基于交叉评价策略的DEA灰色关联排序模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元相对效率的有效方法,其中的交叉效率评价方法可用来对决策单元进行区分排序.针对原有模型中交叉效率值的不唯一问题,结合灰色关联分析思想,构建理想决策单元,定义各决策单元与理想决策单元的灰色关联度,以灰色关联度值最大为目标,建立优化模型来计算输入和输出指标的最佳权重,据此得出决策单元的交叉效率值,实现对决策单元的完全排序.最后通过算例来验证模型的有效性和实用性.     

基于交叉评价策略的DEA灰色关联排序模型北大核心

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元相对效率的有效方法,其中的交叉效率评价方法可用来对决策单元进行区分排序.针对原有模型中交叉效率值的不唯一问题,结合灰色关联分析思想,构建理想决策单元,定义各决策单元与理想决策单元的灰色关联度,以灰色关联度值最大为目标,建立优化模型来计算输入和输出指标的最佳权重,据此得出决策单元的交叉效率值,实现对决策单元的完全排序.最后通过算例来验证模型的有效性和实用性.     

一种基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法的完善和扩展

本文对文[1]中提出的基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法进行了完善和扩展。首先,根据CCR模型,给出了两类特殊的DEA模型,分别是仅有投入数据的DEA模型和仅有产出数据的DEA模型;其次,基于这两个模型,应用上述方法实现了对仅有投入(或产出)数据的决策单元的排序;第三,给出了排序方法中参数a的计算方法;最后,通过修正排序模型,有效提高了排序方法的计算精度。改进后的排序方法避免了两个决策单元因为相对效率值过小而不能排序的情形,其应用范围也进一步扩大。     

带有随机决策单元的广义数据包络分析方法

广义DEA方法是一种相对效率评价方法,解决了决策单元相对于任意参考系(样本单元集)的效率比较问题.在实际中,有时评价标准是确定的,决策单元的生产具有不确定性,有必要在进行生产之前基于确定性样本单元对随机性决策单元进行相对效率评价.为了解决这个问题,研究样本单元为确定值,决策单元为随机变量的广义DEA模型,分别通过期望值和机会约束将随机模型转化为确定性规划,给出决策单元GEDEA有效和GCDEA有效的概念,GEDEA有效与多目标规划Pareto有效关系,以及利用移动因子对决策单元进行有效性排序方法.     

广义与传统BC~2模型效率评价差异及其几何刻画

传统DEA方法相对于决策单元全体对决策单元进行评价,广义DEA方法相对于样本单元全体对决策单元进行评价.由于参照系的不同,对不同决策单元的相对效率评价结果可能不同.针对这种情况,对基于BC2模型的只有投入或只有产出的传统和广义DEA模型进行说明,并通过样本前沿面的移动对广义DEA模型中相对效率值进行几何刻画.     

数量差异较大决策单元的DEA有效性评价

传统DEA方法基于决策单元集对每个决策单元进行相对效率评价,如果决策单元之间在数量上存在较大差异,评价结果可能不尽合理.为了解决这个问题,首先利用聚类分析按一定标准将决策单元进行分类,然后计算每个决策单元相对其所在类的相对效率,最后根据决策单元集和每个类的数量规模进行赋权,给出决策单元的加权综合效率.     

用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序

在数据包络分析(DEA)中,公共权重模型是决策单元效率评价与排序的常用方法之一。与传统DEA模型相比,公共权重模型用一组公共的投入产出权重评价所有决策单元,评价结果往往更具有区分度且更为客观。本文考虑决策单元对排序位置的满意程度,提出了基于最大化最小满意度和最大化平均满意度两类新的公共权重模型。首先,基于随机多准则可接受度分析(SMAA)方法,计算出每个决策单元处于各个排名位置的可接受度;然后,通过逆权重空间分析,分别求得使最小满意度和平均满意度最大化的一组公共权重;最后,利用所求的公共权重,计算各决策单元的效率值及相应的排序。算例分析验证了本文提出的基于SMAA的公共权重模型用于决策单元效率评价与排序的可行性。     

Interval DEA模型中决策单元的投影问题

在传统的DEA模型中,最优相对效率模型是在不大于1的范围内研究决策单元的效率的,最差相对效率模型是在不小于1的范围内研究决策单元的效率,这两种模型在研究投影问题时,是在不同的范围内进行的,有一定的片面性.将在interval DEA模型中,研究决策单元的投影问题,该模型是在相同的约束域内研究最优和最差相对效率模型,得出的结论将更加全面,通过两个定理给出了非DEA有效的决策单元在DEA有效面上的投影表达式和非DEA无效的决策单元在DEA无效面上的投影表达式.同时,通过一个实例对决策单元在interval DEA模型中的投影结果与在传统的DEA模型的投影结果进行了比较,发现投影结果比传统模型得到的投影结果对实际的生产有更强的指导意义.     

四阶椭圆问题的C0非协调元

基于泡函数,本文构造了二维四阶椭圆问题的三个C⁰非协调单元, 其中一个是三角形单元,另两个是矩形单元. 我们证明一个单元是一阶收敛,另两个单元是二阶收敛.     

