首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 421 毫秒
1.
Summary. The standard approaches to solving overdetermined linear systems construct minimal corrections to the vector c and/or the matrix B such that the corrected system is compatible. In ordinary least squares (LS) the correction is restricted to c, while in data least squares (DLS) it is restricted to B. In scaled total least squares (STLS) [22], corrections to both c and B are allowed, and their relative sizes depend on a real positive parameter . STLS unifies several formulations since it becomes total least squares (TLS) when , and in the limit corresponds to LS when , and DLS when . This paper analyzes a particularly useful formulation of the STLS problem. The analysis is based on a new assumption that guarantees existence and uniqueness of meaningful STLS solutions for all parameters . It makes the whole STLS theory consistent. Our theory reveals the necessary and sufficient condition for preserving the smallest singular value of a matrix while appending (or deleting) a column. This condition represents a basic matrix theory result for updating the singular value decomposition, as well as the rank-one modification of the Hermitian eigenproblem. The paper allows complex data, and the equivalences in the limit of STLS with DLS and LS are proven for such data. It is shown how any linear system can be reduced to a minimally dimensioned core system satisfying our assumption. Consequently, our theory and algorithms can be applied to fully general systems. The basics of practical algorithms for both the STLS and DLS problems are indicated for either dense or large sparse systems. Our assumption and its consequences are compared with earlier approaches. Received June 2, 1999 / Revised version received July 3, 2000 / Published online July 25, 2001  相似文献   

2.
周连第 《计算数学》1979,1(3):264-271
本文讨论用拉格朗日乘子法求解线性等式约束最小二乘问题(简称 LSE 问题)的优点.应用此法能细致地讨论约束条件与变量之间的关系,据此并可证明 LSE 问题与某一个无约束最小二乘问题的等价性.此外,尚可得到参数和拉格朗日乘子的协方差矩阵.最后给出一个数值稳定的解 LSE 问题的算法.  相似文献   

3.
The standard approaches to solving an overdetermined linear system Ax ≈ b find minimal corrections to the vector b and/or the matrix A such that the corrected system is consistent, such as the least squares (LS), the data least squares (DLS) and the total least squares (TLS). The scaled total least squares (STLS) method unifies the LS, DLS and TLS methods. The classical normwise condition numbers for the LS problem have been widely studied. However, there are no such similar results for the TLS and the STLS problems. In this paper, we first present a perturbation analysis of the STLS problem, which is a generalization of the TLS problem, and give a normwise condition number for the STLS problem. Different from normwise condition numbers, which measure the sizes of both input perturbations and output errors using some norms, componentwise condition numbers take into account the relation of each data component, and possible data sparsity. Then in this paper we give explicit expressions for the estimates of the mixed and componentwise condition numbers for the STLS problem. Since the TLS problem is a special case of the STLS problem, the condition numbers for the TLS problem follow immediately from our STLS results. All the discussions in this paper are under the Golub-Van Loan condition for the existence and uniqueness of the STLS solution. Yimin Wei is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 10871051, Shanghai Science & Technology Committee under grant 08DZ2271900 and Shanghai Education Committee under grant 08SG01. Sanzheng Qiao is partially supported by Shanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Applied Mathematics of Fudan University during his visiting.  相似文献   

4.
Summary. The standard approaches to solving overdetermined linear systems construct minimal corrections to the data to make the corrected system compatible. In ordinary least squares (LS) the correction is restricted to the right hand side c, while in scaled total least squares (STLS) [14,12] corrections to both c and B are allowed, and their relative sizes are determined by a real positive parameter . As , the STLS solution approaches the LS solution. Our paper [12] analyzed fundamentals of the STLS problem. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the relationship between the sizes of the LS and STLS corrections (called the LS and STLS distances) in terms of . We give new upper and lower bounds on the LS distance in terms of the STLS distance, compare these to existing bounds, and examine the tightness of the new bounds. This work can be applied to the analysis of iterative methods which minimize the residual norm, and the generalized minimum residual method (GMRES) [15] is used here to illustrate our theory. Received July 20, 2000 / Revised version received February 28, 2001 / Published online July 25, 2001  相似文献   

5.
Summary Convergence of different projection methods for linear operators is proved using relatively simple abstract theorems which show common foundations. This is applied to the well-known methods for two-point boundary value problems (Ritz-Galerkin, least squares, collocation). Special emphasis is laid on results about convergence in different norms generalizing some theorems of Nitsche.The form of the results makes it easy to apply them to nonlinear operators and to treat the influence of quadrature formulas.

