微波辅助萃取/样品前处理联用技术的研究进展

微波辅助萃取是近年来新发展的一种样品前处理技术,随着微波辅助萃取的发展和成熟,它与其它样品前处理技术的联用得到了迅速发展。与传统前处理方法相比,这些联用方法具有快速、高效、操作简便、节省溶剂、选择性好、应用范围广的特点。该文综述了微波辅助萃取及其与其它样品前处理技术联用的特点及适用性,并对近年来微波辅助萃取与其它前处理方法联用的发展概况及在分析领域中的应用情况进行了详细总结。     

石墨烯应用于样品前处理的研究进展

样品前处理技术在样品分析中发挥着越来越重要的作用,而对分析物的富集能力和对样品基体的净化程度主要取决于高效的样品前处理材料,所以发展高性能的样品前处理材料一直是该领域的前沿研究方向。近年来,各类先进材料已经被引入样品前处理领域,发展了多种高性能的萃取材料。由于独特的物理化学性质,石墨烯已在各个研究领域获得广泛关注,在样品前处理领域也发挥着重要作用。基于高的比表面积、大的π电子结构、优异的吸附性能、丰富的官能团和易于化学改性等优点,石墨烯和氧化石墨烯基萃取材料被成功应用于各种样品的前处理,对不同领域中多种类型分析物表现出优异的萃取性能。该论文总结和讨论了近3年来石墨烯材料(石墨烯、氧化石墨烯及其功能化材料)在柱固相萃取、分散固相萃取、磁性固相萃取、搅拌棒萃取、纤维固相微萃取和管内固相微萃取等方面的研究进展。基于多种萃取机理如π-π、静电、疏水、亲水、氢键等相互作用,石墨烯萃取材料能够高效萃取和选择性富集不同类别的目标分析物,如重金属离子、多环芳烃、塑化剂、雌激素、药物分子、农药残留、兽药残留等。基于新型石墨烯萃取材料的各种样品前处理技术与多种检测技术如色谱、质谱、原子吸收光谱等联用,广泛应用于环境监测、食品安全和生化分析等领域。最后,总结了石墨烯在样品前处理领域中存在的问题,并展望了未来的发展趋势。     

基于色谱-质谱联用的脂质分析样品前处理技术研究进展

脂质作为细胞膜和亚细胞膜的主要结构成分,在能量来源、细胞信号传导等多种生物学过程中发挥着重要作用。近年来,脂质分析受到越来越多的关注,其中色谱-质谱联用技术在脂质分析中占据主导地位。由于样品基质复杂,样品前处理有富集痕量物质和减少基质干扰的作用,成为脂质分析中的一个关键步骤。该文综述了近年来基于色谱-质谱联用技术的脂质分析中样品前处理技术的研究进展和应用,对各种样品前处理技术进行了阐述和总结。基于液相的萃取方法有液-液萃取和单一有机溶剂萃取。基于固相的萃取方法包括固相萃取和固相微萃取。场辅助萃取方法包括超临界流体萃取、加压流体萃取、微波辅助萃取和超声辅助萃取。此外,还介绍了在线联用样品前处理方法和用于活体分析的样品前处理方法。最后,对基于色谱-质谱联用的脂质分析样品前处理技术存在的问题及发展趋势进行了探讨。样品前处理技术的发展将提高脂质分析的灵敏度、选择性和分析速度。     

基于色谱-质谱联用的脂质分析样品前处理技术研究进展（英文）

脂质作为细胞膜和亚细胞膜的主要结构成分,在能量来源、细胞信号传导等多种生物学过程中发挥着重要作用。近年来,脂质分析受到越来越多的关注,其中色谱-质谱联用技术在脂质分析中占据主导地位。由于样品基质复杂,样品前处理有富集痕量物质和减少基质干扰的作用,成为脂质分析中的一个关键步骤。该文综述了近年来基于色谱-质谱联用技术的脂质分析中样品前处理技术的研究进展和应用,对各种样品前处理技术进行了阐述和总结。基于液相的萃取方法有液-液萃取和单一有机溶剂萃取。基于固相的萃取方法包括固相萃取和固相微萃取。场辅助萃取方法包括超临界流体萃取、加压流体萃取、微波辅助萃取和超声辅助萃取。此外,还介绍了在线联用样品前处理方法和用于活体分析的样品前处理方法。最后,对基于色谱-质谱联用的脂质分析样品前处理技术存在的问题及发展趋势进行了探讨。样品前处理技术的发展将提高脂质分析的灵敏度、选择性和分析速度。     

