首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
We prove that if n \geqq 3 n \geqq 3 and A0, ?, An-2 A_0, \ldots, A_{n-2} are entire functions of small growth, not all polynomials, then the linear differential equation¶¶ w(n) + ?j=0n-2 Aj w(j) = 0 w^{(n)} + \sum\limits_{j=0}^{n-2} A_j w^{(j)} = 0 ¶¶ cannot have a fundamental set of solutions each with few zeros.  相似文献   

2.
In this paper we classify the centers localized at the origin of coordinates, the cyclicity of their Hopf bifurcation and their isochronicity for the polynomial differential systems in \mathbbR2{\mathbb{R}^2} of degree d that in complex notation z = x + i y can be written as
[(z)\dot] = (l+i) z + (z[`(z)])\fracd-52 (A z4+j[`(z)]1-j + B z3[`(z)]2 + C z2-j[`(z)]3+j+D[`(z)]5), \dot z = (\lambda+i) z + (z \overline{z})^{\frac{d-5}{2}} \left(A z^{4+j} \overline{z}^{1-j} + B z^3 \overline{z}^2 + C z^{2-j} \overline{z}^{3+j}+D \overline{z}^5\right),  相似文献   

3.
We solve the truncated complex moment problem for measures supported on the variety K o \mathcal{K}\equiv { z ? \in C: z [(z)\tilde]\widetilde{z} = A+Bz+C [(z)\tilde]\widetilde{z} +Dz 2 ,D 1 \neq 0}. Given a doubly indexed finite sequence of complex numbers g o g(2n):g00,g01,g10,?,g0,2n,g1,2n-1,?,g2n-1,1,g2n,0 \gamma\equiv\gamma^{(2n)}:\gamma_{00},\gamma_{01},\gamma_{10},\ldots,\gamma_{0,2n},\gamma_{1,2n-1},\ldots,\gamma_{2n-1,1},\gamma_{2n,0} , there exists a positive Borel measure m\mu supported in K \mathcal{K} such that gij=ò[`(z)]izj dm (0 £ 1+j £ 2n) \gamma_{ij}=\int\overline{z}^{i}z^{j}\,d\mu\,(0\leq1+j\leq2n) if and only if the moment matrix M(n)( g\gamma ) is positive, recursively generated, with a column dependence relation Z [(Z)\tilde]\widetilde{Z} = A1+BZ +C [(Z)\tilde]\widetilde{Z} +DZ 2, and card V(g) 3\mathcal{V}(\gamma)\geq rank M(n), where V(g)\mathcal{V}(\gamma) is the variety associated to g \gamma . The last condition may be replaced by the condition that there exists a complex number gn,n+1 \gamma_{n,n+1} satisfying gn+1,n o [`(g)]n,n+1=Agn,n-1+Bgn,n+Cgn+1,n-1+Dgn,n+1 \gamma_{n+1,n}\equiv\overline{\gamma}_{n,n+1}=A\gamma_{n,n-1}+B\gamma_{n,n}+C\gamma_{n+1,n-1}+D\gamma_{n,n+1} . We combine these results with a recent theorem of J. Stochel to solve the full complex moment problem for K \mathcal{K} , and we illustrate the connection between the truncated and full moment problems for other varieties as well, including the variety z k = p(z, [(Z)\tilde] \widetilde{Z} ), deg p < k.  相似文献   

4.
For a continuous function s\sigma defined on [0,1]×\mathbbT[0,1]\times\mathbb{T}, let \ops\op\sigma stand for the (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1)\times(n+1) matrix whose (j,k)(j,k)-entries are equal to \frac1 2pò02p s( \fracjn,eiq) e-i(j-k)q  dq,        j,k = 0,1,...,n . \displaystyle \frac{1} {2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \sigma \left( \frac{j}{n},e^{i\theta}\right) e^{-i(j-k)\theta} \,d\theta, \qquad j,k =0,1,\dots,n~. These matrices can be thought of as variable-coefficient Toeplitz matrices or as the discrete analogue of pseudodifferential operators. Under the assumption that the function s\sigma possesses a logarithm which is sufficiently smooth on [0,1]×\mathbbT[0,1]\times\mathbb{T}, we prove that the asymptotics of the determinants of \ops\op\sigma are given by det[\ops] ~ G[s](n+1)E[s]     \text as   n?¥ , \det \left[\op\sigma\right] \sim G[\sigma]^{(n+1)}E[\sigma] \quad \text{ as \ } n\to\infty~, where G[s]G[\sigma] and E[s]E[\sigma] are explicitly determined constants. This formula is a generalization of the Szegö Limit Theorem. In comparison with the classical theory of Toeplitz determinants some new features appear.  相似文献   

