Correction: Abelian Varieties defined over their Fields of Moduli, I

Bull London Math. Soc, 4 (1972), 370–372. The proof of the theorem contains an error. Before giving acorrect proof, we state two lemmas. LEMMA 1. Let K/k be a cyclic Galois extension of degree m, let generate Gal (K/k), and let (A, I, ) be defined over K. Supposethat there exists an isomorphism :(A,I,) (A, I, ) over K suchthat v^m–1 ... = 1, where v is the canonical isomorphism(A^m, I^m, ^m) (A, I, ). Then (A, I, ) has a model over k, whichbecomes isomorphic to (A, I, ) over K. Proof. This follows easily from [7], as is essentially explainedon p. 371. LEMMA 2. Let G be an abelian pro-finite group and let : G Q/Z be a continuous character of G whose image has order p.Then either: (a) there exist subgroups G' and H of G such that H is cyclicof order p^m for some m, (G') = 0, and G = G' x H, or (b) for any m > 0 there exists a continuous character m ofG such that p^m _m = . Proof. If (b) is false for a given m, then there exists an element G, of order p^r for some r m, such that () ¦ 0. (Considerthe sequence dual to 0 Ker (p^m) G ^pm G). There exists an opensubgroup G_o of G such that (G₀) = 0 and has order p^r in G/G₀.Choose H to be the subgroup of G generated by , and then aneasy application to G/G₀ of the theory of finite abelian groupsshows the existence of G' (note that () ¦ 0 implies that is not a p-th. power in G). We now prove the theorem. The proof is correct up to the statement(iv) (except that (i) should read: F' k₁ F'ab). To removea minor ambiguity in the proof of (iv), choose to be an elementof Gal (F'_ab/k₂) whose image $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$ in Gal (k₁/k₂) generates this last group. The error occursin the statement that the canonical map v : A^P A acts on pointsby sending a^p a; it, of course, sends a a. The proof is correct, however, in the case that it is possibleto choose so that ^p = 1 (in Gal (F'/k₂)). By applying Lemma 2 to G = Gal (F'_ab/k₂) and the map G Gal(k₁/k₂) one sees that only the following two cases have to beconsidered. (a) It is possible to choose so that ^pm = 1, for some m, andG = G' x H where G' acts trivially on k₁ and H is generatedby . (b) For any m > 0 there exists a field K, F'ab K k₁ k₂is a cyclic Galois extension of degree p^m. In the first case, we let K F'_ab be the fixed field of G'.Then (A, I, ), regarded as being defined over K, has a modelover k₂. Indeed, if m = 1, then this was observed above, butwhen m > 1 the same argument applies. In the second case, let : (A, I, ) (A$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$, I$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$, $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$) be an isomorphism defined over k₁ and let v ... ^p–1 = µ(R). If is replaced by for some Aut_k1((A, I, )) then is replacedby ^P. Thus, as µ(R) is finite, we may assume that ^pm–1= 1 for some m. Choose K, as in (b), to be of degree p^m overk₂. Let _m be a generator of Gal (K/k₂) whose restriction tok₁ is $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$. Then : (A, I, ) (A^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$}, I^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$}, ^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$} = (A^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$m}, I^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$m}, ^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$m} is an isomorphism defined over K and v ^mpm–1, ... ^m =^pm–1 = 1, and so, by) Lemma 1, (A, I, ) has a model overk₂ which becomes isomorphic to (A, I, over K. The proof may now be completed as before. Addendum: Professor Shimura has pointed out to me that the claimon lines 25 and 26 of p. 371, viz that µ(R) is a puresubgroup of _R^*t, does not hold for all rings R. Thus this condition,which appears to be essential for the validity of the theorem,should be included in the hypotheses. It holds, for example,if µ(R) is a direct summand of µ(F).     

On the ideals and singularities of secant varieties of Segre varieties

We find minimal generators for the ideals of secant varietiesof Segre varieties in the cases of _k(¹ x ⁿ x ^m) for all k, n,m, ₂(ⁿ x ^m x ^p x ^r) for all n, m, p, r (GSS conjecture for fourfactors), and ₃(ⁿ x ^m x ^p) for all n, m, p and prove they arenormal with rational singularities in the first case and arithmeticallyCohen–Macaulay in the second two cases.     

