph on n vertices.     

Nonchordal positive semidefinite stochastic matrices

Let K_nbe the convex set of n×npositive semidefinite doubly stochastic matrices. If Aε k_n, the graph of A,G(A), is the graph on n vertices with (i,j) an edge if a_ij ≠ 0i≠ j. We are concerned with the extreme points in K_n. In many cases, the rank of Aand G(A) are enough to determine whether A is extreme in K_n. This is true, in particular, if G(A)is a special kind of nonchordal graph, i.e., if no two cycles in G(A)have a common edge.     

Stable graphs for a family of endomorphisms

We prove several fixed subgraph properties. In particular it is shown that if is a commuting family of contractions of a connected graph G without infinite path and infinite interval, then there exists a nonempty finite subgraph F which is invariant under any element of . In particular this subgraph F is a simplex if G is moreover a strongly dismantlable graph or a ball-Helly graph without infinite block, or if it is chordal. This implies that for any commuting family of contractions of a tree without infinite path, there is a common fixed vertex or a common fixed edge.     

Some results on characterizing the edges of connected graphs with a given domination number

A dominating set for a graph G = (V, E) is a subset of vertices V′ V such that for all v ε V − V′ there exists some u ε V′ for which {v, u} ε E. The domination number of G is the size of its smallest dominating set(s). For a given graph G with minimum size dominating set D, let m₁ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have neither endpoint in D, and let m₂ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have at least one endpoint in D. We characterize the possible values that the pair (m₁ (G, D), m₂ (G, D)) can attain for connected graphs having a given domination number.     

Graph rigidity via Euclidean distance matrices

Let G=(V,E,ω) be an incomplete graph with node set V, edge set E, and nonnegative weights ω_ij's on the edges. Let each edge (v_i,v_j) be viewed as a rigid bar, of length ω_ij, which can rotate freely around its end nodes. A realization of a graph G is an assignment of coordinates, in some Euclidean space, to each node of G. In this paper, we consider the problem of determining whether or not a given realization of a graph G is rigid. We show that each realization of G can be epresented as a point in a compact convex set ; and that a generic realization of G is rigid if and only if its corresponding point is a vertex of Ω, i.e., an extreme point with full-dimensional normal cone.     

A Helly theorem for geodesic convexity in strongly dismantlable graphs

A (finite or infinite) graph G is strongly dismantlable if its vertices can be linearly ordered x₀,…, x so that, for each ordinal β < , there exists a strictly increasing finite sequence (i_j)_{0 j n} of ordinals such that i₀ = β, i_n = and x_ij+1 is adjacent with x_ij and with all neighbors of x_ij in the subgraph ofG induced by {x_y: β γ }. We show that the Helly number for the geodesic convexity of such a graph equals its clique number. This generalizes a result of Bandelt and Mulder (1990) for dismantlable graphs. We also get an analogous equality dealing with infinite families of convex sets.