5.
Given g { l\fracn2 g( lj x - kb ) }jezjezn ,where  lj \left\{ {\lambda ^{\frac{n}{2}} g\left( {\lambda _j x - kb} \right)} \right\}_{j\varepsilon zj\varepsilon z^n } ,where\;\lambda _j > 0 and b > 0. Sufficient conditions for the wavelet system to constitute a frame for L 2(R n ) are given. For a class of functions g{ ezrib( j,x ) g( x - lk ) }jezn ,kez\left\{ {e^{zrib\left( {j,x} \right)} g\left( {x - \lambda _k } \right)} \right\}_{j\varepsilon z^n ,k\varepsilon z} to be a frame.  相似文献   

6.
7.
Let Lf(x)=-\frac1w?i,j ?i(ai,j(·)?jf)(x)+V(x)f(x){\mathcal{L}f(x)=-\frac{1}{\omega}\sum_{i,j} \partial_i(a_{i,j}(\cdot)\partial_jf)(x)+V(x)f(x)} with the non-negative potential V belonging to reverse H?lder class with respect to the measure ω(x)dx, where ω(x) satisfies the A 2 condition of Muckenhoupt and a i,j (x) is a real symmetric matrix satisfying l-1w(x)|x|2 £ ?ni,j=1ai,j(x)xixj £ lw(x)|x|2.{\lambda^{-1}\omega(x)|\xi|^2\le \sum^n_{i,j=1}a_{i,j}(x)\xi_i\xi_j\le\lambda\omega(x)|\xi|^2. } We obtain some estimates for VaL-a{V^{\alpha}\mathcal{L}^{-\alpha}} on the weighted L p spaces and we study the weighted L p boundedness of the commutator [b, Va L-a]{[b, V^{\alpha} \mathcal{L}^{-\alpha}]} when b ? BMOw{b\in BMO_\omega} and 0 < α ≤ 1.  相似文献   

8.
Let x1,..., xn be points in the d-dimensional Euclidean space Ed with || xi-xj|| £ 1\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| \le 1 for all 1 \leqq i,j \leqq n1 \leqq i,j \leqq n, where || .||\| .\| denotes the Euclidean norm. We ask for the maximum M(d,n) of \mathop?ij=1n|| xi-xj|| 2\textstyle\mathop\sum\limits _{i,\,j=1}^{n}\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| ^{2} (see [4]). This paper deals with the case d = 2. We calculate M(2, n) and show that the value M(2, n) is attained if and only if the points are distributed as evenly as possible among the vertices of a regular triangle of edge-length 1. Moreover we give an upper bound for the value \mathop?ij=1n|| xi-xj|| \textstyle\mathop\sum\limits _{i,\,j=1}^{n}\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| , where the points x1,...,xn are chosen under the same constraints as above.  相似文献   

9.
A generalized Hlawka's inequality says that for any n (\geqq 2) (\geqq 2) complex numbers¶ x1, x2, ..., xn,¶¶ ?i=1n|xi - ?j=1nxj| \leqq ?i=1n|xi| + (n - 2)|?j=1nxj|. \sum_{i=1}^n\Bigg|x_i - \sum_{j=1}^{n}x_j\Bigg| \leqq \sum_{i=1}^{n}|x_i| + (n - 2)\Bigg|\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_j\Bigg|. ¶¶ We generalize this inequality to the trace norm and the trace of an n x n matrix A as¶¶ ||A - Tr A ||1 \leqq ||A||1 + (n - 2)| Tr A|. ||A - {\rm Tr} A ||_1\ \leqq ||A||_1 + (n - 2)| {\rm Tr} A|. ¶¶ We consider also the related inequalities for p-norms (1 \leqq p \leqq ¥) (1 \leqq p \leqq \infty) on matrices.  相似文献   

10.
In this paper we study the asymptotic behaviour as t → ∞ of solutions to a nonlocal diffusion problem on a lattice, namely, un(t) = ?j ? \mathbbZd Jn-juj(t)-un(t)u^{\prime}_{n}(t) = \sum_{{j\in}{{{\mathbb{Z}}}^{d}}} J_{n-j}u_{j}(t)-u_{n}(t) with t ≥ 0 and n ? \mathbbZdn \in {\mathbb{Z}}^{d}. We assume that J is nonnegative and verifies ?n ? \mathbbZdJn = 1\sum_{{n \in {\mathbb{Z}}}^{d}}J_{n}= 1. We find that solutions decay to zero as t → ∞ and prove an optimal decay rate using, as our main tool, the discrete Fourier transform.  相似文献   

