关于TOPSIS法应用中的逆序问题及消除的方法

在多指标决策问题中,TOPSIS法是一种常用的方法,然而传统的TOPSIS法在实际应用中容易产生逆序的现象.本文分析了逆序产生的主要原因,并提出了一种改进的方法-RTOPSIS法.应用本文的方法不仅能消除逆序的现象,而且还能正确反映指标权重对决策结果的影响.     

两两比较的TOPSIS法

TOPSIS法是一种常用的多目标决策方法,它以正负理想解作为统一的参照基准来比较方案的优劣.并不适用于常见的两两比较的决策行为.运用最小二乘法解决判别一致性问题,从而建立了两两比较的TOPSIS法,并进行了实例分析.     

IS/IT项目选择决策的灰色逼近理想解排序法

IS/IT项目选择决策是一个多属性决策问题.针对传统逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)在确定属性权重系数上的缺陷,并考虑到在实际IS/IT项目选择决策过程中部分决策信息的不足,提出了基于灰色TOPSIS改进算法.算法运用区间灰数表达指标权重和指标评价值,定义备择项目与正、负理想解的灰色关联度,依此计算各备则项目的贴近度并实现最终排序.仿真实例验证了该方法的合理和有效性.     

关于TOPSIS法应用中的逆序问题及消除的方法

在多指标决策问题中，TOPSIS法是一种常用的方法，然而传统的TOPSIS法在实际应用中容易产生逆序的现象。本分析了逆序产生的主要原因，并提出了一种改进的方法-RTOPSIS法。应用本的方法不仅能消除逆序的现象，而且还能正确反映指标权重对决策结果的影响。     

应急不完全信息环境下的混合多属性协同决策方法

科学的应急救援协同决策理论方法,不但能使应急管理系统更好地发挥作用,而且能使政府及公众的应急救援行为更加规范和有序.为此,针对应急环境下决策信息不完全的背景,研究构建了一类综合集成网络层次分析法(ANP)、证据理论(D-SEvidence Theory)以及改进的理想点法(TOPSIS)的混合多属性应急协同决策方法.其中ANP用于处理应急救援方案非独立和相互联系的评价指标权重的确立,D-S Theory用于处理不完全信息条件下多个部门对应急救援候选方案的不同评价信息融合,改进的理想点法(TOPSIS)则用于最终候选应急救援方案的排序.研究结果表明,所提出的混合多属性协同决策方法不仅在理论上有所集成创新,而且在实际应用中可以有效解决应急环境下多部门或多环节协同决策问题.     

基于马氏距离的TOPSIS决策方法及其应用

针对决策指标之间的相关性问题,将马氏距离引入传统TOPSIS方法,提出了基于马氏距离的TOPSIS方法.在此基础上,分析了基于马氏距离改进后贴近度的性质,并以投资决策方案选择为例加以说明.结果表明,基于马氏距离改进的TOPSIS方法对决策数据的非奇异线性变换具有不变性.协方差矩阵体现了决策指标之间的相关性,因而可以有效避免指标的相关性对决策效果的影响.     

区间数型多属性决策正交投影模型及其应用

针对用TOPSIS法进行多属性决策时备择方案可能既与"理想方案"距离最近,又与"负理想方案"距离最近的不足,用正交投影代替TOPSIS法中的相对贴近度,建立了区间数型多属性决策正交投影模型.模型首先将"理想方案"平移至坐标原点后,转换为0向量,只用平移后的"负理想方案"计算正交距离,然后将区间数转换为a+bi型联系数,根据联系数复运算排序得到最终决策结果.通过一个工程设计方案评价例子进行了计算分析,说明了模型的有效性.     