A remark on the representation of Zolotarev polynomials

Zolotarev polynomials are the polynomials that have minimaldeviation from zero on [–1, 1] with respect to the norm||xⁿ – x^n–1 + a_n–2 x^n–2 + ... + a₁x+ a_n|| for given and for all a_k . This note complements the paper of F. Pehersforfer [J. LondonMath. Soc. (1) 74 (2006) 143–153] with exact (not asymptotic)construction of the Zolotarev polynomials with respect to thenorm L₁ for || < 1 and with respect to the norm L₂ for || 1 in the form of Bernstein–Szegö orthogonal polynomials.For all in L₁ and L₂ norms, the Zolotarev polynomials satisfyexactly (not asymptotically) the triple recurrence relationof the Chebyshev polynomials.     

Finite CI-Groups are Soluble

For a finite group G and a subset S of G with 1 S and S = S^–1,the Cayley graph Cay(G, S) is the graph with vertex set G suchthat {x, y} is an edge if and only if yx^–1 S. The groupG is called a CI-group if, for all subsets S and T of G\{1},Cay(G, S) Cay(G, T) if and only if S = T for some Aut(G).In this paper, for each prime p 1 (mod 4), a symmetric graph(p) is constructed from PSL(2, p) such that Aut (p) = Z₂ x PSL(2,p); it is then shown that A₅ is not a CI-group, and that allfinite CI-groups are soluble. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification05C25.     

Rank of Elliptic Curves over almost Separably Closed Fields

Let E be an elliptic curve over a finitely generated infinitefield K. Let K^s denote a separable closure of K, an elementof the Galois group G_K=Gal(K^s/K), and K^s() the invariant subfieldof K^s. If the characteristic of K is not 2 and belongs to asuitable open subgroup of G_K, then E(K^s()) has infinite rank.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 11G05.     

Relation Modules of Infinite Groups

Let F_n be the free group of rank n with basis x₁, x₂, ..., x_n,and let d(G) denote the minimal number of generators of thefinitely generated group G. Suppose that n d(G). There existsan exact sequence and wemay view the free abelian group as a right ZG-module by defining (rR')^g = r^g–1R' for allg G, where g^–1 is any preimage of g under , and = (g^–1)^–1 r(g^–1),the conjugate of r by g^–1. We call the relation module of G associated with the presentation(1), and say that has ambient rank n. Furthermore, we call the group F_n/R' the free abelianizedextension of G associated with (1). 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 20F05, 20C07.     

Classification Des Ideaux a Droite De A1(k)

Les études récentes sur les idéaux àdroite de A₁(k), la première algèbre de Weyl surun corps algébriquement clos et de caractéristiquenulle k, nous montrent que : pour tout idéal I 0 àdroite de A₁(k), il existe x Q = frac(A₁(k)), et V V telsque : I = xD(R, V) o V est l'ensemble des sous-espaces primairementdécomposables de k[t] = R, et D(R, V), l'idéalà droite {d A₁(k/d(R V}. Dans cet article nous montreronsprincipalement que: pour tout 0 I idéal à droitede A₁(k, !n N, (x, ) Q^* x Aut_k(A₁(k)) : I = x(D(R, O(X_n))),où X_n est la courbe d'algèbre des fonctions régulières: O(X_n = k+tⁿ⁺¹k[t]. La forme des idéaux décriteci-dessus permet de voir dans une hypothèse de Letzteret Makar-Limanov, pour deux courbes algébriques affinesX et X' on a : D(XD(X') co dim D(X = co dim D(X'). Recent studies on right ideals of the first Weyl algebra A₁(k)over an algebraic closed field k with characteristic zero showthat: for each right ideal I 0 of A₁(k), there exist x Q =fracA₁(k)) and a primary decomposable sub-space V of k[t] suchthat I=xD(R,V), where D(R,V) : = {d A₁(k)/d(R) V} is a rightideal of A₁(k). In this paper, we show that for all right idealsI 0 of A₁(k), !n N, (x, ) Q^* x Aut_k(A₁(k)) : I = x(D(R, O(X_n))),where X_n denotes the affine algebraic curve with ring of regularfunctions O(X_n=k+tⁿ⁺¹k[t]. With ideals as described above, onecan easily see, under a hypothesis given by Letzter and Makar-Limanov,that for two affine algebraic curves X and X', D(X)D(X') codim D(X) = co dim D(X'). 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification16S32.     