11.
Let W í \Bbb C\Omega \subseteq {\Bbb C} be a simply connected domain in \Bbb C{\Bbb C} , such that {¥} è[ \Bbb C \[`(W)]]\{\infty\} \cup [ {\Bbb C} \setminus \bar{\Omega}] is connected. If g is holomorphic in Ω and every derivative of g extends continuously on [`(W)]\bar{\Omega} , then we write gA (Ω). For gA (Ω) and z ? [`(W)]\zeta \in \bar{\Omega} we denote SN (g,z)(z) = ?Nl=0\fracg(l) (z)l ! (z-z)lS_N (g,\zeta )(z)= \sum^{N}_{l=0}\frac{g^{(l)} (\zeta )}{l !} (z-\zeta )^l . We prove the existence of a function fA(Ω), such that the following hold:
i)  There exists a strictly increasing sequence μn ∈ {0, 1, 2, …}, n = 1, 2, …, such that, for every pair of compact sets Γ, Δ ⊂ [`(W)]\bar{\Omega} and every l ∈ {0, 1, 2, …} we have supz ? G supw ? D \frac?l?wl Smnf,z) (w)-f(l)(w) ? 0,    as n ? + ¥    and\sup_{\zeta \in \Gamma} \sup_{w \in \Delta} \frac{\partial^l}{\partial w^l} S_{\mu_ n} (\,f,\zeta) (w)-f^{(l)}(w) \rightarrow 0, \hskip 7.8pt {\rm as}\,n \rightarrow + \infty \quad {\rm and}
ii)  For every compact set K ì \Bbb CK \subset {\Bbb C} with K?[`(W)] = ?K\cap \bar{\Omega} =\emptyset and Kc connected and every function h: K? \Bbb Ch: K\rightarrow {\Bbb C} continuous on K and holomorphic in K0, there exists a subsequence { m¢n }n=1\{ \mu^\prime _n \}^{\infty}_{n=1} of {mn }n=1\{\mu_n \}^{\infty}_{n=1} , such that, for every compact set L ì [`(W)]L \subset \bar{\Omega} we have supz ? L supz ? K Sm¢nf,z)(z)-h(z) ? 0,    as  n? + ¥.\sup_{\zeta \in L} \sup_{z\in K} S_{\mu^\prime _n} (\,f,\zeta )(z)-h(z) \rightarrow 0, \hskip 7.8pt {\rm as} \, n\rightarrow + \infty .
  相似文献   

12.
Let V be a 2m-dimensional symplectic vector space over an algebraically closed field K. Let $ \mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)} Let V be a 2m-dimensional symplectic vector space over an algebraically closed field K. Let \mathfrakBn(f) \mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)} be the two-sided ideal of the Brauer algebra \mathfrakBn( - 2m ) {\mathfrak{B}_n}\left( { - 2m} \right) over K generated by e 1 e 3⋯ e 2f-1 where 0 ≤ f ≤ [n/2]. Let HTf ?n \mathcal{H}\mathcal{T}_f^{ \otimes n} be the subspace of partial-harmonic tensors of valence f in V n . In this paper we prove that dimHTf ?n \mathcal{H}\mathcal{T}_f^{ \otimes n} and dim \textEn\textdK\textSp(V)( V ?n \mathord
/ \vphantom V ?n V ?n V ?n\mathfrakBn(f) ) {\text{En}}{{\text{d}}_{K{\text{Sp}}(V)}}\left( {{{{V^{ \otimes n}}} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{V^{ \otimes n}}} {{V^{ \otimes n}}}}} \right.} {{V^{ \otimes n}}}}\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}} \right) are both independent of K, and the natural homomorphism from \mathfrakBn( - 2m ) \mathord/ \vphantom ( - 2m ) \mathfrakBn(f) \mathfrakBn(f) {\mathfrak{B}_n}{{\left( { - 2m} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( { - 2m} \right)} {\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}}}} \right.} {\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}}} to \textEn\textdK\textSp(V)( V ?n \mathord/ \vphantom V ?n V ?n V ?n\mathfrakBn(f) ) {\text{En}}{{\text{d}}_{K{\text{Sp}}(V)}}\left( {{{{V^{ \otimes n}}} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{V^{ \otimes n}}} {{V^{ \otimes n}}}}} \right.} {{V^{ \otimes n}}}}\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}} \right) is always surjective. We show that HTf ?n \mathcal{H}\mathcal{T}_f^{ \otimes n} has a Weyl filtration and is isomorphic to the dual of V ?n\mathfrakBn(f) \mathord/ \vphantom V ?n\mathfrakBn(f) V V ?n\mathfrakBn( f + 1 ) {{{{V^{ \otimes n}}\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{{V^{ \otimes n}}\mathfrak{B}_n^{(f)}} V}} \right.} V}^{ \otimes n}}\mathfrak{B}_n^{\left( {f + 1} \right)} as an \textSp(V) - ( \mathfrakBn( - 2m ) \mathord/ \vphantom ( - 2m ) \mathfrakBn( f + 1 ) \mathfrakBn( f + 1 ) ) {\text{Sp}}(V) - \left( {{\mathfrak{B}_n}{{\left( { - 2m} \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( { - 2m} \right)} {\mathfrak{B}_n^{\left( {f + 1} \right)}}}} \right.} {\mathfrak{B}_n^{\left( {f + 1} \right)}}}} \right) -bimodule. We obtain an \textSp(V) - \mathfrakBn {\text{Sp}}(V) - {\mathfrak{B}_n} -bimodules filtration of V n such that each successive quotient is isomorphic to some ?( l) ?zg,l\mathfrakBn \nabla \left( \lambda \right) \otimes {z_{g,\lambda }}{\mathfrak{B}_n} with λ ⊢ n 2g, ℓ(λ)≤m and 0 ≤ g ≤ [n/2], where ∇(λ) is the co-Weyl module associated to λ and z g is an explicitly constructed maximal vector of weight λ. As a byproduct, we show that each right \mathfrakBn {\mathfrak{B}_n} -module zg,l\mathfrakBn {z_{g,\lambda }}{\mathfrak{B}_n} is integrally defined and stable under base change.  相似文献   

