Cardinal Invariants and Eventually Different Functions

In this paper we study several kinds of maximal almost disjointfamilies. In the main result of this paper we show that forsuccessor cardinals , there is an unexpected connection betweeninvariants a_e(), b() and a certain cardinal invariant m_d(⁺)on ⁺. As a corollary we get for example the following result.For a successor cardinal , even assuming that ^< = and 2= ⁺, the following is not provable in Zermelo–Fraenkelset theory. There is a ⁺-cc poset which does not collapse andwhich forces a() = ⁺ < a_e() = ⁺⁺ = 2. We also apply the ideasfrom the proofs of these results to study a = a() and non(M).2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 03E17 (primary), 03E05(secondary).     

Approximation of Ground State Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of Dirichlet Laplacians

Let be a bounded connected open set in R^N, N 2, and let –0be the Dirichlet Laplacian defined in L²(). Let > 0 be thesmallest eigenvalue of –, and let > 0 be its correspondingeigenfunction, normalized by ||||₂ = 1. For sufficiently small>0 we let R() be a connected open subset of satisfying Let – 0 be the Dirichlet Laplacian on R(), and let >0and >0 be its ground state eigenvalue and ground state eigenfunction,respectively, normalized by ||||₂=1. For functions f definedon , we let Sf denote the restriction of f to R(). For functionsg defined on R(), we let Tg be the extension of g to satisfying 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 47F05.     

On the ideals and singularities of secant varieties of Segre varieties

We find minimal generators for the ideals of secant varietiesof Segre varieties in the cases of _k(¹ x ⁿ x ^m) for all k, n,m, ₂(ⁿ x ^m x ^p x ^r) for all n, m, p, r (GSS conjecture for fourfactors), and ₃(ⁿ x ^m x ^p) for all n, m, p and prove they arenormal with rational singularities in the first case and arithmeticallyCohen–Macaulay in the second two cases.     

Correction: on the Intersection Matrices of Curves lying on Irregular Algebraic Surfaces

Professor W. F. Hammond has kindly drawn my attention to a blunderin 4 of the above paper. He referred to the ( – 2r) xß submatrix D of the skew-symmetric matrix displayednear the top of page 181, of which it is asserted that it issquare and non-singular, and pointed out that, from the factthat the matrix of which D forms part is regular, it may onlybe deduced that the columns of D are linearly independent; thatis, it only follows that – 2r ß. The validity of the equation – 2r = ß is essentialto the succeeding argument and, fortunately, may be establishedby alternative means. Using the nomenclature of the paper, wehave on F the set ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^* of independent3-cycles (independent because they cut independent 1-cycleson the curve C), which may be completed, to form a basis forsuch cycles on F, by a further set ₁', ..., _2q–2r–pof independent 3-cycles, each of which meets C in a cycle homologousto zero on C. The cycles ₁^*, ..., ^* are invariant cycles andare independent on F so that, if > 2r + ß, thereis a non-trivial linear combination ^* of these having zero intersectionon C with each of the cycles ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^*.Thus we have. (^* ._k^*)c = 0 = (^* ._i^*)c i.e. (^* ._k^*) = 0 = (^* ._i^* on F (1 k 2r; 1 i ß). Furthermore, (_j . C) 0 on C and we have (^* ._j .C)_C = 0 i.e. (^* ._j) = 0 on F (1 j 2q – 2r – ß). It now follows that ^* 0 on F (for it has zero intersectionwith every member of a basic set of 3-cycles on F). But thiscondradicts the assumption that ^* is a non-trivial linear combinationof the independent cycles ₁^*, ...,^*; and hence < 2r + ß.     

Metric Entropy of Convex Hulls in Hilbert Spaces

We show in this note the following statement which is an improvementover a result of R. M. Dudley and which is also of independentinterest. Let X be a set of a Hilbert space with the propertythat there are constants , >0, and for each n N, the setX can be covered by at most n balls of radius n^–. Then,for each n N, the convex hull of X can be covered by 2ⁿ ballsof radius . The estimate is best possible for all n N, apart from the value c=c(, , X).In other words, let N(, X), >0, be the minimal number ofballs of radius covering the set X. Then the above result isequivalent to saying that if N(, X)=O(^–1/) as 0, thenfor the convex hull conv (X) of X, N(, conv (X)) =O(exp(^–2/(12))). Moreover, we give an interplay between several coveringparameters based on coverings by balls (entropy numbers) andcoverings by cylindrical sets (Kolmogorov numbers). 1991 MathematicsSubject Classification 41A46.     