微波辅助萃取应用研究进展

近年来关于微波辅助萃取(MAE)与其他各种样品前处理技术的结合使用,以及与多种检测技术在线联用的研究越来越多,此外离子液体等新型绿色溶剂作为萃取剂在MAE中的应用也开始得到广泛关注.本文综述了近几年微波辅助萃取在环境、天然产物提取、食品和药物分析领域的应用情况,并对其将来的发展进行了展望.     

固相微萃取技术在滥用药物分析中的应用进展

固相微萃取技术(Solid phase microextraction,SPME)是将少量吸附材料通过物理或化学的方法固定于不锈钢丝或光纤等材质表面制备成萃取纤维,再将萃取纤维暴露于样品体系中,对待测物进行萃取、富集、进样和解析的一种适用于实验室和现场样品的新型前处理技术。由于SPME及其联用技术具有快速、简便、灵敏、绿色等优点,已经在滥用药物检验鉴定领域被成功应用,并成为此类药物定性定量分析的最佳方法之一。本文综述了近年来SPME技术在滥用药物分析中的研究进展。     

分子印迹微萃取技术的研究进展

微萃取技术是一种将分析物高效萃取富集于微体积的聚合物或有机溶剂中,集采样、萃取、浓缩、进样于一体的无(少)溶剂、易于与其他技术在线联用的样品前处理方法。分子印迹聚合物是一种具有强大分子识别功能的材料,具有高效的选择特异性,可从复杂样品中选择性分离富集目标分析物,在微萃取技术中得到了广泛的应用。本文综述了近年来分子印迹微萃取技术的研究进展,包括分子印迹固相微萃取、分子印迹搅拌棒吸附萃取、分子印迹磁性微球萃取等微萃取技术。共引用文献75篇。     

单滴微萃取在实际样品分析中的研究进展

单滴微萃取已被广泛应用于各种样品的前处理,包括环境样品、生物样品、天然产物、食品、药品等。单滴微萃取样品富集倍数高,可提高检测方法的灵敏度,且绿色环保,简单易行,成本较低,易于实现与多种检测技术联用。本文介绍了单滴微萃取的分类,并对其中最常用的直接浸没液相微萃取和顶空单滴微萃取在多种实际样品中的应用进行综述。     

多孔整体材料在固相微萃取中的应用研究进展

作为新型的样品前处理技术,固相微萃取由于具有操作简便、使用灵活、样品用量少、环境友好以及便于与分析仪器联用等优点而受到人们的广泛青睐。多孔整体材料具有通透性好、传质速度快、制备简单和易于改性等优点,目前被广泛用于包括样品前处理在内的诸多领域。文章结合作者的研究工作,对近几年整体材料在固相微萃取中的应用研究进行综述,并对其发展方向进行了展望。     

石墨烯及其复合材料在样品前处理中的应用

样品前处理新技术与方法研究是现代分析化学的重要研究课题与发展方向之一。固相萃取是目前应用最为广泛的样品前处理技术,其技术核心是吸附材料,因此开发新型吸附材料是样品前处理领域的研究热点。石墨烯是一种新型碳纳米材料,由于其良好的物理化学性质,在短短几年内迅速成为众多学科的研究热点。其高比表面积、良好的化学稳定性和热稳定性使之在分离科学领域得到广泛的应用。本文系统综述了石墨烯及其复合材料在样品前处理中的应用研究,主要包括其作为固定相在固相萃取、固相微萃取、磁固相萃取等技术在环境、食品、生物等样品前处理中的应用。     

A review of developments and applications of thin‐film microextraction coupled to surface‐enhanced Raman scattering

Surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) greatly expands the applications of Raman spectroscopy and is a promising technique for food safety, environmental analysis, and public safety. Thin‐film microextraction (TFME) provides an efficient sample preparation method for SERS to improve its selectivity and detection efficiency. This review comprehensively describes the development and applications of SERS and TFME, including the history, mechanisim, and active substrate of SERS and the theory, device, forms, and practical applications of TFME. The applications of TFME‐SERS in food safety and environment monitoring are discussed, which could improve their advantages. TFME extracts and enriches the target analytes to eliminate the interfering substance, providing a facial way for SERS to analyze the target analytes in complex matrices. The development of TFME‐SERS technology not only expands the application range of TFME, but greatly improves the anti‐interference ability and detection sensitivity of SERS. Thus, the established methods are fast, convenient, and highly sensitive. This technology is potential to be applied in the on‐site and real‐time detection.     

