共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
设(L,≤,∨,∧)为一分配格。满足Ax=x的向量x称为方阵A的特征向量。本文的主工目的是通过矩阵的伴随有向图来刻画矩阵的特征向量并给出矩阵特征向量的界。同时我们将定义矩阵A的上基本特征向量并讨论它的性质。 相似文献
2.
主要讨论分配格上的矩阵A的标准特征向量问题.从基本概念出发,给出了全部标准特征向量的计算方法。 相似文献
3.
借助于伪补和矩阵的幂序列研究了完全完备分配格上矩阵相对于特征值的特征向量的计算方法,利用特征向量的性质证明了最大特征向量的计算公式,并给出了一般特征向量的计算方法. 相似文献
4.
5.
本文给出并论证了 ,当 n阶实方阵 A具有 i ( 1≤ i≤ n)个 (即任意多个 )模最大的特征值时 ,用幂法求出这些模最大的特征值及其相应特征向量的方法 .该方法是对幂法理论的进一步完善 相似文献
6.
本给出并论证了当n阶实方阵A具有r(1≤r≤n)个模最大的特征值及其相应特征向量的方法,实验规范化措施,使得行范数等于1,在电子计算机上不会产生溢出停机,这是一种有实用价值的算法。 相似文献
7.
8.
矩阵特征值、特征向量的确定 总被引:4,自引:1,他引:3
首先对由 A的特征值、特征向量求 A- 1 ,AT,A* ( A的伴随矩阵 )、P- 1 AP以及 A的多项式φ( A)的特征值和特征向量的结论作了个归纳 ;对相反的情形 ,我们给出了部分已有的结果 ,并通过四道例题着重讨论了如何由 φ( A)的特征值来求 A的特征值 . 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
《Quaestiones Mathematicae》2013,36(4):347-370
Abstract In this note we obtain some extensions and an approximation of the Lyapunov convexity theorem by means of the bilinear integration of a set-valued function. The integration is performed successively with respect to a non-atomic, a direct sum and a Darboux vector measure. The necessary counterexamples are provided. 相似文献
12.
Tuomas E. Tahko 《Metaphysica》2011,12(2):151-164
The distinction between a priori and a posteriori knowledge has been the subject of an enormous amount of discussion, but the literature is biased against recognizing the intimate relationship between these forms of knowledge. For instance, it seems to be almost impossible to find a sample of pure a priori or a posteriori knowledge. In this paper, it will be suggested that distinguishing between a priori and a posteriori is more problematic than is often suggested, and that a priori and a posteriori resources are in fact used in parallel. We will define this relationship between a priori and a posteriori knowledge as the bootstrapping relationship. As we will see, this relationship gives us reasons to seek for an altogether novel definition of a priori and a posteriori knowledge. Specifically, we will have to analyse the relationship between a priori knowledge and a priori reasoning, and it will be suggested that the latter serves as a more promising starting point for the analysis of aprioricity. We will also analyse a number of examples from the natural sciences and consider the role of a priori reasoning in these examples. The focus of this paper is the analysis of the concepts of a priori and a posteriori knowledge rather than the epistemic domain of a posteriori and a priori justification. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Kirsty Wilson 《Research in Mathematics Education》2013,15(1):117-132
Spreadsheets use a meaningful algebra-like notation which, research suggests, can support pupils in developing an understanding of variables. This paper discusses the activity of Year 8 pupils who were taught to name a column on a spreadsheet, and who were asked to reflect upon their activity in a stimulated recall interview. More specifically, it considers the pupils' understanding of notation, such as 'A2' and 'm', which they used when constructing spreadsheet formulae. It is suggested that experience of naming columns may help pupils to develop a clearer sense of the notation as a variable, and to make links between their spreadsheet activity and use of standard algebraic notation [1]. 相似文献
16.
向开南 《数学物理学报(B辑英文版)》2000,20(4)
Let M = (Mt,Ft) be a uniformly integrable continuous martingale with MO = 0. For1 5 p < cot we setIIMllBMO. = '3p II[E[IMoo ~ MTIplFT]]'/Pll.,where the supremum is taken over all stopping times T.Set BMO. = {M: IIMllBMO. < co}. It is well known that BMO. = BMO, (VI S p 5 q).F'urthermore, all 11.llBMO. norms are equivalent andIIi ~~if;llMllBMO. = SUP T P(T < co)i'where the supremum is taken over all stopping times T satisfying P(T < co) > 0. In the laterwe shall simply … 相似文献
17.
18.
Rulin Shen Changguo Shao Qinhui Jiang Wujie Shi Victor Mazurov 《Monatshefte für Mathematik》2010,160(3):337-341
Let G be a group and τ e (G) the set of numbers of elements of G of the same order. In this paper, by τ e (G), we give a new characterization of A 5, where A 5 is the alternating group of degree 5. We get the theorem following: Theorem. Let G be a group, ${G\cong A_5}$ if and only if τ e (G) = τ e (A 5) = {1, 15, 20, 24}. 相似文献
19.