Singular Cardinal Problem: Shelah's Theorem on 2N{omega}

This is an expository paper giving a complete proof of a theoremof Saharon Shelah: if 2 < for all n < , then 2 < ₄.     

The structure of the normalisers of the congruence subgroups of the Hecke group G5

Let = 2cos (/5) and let []. Denote the normaliser ofG₀() of the Hecke group G₅ in PSL₂() by N(G₀()). Then N(G₀())= G₀(/h), where h is the largest divisor of 4 such that h² divides. Further, N(G₀())/G₀() is either 1 (if h = 1), ₂ x ₂ (if h= 2) or ₄ x ₄ (if h = 4).     

Packing, Tiling, Orthogonality and Completeness

Let R^d be an open set of measure 1. An open set DR^d is calleda ‘tight orthogonal packing region’ for if D–Ddoes not intersect the zeros of the Fourier transform of theindicator function of , and D has measure 1. Suppose that isa discrete subset of R^d. The main contribution of this paperis a new way of proving the following result: D tiles R^d whentranslated at the locations if and only if the set of exponentialsE = {exp 2i, x: } is an orthonormal basis for L²(). (This resulthas been proved by different methods by Lagarias, Reeds andWang [9] and, in the case of being the cube, by Iosevich andPedersen [3]. When is the unit cube in R^d, it is a tight orthogonalpacking region of itself.) In our approach, orthogonality ofE is viewed as a statement about ‘packing’ R^d withtranslates of a certain non-negative function and, additionally,we have completeness of E in L²() if and only if the above-mentionedpacking is in fact a tiling. We then formulate the tiling conditionin Fourier analytic language, and use this to prove our result.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 52C22, 42B99, 11K70.     

Frame duality properties for projective unitary representations

Let be a projective unitary representation of a countable groupG on a separable Hilbert space H. If the set B of Bessel vectorsfor is dense in H, then for any vector x H the analysis operator_x makes sense as a densely defined operator from B to ²(G)-space.Two vectors x and y are called -orthogonal if the range spacesof _x and _y are orthogonal, and they are -weakly equivalent ifthe closures of the ranges of _x and _y are the same. These propertiesare characterized in terms of the commutant of the representation.It is proved that a natural geometric invariant (the orthogonalityindex) of the representation agrees with the cyclic multiplicityof the commutant of (G). These results are then applied to Gaborsystems. A sample result is an alternate proof of the knowntheorem that a Gabor sequence is complete in L²( ^d) ifand only if the corresponding adjoint Gabor sequence is ²-linearlyindependent. Some other applications are also discussed.     

Calculs De Facteurs Epsilon De Paires Pour GLn Sur Un Corps Local, I

Soient F un corps commutatif localement compact non archimédienet un caractère additif non trivial de F. Soient unereprésentation du groupe de Weil–Deligne de F,et sa contragrédiente. Nous calculons le facteur (, , ). De manière analogue, nous calculons le facteur (x, , ) pour toute représentationadmissible irréductible de GL_n(F). En conséquence,si F est de caractéristique nulle et si et se correspondentpar la correspondance de Langlands construite par M. Harris,ou celle construite par les auteurs, alors les facteurs (, , s) et (x, , s) sont égaux pour tout nombre complexe s. Let F be a non-Archimedean local field and a non-trivial additivecharacter of F. Let be a representation of the Weil–Delignegroup of F and its contragredient representation. We compute (, , ). Analogously, we compute (x, , ) for all irreducible admissible representations of GL_n(F).Consequently, if F has characteristic zero, and , correspondvia the Langlands correspondence established by M. Harris orthe correspondence constructed by the authors, then we have(, , s) = (x, , s) for all sC. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification22E50.     

A Variation on a Theorem of Galvin and Hajnal

Let be a singular cardinal of regular uncountable cofinality. Let {(): < } be a continuous increasing sequence withlimit , and let =₍₎₊₍₎, < be regular cardinals. Let I be a normal ideal on , and assume that the reduced product_</I admits a cofinal -scale of ordinal functions. Then ₊, where =||||_I is the I-norm of .     