Thin-Film Microextraction Coupled with Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Thin-film microextraction (TFME) is a format of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) technique which offers improvement of sensitivity without sacrificing time through the increase of available surface area and extractive phase volume. This technique offers significant advantages which make it attractive for many analytical/bioanalytical applications. This review discusses the fundamental principle of TFME and its benefits versus the rod fiber geometry of SPME, and demonstrates the agreements of the experimental data for the available TFME systems with the theoretical concept. The current configurations, coating chemistries, coating preparation methods, and applications for TFME system are reported.     

Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction for on-site sampling and sample preparation

On-site sampling and sample preparation favor portable, solventless or even solvent-free techniques. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has these advantages. This review focuses on developments between 2007 and early 2011 in microextraction techniques for on-site sampling and sample preparation, including fiber SPME, stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), thin-film microextraction (TFME) and different types of in-needle SPME. The major trends in on-site applications of SPME appear to be fiber and thin-film SPME, microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) and the sorbent-packed needle-trap device (NTD). We discuss and compare several aspects of these types of SPME in on-site applications. We also describe sorbent phases for SPME that benefit on-site applications. Finally, we provide a perspective on SPME-based techniques for on-site applications.     

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane based thin film microextraction for enrichment of benzoylurea insecticides from water samples followed by their determination with HPLC

Thin-film microextraction(TFME),a new geometry for solid-phase microextraction,has become an attractive sample-preparation technique.Compared to other microextraction approaches,the sensitivity of this technique was enhanced without sacrificing the sampling time due to the high surface area-tovolume ratio together with the increase of extraction-phase volume.In this paper,a new TFME method based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane was developed for the extraction of benzoylurea insecticides(diflubenzuron,triflumuron,hexaflumuron and teflubenzuron) from water samples followed by their determination with high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection.Under the optimal conditions,good linearity was observed over the concentration range of 0.5-100.0 ng/mL with correlation coefficient greater than 0.9994.The limits of detection(S/N = 3) of the method for the target analytes were 0.1 ng/mL.Mean recoveries ranged from 87.7% to 103.9% with relative standard deviations lower than 6.5%.The results indicated that the developed TFME method is simple,efficient,and cost effective.     

固相微萃取在药品和生物样品分析中的应用

 按被分析的样品的性质分类 ,对 2 0世纪 90年代发展起来的一种新型样品预处理技术固相微萃取技术在药品及生物样品分析中的应用实例进行了综述 ,共 6 0篇。     

Analysis of wastewater samples by direct combination of thin-film microextraction and desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

An analysis method for aqueous samples by the direct combination of C18/SCX mixed mode thin-film microextraction (TFME) and desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) was developed. Both techniques make analytical workflow simpler and faster, hence the combination of the two techniques enables considerably shorter analysis time compared to the traditional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approach. The method was characterized using carbamazepine and triclosan as typical examples for pharmaceuticals and personal care product (PPCP) components which draw increasing attention as wastewater-derived environmental contaminants. Both model compounds were successfully detected in real wastewater samples and their concentrations determined using external calibration with isotope labeled standards. Effects of temperature, agitation, sample volume, and exposure time were investigated in the case of spiked aqueous samples. Results were compared to those of parallel HPLC-MS determinations and good agreement was found through a three orders of magnitude wide concentration range. Serious matrix effects were observed in treated wastewater, but lower limits of detection were still found to be in the low ng L(-1) range. Using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, the technique was found to be ideal for screening purposes and led to the detection of various different PPCP components in wastewater treatment plant effluents, including beta-blockers, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and UV filters.     

