考虑产品绿色度的双渠道供应链协调研究

本文在消费者需求受价格和产品绿色度影响的背景下,考虑制造商通过提高产品绿色度来扩大需求的情况以及双渠道需求之间的搭便车效应,构建了集中式和分散式博弈模型,并设计了收益共享和成本共担的联合契约协调供应链。研究发现:直销渠道价格和传统渠道价格都会随着产品绿色度的提高而上升,其中直销渠道价格的上升幅度随着搭便车消费者比例的增大而下降,传统渠道价格的上升幅度随着搭便车消费者比例的增大而加快;联合契约的引入能有效地降低直销渠道价格和传统渠道价格,提高产品绿色度和供应链总需求,使供应链总利润达到集中决策时的水平。     

考虑网络外部性的生鲜企业渠道选择策略研究

考虑到生鲜产品容易变质而且线上配送时间较长,并且线上销售可为消费者带来额外网络外部性,传统生鲜企业在电商冲击的背景下需要考虑是否入驻电商平台开拓线上业务。为解决此类企业所面临渠道选择问题,本文考虑一个传统生鲜企业和一个主导电商市场的电商平台,并通过构建理论模型研究企业最优生鲜产品定价和渠道选择策略。研究结果表明,若平台所收取年服务费较低,则企业应入驻平台;反之,企业不应入驻平台。此外,消费者网络外部性敏感程度对企业入驻平台行为具有正影响。在拓展模型,本文考虑分散式供应链情形下企业最优渠道选择,结果表明相较于集中式决策,分散式供应链情形下零售商更不愿意入驻平台。此外,本文通过设计收益共享契约以协调生鲜企业与电商平台,并发现通过契约协调,零售商更愿意入驻电商平台。     

基于消费者偏好的低碳双渠道供应链定价与减排策略

在考虑消费者渠道偏好和低碳偏好的基础上,使用以制造商为主的Stackelberg博弈模型,研究了单一传统零售渠道、网上直销双渠道和网上分销双渠道中各成员的最优定价决策与减排策略,以及两种双渠道的利润分享协调策略。研究发现:当制造商引入网上直销和分销渠道后,能够有效增加制造商的最优单位减排量;在开通新的渠道后,传统零售商的利润总是会降低,而当消费者对网上销售渠道的偏好处于某一范围内时,制造商的利润会增加。本文通过设计利润分享机制来协调制造商和传统零售商的利润问题,使得供应链成员的利润实现Pareto改进。     

零售商公平关切下双渠道闭环供应链的协调

在双渠道闭环供应链中考虑零售商具有公平关切行为倾向,针对集中、分散两种决策情形分别建立双渠道闭环供应链定价模型,研究和对比了两种不同决策情形对直销价格、零售价格、回收价格及供应链系统利润的影响.研究表明,分散决策情形的系统利润要低于集中决策情形的系统利润;制造商提供一个由批发价格、直销价格和回收转移价格组成的协调契约可以协调双渠道闭环供应链,但该契约只对零售商有利,对制造商不利,为此,通过增加一个利润共享补充协议或两部定价补充协议可以有效协调双渠道闭环供应链,实现制造商和零售商的双赢;而零售商公平关切行为的存在将增强零售商参与协调时的议价能力,进一步影响零售商利润分享比例或零售商支付给制造商固定费用的变化范围.     

