加速溶剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法测定土壤及蚯蚓样品中多环芳烃

研究了加速溶剂萃取( ASE)、固相萃取柱净化( SPE)、高效液相色谱( HPLC)联合( ASE-SPE-HPLC)测定土壤及蚯蚓样品中7种多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析方法,确定了以正己烷-丙酮(4∶1, V/V)作为萃取剂,用ASE对土壤及蚯蚓进行萃取,提取液经SPE柱净化(土壤样品用硅胶柱净化,蚯蚓样品用 Al2 O3-硅胶柱净化),正己烷-二氯甲烷(9∶1, V/V)进行洗脱,洗脱体积为10 mL,旋转浓缩蒸干后,乙腈定容,过0.22μm有机滤膜,最后用HPLC对提取液中7种PAHs进行定量的分析方法。土壤样品方法回收率在83.5%~110.2%之间,相对标准偏差为1.0%~4.6%;蚯蚓样品回收率在81.2%~97.1%之间,相对标准偏差为1.6%~4.2%。方法检出限为0.15~0.85μg/kg,且重现性好。可满足样品分析的质量控制要求,表明本分析方法具有良好的准确性与可靠性。     

加速溶剂萃取-硅胶萃取净化-气相色谱/质谱法检测地表水中有机氯农药和多氯联苯

建立了加速溶剂萃取-硅胶固相萃取净化-气相色谱/质谱同时检测地表水中15种有机氯农药(OCPs)和82种多氯联苯(PCBs)的方法.对影响OCPs和PCBs回收率的主要因素进行优化,得出最优的萃取条件:3次静态萃取循环,100℃的萃取温度,丙酮/正己烷(1∶1,V/V)为萃取液,静态萃取10 min.在最优条件下,15种OCPs和82种PCBs在加标水溶液中的回收率分别为70.9％～130％和52.5％～89.1％.日内和日间相对标准偏差分别为1.7％～16.1％和2.4％ ～33.3％.OCPs和PCBs混合标样在10～ 800 μg/L范围内线性相关系数(R2)均大于0.995.OCPs和PCBs方法检测限分别为0.13 ～0.38 ng/L和0.10 ～0.32 ng/L.相比于传统萃取方法,本方法回收率高、萃取时间短、试剂用量少.应用本方法测得北京城区地表水中OCPs和PCBs的含量范围分别为n.d.～ 3.45 ng/L和n.d.～4.88 ng/L.     

凝胶渗透色谱-固相萃取净化测定茶叶中16种菊酯残留量

建立了以凝胶渗透色谱(GPC)和固相萃取(SPE)净化,气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)负化学源(NCI)技术测定茶叶中七氟菊酯、 四氟菊酯、丙烯菊酯、联苯菊酯、胺菊酯、甲氰菊酯、氯氟氰菊酯、氟丙菊酯、苯醚氰菊酯、氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、氟氰戊菊酯、氰戊菊酯、 氟胺氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、氯菊酯等16种菊酯残留量的方法.样品经V(丙酮)∶V(乙酸乙酯)∶V(正己烷)＝1∶2∶1提取,经GPC去除大分子的色素和类脂杂质,弗罗里硅土 SPE柱进一步净化,以毒死蜱同位素D-10作内标,内标法定量.方法的回收率67.2%～108%之间.变异系数小于18%.16种菊酯方法定量限在0.0125～0.025 mg/kg之间.     

加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱法检测土壤中14种有机氯农药方法

建立了加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱检测土壤中14种有机氯农药(OCPs)的方法。对影响OCPs回收率的主要因素进行优化,得出优化条件:1次静态萃取循环,萃取温度90℃,静态萃取时间3 min,冲洗量30%,氮气吹扫时间40 s,正己烷/丙酮(1∶1,V/V)为萃取液。在优化条件下,加标水平为10、100?g/L时,平均加标回收率为86.6%～120%、88.1%～120%,相对标准偏差(n=7)均小于10%,方法检出限(t值法)为1.03～2.64?g/L。     

加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-负化学电离质谱法对广东凉茶冲剂中有机氯杀虫剂残留的测定

建立了加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-负化学电离质谱法( ASE/GC - NCI - MS)测定广东凉茶颗粒冲剂中有机氯杀虫剂(OcPs)含量的方法.采用ASE萃取冲剂中的OCPs,萃取溶剂为正己烷-二氯甲烷(1:1),萃取温度100℃,萃取压力10 MPa,萃取时间10 min×3.萃取液经SPE净化,浓缩定容后,经色谱柱...     

超声微波协同萃取/气相色谱法测定土壤中的多溴联苯醚

建立了同时测定土壤中7种多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)的超声微波协同萃取/气相色谱测定方法.考察了萃取溶剂的种类和用量、微波功率、萃取时间等因素对模拟土壤中PBDEs回收率的影响,得到了最佳萃取条件:萃取剂为50 mL正己烷-丙酮(1:1),微波辐射功率为90W,萃取时间为10 min.在最佳条件下,PB-DEs在10～40...     

