样品预处理与实时直接分析质谱的联用技术及应用

近年来,与实时直接分析质谱(DART-MS)相结合的样品预处理技术发展迅速,使得对复杂生物、环境、法医学、食品、个体小生物以及单细胞样品中的分析物进行直接分析成为可能。然而固体基质内部分析物检测困难、痕量分析物检测性能不佳已成为限制DART-MS进一步发展的关键问题。针对这些问题,多年来,研究人员在不同领域对样品预处理与质谱联用进行了多种尝试。该文以固相萃取(SPE)、分散固相萃取(DSPE)、搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)、固相微萃取(SPME)、机械化学提取(MCE)和微波提取(MAE)等样品预处理技术为例,对不同研究领域中样品预处理技术与DART-MS联用的研究成果进行了综述,并对未来的发展趋势进行了展望。希望该综述能为开发与DART-MS联用的新型样品处理技术提供参考和帮助。     

原位衍生化技术在液相色谱和液相色谱-质谱联用分析中的应用

衍生化是将待分析物转化为更适合的物质形式以便于分析的有效手段。原位衍生化技术作为一种常用的柱前衍生化方法,可以在样品基质中同时完成分析物的萃取和衍生化,具有高效、灵敏和选择性好的优点。原位衍生化结合其他前处理技术广泛用于胺类、醛酮类、醇类、酚类、羧酸和巯基化合物的分析中,在生物、药物、食品、环境、化妆品分析等领域有广泛的应用。该文概述了原位衍生化的反应类型和代表性衍生试剂,综述了原位衍生化技术在液相色谱和液相色谱-质谱联用分析中的应用,并展望其发展趋势。     

LPME原位衍生气质联法检测尿样中的麻醉剂

基于中空纤维的液相微萃取技术是一种新的样品前处理技术~([1,2]).HF-LPME与GC联用的过程中,对于一些不挥发或者难挥发性物质的测定,需要将其进行衍生化处理.以衍生剂与萃取溶剂混合作为接受相,使待分析物在被萃取的同时被衍生,可减少有机溶剂和衍生剂消耗量,省去衍生步骤,目前已有少量文献报道~([3～6]).本实验以N-三甲基硅基-N-甲基三氟乙酰胺及甲苯的混合物作为萃取剂,利用HF-LPME原位衍生并萃取尿样中的多种麻醉剂,最终通过GC/MS进行检测.     

分子印迹固-液微萃取联用技术检测复杂样品痕量三嗪类除草剂

本文结合分子印迹固相微萃取与中空纤维液相微萃取技术的优点,发展了分子印迹固-液微萃取(MIP-SLME)样品前处理联用技术.设计联用萃取技术装置,以自制的特丁津MIP-SPME涂层研究MIP-SLME技术的萃取条件和萃取性能,建立特丁津MIP-SLME/HPLC联用分析方法,实现复杂生物、环境样品中痕量三嗪类除草剂多残留同时分析.     

萃取-表面增强拉曼光谱联用技术及其在有害物质检测领域的应用

表面增强拉曼光谱(SERS)技术以其高灵敏度和分子特征指纹光谱在众多领域获得广泛应用,然而对于实际复杂样品中的目标分析物,样品基质会极大地干扰目标分析物SERS信号的准确获取,从而限制SERS在实际样品分析中的应用.萃取-表面增强拉曼光谱(Ex-SERS)联用技术为解决这一现实难题提供了可能性,国内外课题组结合萃取和SERS的各自优势,构建了基于固相萃取、固相微萃取、磁分散固相微萃取、薄层微萃取、液液分散微萃取、擦拭萃取等多种Ex-SERS联用技术,并以此发展了面向多种有害物质的Ex-SERS联用方法,可实现复杂基质中目标分析物的快速原位分离和SERS检测,进一步拓展SERS在实际样品分析中的应用.     

氟固相萃取辅助的生物分子质谱分析新方法

氟固相萃取(Fluorous solid-phase extraction,FSPE)是一种基于全氟化合物之间氟-氟相互作用的固相萃取技术,通过在目标分子上进行氟标签衍生,利用高氟化固相吸附剂实现特异性的分离纯化.这一技术在有机合成、催化,以及化学和生物分离分析等诸多领域应用广泛.近年来,由于氟固相萃取和生物质谱技术之间良好的兼容性,两者联用结合的分析方法受到了研究者的广泛关注.本文在简要介绍氟固相萃取技术原理的基础之上,重点综述了其在生物质谱分析领域中的应用,并对其发展前景进行了展望.     