E-供应链竞争下自营品牌商的第三方零售渠道引入与定价策略

基于电商平台销售渠道的多样性,决策是否引入第三方零售渠道是自营品牌商在现实的E-供应链竞争中常常面临的重要难题。在多渠道竞争环境下,构建由两个自营品牌商和一个电商平台组成的E-供应链系统。考虑品牌商不引入、单一品牌商引入与两个品牌商均引入第三方零售渠道三种情形,分别建立Stackelberg博弈模型并求解,分析了平台佣金、消费者的自营零售渠道偏好和交叉价格弹性系数等因素对第三方零售渠道引入及E-供应链各成员最优策略的影响。研究表明:不同的交叉价格弹性系数和消费者自营渠道偏好对第三方零售渠道引入策略具有差异性,且两个品牌商均引入第三方零售渠道对电商平台最有利。此外,平台佣金、消费者自营渠道偏好和交叉价格弹性系数对自营、第三方商品的定价以及电商平台、品牌商的利润具有重要影响。     

低碳双渠道供应链的需求信息共享策略研究

在需求不确定环境下,研究考虑消费者低碳意识的双渠道供应链的需求信息共享策略。论文考虑由单个零售商和单个进行碳减排的制造商构成的两级双渠道供应链,构建三种情形的模型:信息不共享、信息共享和只有零售商作预测。通过三种情形下供应链中成员最优决策和利润的比较,得到需求信息共享策略对供应链的影响;并进一步研究消费者低碳意识等参数对供应链运营的影响。研究发现,需求信息共享未必使得供应链成员利润均提高,当制造商预测准确度优于零售商时,零售商会选择信息共享,制造商选择信息不共享情形;当零售商比制造商预测准确时,零售商会选择信息不共享的情形,而制造商会选择仅有零售商预测,此时制造商应采取一定的激励措施以获得零售商的预测信息;消费者低碳意识对批发价、零售价、单位产品减排量、供应链成员利润均产生正向影响。     

竞争环境下双渠道供应链的决策与协调研究

基于收益共享契约协调的二级供应链, 在考虑市场竞争环境中需求转移为非线性的情况下,探讨供应商增加直销渠道的条件,并研究双渠道供应链中供应商在直销渠道上的最优定价,总的最优生产量及零售商的最优订货量,研究表明,在一定直销渠道建设成本范围内,供应商加入直销渠道会增加供应商以及供应链的总期望收益,但会减小零售商的期望收益.文中通过解析和数值分析指出,供应商采用网络收益共享契约可以减小零售渠道与直销渠道的冲突,提高系统收益,实现双渠道供应链的协调.     

低碳双渠道供应链的需求信息共享策略研究

在需求不确定环境下,研究考虑消费者低碳意识的双渠道供应链的需求信息共享策略。论文考虑由单个零售商和单个进行碳减排的制造商构成的两级双渠道供应链,构建三种情形的模型:信息不共享、信息共享和只有零售商作预测。通过三种情形下供应链中成员最优决策和利润的比较,得到需求信息共享策略对供应链的影响;并进一步研究消费者低碳意识等参数对供应链运营的影响。研究发现,需求信息共享未必使得供应链成员利润均提高,当制造商预测准确度优于零售商时,零售商会选择信息共享,制造商选择信息不共享情形;当零售商比制造商预测准确时,零售商会选择信息不共享的情形,而制造商会选择仅有零售商预测,此时制造商应采取一定的激励措施以获得零售商的预测信息;消费者低碳意识对批发价、零售价、单位产品减排量、供应链成员利润均产生正向影响。     

传统零售商主导下的制造商双渠道定价决策与渠道选择

根据制造商不同双渠道结构区分为网上直销双渠道、网上分销双渠道和网上代销双渠道,引入消费者渠道偏好、单位直销成本和单位佣金比例系数参数,分析在传统零售商主导下制造商如何进行产品定价和渠道选择问题.研究表明:传统零售商和供应链总利润大小与直销成本和网络偏好相关,当直销成本和网络偏好都较高时,传统零售商利润在网络分销中最大;当直销成本较高而网络偏好较小时,其利润在网络直销中最大;且代销模式下供应链总利润始终高于分销模式.网络零售商利润大小主要受网络偏好的影响,当网络偏好较小时,其利润在代销中最大;当网络偏好较大时,其利润在分销中最大.制造商利润与直销成本、网络偏好以及佣金比例均相关,当网络偏好偏大或者偏小时,其利润在直销中最大;当网络偏好适中且佣金比例较小时,其利润在分销中最大;当网络偏好适中且佣金比例较大时,其利润在代销中最大.     