快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-质谱法同时测定土壤中多环芳烃、六六六和滴滴涕

建立快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-质谱法同时测定土壤中多环芳烃、六六六和滴滴涕。优化了提取溶剂和洗脱溶剂,采用加速溶剂萃取法处理土壤样品,萃取溶剂为二氯甲烷-正己烷(1∶1)。提取液用氮吹仪浓缩、硅酸镁固相萃取小柱净化,用二氯甲烷-正己烷(3∶7)混合溶剂对固相萃取小柱进行活化和洗脱,流出液净化后氮吹浓缩至1 mL,利用气相色谱-质谱内标法进行分析定量。16种多环芳烃、8种有机氯农药及3种替代物在5.0～500μg/L范围内线性良好,方法检出限为0.000 55～0.000 77 mg/kg,加标回收率为68.2%～112.7%,相对标准偏差为4.3%～10.1%(n=5)。该方法可用于同时测定土壤中多环芳烃、六六六、滴滴涕的含量。     

加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-负化学电离质谱法对土壤中毒杀芬的测定研究

建立了加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-负化学电离质谱法测定土壤中毒杀芬的方法.在加速溶剂萃取实验条件优化的基础上,确定了最佳实验条件:系统压力12.4 MPa,萃取溶剂为正己烷-丙酮(体积比1 : 1),萃取温度100 ℃,静态萃取时间10 min,循环2次.萃取液经活性炭与弗罗里硅土复合小柱净化后,氮吹至1.0 mL,于GC-MS仪上测定.结果表明,毒杀芬的线性范围为0.3 ～3 000 ng/g(毒杀芬总量),相关系数均不小于0.999 0,方法检出限为0.10 ～1.00 ng/g,平均回收率为86% ～104%,相对标准偏差(n=7)为6.8% ～13.5%.     

加速溶剂萃取-高效液相色谱法测定塑料制品中多溴二苯醚

提出了塑料制品中多溴二苯醚的高效液相色谱法。样品经粉碎后用乙醇-丙酮(1+1)萃取溶剂经加速溶剂萃取仪在150℃静态萃取10min,提取液旋转蒸发后用正己烷溶解过硅胶固相萃取柱净化,流出液蒸发至近干用异辛烷-甲苯(4+1)混合溶剂定容后,注入高效液相色谱仪分离测定。方法的检出限(3S/N)在0.1～0.2mg.L-1之间,加标回收率在87%～104%之间。     

多壁碳纳米管固相萃取净化气相色谱法分析蔬菜中有机氯和拟除虫菊酯农药残留

建立了多壁碳纳米管为吸附剂的固相萃取(SPE)净化、气相色谱-电子捕获检测(GC-ECD)测定蔬菜中6种有机氯和7种拟除虫菊酯农药的方法。采用双柱(HP-50和HP-1色谱柱)双检测器进行定性和定量分析。蔬菜样品采用乙腈提取,多壁碳纳米管SPE柱净化,正己烷溶解上样,丙酮-正己烷(7:3, v/v)洗脱,13种农药中有11种农药的添加回收率高于70%。将该净化方法用于荷兰黄瓜、卷心菜、红圣女果、奶油生菜、紫甘蓝、韭菜、大葱和洋葱等样品的净化,与弗罗里硅土SPE柱相比较,净化效果更好,表明多壁碳纳米管具有较强的吸附去除色素的能力,可以避免色素对测定的干扰。     

对氨基酚络合萃取机理的探讨

对氨基酚络合萃取机理的探讨;对氨基酚; 络合萃取; 萃取机理; 萃取反应热     

Focused microwave aqueous extraction of chlorophenols from solid matrices and their analysis by chromatographic techniques

Open-vessel focused microwave (FMW) extraction with a purely aqueous carbonate solution was used for the extraction of chlorophenols from various solid matrices. After SPE on C18-bonded silica, the analytes were determined as such by LC-UV or, as their acetyl derivatives, by GC-ECD. The FMW aqueous extraction is efficient and rapid and no organic solvents are used. PCP was detected in several solid samples, with recoveries of 101-115% (RSD, 2-4%) relative to Soxhlet extraction. Similar recoveries were obtained for the other chlorophenols for spiked samples.     

超声辅助液液萃取法提取烟用香精成分的研究

采用超声辅助液液萃取法(ULLE)提取某品牌烟用香精成分,GC-MS对其进行分析,研究了不同萃取剂、萃取时间和萃取温度对分析结果的影响,初步确定了最佳条件为:以二氯甲烷为萃取剂,饱和NaCl溶液作水相,室温下超声萃取5 min.又分别与同时蒸馏萃取法(SDE)和传统的液液萃取法(LLE)作以比较,对ULLE法和SDE法鉴定出的化学成分、重现性和定量值进行了对比.结果表明:超声辅助液液萃取具有操作简便、快速、节能、萃取效率高、重现性好等特点,适合于烟用香精成分的提取.     

