面向高阶思维培养的自主型实验教学模式的设计与实践*

基于教育现代化、发展“互联网+教育”、培养创新性人才的指导思想,结合“超星学习通”网络平台与实验课堂的优势,设计了面向高阶思维培养的“预习自测-讲授讨论-自主实践-总结反思”的四段自主型实验教学模式,并应用于化学与化工类专业分析化学实验课程的教学实践。该实验教学模式增加了学生自主学习时间,培养了学生“分析、综合、评价和创造”等高阶思维能力,提高了实验课程的教学效率,为高等院校实践实验教学的改革提供了参考依据。     

以深度的科学探究促进初中生高阶思维能力发展*——以“酸和碱的中和反应”为例

针对学生在学习“酸和碱的中和反应”中普遍存在的“被动接受具体知识、缺失开展真实科学探究的思路、机械记忆中和反应规律、缺乏批判质疑精神及高阶思维能力不足”等倾向问题,设置了驱动性问题链协助学生搭建“情境问题”与“真实的科学探究”间的思路桥梁,在深度的科学探究中发展学生的发散性思维、有序思维、多角度分析问题、设计创造思维、逻辑严密的推理及评价反思等高阶思维能力。课堂教学中营造轻松、舒适的交流讨论环境,有益于学生之间碰撞出思维的火花、激发出创造的灵感。课堂观察表明,深度科学探究教学的实施,有效提升了学生的高阶思维能力及解决问题的能力。     

基于变构学习模型的高中化学“导致悖论”教学设计*

“导致悖论”教学是一种智在创境、妙在引领的教学,其核心理念源自于变构学习模型的悖论思想,给学习者创造一个“肯定→否定→肯定”的反思性学习过程。高中化学教学设计可以通过4种途径分别创设“概念与概念”相悖、“理论与实验”相悖、“理论与理论”相悖和“实验与实验”相悖的悖论情境,最终实现学生新旧概念的更替和高阶思维能力的发展。“导致悖论”教学在实施中要注意精选合适的知识内容,加强学生心理的调控,提供丰富的支撑材料。     

阅读理解与学生知识建构的调查分析

针对学生知识建构的过程与阅读理解的关系展开论述;通过学生对“溶解度”、“燃烧的条件”、“氧气的性质”3个主题教学内容关注程度的调查分析,发现有利于学生思维顺延的教学设计应尽可能基于真实的情境,同时注意阶梯状或螺旋状的及时跟进。     

基于真实情境的初中化学微项目教学实践与反思*——以“溶液的形成”为例

以“溶液的形成”为例进行微项目教学实践,选择学生熟悉的护手霜为主题情境,巧妙设计了“原料分散”“微观探秘”“辨识活动”“对比实验”“感知乳化”等系列微项目活动,通过情境不断地设置认知冲突,引导学生反思、修正并最终形成更完善的概念,在环环相扣的探究活动中使学生自主建构结构化的知识。通过制作“护手霜”将“溶解”和“乳化”串联,感知溶液,感受乳化,感悟人与自然、社会的和谐、可持续发展。     

高中化学“次氯酸盐的性质”的项目式教学*——84消毒液的使用指南

以“84消毒液的使用指南”为主题,开展高中化学“次氯酸盐的性质”的教学。学生通过完成“一张图说清消毒剂”“探究84消毒液的漂白效果与酸碱性的关系”“探究84消毒液的漂白效果与光照的关系”“探究84消毒液的漂白效果与温度的关系”“84消毒液与酒精混合会有氯气吗”等5个项目任务,理解了次氯酸盐的性质及漂白原理,培养了学生的文献检索能力、实验探究能力以及发展了学生的高阶思维能力。将文献查阅与学生实验相结合,让学生在真实问题的解决中,完成次氯酸盐的性质等相关知识的内化,是顺利完成本项目教学的关键。     