使用收益分享合同获得渠道协调

考虑单周期库存(报童)类型的供应链协调问题,制造商将采用两种方式销售给零售商:直接销售方式(也称批发价合同)和收益分享方式.在收益分享方式中,零售商支付给制造商的批发价将小于直接由零售商购买时的批发价,但零售商必须将部分收益与制造商分享.文研究借助数值方法分析了制造商采用收益分享合同时的效果并证明收益分享合同可以获得渠道协调(帕累托提高).     

考虑专利保护和渠道偏好的再制造双渠道闭环供应链决策与协调

本文在电子商务环境下考虑消费者对零售渠道和直销渠道具有不同的渠道偏好,研究了专利许可零售商实施再制造的双渠道闭环供应链定价决策和协调问题。运用博弈论方法求得了集中决策和分散决策情形下的最优定价策略,并分析了消费者渠道偏好系数对节点企业最优定价策略及利润的影响。针对分散决策存在效率损失的问题,以集中决策的最优解为基准,通过联合运用一个由批发价格、直销价格和专利许可费构成的定价机制和一个利润分享机制,实现了双渠道闭环供应链的完美协调。     

Impact of product pricing and timing of investment decisions on supply chain co-opetition

In supply chain co-opetition, firms simultaneously compete and co-operate in order to maximize their profits. We consider the nature of co-opetition between two firms: The product supplier invests in the technology to improve quality, and the purchasing firm (buyer) invests in selling effort to develop the market for the product before uncertainty in demand is resolved. We consider three different decision making structures and discuss the optimal configuration from each firm’s perspective. In case 1, the supplier invests in product quality and sets the wholesale price for the product. The buyer then exerts selling effort to develop the market and following demand potential realization, sets the resale price. In case 2, the supplier invests in product quality followed by the buyer’s investment in selling effort. Then, after demand potential is observed, the supplier sets the wholesale price and the buyer sets the resale price. Finally, in case 3, both firms simultaneously invest in product quality and selling effort, respectively. Subsequently, observing the demand potential, the supplier sets the wholesale price and the buyer sets the resale price. We compare all configuration options from both the perspective of the supplier and the buyer, and show that the level of investment by the firms depends on the nature of competition between them and the level of uncertainty in demand. Our analysis reveals that although configuration 1 results in the highest profits for the integrated channel, there is no clear dominating preference on system configuration from the perspective of both parties. The incentives of the co-opetition partners and the investment levels are mainly governed by the cost structure and the level of uncertainty in demand. We examine and discuss the relation between system parameters and the incentives in desiging the supply contract structure.     

消费者公平偏好对制造商开通直销渠道的影响研究

研究了消费者公平偏好对制造商开通直销渠道的影响,并分析消费者公平偏好对制造商和零售商的最优决策、制造商开通直销渠道意愿、零售商利润、以及消费者剩余等的影响。最后通过算例分析消费者公平偏好对制造商开通直销渠道意愿的影响。研究发现:不存在消费者公平偏好时,制造商仅在直销成本较小时开通直销渠道;当直销成本较大时,制造商不应开通直销渠道。然而,消费者公平偏好会降低制造商开通直销渠道的意愿;即使无直销成本,若消费者公平偏好较大,制造商也可能不会开通直销渠道。     

不同渠道偏好和运营成本下双渠道闭环供应链定价决策研究

本文以消费者对传统零售渠道和网络直销渠道的不同偏好和不同渠道运营成本为基础,研究零售商销售新产品并回收废旧产品、制造商开辟网络直销渠道的双渠道闭环供应链中成员的定价决策问题。建立三种不同市场权力结构下的定价博弈模型,用逆向归纳法得到模型的最优解,并用解析分析和数值分析得到消费者的渠道偏好程度和渠道运营成本对定价决策和利润的影响。研究表明:最优直销价格随网络直销渠道偏好程度的增加而上升,最优零售价格随网络直销渠道偏好程度的增加而下降;网络直销渠道运营成本增加对零售商有利但不利于制造商;传统渠道运营成本的增加对所有成员都不利。     

