Combined microwave-assisted isolation and solid-phase purification procedures prior to the chromatographic determination of phenolic compounds in plant materials

A fast, sensitive and selective procedure employing a combination of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) was applied prior to liquid chromatographic identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in plant materials. MAE has been tested and optimized for the isolation of phenolic acids (gallic, protocatechuic, p-hydroxybenzoic, chlorogenic, vanilic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, sinapic, benzoic, m-coumaric, o-coumaric, rosmarinic, cinnamic acids) and 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde, syringaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, and vanillin in various plants. The effects of experimental conditions on MAE efficiency, such as solvent composition, temperature, extraction time, have been studied. The extraction efficiencies were compared with those obtained by computer-controlled, two-step Soxhlet-like extractions. Plant extracts were purified and phenolic compounds were pre-concentrated using SPE on polymeric RP-105 SPE sorbent prior to HPLC analysis. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Hypersil BDS C₁₈ column using a mobile phase consisted of 0.3% (v/v) acetic acid in water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) at flow rate 0.6 ml min⁻¹ and column temperature 30 °C with gradient elution.     

中草药中槲皮素的毛细管电泳法测定

近年来,毛细管电泳法用于中药的分析正在逐渐展开．微波辅助萃取是微波与传统的溶剂萃取法相结合后形成的一种新的萃取方法,目前已被用于环境、食品和天然产物的提取等领域,我们也曾用微波萃取法研究了中药刺五加和黄芩中的黄酮类化合物。     

Comparison of extraction techniques for the isolation of explosives and their degradation products from soil

A comparison of four extraction techniques used for the isolation of 14 explosive compounds (Method 8330-Explosives) from spiked soil samples is described. Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE), pressurized solvent extraction (PSE), microwave assisted extraction (MAE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were included. The effects of basic extraction conditions – i.e. type of extraction solvent, temperature, pressure, and extraction time – were investigated. The best extraction recovery of the monitored compounds from spiked soil was obtained using pressurized solvent extraction. Recoveries of explosives using the PSE technique were in the range from 65 to 112%. Extraction recoveries by Soxhlet warm extraction and supercritical fluid extraction reached 65–99% and 52–75%, respectively. The lowest extraction recoveries (28–65%) were obtained using microwave assisted extraction. A very low extraction recovery for tetryl was observed in all cases but the best results were achieved by pressurized solvent extraction (58%).     

Rapid determination of yunaconitine and related alkaloids in aconites and aconite‐containing drugs by ultra high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Yunaconitine (YAC) is a toxic aconite alkaloid that is considered to be a hidden aconite poison since it is frequently found in body fluids from aconite poisoning patients, but has not been well studied in commonly used herbal drugs. In this paper, a rapid and sensitive ultra high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS/MS) detection combined with microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) was developed for high throughput simultaneous determination of YAC and six other toxic aconite alkaloids in 31 samples of crude, processed aconites and aconite‐containing drugs. The optimized method showed excellent linearity, precision, accuracy and recovery for all target compounds with short run time. YAC was detected in some samples with contents from 0.015 to 10.41 mg/g. This is the first report on the determination of YAC in Radix Aconiti, Radix Aconiti Kusnezoffii and aconite‐containing drugs. This newly developed method facilitates the rapid screening of YAC and related toxic aconite alkaloids and allows YAC to be used as a chemical marker for the quality control of aconites and aconite‐containing drugs. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

LC–UV determination of atrazine and its principal conversion products in soil after combined microwave-assisted and solid-phase extraction

A multiresidue method developed for the analysis of atrazine and its principal conversion products, deisopropylatrazine (DIA), deethylatrazine (DEA) and hydroxyatrazine (HA), in soil is presented. The method is based on the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of soil with aqueous methanol followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) of the extracts and subsequent analysis by LC–UV with a diode array detector. MAE operational parameters (extraction solvent, extractant volume) were optimized with respect to extraction efficiency of the target compounds from soils with 2.5% organic matter (OM) content. Recoveries above 80% were obtained for all solutes. Soil OM content did not affect analyte recoveries. Recoveries from fresh and aged residues, the latter weathered under cold storage conditions, were not statistically different. Finally, MAE was found to be superior in terms of extraction efficiency, sample throughput, and solvent consumption to conventional flask-shaking extraction.     