Quasi-Affinity in certain Classes of Operators

The family of operators S + V (, C, Re > 0), where V isan injective S-Volterra operator (that is, [S, V[ = V²) and— A — V^–1 generates a uniformly bounded C₀-semigroup,is studied in the context of similarity and of the weaker quasi-affinityrelation. It is shown that S is similar to S + V for all , C,Re > 1, and is a quasi-affine transform of S + tV for allt 0 and 0 < < 1.     

A remark on the representation of Zolotarev polynomials

Zolotarev polynomials are the polynomials that have minimaldeviation from zero on [–1, 1] with respect to the norm||xⁿ – x^n–1 + a_n–2 x^n–2 + ... + a₁x+ a_n|| for given and for all a_k . This note complements the paper of F. Pehersforfer [J. LondonMath. Soc. (1) 74 (2006) 143–153] with exact (not asymptotic)construction of the Zolotarev polynomials with respect to thenorm L₁ for || < 1 and with respect to the norm L₂ for || 1 in the form of Bernstein–Szegö orthogonal polynomials.For all in L₁ and L₂ norms, the Zolotarev polynomials satisfyexactly (not asymptotically) the triple recurrence relationof the Chebyshev polynomials.     

Gyration Numbers, Fixed Points and K2

We give a formula for the Boyle-Krieger gyration numbers ofan involution in the symmetry group Aut (_A) of an even subshiftof finite type _A in terms of the number of fixed points of in the periodic orbits of _A. A relationship between gyrationnumbers, the algebraic K-theory group K₂, and the tame symbolis also discussed.     

Boundaries of reduced free group C*-algebras

We prove that the crossed product C*-algebra C*_r(, ) of a freegroup with its boundary sits naturally between the reducedgroup C*-algebra C*_r and its injective envelope I(C*_r). In otherwords, we have natural inclusion C*_r C*_r(, ) I(C*_r) of C*-algebras.     

Rank of Elliptic Curves over almost Separably Closed Fields

Let E be an elliptic curve over a finitely generated infinitefield K. Let K^s denote a separable closure of K, an elementof the Galois group G_K=Gal(K^s/K), and K^s() the invariant subfieldof K^s. If the characteristic of K is not 2 and belongs to asuitable open subgroup of G_K, then E(K^s()) has infinite rank.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 11G05.     

Corrigendum: Elliptic Curves and Quadratic Recurrence Sequences

The statement of the numerical values and z₀ on page 167 of[1, Section 3] contained an error. The values that were actuallyused were (to nine decimal places): thesebeing shifted, by the periods 2₁ and 2₃ respectively, comparedwith the values given in [1] (with ₁ = 1.496729323 and ₃ = 1.225694691i).With ₀ = ₁ and (z) denoting the sigma function (z; g2, g3) withinvariants g2 = 4, g3 = –1 associated with the ellipticcurve given by equation (3.2), these values of and z₀ yield and the latter three values all agreewith those stated in the paper (apart from rounding down thelast digit in the imaginary part of A). 2000 Mathematics SubjectClassification 11B37 (primary), 33E05, 37J35 (secondary).     

On Extensions of Myers' Theorem

Let M be a compact Riemannian manifold, and let h be a smoothfunction on M. Let p^h(x) = inf||–₁(Ric_x(,)–2Hess(h_x(,)).Here Ric_x denotes the Ricci curvature at x and Hess(h) is theHessian of h. Then M has finite fundamental group if ^h–p^h<0. Here ^h =:+2L_h is the Bismut-Witten Laplacian. This leadsto a quick proof of recent results on extension of Myers' theoremto manifolds with mostly positive curvature. There is also asimilar result for noncompact manifolds.     

Logarithmic Convexity for Supremum Norms of Harmonic Functions

We prove the following convexity property for supremum normsof harmonic functions. Let be a domain in Rⁿ, ₀ and E a subdomainand a compact sebset of ,respectively. Then there exists a constant = (E, ₀, ) (0, 1) such that for all harmonic functions u on, the inequality is valid.The case of concentric balls E plays a key role in the proof.For positive harmonic funcitons ono osuch balls, we determinethe sharp constant in the inequlity.     

The Polynomials Associated with a Julia Set

We prove that, with two exceptions, the set of polynomials withJulia set J has the form {pⁿ:nN,} where p is one of these polynomialsand is the symmetry group of J. The exceptions occur when Jis a circle or a straight line segment.