The structure of the normalisers of the congruence subgroups of the Hecke group G5

Let = 2cos (/5) and let []. Denote the normaliser ofG₀() of the Hecke group G₅ in PSL₂() by N(G₀()). Then N(G₀())= G₀(/h), where h is the largest divisor of 4 such that h² divides. Further, N(G₀())/G₀() is either 1 (if h = 1), ₂ x ₂ (if h= 2) or ₄ x ₄ (if h = 4).     

Exceptional Functions and Normality

Yang proved in [10] that if f and f^(k) have no fix-points forevery fF, where F is a family of meromorphic functions in adomain G and k a fixed integer, then F is normal in G. In thispaper we prove normality for families F for which every fF omits₁ and f^(k) omits ₂, where ₁ and ₂ are analytic functions with. 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 30D35, 30D45.     

Corrigendum: Elliptic Curves and Quadratic Recurrence Sequences

The statement of the numerical values and z₀ on page 167 of[1, Section 3] contained an error. The values that were actuallyused were (to nine decimal places): thesebeing shifted, by the periods 2₁ and 2₃ respectively, comparedwith the values given in [1] (with ₁ = 1.496729323 and ₃ = 1.225694691i).With ₀ = ₁ and (z) denoting the sigma function (z; g2, g3) withinvariants g2 = 4, g3 = –1 associated with the ellipticcurve given by equation (3.2), these values of and z₀ yield and the latter three values all agreewith those stated in the paper (apart from rounding down thelast digit in the imaginary part of A). 2000 Mathematics SubjectClassification 11B37 (primary), 33E05, 37J35 (secondary).     

A separation property of the zeros of Eisenstein series for SL(2, Z)

Let E_k(z) be the Eisenstein series with weight k for the modulargroup SL(2, ). We prove that the zeros of E_k(eⁱ) interlace withthe zeros of E_k+12(eⁱ) on /2 < < 2/3. That is, any zeroof E_k(eⁱ) lies between two consecutive zeros of E_k+12(eⁱ) on/2 < < 2/3.     

Correction: on the Intersection Matrices of Curves lying on Irregular Algebraic Surfaces

Professor W. F. Hammond has kindly drawn my attention to a blunderin 4 of the above paper. He referred to the ( – 2r) xß submatrix D of the skew-symmetric matrix displayednear the top of page 181, of which it is asserted that it issquare and non-singular, and pointed out that, from the factthat the matrix of which D forms part is regular, it may onlybe deduced that the columns of D are linearly independent; thatis, it only follows that – 2r ß. The validity of the equation – 2r = ß is essentialto the succeeding argument and, fortunately, may be establishedby alternative means. Using the nomenclature of the paper, wehave on F the set ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^* of independent3-cycles (independent because they cut independent 1-cycleson the curve C), which may be completed, to form a basis forsuch cycles on F, by a further set ₁', ..., _2q–2r–pof independent 3-cycles, each of which meets C in a cycle homologousto zero on C. The cycles ₁^*, ..., ^* are invariant cycles andare independent on F so that, if > 2r + ß, thereis a non-trivial linear combination ^* of these having zero intersectionon C with each of the cycles ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^*.Thus we have. (^* ._k^*)c = 0 = (^* ._i^*)c i.e. (^* ._k^*) = 0 = (^* ._i^* on F (1 k 2r; 1 i ß). Furthermore, (_j . C) 0 on C and we have (^* ._j .C)_C = 0 i.e. (^* ._j) = 0 on F (1 j 2q – 2r – ß). It now follows that ^* 0 on F (for it has zero intersectionwith every member of a basic set of 3-cycles on F). But thiscondradicts the assumption that ^* is a non-trivial linear combinationof the independent cycles ₁^*, ...,^*; and hence < 2r + ß.     

Approximation of Ground State Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of Dirichlet Laplacians

Let be a bounded connected open set in R^N, N 2, and let –0be the Dirichlet Laplacian defined in L²(). Let > 0 be thesmallest eigenvalue of –, and let > 0 be its correspondingeigenfunction, normalized by ||||₂ = 1. For sufficiently small>0 we let R() be a connected open subset of satisfying Let – 0 be the Dirichlet Laplacian on R(), and let >0and >0 be its ground state eigenvalue and ground state eigenfunction,respectively, normalized by ||||₂=1. For functions f definedon , we let Sf denote the restriction of f to R(). For functionsg defined on R(), we let Tg be the extension of g to satisfying 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 47F05.     