Dieser Aufsatz enthält Ergebnisse aus der Dissertation des Verfassers, die von Prof. Dr. J. Schröder, Köln, angeregt und unterstützt wurde.  相似文献   

6.
The null space method is a standard method for solving the linear least squares problem subject to equality constraints (the LSE problem). We show that three variants of the method, including one used in LAPACK that is based on the generalized QR factorization, are numerically stable. We derive two perturbation bounds for the LSE problem: one of standard form that is not attainable, and a bound that yields the condition number of the LSE problem to within a small constant factor. By combining the backward error analysis and perturbation bounds we derive an approximate forward error bound suitable for practical computation. Numerical experiments are given to illustrate the sharpness of this bound.  相似文献   

7.
Summary This paper completes our previous discussion on the total least squares (TLS) and the least squares (LS) problems for the linear systemAX=B which may contain more than one solution [12, 13], generalizes the work of Golub and Van Loan [1,2], Van Huffel [8], Van Huffel and Vandewalle [11]. The TLS problem is extended to the more general case. The sets of the solutions and the squared residuals for the TLS and LS problems are compared. The concept of the weighted squares residuals is extended and the difference between the TLS and the LS approaches is derived. The connection between the approximate subspaces and the perturbation theories are studied.It is proved that under moderate conditions, all the corresponding quantities for the solution sets of the TLS and the modified LS problems are close to each other, while the quantities for the solution set of the LS problem are close to the corresponding ones of a subset of that of the TLS problem.This work was financially supported by the Education Committee, People's Republic of China  相似文献   

8.
In this paper, we propose the nested totoal least squatres problem (NTLS), which is an extension of the equality constrained least squares problem (LSE). The formulation of the NTLS problem is given and the solution set of the NTLS problem is obtained. The least squares residuals and the minimal norm correction matrices of the NTLS solution are provided and a perturbation analysis of the NTLS solutions is given.  相似文献   

9.
Summary In this paper the closeness of the total least squares (TLS) and the classical least squares (LS) problem is studied algebraically. Interesting algebraic connections between their solutions, their residuals, their corrections applied to data fitting and their approximate subspaces are proven.All these relationships point out the parameters which mainly determine the equivalences and differences between the two techniques. These parameters also lead to a better understanding of the differences in sensitivity between both approaches with respect to perturbations of the data.In particular, it is shown how the differences between both approaches increase when the equationsAXB become less compatible, when the length ofB orX is growing or whenA tends to be rank-deficient. They are maximal whenB is parallel with the singular vector ofA associated with its smallest singular value. Furthermore, it is shown how TLS leads to a weighted LS problem, and assumptions about the underlying perturbation model of both techniques are deduced. It is shown that many perturbation models correspond with the same TLS solution.Senior Research Assistant of the Belgian N.F.W.O. (National Fund of Scientific Research)  相似文献   

10.
In many linear parameter estimation problems, one can use the mixed least squares–total least squares (MTLS) approach to solve them. This paper is devoted to the perturbation analysis of the MTLS problem. Firstly, we present the normwise, mixed, and componentwise condition numbers of the MTLS problem, and find that the normwise, mixed, and componentwise condition numbers of the TLS problem and the LS problem are unified in the ones of the MTLS problem. In the analysis of the first‐order perturbation, we first provide an upper bound based on the normwise condition number. In order to overcome the problems encountered in calculating the normwise condition number, we give an upper bound for computing more effectively for the MTLS problem. As two estimation techniques for solving the linear parameter estimation problems, interesting connections between their solutions, their residuals for the MTLS problem, and the LS problem are compared. Finally, some numerical experiments are performed to illustrate our results.  相似文献   

11.
Summary Presented is a realistic, elementwise analysis for the rounding errors of a generalization of Gauss elimination for solving the linear best least squares problem without pivoting. The bounds are suitable to determine the class of well-posed problems to the given method. A mixed error analysis is given and then the effects of errors in the input data are studied. Numerical examples demonstrate the efficiency.
  相似文献   

12.
Zusammenfassung Das Verfahren von I.H. Sloan, das eine Konvergenzverbesserung bei der numerischen Lösung von Integralgleichungen liefert, kann auch auf lineare Randwertaufgaben gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen angewendet werden. Die Ergebnisse sind jedoch nur bedingt vergleichbar.
Global superconvergence for the solution of linear boundary value problems
Summary The method of I.H. Sloan, which yields an improvement of the rate of convergence for the numerical solution of integral equations, may also be applied to linear boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations. However the results for comparable only up to a point.
  相似文献   

