决策单元的投影问题研究

在传统的DEA模型中,不论是最优相对效率模型或者最差相对效率模型,它们研究投影问题都是在不同的约束域内进行的,得出的结论都有一定的片面性.在bounded DEA模型中,决策单元的效率计算是在一个区间内进行的,可以同时研究非DEA有效的决策单元在有效前沿面上的投影和非DEA无效的决策单元在DEA无效面上的投影,得出的结论更加科学合理,并以定理的形式给出了投影结果的表达式.通过一个实例将投影结果与传统模型中得出的投影结果进行了比较,发现bounded DEA模型得到的投影结果对实际的生产具有更强的指导意义.     

只有产出(投入)BC~2模型中决策单元效率的几何刻画

在DEA方法中,DEA有效和弱DEA有效的决策单元位于生产前沿面上,非弱DEA有效的DEA无效决策单元位于生产可能集的内部而非生产前沿面上.通过引入生产可能集与生产前沿面移动的思想,证明只有产出(投入)的BC²模型评价下的决策单元的最优值与相应的生产前沿面的移动值存在倒数关系,以双产出(投入)情形图示说明,明确了决策单元在生产可能集中所处的位置.     

指标可取负值的基于输入与输出的DEA模型

有关基于输入与输出的DEA模型,本文与现有文献的不同之处,一是模型中的评价指标可取负值,二是被评的决策单元可以不是所给的n个决策单元之一,三是模型并非由多目标规划模型推得.此外,给出了有关此模型的三个定理.因此,可知有关此模型的最优解存在的充分条件;在求解此模型后就能在判断决策单元的DEA有效性的同时计算出其相对效率,并能计算出其在DEA相对有效面上的"投影".     

投入变量缺失系统DEA效率评价

针对投入变量缺失生产服务系统,提出一种基于DEA的相对效率评价方法.由于该系统的投入无法确知,首先需要依据产出对各决策单元(DMU)进行分组,并将其相对效率分解为组内效率与组间效率.对于组内效率,引人虚拟投入变量利用传统超效率DEA模型进行评价.而对于组间效率,则建立扩展的超效率DEA模型.最终以两类效率之积评价所有决策单元之间的相对效率.理论分析表明:投入缺失系统内决策单元有效的充要条件是其组内效率及其所在组的组间效率均有效.文章最后以基金项目评审为例进行实证分析,说明了本方法的合理性与可行性.     

带有随机决策单元的广义数据包络分析方法

广义DEA方法是一种相对效率评价方法,解决了决策单元相对于任意参考系(样本单元集)的效率比较问题.在实际中,有时评价标准是确定的,决策单元的生产具有不确定性,有必要在进行生产之前基于确定性样本单元对随机性决策单元进行相对效率评价.为了解决这个问题,研究样本单元为确定值,决策单元为随机变量的广义DEA模型,分别通过期望值和机会约束将随机模型转化为确定性规划,给出决策单元GEDEA有效和GCDEA有效的概念,GEDEA有效与多目标规划Pareto有效关系,以及利用移动因子对决策单元进行有效性排序方法.     

具有偏好锥的面向输出的超效率DEA模型分析

鉴于传统DEA模型无法区分有效决策单元,超效率DEA模型未考虑决策者的偏好,现提出面向输出的权重受限的综合超效率DEA模型及其投影概念,并讨论该模型与其他超效率DEA模型之间的关系.接着,分析模型的最优目标函数值与决策单元有效性之间的关系,并讨论面向输出的权重受限的综合超效投影与多目标规划问题的非支配解之间的关系.最后,通过对中国西部12个地区工业企业科技创新效率综合评价,并与原有方法进行比较研究,得出本文方法更具优势和合理性.     

广义与传统BC~2模型效率评价差异及其几何刻画

传统DEA方法相对于决策单元全体对决策单元进行评价,广义DEA方法相对于样本单元全体对决策单元进行评价.由于参照系的不同,对不同决策单元的相对效率评价结果可能不同.针对这种情况,对基于BC2模型的只有投入或只有产出的传统和广义DEA模型进行说明,并通过样本前沿面的移动对广义DEA模型中相对效率值进行几何刻画.     