13.
For a simply connected and normalized domain D in the plane it was proven by Pólya and Schiffer in 1954 for the fixed membrane eigenvalues
?n1 \frac1lj 3 ?n1 \frac1l(0)j\sum \limits^{n}_{1} \frac{1}{{\lambda}_j} \geq \sum \limits^{n}_{1} \frac{1}{{\lambda}^{(0)}_j}  相似文献   

14.
Summary. Let F, Y \Phi, \Psi be strictly monotonic continuous functions, F,G be positive functions on an interval I and let n ? \Bbb N \{1} n \in {\Bbb N} \setminus \{1\} . The functional equation¶¶F-1 ([(?i=1nF(xi)F(xi))/(?i=1n F(xi)]) Y-1 ([(?i=1nY(xi)G(xi))/(?i=1n G(xi))])  (x1,?,xn ? I) \Phi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Phi(x_{i})F(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} F(x_{i}}\right) \Psi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Psi(x_{i})G(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} G(x_{i})}\right)\,\,(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n} \in I) ¶was solved by Bajraktarevi' [3] for a fixed n 3 3 n\ge 3 . Assuming that the functions involved are twice differentiable he proved that the above functional equation holds if and only if¶¶Y(x) = [(aF(x) + b)/(cF(x) + d)],       G(x) = kF(x)(cF(x) + d) \Psi(x) = {a\Phi(x)\,+\,b\over c\Phi(x)\,+\,d},\qquad G(x) = kF(x)(c\Phi(x) + d) ¶where a,b,c,d,k are arbitrary constants with k(c2+d2)(ad-bc) 1 0 k(c^2+d^2)(ad-bc)\ne 0 . Supposing the functional equation for all n = 2,3,... n = 2,3,\dots Aczél and Daróczy [2] obtained the same result without differentiability conditions.¶The case of fixed n = 2 is, as in many similar problems, much more difficult and allows considerably more solutions. Here we assume only that the same functional equation is satisfied for n = 2 and solve it under the supposition that the functions involved are six times differentiable. Our main tool is the deduction of a sixth order differential equation for the function j = F°Y-1 \varphi = \Phi\circ\Psi^{-1} . We get 32 new families of solutions.  相似文献   

15.
In this paper we derive a technique for obtaining limit theorems for suprema of Lévy processes from their random walk counterparts. For each a>0, let $\{Y^{(a)}_{n}:n\ge1\}In this paper we derive a technique for obtaining limit theorems for suprema of Lévy processes from their random walk counterparts. For each a>0, let {Y(a)n:n 3 1}\{Y^{(a)}_{n}:n\ge1\} be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables and {X(a)t:t 3 0}\{X^{(a)}_{t}:t\ge0\} be a Lévy process such that X1(a)=dY1(a)X_{1}^{(a)}\stackrel{d}{=}Y_{1}^{(a)}, \mathbbEX1(a) < 0\mathbb{E}X_{1}^{(a)}<0 and \mathbbEX1(a)-0\mathbb{E}X_{1}^{(a)}\uparrow0 as a↓0. Let S(a)n=?k=1n Y(a)kS^{(a)}_{n}=\sum _{k=1}^{n} Y^{(a)}_{k}. Then, under some mild assumptions, , for some random variable and some function Δ(⋅). We utilize this result to present a number of limit theorems for suprema of Lévy processes in the heavy-traffic regime.  相似文献   