人教版高中化学必修模块教科书实验活动的分析与比较*——以2019年版教科书“实验”和“实验活动”栏目为例

以人教版高中化学必修模块教科书(2019年版)“实验”和“实验活动”栏目的实验活动为研究对象,采用Herron修正的“实验活动探究层次分类法”(LOLA)和笔者提出的“学生实验行为要求分类法”(RSBLA)对其进行分析,并与2007年版教科书进行对比。研究发现,2019年版教科书的实验活动探究层次处于层次1和层次2,学生行为要求为“观察”“记录实验现象”“回答与实验有关的问题”和“设计实验”。卡方检验表明,2019年版教科书和2007年版教科书“实验”栏目的实验活动探究层次分布比例和学生实验行为要求均存在显著性差异。     

利用金属探测仪开展化学研究性学习活动

指导高一学生利用金属探测仪开展化学研究性学习活动;带领学生一起构思立足于化学、指向实践和应用的研究体系,主要对金属探测仪从功能（即“能”与“不能”的问题）和性能（即灵敏度的“好”与“差”问题）2个方面加以实验研究。为进一步丰富和完善研究,再对金属的带电状态、电磁辐射的存在状态加以探测对比分析,而后对原理加以分析,形成了基本结论,提出了实践操作的建议,并对整个活动加以总结和反思。     

谈化学教学中培养辩证思维应遵循的几项要求

辩证思维是逻辑思维发展的高级阶段,离开辩证思维“就会连两件自然的事实也联系不起来,或者连两者之间所存在的联系都无法了解”.当前中学化学的辩证思维教学水平如何呢?笔者曾在几所中学作过测试,对象是作过浓硫酸性质实验不久的高中学生,试题是:稀硫酸和铜片一起加热可以观察到什么现象?大多数学生的回答是:“无变化”.     

有机化学教学中的“三融合、二反思、四进阶”创新教学模式*

为培养出新时代创新人才,构建的“三融合、二反思、四进阶”教学模式有效提升了学生们科技创新能力。依据有机化学特点,创设科学发现情境,通过核心知识点网融合(挑战度)、理论实践交叉融合(高阶性)和化学思政融合(课程思政)“三融合”策略,不断激发学生们学习兴趣;通过教师反思、学生反思的“二反思”过程不断优化教学过程,改善教学效果;最终使具有不同知识层次的学生通过“四进阶”教学策略逐步提升科创能力(创新性)。     

Di­methyl­phenyl­sulfonium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate and methyl­di­phenyl­sulfonium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate

The bonding geometry of sulfur in the cations of the title compounds, C₈H₁₁S⁺·CF₃SO₃^? and C₁₃H₁₃S⁺·CF₃SO₃^?, respectively, is similar and is independent of the ratio of the Me/Ph substituents. As expected, in both cations, the S—Ph bonds are somewhat shorter than the S—Me bonds. In both crystal structures, the interaction between cations and anions is similar.     

Methyl­tri­phenyl­stibonium tetra­fluoro­borate

In the title compound, [Sb(CH₃)(C₆H₅)₃]BF₄, there are four independent cations and anions in the asymmetric unit. The geometry around the Sb atom is distorted tetrahedral, with Sb—C distances in the range 2.077 (4)–2.099 (10) Å and angles at the Sb atom in the range 103.3 (3)–119.0 (4)°.     

2,4,6‐Tri­chloro­phenyl­iso­nitrile and 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­benzo­nitrile

The molecular structures of the title compounds, 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­phenyl­iso­nitrile (IUPAC name: 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­phenyl isocyanide), C₇H₂Cl₃N, and 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­benzo­nitrile, C₇H₂Cl₃N, are normal. The two structures are not isomorphous, but do contain similar two‐dimensional layers in which pairs of mol­ecules are held together by pairs of Cl?CN [3.245 (3) Å] or Cl?NC [3.153 (2) Å] interactions. The two‐dimensional isomorphism is lost through different layer‐stacking modes.     