链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

具有偏好锥的面向输出的超效率DEA模型分析

鉴于传统DEA模型无法区分有效决策单元,超效率DEA模型未考虑决策者的偏好,现提出面向输出的权重受限的综合超效率DEA模型及其投影概念,并讨论该模型与其他超效率DEA模型之间的关系.接着,分析模型的最优目标函数值与决策单元有效性之间的关系,并讨论面向输出的权重受限的综合超效投影与多目标规划问题的非支配解之间的关系.最后,通过对中国西部12个地区工业企业科技创新效率综合评价,并与原有方法进行比较研究,得出本文方法更具优势和合理性.     

具有阶段最终产出的广义链式网络DEA模型

传统网络DEA方法通过打开生产过程中的"黑箱",考虑生产过程的中间环节,对生产过程进行相对效率评价.但是传统网络DEA方法只能相对于决策单元集而不能相对于非决策单元集进行相对效率评价.给出能够相对于任意参考集对决策单元进行相对效率评价的基于C2R模型的具有阶段最终产出的广义链式网络DEA方法,初步讨论相应性质并进行算例演示.     

Measuring the performances of decision-making units using interval efficiencies

Efficiency is a relative measure because it can be measured within different ranges. The traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) measures the efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) within the range of less than or equal to one. The corresponding efficiencies are referred to as the best relative efficiencies, which measure the best performances of DMUs and determine an efficiency frontier. If the efficiencies are measured within the range of greater than or equal to one, then the worst relative efficiencies can be used to measure the worst performances of DMUs and determine an inefficiency frontier. In this paper, the efficiencies of DMUs are measured within the range of an interval, whose upper bound is set to one and the lower bound is determined through introducing a virtual anti-ideal DMU, whose performance is definitely inferior to any DMUs. The efficiencies turn out to be all intervals and are thus referred to as interval efficiencies, which combine the best and the worst relative efficiencies in a reasonable manner to give an overall measurement and assessment of the performances of DMUs. The new DEA model with the upper and lower bounds on efficiencies is referred to as bounded DEA model, which can incorporate decision maker (DM) or assessor's preference information on input and output weights. A Hurwicz criterion approach is introduced and utilized to compare and rank the interval efficiencies of DMUs and a numerical example is examined using the proposed bounded DEA model to show its potential application and validity.     

Evaluating the performances of decision-making units based on interval efficiencies

Efficiency could be not only the ratio of weighted sum of outputs to that of inputs but also that of weighted sum of inputs to that of outputs. When the previous efficiency measures the best relative efficiency within the range of no more than one, the decision-making units (DMUs) who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. If the previous efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. When the later efficiency is measured within the range of no more than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. If the later efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. This paper mainly studies an interval DEA model with later efficiency, in which efficiency is measured within the range of an interval, whose upper bound is set to one and the lower bound is determined by introducing a virtual ideal DMU, whose performance is definitely superior to any DMUs. The efficiencies, obtained from interval DEA model, turn out to be all intervals and are referred to as interval efficiencies, which combine the best and the worst relative efficiency in a reasonable manner to give an overall assessment of performances for all DMUs. Assessor's preference information on input and output weights is also incorporated into interval DEA model reasonably and conveniently. Through an example, some differences are found from the ranking results obtained from interval DEA model and bounded DEA model using the Hurwicz criterion approach to rank the interval efficiencies.     

Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data

The objective of the present paper is to propose a novel pair of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models for measurement of relative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data. Compared to traditional DEA, the proposed interval DEA approach measures the efficiency of each DMU relative to the inefficiency frontier, also called the input frontier, and is called the worst relative efficiency or pessimistic efficiency. On the other hand, in traditional DEA, the efficiency of each DMU is measured relative to the efficiency frontier and is called the best relative efficiency or optimistic efficiency. The pair of proposed interval DEA models takes into account the crisp, ordinal, and interval data, as well as non-discretionary factors, simultaneously for measurement of relative efficiencies of DMUs. Two numeric examples will be provided to illustrate the applicability of the interval DEA models.     