杂粮中总黄酮的提取及含量测定的实验设计

通过学生分组，采用溶剂提取法，超声提取法和微波提取法等提取方法，测定了小米、糜子、青稞、荞麦和高梁等杂粮中黄酮含量，结果表明5种杂粮中，青稞中总黄酮的含量最高。该综合实验能够锻炼大学生运用所学实验技术解决实际问题的能力，适合作为高年级本科综合实验项目开设。     

中草药化学成分提取新技术

介绍五种提取新技术棗微波萃取技术、超临界二氧化碳萃取技术、超声波提取技术、半仿生提取技术和酶法的原理和特点,以及这些新技术近年来在中草药化学成分提取工艺中的研究应用现状,并展望了它们的应用前景。     

Improved extraction and clean-up of imidazolinone herbicides from soil solutions using different solid-phase sorbents

Extraction and quantification of herbicide residues from soil are important in understanding the behaviour of persistent herbicides. This research investigated extraction and clean-up methods for imidazolinone herbicides from soil and soil amended with organic material. A series of solvent mixes, pH conditions and sorbents was tested. Across three imidazolinone herbicides: imazapyr, imazethapyr and imazaquin, 0.5 M NaOH extraction gave greater than 90% recovery from soil samples; however, 0.5 M NaOH:MeOH (80:20) resulted in higher recovery for imazaquin, but not for the other two herbicides. Of the sorbents tested, the use of chromatographic mode sequencing using C₁₈ and SCX sorbents provided consistent high (>85%) recovery of all three herbicides from soil and separation of the herbicides from other soil components by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). These two methods will allow high recovery of these imidazolinone herbicides from soil and have the ability to detect these herbicides without interference from other soil components.     

Supercritical fluid extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) provides for the first time a viable option to conventional and widely used Soxhlet extraction. The ability to change the solvating power of a single supercritical fluid by changing its density is an exceedingly attractive feature. An environmentally safe alternative such as supercritical carbon dioxide to organochlorine solvents which are widely used today in many government and industrial analytical laboratories for sample preparation is desirable. SFE may also constitute a viable alternative to other popular sample preparation techniques such as liquid-liquid extraction, solid phase extraction and purge/trap. Much research, however, must be done in order to understand, optimize and apply this technology. For example, (a) automation of extraction, (b) matrix effects, (c) new fluids/modifiers/additives, (d) trapping efficiency, (e) recovery of extracted analytes, and (f) extraction kinetics are some areas which need a greater understanding. This review is concerned with many of these topics as they relate to trace organic analysis wherein SFE is the primary sample preparation technique.     

Comparison of alternative and conventional extraction techniques for the determination of zearalenone in corn

Naturally contaminated corn samples of different origin were extracted using two conventional techniques (blending and shaking) and three alternative approaches (ultrasonic extraction, accelerated solvent extraction, and microwave-assisted extraction). Use of the same extraction mixture for all trials enabled the efficiency of the various extraction techniques to be compared. Extracts were filtered and directly analyzed by LC–ESI–MS, without further clean-up. The yield from the alternative extraction techniques showed efficiency to be higher than for conventional techniques. In particular, microwave-assisted extraction was slightly superior to other techniques.     

A Critical Review on Pulsed Electric Field: A Novel Technology for the Extraction of Phytoconstituents

Different parts of a plant (seeds, fruits, flower, leaves, stem, and roots) contain numerous biologically active compounds called “phytoconstituents” that consist of phenolics, minerals, amino acids, and vitamins. The conventional techniques applied to extract these phytoconstituents have several drawbacks including poor performance, low yields, more solvent use, long processing time, and thermally degrading by-products. In contrast, modern and advanced extraction nonthermal technologies such as pulsed electric field (PEF) assist in easier and efficient identification, characterization, and analysis of bioactive ingredients. Other advantages of PEF include cost-efficacy, less time, and solvent consumption with improved yields. This review covers the applications of PEF to obtain bioactive components, essential oils, proteins, pectin, and other important materials from various parts of the plant. Numerous studies compiled in the current evaluation concluded PEF as the best solution to extract phytoconstituents used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. PEF-assisted extraction leads to a higher yield, utilizes less solvents and energy, and it saves a lot of time compared to traditional extraction methods. PEF extraction design should be safe and efficient enough to prevent the degradation of phytoconstituents and oils.     

Investigation on Ochratoxin A stability using different extraction techniques

The stability of Ochratoxin A during its extraction using different extraction techniques has been evaluated. Microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised liquid extraction, in addition to two other reference methods of extraction, i.e. ultrasound-assisted and magnetic stirring-assisted extraction, were evaluated. The effect of extraction temperature using the cited techniques was checked.The results show that Ochratoxin A can be extracted using microwave-assisted extraction at temperatures up to 150 °C without degradation. Pressurised liquid extraction can be used at temperatures up to 100 °C, for extraction times of less than 30 min. Further, both ultrasound-assisted extraction and magnetic stirring extraction can be applied at temperatures up to 65 °C.High-performance liquid chromatography combined with fluorescence detection using a Chromolith RP-18e column at a flow rate of 5 mL min⁻¹ was used to quantify the Ochratoxin A. The retention time for the Ochratoxin A was 1.3 min. The limits of detection (LOD) and of quantification (LOQ) were 0.03 and 0.10 μg L⁻¹, respectively.