{[(N‐Methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­ranyl­idene]­methyl}(N‐methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­nium iodide

The cationic part of the homodifunctional amino­phospho­ranyl ligand, C₄₁H₄₁N₂P₂⁺·I^?, shows interesting features associated with the N—P—C—P—N skeleton. The P—C(H) bond distances [1.696 (3) and 1.697 (3) Å] possess partial double‐bond characteristics. The nature of the P—C(H) and P—N bonds suggests that the positive charge is only distributed around the P—C—P atoms. The structure has near twofold symmetry through the central methyl­ide‐C atom.     

Ethyl­tri­phenyl­phospho­nium perrhenate and (iodo­methyl)­tri­phenyl­phospho­nium perrhenate

Ethyl­tri­phenyl­phospho­nium perrhenate, (C₂₀H₂₀P)[ReO₄], and (iodo­methyl)­tri­phenyl­phospho­nium perrhenate, (C₁₉H₁₇IP)[ReO₄], have been crystallized from 2‐propanol. Both crystal structures consist of phospho­nium cations and perrhenate anions. The cations show the typical propeller‐like geometry. In both crystals, the positions of the nearly tetrahedral anions are stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, and for the latter compound, I⋯π interactions also occur.     

2,4‐Di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazones of 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde, 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone

In 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate {or 4‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazono­methyl]­benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate}, C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (X), 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­am­ide solvate (or 4‐{1‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]ethyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate), C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (XI), and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate (or 4‐­{[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]phenyl­methyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate), C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₆·C₄H₉NO, (XII), the molecules all lack a center of symmetry, crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups and have been observed to exhibit non‐linear optical activity. In each case, the hydrazone skeleton is fairly planar, facilitated by the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and some partial N—N double‐bond character. Each molecule is hydrogen bonded to one solvent mol­ecule.     

LiF-LiCl-LiVO<Subscript>3</Subscript>-Li<Subscript>2</Subscript>SO<Subscript>4</Subscript>-Li<Subscript>2</Subscript>MoO<Subscript>4</Subscript> system

Phase equilibria in the LiF-LiCl-LiVO₃-Li₂SO₄-Li₂MoO₄ system have been studied by differential thermal analysis. The eutectic composition has been determined as follows (mol %): LiF, 17.4; LiCl, 42.0; LiVO₃, 17.4; Li₂SO₄, 11.6; and Li₂MoO₄, 11.6, with the melting temperature equal to 363°C and the enthalpy of melting equal to (284 ± 7) kJ/kg.     

O‐Benzyl‐N‐tert‐butoxy­carbonyl‐N‐methyl‐l‐tyrosine

The crystal structure of the title compound, alternatively called 3‐[4‐(benzyl­oxy)­phenyl]‐2‐(N‐tert‐butoxy­car­bonyl‐N‐methyl­amino)­propi­onic acid, C₂₂H₂₇NO₅, has been studied in order to ex­amine the role of N‐methyl­ation as a determinant of peptide conformation. The conformation of the tert‐butoxy­carbonyl group is trans–trans. The side chain has a folded conformation and the two phenyl rings are effectively perpendicular to one another. The carboxyl­ate hydroxyl group and the urethane carbonyl group form a strong intermolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond.     

Formation and properties of the Fe<Subscript>8</Subscript>V<Subscript>10</Subscript>W<Subscript>16–x</Subscript>Mo<Subscript>x</Subscript>O<Subscript>85</Subscript> type solid solution

Solid solution phases of a formula Fe₈V₁₀W_16–xMo_xO₈₅ where 0≤x≤4, have been obtained, possessing a structure of the compound Fe₈V₁₀W₁₆O₈₅. It was found on the base of XRD and DTA investigations that these solution phases melted incongruently, with increasing the value of x, in the temperature range from 1108 (x=0) to 1083 K (x=4) depositing Fe₂WO₆ and WO₃. The increase of the Mo⁶⁺ ions content in the crystal lattice of Fe₈V₁₀W₁₆O₈₅ causes the lattice parameters a=b contraction with cbeing almost constant. IR spectra of the Fe₈V₁₀W_16–xMo_xO₈₅ solid solution phases have been recorded.