绿色供应链管理能力指标体系构建与评价研究

提出混合多准则群决策法评价制造商绿色供应链管理能力.首先,运用AHP法构建含6个准则17个指标的绿色供应链管理能力指标体系;然后,综合调研信息和专家评价数据形成混合决策矩阵、综合Theil不均衡指数和改进的灰关联偏离分析确定混合指标权重、综合专家指标熟悉度和专家参评对象熟悉度确定混合专家权重;再次,将所提决策法用于汽车制造商的绿色供应链管理能力评估;最后,将所提方法与VIKOR和TOPSIS法作对比分析.研究结果表明:1)中国汽车业整体供应链绿色化水平还有较大提升空间,国有车企的绿色化意识和水平相对较高,民营车企需迎头赶上;2)构建的绿色供应链管理能力多准则多指标体系能够反映制造商的绿色供应链管理能力;3)混合多准则群决策法弱化了主观随意性和客观刚性,与VIKOR和TOPSIS法异曲同工,为绿色供应链管理能力评估提供了又一贴近实际、科学可行的评价方法.     

三元区间数型多属性决策正交投影模型及其在边坡支护方案评价中的应用

针对用TOPSIS法进行三元区间数型多属性决策的不足,用各方案到"理想方案"的"垂面"距离代替TOPSIS法中的欧氏距离,提出一种三元区间数型多属性决策正交投影模型.模型将"理想方案"平移至坐标原点后,转换为0向量,只用平移后的"负理想方案"计算各方案到"理想方案"的"垂面"距离,根据距离最小原则排序得到最终决策结果.通过一个边坡支护方案评价的例子进行了计算分析,并与用其他方法得到的结果进行了对比,说明了模型的有效性.     

基于博弈论和相对熵的基坑支护方案优选

基坑支护方案优选是一项多属性决策,提出了一种基于博弈论组合赋权和相对熵的逼近理想解(TOPSIS)决策模型.首先采用信息熵确定客观权重,运用层次分析法确定主观权重,然后引入博弈论集结模型将主客观权重科学化组合,得到综合权重,最后采用一种基于相对熵的逼近理想解决策方法进行基坑支护方案优选,并结合工程实例进行验证.结果证明:基于相对熵的TOPSIS决策模型在案例中的评价结果与工程实际相吻合.     

Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method

TOPSIS is a multi-attribute decision making (MADM) technique for ranking and selection of a number of externally determined alternatives through distance measures. When the collected data for each criterion is interval and the risk attitude for a decision maker is unknown, we present a new TOPSIS method for normalizing the collected data and ranking the alternatives. The results show that the decision maker with different risk attitude ranks the different alternatives.     

基于模糊模式识别的动态联盟伙伴选择模型

在基于模糊模式识别的伙伴选择方法中,将TOPS IS方法借助于一个多属性决策问题的“理想解”和“负理想解”去排序的思想应用到其伙伴选择过程中,根据贴近度的公理化定义对TOPS IS方法作以修改,构造出“相对”贴近度,以此折衷地衡量动态联盟合作伙伴的优劣。避免了传统模糊模式识别单纯利用“绝对”贴近度所造成的结果均一化、可比性差的现象,从一定程度上减少了因贴近度选用的不同而造成的结果差异。从某种意义上来说,该种方法可以作为TOPS IS方法的拓展,是本文具有新意之处。     

An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making

An extension of TOPSIS (technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution), a multi-attribute decision making (MADM) technique, to a group decision environment is investigated. TOPSIS is a practical and useful technique for ranking and selection of a number of externally determined alternatives through distance measures. To get a broad view of the techniques used, we provide a few options for the operations, such as normalization, distance measures and mean operators, at each of the corresponding steps of TOPSIS. In addition, the preferences of more than one decision maker are internally aggregated into the TOPSIS procedure. Unlike in previous developments, our group preferences are aggregated within the procedure. The proposed model is indeed a unified process and it will be readily applicable to many real-world decision making situations without increasing the computational burden. In the final part, the effects of external aggregation and internal aggregation of group preferences for TOPSIS with different computational combinations are compared using examples. The results have demonstrated our model to be both robust and efficient.     