13.
Quadratic programming is concerned with minimizing a convex quadratic function subject to linear inequality constraints. The variables are assumed to be nonnegative. The unique solution of quadratic programming (QP) problem (QPP) exists provided that a feasible region is non-empty (the QP has a feasible space).A method for searching for the solution to a QP is provided on the basis of statistical theory. It is shown that QPP can be reduced to an appropriately formulated least squares (LS) problem (LSP) with equality constraints and nonnegative variables. This approach allows us to obtain a simple algorithm to solve QPP. The applicability of the suggested method is illustrated with numerical examples.  相似文献   

14.
In this paper, based on the theory of adjoint operators and dual norms, we define condition numbers for a linear solution function of the weighted linear least squares problem. The explicit expressions of the normwise and componentwise condition numbers derived in this paper can be computed at low cost when the dimension of the linear function is low due to dual operator theory. Moreover, we use the augmented system to perform a componentwise perturbation analysis of the solution and residual of the weighted linear least squares problems. We also propose two efficient condition number estimators. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our condition numbers give accurate perturbation bounds and can reveal the conditioning of individual components of the solution. Our condition number estimators are accurate as well as efficient.  相似文献   

15.
ON THE ACCURACY OF THE LEAST SQUARES AND THE TOTAL LEAST SQUARES METHODS   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
Consider solving an overdetermined system of linear algebraic equations by both the least squares method (LS) and the total least squares method (TLS). Extensive published computational evidence shows that when the original system is consistent. one often obtains more accurate solutions by using the TLS method rather than the LS method. These numerical observations contrast with existing analytic perturbation theories for the LS and TLS methods which show that the upper bounds for the LS solution are always smaller than the corresponding upper bounds for the TLS solutions. In this paper we derive a new upper bound for the TLS solution and indicate when the TLS method can be more accurate than the LS method.Many applied problems in signal processing lead to overdetermined systems of linear equations where the matrix and right hand side are determined by the experimental observations (usually in the form of a lime series). It often happens that as the number of columns of the matrix becomes larger, the ra  相似文献   

16.
Summary After pointing out that two recent results on optimal blockscaling are equivalent, a new short and simple proof of both results is given.Dedicated to Prof. Dr. F.L. Bauer on the occasion of his 60th birthday  相似文献   

17.
Consider a linear approximation problem AXB with multiple right–hand sides. When errors in the data are confirmed both to B and A, the total least squares (TLS) concept is used to solve this problem. Contrary to the standard least squares approximation problem, a solution of the TLS problem may not exist. For a single (vector) right–hand side, the classical theory has been developed by G.H. Golub, C.F. Van Loan [2], and S. Van Huffel, J. Vandewalle [4], and then complemented recently by the core problem approach of C.C. Paige, Z. Strakoš [5,6,7]. Analysis of the problem with multiple right–hand sides is still under development. In this short contribution we present conditions for the existence of a TLS solution. (© 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)  相似文献   

18.
The strictly convex quadratic programming problem is transformed to the least distance problem — finding the solution of minimum norm to the system of linear inequalities. This problem is equivalent to the linear least squares problem on the positive orthant. It is solved using orthogonal transformations, which are memorized as products. Like in the revised simplex method, an auxiliary matrix is used for computations. Compared to the modified-simplex type methods, the presented dual algorithm QPLS requires less storage and solves ill-conditioned problems more precisely. The algorithm is illustrated by some difficult problems.   相似文献   

19.
对线性模型参数,讨论了Bayes估计的Pitman最优性,将已有结果进行了改进,去掉了附加条件,证明了在Pitman准则下,Bayes估计一致优于最小二乘估计(LSE),在此基础上,提出了一种基于先验信息的方差分量估计,通过和基于LSE的方差分量估计作比较,证明了新估计是无偏估计且有更小的均方误差.最后,证明了在Pitman准则下生长曲线模型参数的Bayes估计优于最佳线性无偏估计.  相似文献   

20.
We prove duality results for adjoint operators and product norms in the framework of Euclidean spaces. We show how these results can be used to derive condition numbers especially when perturbations on data are measured componentwise relatively to the original data. We apply this technique to obtain formulas for componentwise and mixed condition numbers for a linear function of a linear least squares solution. These expressions are closed when perturbations of the solution are measured using a componentwise norm or the infinity norm and we get an upper bound for the Euclidean norm.   相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号