The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data-oriented approach for evaluating the performances of a set of peer entities called decision-making units (DMUs), whose performance is determined based on multiple measures. The traditional DEA, which is based on the concept of efficiency frontier (output frontier), determines the best efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. Based on these scores, DMUs are classified into DEA-efficient (optimistic efficient) or DEA-non-efficient (optimistic non-efficient) units, and the DEA-efficient DMUs determine the efficiency frontier. There is a comparable approach which uses the concept of inefficiency frontier (input frontier) for determining the worst relative efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs on the inefficiency frontier are specified as DEA-inefficient or pessimistic inefficient, and those that do not lie on the inefficient frontier, are declared to be DEA-non-inefficient or pessimistic non-inefficient. In this paper, we argue that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously, and any approach that considers only one of them will be biased. For measuring the overall performance of the DMUs, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval, and we call the proposed DEA models for efficiency measurement the bounded DEA models. In this way, the efficiency interval provides the decision maker with all the possible values of efficiency, which reflect various perspectives. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed DEA models.     

Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach

Traditional DEA models deal with measurements of relative efficiency of DMUs regarding multiple-inputs vs. multiple-outputs. One of the drawbacks of these models is the neglect of intermediate products or linking activities. After pointing out needs for inclusion of them to DEA models, we propose a slacks-based network DEA model, called Network SBM, that can deal with intermediate products formally. Using this model we can evaluate divisional efficiencies along with the overall efficiency of decision making units (DMUs).     

关于DEA有效性“新方法”的探讨

主要指出文献[1],[2]中所用的"新方法"不能完全区分决策单元的DEA有效性和弱DEA有效性.同时,"新方法"中所使用的DEA模型(即文献[3]中超效率DEA模型)的最优解不一定存在,这也是"新方法"使用中的一大缺陷.本文同时指出"新方法"虽然是可以扩充的,但扩充后,某些"新模型"仍然会出现上述问题.如果单纯的去评价决策单元的DEA有效性、弱DEA有效性和非弱DEA有效性时,建议还是使用传统的经典模型为好;如果需要进一步对DEA有效性再进行分析,是可以象最早提出超效率DEA模型的文献[3]中那样去应用超效率DEA模型。     

考虑决策单元竞争合作动态变化的DEA博弈交叉效率方法

利用DEA方法进行相对效率评估时,决策单元通常需要考虑多重目标,且随着目标的变化,决策单元间竞争合作状态也会发生动态变化。传统竞合模型虽然考虑了决策单元间竞争与合作同时存在的现象,但忽视了竞争合作关系动态变化的过程。本文以竞争合作对策为切入点,将多目标规划中的优先因子引入传统DEA博弈交叉效率模型中,提出了带有优先等级的多目标DEA博弈交叉效率模型,即动态竞合博弈交叉效率模型。该模型充分体现了不同目标下决策单元间竞争合作关系的动态变化,其焦点由传统竞合模型对多重最优权重现象的改善,转向对最优效率得分的直接寻找。利用DEA动态竞合博弈交叉效率模型,本文对环境污染约束下2014年长三角地区制造业投入产出绩效进行了客观的评估。分析结果表明:DEA动态竞合博弈交叉效率模型收敛速度优于传统DEA博弈交叉效率模型,其交叉效率得分收敛于唯一的纳什均衡点;不同目标重要性的差异程度,对最终排名结果不产生明显影响,不需要确切指出。     

An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA), considering the best condition for each decision making unit (DMU), assesses the relative efficiency and partitions DMUs into two sets: efficient and inefficient. Practically, in traditional DEA models more than one efficient DMU are recognized and these models cannot rank efficient DMUs. Some studies have been carried out aiming at ranking efficient DMUs, although in some cases only discrimination of the most efficient unit is desirable. Furthermore, several investigations have been done for finding the most CCR-efficient DMU. The basic idea of the majority of them is to introduce an integrated model which achieves an optimal common set of weights (CSW). These weights help us identify the most efficient unit in an identical condition.