固相微萃取-衍生化技术及其在环境和生物分析中的应用

固相微萃取(SPME)是近年发展起来的一种无溶剂、简单快速的样品预处理方法。SPME同衍生化技术结合是拓展SPME方法的一个重要方向。对固相微革取与衍生化方法结合在环境及生物样品中极性分析和金屑有机化合物上的应用及进展进行了评述，又对SPME衍生化反应的方式和条件进行了讨论。     

衍生-超临界流体萃取金属离子的技术与进展

综述了近年来衍生-超临界流体萃取环境样品和环境模拟样品中金属离子的研究报道,结合作者的研究工作,着重评述了超临界流体萃取不同环境样品、环境模拟样品中金属离子的原理、萃取过程的动力学模型、衍生剂的选择原则、金属螫合物在超临界流体中的溶解度理论、影响萃取效率的因素、金属离子超临界流体萃取应用研究现状与进展等。利用流体与基体改性技术实现了金属离子和金属螯合物的超临界流体萃取,且在萃取体系中加入适量的表面活性剂能显著提高萃取效率。     

金属有机骨架衍生材料在样品前处理中的应用研究进展

样品前处理技术在复杂样品的整个分析过程中起着至关重要的作用,其不仅可以提高痕量目标物在样品中的浓度,而且能有效消除样品基质对分析的干扰。对于样品前处理技术而言,吸附剂是其最为核心部分。因此开发高效、稳定的新型吸附剂已成为前处理技术领域的研究热点。近年来,由金属有机骨架(metal-organic frameworks, MOFs)衍生的多孔材料因其形貌结构多样、孔径可调、比表面积高、热稳定性良好、耐化学腐蚀等优异性能,使其在样品前处理领域拥有广阔的应用前景,基于MOFs衍生材料的样品前处理新方法也层出不穷。然而,MOFs衍生材料仍存在MOFs前驱体合成工艺复杂、生产成本高、量产困难等问题。该文总结了近几年来MOFs衍生材料在分散固相萃取(dSPE)、磁固相萃取(MSPE)、固相微萃取(SPME)、搅拌棒固相萃取(SBSE)和分散微固相萃取(DMSPE)等样品前处理技术中的研究进展,并对多种MOFs衍生材料的制备方法、功能化调控、富集效率等方面进行了评述。最后,展望了MOFs衍生材料在该领域中的应用前景,为进一步研究MOFs衍生材料的应用提供了参考。     

涡流色谱技术在生物样品分析中的应用

生物样品的复杂性使其在进行分析测定前必须经过处理。传统的样品前处理方法(如液-液萃取、固相萃取等)耗时长且操作繁琐。涡流色谱作为在线萃取技术,可以实现生物样品直接进样,减少了样品处理步骤,有效富集纯化了分析物,是一种高通量、高选择性的生物样品前处理方法。为此,本文介绍了涡流色谱技术的原理及优势,并总结了不同涡流柱的特点及其在生物样品分析领域中的应用情况。     

Solventless sample preparation techniques based on solid- and vapour-phase extraction

The main objective of this review is to critically evaluate recent developments in solventless sample preparation techniques. The potential of a variety of sample preparation techniques based on solid- and vapour-phase extraction techniques is evaluated. Direct thermal extraction and derivatization processes to facilitate the extraction of analytes in different areas are included. The applicability, disadvantages and advantages of each sample preparation technique for the determination of environmental contaminants in different matrices are discussed.     

Dispersive derivatization liquid-liquid extraction of degradation products/precursors of mustards and V-agents from aqueous samples

A new derivatization and extraction technique termed as dispersive derivatization liquid-liquid extraction (DDLLE) speeds up the analysis process by removing the requirement for drying of the sample. The derivatization process takes place at the interface between the analyte containing aqueous phase and derivatization agent laden organic phase. The organic phase is highly dispersed using disperser solvent so that the total surface area is large. The derivatizing agent used is 1-(heptafluorobutyryl)imidazole and the resulting heptafluorobutyryl (HFB) derivatized analytes are partitioned into the organic phase. In addition to reduced sample preparation time, for some of the analytes, the HFB derivatives provide better spectral differentiation between isomers than conventional trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives. Method parameters for the DDLLE, such as extraction, and disperser solvent and their volume, type and amount of base, amount of heptafluorobutyrylimidazole and extraction time were optimized on diisopropylaminoethanol (DiPAE), ethyldiethanolamine (EDEA), triethanolamine (TEA) and thiodiglycol (TDG). The DDLLE was also used on various real world samples, which also includes few OPCW organized proficiency test and a spiked urine sample. The observed limit of detection (LOD) with 1mL of sample for DDLLE in full scan with AMDIS was 10ng/mL and with methane chemical ionization, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was 100pg/mL, i.e., 100fg on-column.     