16.
Let \mathbb Dn:={z=(z1,?, zn) ? \mathbb Cn:|zj| < 1,   j=1,?, n}{\mathbb {D}^n:=\{z=(z_1,\ldots, z_n)\in \mathbb {C}^n:|z_j| < 1, \;j=1,\ldots, n\}}, and let [`(\mathbbD)]n{\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n} denote its closure in \mathbb Cn{\mathbb {C}^n}. Consider the ring
Cr([`(\mathbbD)]n;\mathbb C) = {f:[`(\mathbbD)]n? \mathbb C:f   is   continuous   and  f(z)=[`(f([`(z)]))]   (z ? [`(\mathbbD)]n)}C_{\rm r}(\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n;\mathbb {C}) =\left\{f: \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n\rightarrow \mathbb {C}:f \,\, {\rm is \,\, continuous \,\, and}\,\, f(z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})} \;(z\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n)\right\}  相似文献   

17.
Letf(z):=Σ j=0 a j z j , where aj 0,j large enough, and for someq ε C such that ¦q¦ $$q_j : = a_{j - 1} a_{j + 1} /a_j^2 \to q,j \to \infty .$$ Define for m,n = 0,1,2,..., the Toeplitz determinant $$D(m/n): = \det (a_{m - j + k} )_{j,k = 1}^n .$$ Given ? > 0, we show that form large enough, and for everyn = 1,2,3,..., $$(1 - \varepsilon )^n \leqslant \left| {{{D(m/n)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{D(m/n)} {\left\{ {a_m^n \mathop \Pi \limits_{j - 1}^{n - 1} (1 - q_m^j )^{n - j} } \right\}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left\{ {a_m^n \mathop \Pi \limits_{j - 1}^{n - 1} (1 - q_m^j )^{n - j} } \right\}}}} \right| \leqslant (1 + \varepsilon )^n .$$ We apply this to show that any sequence of Padé approximants {[m k /n k ]} 1 tof, withm k →∞ ask→ ∞, converges locally uniformly in C. In particular, the diagonal sequence {[n/n]} 1 converges throughout C. Further, under additional assumptions, we give sharper asymptotics forD(m/n).  相似文献   

18.
Let R(T): = ò1T|z(1+it)|2 dt - z(2)T+plogTR(T):= \int_{1}^{T}|\zeta (1+it)|^{2}\,\mathrm{d}t - \zeta (2)T+\pi\log T. We derive a precise explicit expression for R(t) which is used to derive asymptotic formulas for ò1TR(t) dt\int_{1}^{T}R(t)\,\mathrm{d}t and ò1TR2(t) dt\int_{1}^{T}R^{2}(t)\,\mathrm{d}t. These results improve on earlier upper bounds of Balasubramanian, Ramachandra and the author for the integrals in question.  相似文献   

19.
The aim of this paper is to prove the transcendence of certain infinite products. As applications, we get necessary and sufficient conditions for transcendence of the value of $\Pi_{k=0}^{\infty}(1+a_{k}^{(1)}{z_{1}r^{k}}+\cdot\cdot\cdot+a_{k}^{(m)}{z_{m}r^{k}})$ at appropriate algebraic points, where r ≥ 2 is an integer and {an (i)}n≥ 0 (1 ≤ im) are suitable sequences of algebraic numbers.  相似文献   

20.
Let x1, ?, xn \xi_1, \ldots, \xi_n be random variables and U be a subset of the Cartesian product \mathbbZ+n, \mathbbZ+ \mathbb{Z}_+^n, \mathbb{Z}_+ being the set of all non-negative integers. The random variables are said to be strictly U-uncorrelated if¶¶E(x1j1 ?xnjn) = E(x1j1) ?E(xnjn) ? (j1, ... ,jn) ? U. \textbf {E}\big(\xi_1^{j_1} \cdots \xi_n^{j_n}\big) = \textbf {E}\big(\xi_1^{j_1}\big) \cdots \textbf {E}\big(\xi_n^{j_n}\big) \iff (j_1, \dots ,j_n) \in U. ¶It is proved that for an arbitrary subset U \subseteqq \mathbbZ+n U \subseteqq \mathbb{Z}_+^n containing all points with 0 or 1 non-zero coordinates there exists a collection of n strictly U-uncorrelated random variables.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号