The Symmetrized Bidisc and Lempert's Theorem

Let G C² be the open symmetrized bidisc, namely G = {(₁ + ₂,₁₂) : |₁| < 1, |₂| < 1}. In this paper, a proof is giventhat G is not biholomorphic to any convex domain in C². By combiningthis result with earlier work of Agler and Young, the authorshows that G is a bounded domain on which the Carathéodorydistance and the Kobayashi distance coincide, but which is notbiholomorphic to a convex set. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification32F45 (primary), 15A18 (secondary).     

Frame duality properties for projective unitary representations

Let be a projective unitary representation of a countable groupG on a separable Hilbert space H. If the set B of Bessel vectorsfor is dense in H, then for any vector x H the analysis operator_x makes sense as a densely defined operator from B to ²(G)-space.Two vectors x and y are called -orthogonal if the range spacesof _x and _y are orthogonal, and they are -weakly equivalent ifthe closures of the ranges of _x and _y are the same. These propertiesare characterized in terms of the commutant of the representation.It is proved that a natural geometric invariant (the orthogonalityindex) of the representation agrees with the cyclic multiplicityof the commutant of (G). These results are then applied to Gaborsystems. A sample result is an alternate proof of the knowntheorem that a Gabor sequence is complete in L²( ^d) ifand only if the corresponding adjoint Gabor sequence is ²-linearlyindependent. Some other applications are also discussed.     

On Transitive Permutation Groups with Primitive Subconstituents

Let G be a transitive permutation group on a set such that,for , the stabiliser G induces on each of its orbits in \{}a primitive permutation group (possibly of degree 1). Let Nbe the normal closure of G in G. Then (Theorem 1) either N factorisesas N=GG for some , , or all unfaithful G-orbits, if any exist,are infinite. This result generalises a theorem of I. M. Isaacswhich deals with the case where there is a finite upper boundon the lengths of the G-orbits. Several further results areproved about the structure of G as a permutation group, focussingin particular on the nature of certain G-invariant partitionsof . 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 20B07, 20B05.     

The Series of Norms in a Soluble p-Group

The norm of a group G is the subgroup of elements of G whichnormalise every subgroup of G. We shall denote it (G). An ascendingseries of subgroups _i(G) in G may be defined recursively by:₀(G) = 1 and, for i 0, _i+1(G)/_i(G) = (G/_i(G)). For each i,the section _i+1(G)/i(G) clearly contains the centre of the groupG/_i(G). A result of Schenkman [8] gives a very close connectionbetween this norm series and the upper central series: _i(G) _i(G) _2i(G). 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 20E15.     

Finite groups in Stone-Cech compactifications

Let be an infinite cardinal and let G = ₂. Now let β Gbe the Stone–ech compactification of G as a discrete semigroup,and let =_<c_{β G} {xG\{0}:minsupp (x)}. We show that thesemigroup contains no nontrivial finite group.     

A Liouville Theorem for Matrix-Valued Harmonic Functions on Nilpotent Groups

Let be a non-degenerate positive M_n-valued measure on a locallycompact group G with |||| = 1. An M_n-valued Borel function fon G is called -harmonic if for all x G. Given such a function f which is bounded and leftuniformly continuous on G, it is shown that every central elementin G is a period of f. Further, it is shown that f is constantif G is nilpotent or central. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification31C05, 43A05, 45E10, 46G10.     

Cardinal Invariants and Eventually Different Functions

In this paper we study several kinds of maximal almost disjointfamilies. In the main result of this paper we show that forsuccessor cardinals , there is an unexpected connection betweeninvariants a_e(), b() and a certain cardinal invariant m_d(⁺)on ⁺. As a corollary we get for example the following result.For a successor cardinal , even assuming that ^< = and 2= ⁺, the following is not provable in Zermelo–Fraenkelset theory. There is a ⁺-cc poset which does not collapse andwhich forces a() = ⁺ < a_e() = ⁺⁺ = 2. We also apply the ideasfrom the proofs of these results to study a = a() and non(M).2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 03E17 (primary), 03E05(secondary).