Simultaneous sampling and analysis of indoor air infested with Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) by solid phase microextraction,thin film microextraction and needle trap device

Air in a room infested by Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) was sampled simultaneously by three different sampling devices including solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber coatings, thin film microextraction (TFME) devices, and needle trap devices (NTDs) and then analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The main focus of this study was to fully characterize indoor air by identifying compounds extracted by three different microextraction formats and, therefore, perform both the device comparison and more complete characterization of C. lectularius pheromone. The NTD technique was capable of extracting both (E)-2-hexenal and (E)-2-octenal, which were previously identified as alarm pheromones of bedbugs, and superior NTD recoveries for these two components allowed reliable identification based on mass spectral library searching and linear temperature programmed retention index (LTPRI) technique. While the use of DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber coatings provided complementary sample fingerprinting and profiling results, TFME sampling devices provided discriminative extraction coverage toward highly volatile analytes. In addition to two alarm pheromones, relative abundances of all other analytes were recorded for all three devices and aligned across all examined samples, namely, highly infested area, less infested area, and control samples which were characterized by different bedbug populations. The results presented in the current study illustrate comprehensive characterization of infested indoor air samples through the use of three different non-invasive SPME formats and identification of novel components comprising C. lectularius pheromone, therefore, promising future alternatives for use of potential synthetic pheromones for detection of infestations.     

Microextraction sample preparation techniques in forensic analytical toxicology

Sample preparation is a critical step in forensic analytical toxicology. Different extraction techniques are employed with the goals of removing interferences from the biological samples, such as blood, tissues and hair, reducing matrix effects and concentrating the target analytes, among others. With the objective of developing faster and more ecological procedures, microextraction techniques have been expanding their applications in the recent years. This article reviews various microextraction methods, which include solid‐based microextraction, such as solid‐phase microextraction, microextraction by packed sorbent and stir‐bar sorptive extraction, and liquid‐based microextraction, such as single drop/hollow fiber‐based liquid‐phase microextraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, as well as their applications to forensic toxicology analysis. The development trend in future microextraction sample preparation is discussed.     

Basic principles,recent trends and future directions of microextraction techniques for the analysis of aqueous environmental samples

Microextraction-based sample preparation techniques have exhibited remarkable importance in analytical chemistry since they were first developed in the 1980s. The application of these techniques involves efficient and, at the same time, environmentally-friendly analytical methodologies. They are also generally faster when compared with classical sample preparation techniques, requiring low solvent and sample volumes, and also allowing for automated or semi-automated procedures. This paper provides an overview of the basic principles of sample preparation techniques and the important applications and developments that have taken place in this area over the past five years. These procedures include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), bar adsorptive microextraction (BAμE), rotating disk sorptive extraction (RDSE), micro solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). The main variations are discussed with a focus on recent applications in the analysis of environmental water samples. Lastly, some of the trends and perspectives associated with these outstanding microextraction sample preparation approaches are highlighted.     

Application of solid‐phase microextraction in current biomedical research

Extraction of endogenous compounds and drugs and their corresponding metabolites from complex matrices, such as biofluids and solid tissues, requires adequate analytical approach facilitating qualitative and quantitative analysis. To this end, solid‐phase microextraction has been introduced as modern technology that is capable of efficient and high‐throughput extraction of compounds due to its ability to amalgamate sampling, extraction, and pre‐concentration steps, while requiring minimal use of organic solvents. The ability of solid‐phase microextraction to enable analyses on small‐volume biological samples and growing availability of biocompatible solid‐phase microextraction coatings make it a highly useful technology for variety of applications. For example, solid‐phase microextraction is particularly useful for identifying biomarkers in metabolomics studies, and it can be successfully applied in pharmaceutical and toxicological studies requiring the fast and sensitive determination of drug levels, especially those that are present at low levels in biological matrices such as plasma, urine, saliva, and hair. Moreover, solid‐phase microextraction can be directly applied in in vivo studies because this extraction technique is non‐exhaustive and its biocompatible probes offer minimal invasiveness to the analyzed system. In this article, we review recent progress in well‐established solid‐phase microextraction technique for in vitro and in vivo analyses of various metabolites and drugs in clinical, pharmaceutical, and toxicological applications.