基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法

传统的交叉效率集结过程通常采用算术平均方法,不仅会低估自评的重要性,而且未考虑决策者的风险偏好。针对上述问题,提出一种基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法。首先,求解交叉效率矩阵,运用熵权法确定他评过程中评价单元的指标权重。然后,引入前景理论以考虑决策者在交叉效率集结过程中的风险偏好,利用TOPSIS方法识别正负参考点,进而构造总体效用函数,得到前景交叉效率矩阵。随后,构建最大化前景价值模型,求解集结权重。该方法既考虑到交叉效率集结的相对重要性权重,又将决策者的风险偏好纳入到效率评价中,从而实现决策单元的全排序。最后,结合实例验证方法的有效性。     

Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): Model and ranking method

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a very effective method to evaluate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). Since the data of production processes cannot be precisely measured in some cases, the uncertain theory has played an important role in DEA. This paper attempts to extend the traditional DEA models to a fuzzy framework, thus producing a fuzzy DEA model based on credibility measure. Following is a method of ranking all the DMUs. In order to solve the fuzzy model, we have designed the hybrid algorithm combined with fuzzy simulation and genetic algorithm. When the inputs and outputs are all trapezoidal or triangular fuzzy variables, the model can be transformed to linear programming. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the fuzzy DEA model and the method of ranking all the DMUs.     

A Complete Efficiency Ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

The efficiency measures provided by DEA can be used for ranking Decision Making Units (DMUs), however, this ranking procedure does not yield relative rankings for those units with 100% efficiency. Andersen and Petersen have proposed a modified efficiency measure for efficient units which can be used for ranking, but this ranking breaks down in some cases, and can be unstable when one of the DMUs has a relatively small value for some of its inputs. This paper proposes an alternative efficiency measure, based on a different optimization problem that removes the difficulties.     

Random effects logistic regression model for ranking efficiency in data envelopment analysis

Ranking efficiency based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) results can be used for grouping decision-making units (DMUs). The resulting group membership can be partly related to the environmental characteristics of DMU, which are not used either as input or output. Utilizing the expert knowledge on super efficiency DEA results, we propose a multinomial Dirichlet regression model, which can be used for the purpose of selection of new projects. A case study is presented in the context of ranking analysis of new information technology commercialization projects. It is expected that our proposed approach can complement the DEA ranking results with environmental factors and at the same time it facilitates the prediction of efficiency of new DMUs with only given environmental characteristics.     

A Semi-Infinite Programming Model In Data Envelopment Analysis

We consider a model for data envelopment analysis with infinitely many decision-making units. The determination of the relative efficiency of a given decision-making unit amounts to the solution of a semi-infinite optimization problem. We show that a decision-making unit of maximal relative efficiency exists and that it is 100% efficient. Moreover, this decision-making unit can be found by calculating a zero of the semi-infinite constraint function. For the latter task we propose a bi-level algorithm. We apply this algorithm to a problem from chemical engineering and present numerical results     

计算股市的基本方程、理论和原理(Ⅲ)——基本理论

由基本方程导出两个理论:1 股票的价值理论v*(t)=v(0)exp(ar₂t)。2 股能守恒理论。将股能定义为股价v及其导数v>的二次函数φ=Av2+Bvv+Cv2+Dv,在基本方程约束下,将问题归结为沿最优路径的约束优化问题。应用Lagrange乘数,变分法Euler方程可证?对任何v、v>守恒。文中给出应用这些方程和理论对股市走势作分析的一些判断并为深沪股市实际走势所验证。     

Interval cross efficiency for fully ranking decision making units using DEA/AHP approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular technique for measuring the relative efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs). Fully ranking DMUs is a traditional and important topic in DEA. In various types of ranking methods, cross efficiency method receives much attention from researchers because it evaluates DMUs by using self and peer evaluation. However, cross efficiency score is usual nonuniqueness. This paper combines the DEA and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to fully rank the DMUs that considers all possible cross efficiencies of a DMU with respect to all the other DMUs. We firstly measure the interval cross efficiency of each DMU. Based on the interval cross efficiency, relative efficiency pairwise comparison between each pair of DMUs is used to construct interval multiplicative preference relations (IMPRs). To obtain the consistency ranking order, a method to derive consistent IMPRs is developed. After that, the full ranking order of DMUs from completely consistent IMPRs is derived. It is worth noting that our DEA/AHP approach not only avoids overestimation of DMUs’ efficiency by only self-evaluation, but also eliminates the subjectivity of pairwise comparison between DMUs in AHP. Finally, a real example is offered to illustrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed procedure.     

一类非线性积分偏微分方程的初值问题

讨论初值问题 整体经典解的存在性。该问题来源于粘弹性力学。在关于已知函数的一些正则性假设和p'(s)≥c₁>0,|q'(s)|≤const,λ(0)<0,λ'(0)<λ2(0)的条件下,通过能量估计,证明了该问题整体经典解的存在性。     

Evaluating the performances of decision-making units based on interval efficiencies

Efficiency could be not only the ratio of weighted sum of outputs to that of inputs but also that of weighted sum of inputs to that of outputs. When the previous efficiency measures the best relative efficiency within the range of no more than one, the decision-making units (DMUs) who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. If the previous efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. When the later efficiency is measured within the range of no more than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. If the later efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. This paper mainly studies an interval DEA model with later efficiency, in which efficiency is measured within the range of an interval, whose upper bound is set to one and the lower bound is determined by introducing a virtual ideal DMU, whose performance is definitely superior to any DMUs. The efficiencies, obtained from interval DEA model, turn out to be all intervals and are referred to as interval efficiencies, which combine the best and the worst relative efficiency in a reasonable manner to give an overall assessment of performances for all DMUs. Assessor's preference information on input and output weights is also incorporated into interval DEA model reasonably and conveniently. Through an example, some differences are found from the ranking results obtained from interval DEA model and bounded DEA model using the Hurwicz criterion approach to rank the interval efficiencies.