一种基于决策者风险态度的区间数多指标决策方法

针对具有区间数的多指标决策问题，提出了一种新的决策分析方法。该方法的思路是：首先通过引入决策的风险态度因子将区间数决策问题映射为传统的点值决策问题。然后给出了基于TOPSIS的方案排序方法，最后通过对风险态度因子的不同取值可进行方案排序的灵敏度分析。     

Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set

The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are all based on an aggregating function representing “closeness to the ideal”, which originated in the compromise programming method. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum “group utility” for the “majority” and a minimum of an “individual regret” for the “opponent”, which is an effective tool in multi-criteria decision making, particularly in a situation where the decision maker is not able, or does not know to express his/her preference at the beginning of system design. The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. And, the hesitant fuzzy set is a very useful tool to deal with uncertainty, which can be accurately and perfectly described in terms of the opinions of decision makers. In this paper, we develop the E-VIKOR method and TOPSIS method to solve the MCDM problems with hesitant fuzzy set information. Firstly, the hesitant fuzzy set information and corresponding concepts are described, and the basic essential of the VIKOR method is introduced. Then, the problem on multiple attribute decision marking is described, and the principles and steps of the proposed E-VIKOR method and TOPSIS method are presented. Finally, a numerical example illustrates an application of the E-VIKOR method, and the result by the TOPSIS method is compared.     

Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods

The VIKOR method was developed to solve MCDM problems with conflicting and noncommensurable (different units) criteria, assuming that compromising is acceptable for conflict resolution, the decision maker wants a solution that is the closest to the ideal, and the alternatives are evaluated according to all established criteria. This method focuses on ranking and selecting from a set of alternatives in the presence of conflicting criteria, and on proposing compromise solution (one or more). The VIKOR method is extended with a stability analysis determining the weight stability intervals and with trade-offs analysis. The extended VIKOR method is compared with three multicriteria decision making methods: TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE. A numerical example illustrates an application of the VIKOR method, and the results by all four considered methods are compared.     

企业经济效益综合评价方法及应用

何晓亚．企业经济效益综合评价方法及应用．数理统计与管理．１９９７，１６（４），５～７．本文介绍了多目标决策分析中的ＴＯＰＳＩＳ法在企业经济效益综合评价中的应用，此方法简便、实用     

Restricting weights in supplier selection decisions in the presence of dual-role factors

One of the uses of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is supplier selection. Weight restrictions allow for the integration of managerial preferences in terms of relative importance levels of various inputs and outputs. As well, in some situations there is a strong argument for permitting certain factors to simultaneously play the role of both inputs and outputs. The objective of this paper is to propose a method for selecting the best suppliers in the presence of weight restrictions and dual-role factors. This paper depicts the supplier selection process through a DEA model, while allowing for the incorporation of decision maker’s preferences and considers multiple factors which simultaneously play both input and output roles. The proposed model does not demand exact weights from the decision maker. This paper presents a robust model to solve the multiple-criteria problem. A numerical example demonstrates the application of the proposed method.     

基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法

传统的交叉效率集结过程通常采用算术平均方法,不仅会低估自评的重要性,而且未考虑决策者的风险偏好。针对上述问题,提出一种基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法。首先,求解交叉效率矩阵,运用熵权法确定他评过程中评价单元的指标权重。然后,引入前景理论以考虑决策者在交叉效率集结过程中的风险偏好,利用TOPSIS方法识别正负参考点,进而构造总体效用函数,得到前景交叉效率矩阵。随后,构建最大化前景价值模型,求解集结权重。该方法既考虑到交叉效率集结的相对重要性权重,又将决策者的风险偏好纳入到效率评价中,从而实现决策单元的全排序。最后,结合实例验证方法的有效性。     

基于模糊的创新动态联盟伙伴选择多属性决策模型

针对开放式创新合作伙伴选择过程中决策者判断模糊性的特点,考虑到不同的决策者其决策可信性的不同,提出了开放式创新合作伙伴选择的模糊多属性群决策模型。首先描述了开放式创新合作伙伴选择的多属性群决策问题;然后依据该种方法比较突出的特点,考虑到决策者对评价指标权重的不同,对TOPSIS方法加以改进;最后,通过算例说明了该方法的有效性和可行性。