Chemical reactions in liquid-phase microextraction

In recent years, liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), a microscale implementation of liquid-liquid extraction, has become a very popular sample pretreatment technique because it combines extraction and enrichment, and is inexpensive, easy to operate and nearly solvent-free. Especially so in hollow fiber-protected LPME, sample cleanup is also effected. Essentially, owing to its high sample-to-extracting solvent volume ratio, LPME can achieve high analyte enrichment. Since its advent, the technique has been widely used, and applied to environmental, pharmaceutical, biological and forensic analyses. This review focuses on developments relating to chemical reactions associated with LPME applications, in contrast to conventional, straightforward extractions in which analytes remain as they are during the extraction process. Chemical reactions brought about during LPME serve to promote the extractability of the analytes (thus expanding the scope of applicability of the technique), facilitate their (analyte) compatibility with the analytical system and/or improve detection sensitivity. The reactions that are usually enabled during LPME include ion-pair extraction (carrier-mediated membrane transport), complexation, chemical (pre-extraction, in situ, and post-extraction) derivatization, phase-transfer catalysis and other "special affinity" reactions. Strategies on chemical reactions in LPME are overviewed in this report.     

Recent advances in applications of single-drop microextraction: a review

During the past fifteen years since its introduction, single-drop microextraction has witnessed incessant growth in the range of applications of samples preparation for trace organic and inorganic analysis. This was mainly due to the array of modes that are available to accomplish extraction in harmony with the nature of analytes, and to use the extract directly for analysis by diverse instrumental methods. Whilst engineering of novel sorbent materials has expanded the sample capabilities of rival method of solid-phase microextraction, the single-drop microextraction – irrespective of the mode of extraction – uses common equipment found in analytical laboratories sans any modification, and in a much economic way. The recent innovations made in the field, as highlighted in this review article in the backdrop of historical developments, are due to the freedom in operational conditions and practicability to exploit chemical principals for optimum extraction and sensitive determination of analytes. Literature published till July 2011 has been covered.     

脂质组学分析中样品前处理技术的研究进展

脂质不仅是细胞膜的主要组成部分,还参与一些生命活动如能量存储、信号传导等,在生命体中发挥着重要作用。近年来,越来越多的研究表明脂质的变化与一些重大疾病的发生发展密切相关,脂质组学研究对理解疾病的发生机制及过程具有重要意义。在脂质分析过程中,由于样品基质的干扰或被分析物浓度的限制,通常需要对样品进行前处理,以得到最佳的分析性能。该文综述了脂质组学分析中的样品前处理技术,包括脂质的提取方法（如液液萃取、固相萃取等）和针对不同类脂质的化学衍生化技术在各领域,尤其是生命分析和代谢组学中的应用,并对脂质组学分析中的样品前处理技术的发展进行了展望。     

Simultaneous derivatization and air‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction of some parabens in personal care products and their determination by GC with flame ionization detection

A simultaneous derivatization/air‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction technique has been developed for the sample pretreatment of some parabens in aqueous samples. The analytes were derivatized and extracted simultaneously by a fast reaction/extraction with butylchloroformate (derivatization agent/extraction solvent) from the aqueous samples and then analyzed by GC with flame ionization detection. The effect of catalyst type and volume, derivatization agent/extraction solvent volume, ionic strength of aqueous solution, pH, numbers of extraction, aqueous sample volume, etc. on the method efficiency was investigated. Calibration graphs were linear in the range of 2–5000 μg/L with squared correlation coefficients >0.990. Enhancement factors and enrichment factors ranged from 1535 to 1941 and 268 to 343, respectively. Detection limits were obtained in the range of 0.41–0.62 μg/L. The RSDs for the extraction and determination of 250 μg/L of each paraben were <4.9% (n = 6). In this method, the derivatization agent and extraction solvent were the same and there is no need for a dispersive solvent, which is common in a traditional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction technique. Furthermore, the sample preparation time is very short.     

Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis

Sample preparation is an essential step in analysis, greatly influencing the reliability and accuracy of resulted the time and cost of analysis. Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) is a very simple and efficient, solventless sample preparation method, invented by Pawliszyn in 1989. SPME has been widely used in different fields of analytical chemistry since its first applications to environmental and food analysis and is ideally suited for coupling with mass spectrometry (MS). All steps of the conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) such as extraction, concentration, (derivatization) and transfer to the chromatograph are integrated into one step and one device, considerably simplifying the sample preparation procedure. It uses a fused-silica fibre that is coated on the outside with an appropriate stationary phase. The analytes in the sample are directly extracted to the fibre coating. The SPME technique can be routinely used in combination with gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis and places no restriction on MS. SPME reduces the time necessary for sample preparation, decreases purchase and disposal costs of solvents and can improve detection limits. The SPME technique is ideally suited for MS applications, combining a simple and efficient sample preparation with versatile and sensitive detection. This review summarizes analytical characteristics and variants of the SPME technique and its applications in combination with MS.     

On-matrix derivatisation-extraction of precursors of nitrogen- and sulfur-mustards for verification of chemical weapons convention

Development and refinement of sample preparation protocols for retrospective detection and identification of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) and their markers is of paramount importance from verification point of view of chemical weapons convention (CWC). Precursors of nitrogen- and sulfur-mustards (NMPs and SMPs) are polar adsorptive markers of vesicant class of CWAs. Their detection in a given environmental sample may imply past contamination with mustards. For the efficient extraction of NMPs and SMPs from soil, on-matrix derivatisation-extraction (OMDEX) method was developed and optimized. The method involved trifluoroacetylation of analytes on soil itself, followed by extraction with suitable solvent. The extracted samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This virtually single-step sample preparation offered better recoveries of NMPs and SMPs in comparison to conventionally used extraction, evaporation and derivatisation. The best recoveries of analytes were obtained with acetonitrile by OMDEX method. Dynamic linearity range of trifluoroacetylated (TFA) derivatives of NMPs and SMPs was 1-12 microg/L in GC-MS analysis in SIM mode. Repeatability and reproducibility of this technique containing 5 and 10 microg analytes/gm soil was <3.3% and <4.6%, respectively. OMDEX technique was finally applied for the detection of TFA derivatives of NMPs in the soil sample supplied in 16th official proficiency test conducted by OPCW in October 2004.     

Solid-phase analytical derivatization: enhancement of sensitivity and selectivity of analysis.

Analytical derivatizations enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of determinations for organic compounds. Classical techniques are often based on solution chemistry. Most modern sample preparation techniques, however, are based on solid-phase extractions. Solid-phase analytical derivatization bridges this gap and facilitates sample preparation by combining the isolation step with the derivatization. The solid-phase retains both reagents and derivatized analytes and often permits facile separation of excess reagent or selective elution of the desired products. The most recent solid-phase extraction techniques have been used in conjunction with analytical derivatization to automate the analysis. In this review, analytical derivatizations are presented as functional group analysis.     

Automated solid phase extraction, on-support derivatization and isotope dilution-GC/MS method for the detection of urinary dialkyl phosphates in humans

We developed an analytical method based on solid phase extraction, on-support derivatization and isotope dilution-GC/MS for the detection of dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolites, dimethyl thiophosphate, diethyl thiophosphate, dimethyl dithiophosphate, and diethyl dithiophosphate in human urine. The sample preparative procedure is simple and fully automated. In this method, the analytes were extracted from the urinary matrix onto a styrene-divinyl benzene polymer-based solid phase extraction cartridge and derivatized on-column with pentafluorobenzyl bromide. The ester conjugated analytes are eluted from the column with acetonitrile, concentrated and analyzed. Compared to extraction-post extraction derivatization methods for the analysis of DAP metabolites, this on-support derivatization is fast, efficient, and less labor-intensive. Furthermore, it has fewer steps in the sample preparation, uses less solvent and produces less interference. The method is highly sensitive with limits of detection for the analytes ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 ng/mL. The recoveries were high and comparable with those of our previous method. Relative standard deviation, indicative of the repeatability and precision of the method, was 1-17% for the metabolites.