Comparison of extraction methods for sampling of low molecular compounds in polymers degraded during recycling

The demand for mechanical recycling of plastic waste results in an increasing amount of recycled polymeric materials available for development of new products. In order for recycled materials to find their way into the material market, high quality is demanded. Thereby, a complete and closed loop of polymeric materials can be achieved successfully. The concept of high quality for recycled plastics imply that besides a pure fraction of e.g. polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP), containing only minor trace amount of foreign plastics, knowledge is required about the type and amount of low molecular weight (LMW) compounds. During long-term use (service-life), products made of polymeric materials will undergo an often very slow degradation where a series of degradation products are formed, in parallel, additives incorporated in the matrix may also degrade. These compounds migrate at various rates to the surrounding environment. The release rate of LMW products from plastics depends on the initiation time of degradation and the degradation mechanisms. For polymers the formation of degradation products may be initiated already during processing, and subsequent use will add products coming from the surrounding environment, e.g. fragrance and aroma compounds from packaging. During recycling of plastics, emissions which contain a series of different LMW compounds may reach the environment leading to unwanted exposure to additives and their degradation residues as well as degradation products of polymers.Several extraction techniques are available for sampling of LMW compounds in polymers before chromatographic analysis. This paper reviews and compares polymer dissolution, accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), super critical fluid extraction (SFE), soxhlet extraction, head-space extraction (HS), head-space solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME), and head-space stir bar sorptive extraction (HSSE) as appropriate sampling methods for LMW compounds in recycled polymers. Appropriate internal standards useful for these kinds of matrices were selected, which improved the possibility for later quantification. Based on the review of extraction methods, the most promising techniques were tested with industrially recycled samples of HDPE and PP and virgin HDPE and PP for method comparison.     

Comparison of extraction techniques for isolation of steroid oestrogens in environmentally relevant concentrations from sediment

The comparison of four extraction techniques for isolation of five native and one labelled steroid oestrogens from sediment was described. The three conventional extraction techniques Soxhlet warm extraction (SWE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and a promising technique QuEChERS were tested for isolation of low environmentally relevant oestrogen concentrations using different extraction conditions. The least expensive and time-consuming method QuEChERS provided the best extraction recoveries (53–84%) from all techniques. MAE achieved the highest recovery from conventional techniques for less polar oestrogens using dichloromethane: acetone 3:1 mixture as an extraction solvent (50–71%), but for extraction of the whole group of oestrogens including more polar estriol acetone or methanol must be used. ASE provided higher extraction recoveries using dichloromethane at 60°C (53–74%) for less polar oestrogens. However, the repeatability of results was unsatisfactory and recoveries using other extraction conditions were lower than for MAE. The most time-consuming SWE achieved the worst extraction recoveries and for isolation of low oestrogen concentrations from sediments, it is completely unsuitable.     

Determination of engineered nanoparticles on textiles and in textile wastewaters

Textile materials with engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) have excellent properties as they are antibacterial, antimicrobial, water resistant and protective. The textile industry has recognized the importance and the advantages of ENPs, so they comprise one of the fastest developing branches of processing.The most important sources of ENPs released to the environment from textiles are textile-industry wastewaters and waters from large hospital or hotel laundries. In addition, waste textile materials coated with ENPs present a threat to the environment, if such materials are not properly handled and disposed of after use.Currently, the toxicity and the potential harm of ENPs widely applied on textiles are not thoroughly investigated and/or eliminated. Consequently, there is an urgent need to define the most appropriate analytical methods for monitoring ENPs on textiles.This review presents the most important techniques for monitoring ENPs on textile materials and in textile-wastewater samples, from the perspective of protecting the environment and human health.     

微波辅助萃取-分散固相萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定茶叶中23种农药残留

建立了微波辅助萃取-分散固相萃取净化-气相色谱质谱法（GC-MS）快速测定茶叶中23种农药残留量的方法. 茶叶样品用乙腈进行微波辅助萃取（MAE）,提取液经分散固相萃取（DSPE）净化处理. 采用DB-17MS毛细管色谱柱分离后,选择离子监测模式下（SIM）质谱法进行测定. 23种农药组分在0.01~0.50 mg/mL质量浓度范围内呈线性关系,相关系数r2大于0.995,方法测定低限（10S/N）为0.005~0.01 mg/kg. 以空白绿茶为基体,在4个标准添加水平0.01、0.05、0.10、0.25 mg/kg进行加标回收试验,加标平均回收率为70%~105%,相对标准偏差为3.0%~8.2%.     

密闭微波辅助萃取天麻中天麻素的研究

应用密闭微波萃取装置,对中药天麻中有效成分天麻素的萃取进行了研究。分别讨论了药材颗粒粒径、提取溶剂浓度、微波提取时间和提取剂的用量对微波萃取天麻素的影响。结果表明:当药材粒径<50μm,乙醇体积分数为50%,微波辐射时间为2min,提取剂质量为药材质量的30倍时,天麻素提取率最高。此外,将微波萃取与索氏萃取和超声波萃取进行了比较。