规模效应下产品具有可替代性的竞争企业的外包决策

针对产品具有一定替代性的两个竞争企业(分别为企业1和企业2)和存在规模效应的上游供应商的外包决策问题, 构建了企业1 外包前后各方的利润模型,求解了下游企业的外包和自产的最优策略以及供应商的最佳批发价格,分析了企业1 的外包策略对企业2 和供应商的外包决策的影响,比较了产品替代性对外包前后各决策变量的影响。研究发现:当企业的单位生产成本高于外包成本时,企业也可能选择自产;而当企业的单位生产成本低于外包成本时,企业也可能选择产品外包。并对模型进行进一步的拓展,比较了下游企业作顺序和同时外包决策两种情景的异同。     

Consignment contracting: Who should control inventory in the supply chain?

Consignment is a popular form of business arrangement where supplier retains ownership of the inventory and gets paid from the retailer based on actual units sold. The popularity of such an arrangement has come with some continued debates on who should control the supply chain inventory, the supplier or retailer. This paper aims at shedding light on these debated issues. We consider a single period supply chain model where a supplier contracts with a retailer. Market demand for the product is price-sensitive and uncertain. The supplier decides his consignment price charged to the retailer for each unit sold, and the retailer then chooses her retail price for selling the product. We study and compare two different consignment arrangements: The first allows the retailer to choose the supply chain inventory, together with her retail price, and is labeled as a Retailer Managed Consignment Inventory (RMCI) program; and the second calls for the supplier to decide the inventory, together with his consignment price, and is labeled as a Vendor Managed Consignment Inventory (VMCI) program. We show that with an RMCI program, the supply chain loses at least 26.4% of its first-best (expected) profit, while with VMCI, it loses just or no more than 26.4% of the first-best profit. Second, we demonstrate that both programs lead to an equal split of the corresponding channel profit between the supplier and the retailer. These results indicate that it is beneficial both to the supplier and to the retailer when delegating the inventory decision to the supplier rather than to the retailer in the channel.     

Revenue management for a supply chain with two streams of customers

In this paper, we consider revenue management for a service supply chain with one supplier and one retailer. The supplier has a limited capacity of a perishable product and both the supplier and the retailer face customers. Each customer may choose to buy a product from either the supplier or the retailer by considering prices and the cost associated with switching. For the centralized model, the supplier determines the selling prices for both herself and the retailer, and the retailer simply collects a commission fee for each product sold. We derive monotone properties for the revenue functions and pricing strategies. Further, we show that the commission fee increases the retailer’s price while decreasing the supplier’s and leads to efficiency loss of the chain. For the decentralized decision-making model, the supplier and the retailer compete in price over time. Two models are considered. In the first, the retailer buys products from the supplier before the selling season and in the second the retailer shares products with the supplier in retailing. For both models, we discuss the existence of the equilibrium and characterize the optimal decisions. Numerical results are presented to illustrate properties of the models and to compare the supply chain performance between the centralized and the decentralized models.     

Benefits of partial myopia in a durable product supply chain considering pricing and advertising

Consider a bilateral monopoly supply chain where a manufacturer distributes a durable product through a retailer to end consumers. This paper develops a differential game in which the manufacturer determines the advertising and the wholesale price while the retailer sets the retail price. Channel members are partially myopic when they only consider goodwill dynamics and disregard sales evolution. We derive and compare partially myopic and forward-looking strategies with the following observations: First, under decentralized scenario, partially myopic channel members get higher profits than the forward-looking ones, while the opposite result occurs in centralized scenario. Second, when channel members are partially myopic, the distribution channel can benefit from the strategic decentralization.