Dickson-Mui Invariants

Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over a finite field.The general and special linear groups, GL(V) and SL(V), acton the exterior algebras ^*V and ^*V^* of V and its dual V^*, andon the symmetric algebra S^*V. The subring of SL(V)-invariantsof ^*VS^*V was determined by Dickson and Mui. This paper describesthe equivalent, but simpler, calculation of the invariant subringof ^*VS^*V as a representation of GL(V)/SL(V). 2000 MathematicsSubject Classification 13A50.     

Correction: Abelian Varieties defined over their Fields of Moduli, I

Bull London Math. Soc, 4 (1972), 370–372. The proof of the theorem contains an error. Before giving acorrect proof, we state two lemmas. LEMMA 1. Let K/k be a cyclic Galois extension of degree m, let generate Gal (K/k), and let (A, I, ) be defined over K. Supposethat there exists an isomorphism :(A,I,) (A, I, ) over K suchthat v^m–1 ... = 1, where v is the canonical isomorphism(A^m, I^m, ^m) (A, I, ). Then (A, I, ) has a model over k, whichbecomes isomorphic to (A, I, ) over K. Proof. This follows easily from [7], as is essentially explainedon p. 371. LEMMA 2. Let G be an abelian pro-finite group and let : G Q/Z be a continuous character of G whose image has order p.Then either: (a) there exist subgroups G' and H of G such that H is cyclicof order p^m for some m, (G') = 0, and G = G' x H, or (b) for any m > 0 there exists a continuous character m ofG such that p^m _m = . Proof. If (b) is false for a given m, then there exists an element G, of order p^r for some r m, such that () ¦ 0. (Considerthe sequence dual to 0 Ker (p^m) G ^pm G). There exists an opensubgroup G_o of G such that (G₀) = 0 and has order p^r in G/G₀.Choose H to be the subgroup of G generated by , and then aneasy application to G/G₀ of the theory of finite abelian groupsshows the existence of G' (note that () ¦ 0 implies that is not a p-th. power in G). We now prove the theorem. The proof is correct up to the statement(iv) (except that (i) should read: F' k₁ F'ab). To removea minor ambiguity in the proof of (iv), choose to be an elementof Gal (F'_ab/k₂) whose image $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$ in Gal (k₁/k₂) generates this last group. The error occursin the statement that the canonical map v : A^P A acts on pointsby sending a^p a; it, of course, sends a a. The proof is correct, however, in the case that it is possibleto choose so that ^p = 1 (in Gal (F'/k₂)). By applying Lemma 2 to G = Gal (F'_ab/k₂) and the map G Gal(k₁/k₂) one sees that only the following two cases have to beconsidered. (a) It is possible to choose so that ^pm = 1, for some m, andG = G' x H where G' acts trivially on k₁ and H is generatedby . (b) For any m > 0 there exists a field K, F'ab K k₁ k₂is a cyclic Galois extension of degree p^m. In the first case, we let K F'_ab be the fixed field of G'.Then (A, I, ), regarded as being defined over K, has a modelover k₂. Indeed, if m = 1, then this was observed above, butwhen m > 1 the same argument applies. In the second case, let : (A, I, ) (A$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$, I$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$, $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$) be an isomorphism defined over k₁ and let v ... ^p–1 = µ(R). If is replaced by for some Aut_k1((A, I, )) then is replacedby ^P. Thus, as µ(R) is finite, we may assume that ^pm–1= 1 for some m. Choose K, as in (b), to be of degree p^m overk₂. Let _m be a generator of Gal (K/k₂) whose restriction tok₁ is $$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$. Then : (A, I, ) (A^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$}, I^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$}, ^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$} = (A^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$m}, I^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma }$$m}, ^{$$\stackrel{\¯}{\sigma}$$m} is an isomorphism defined over K and v ^mpm–1, ... ^m =^pm–1 = 1, and so, by) Lemma 1, (A, I, ) has a model overk₂ which becomes isomorphic to (A, I, over K. The proof may now be completed as before. Addendum: Professor Shimura has pointed out to me that the claimon lines 25 and 26 of p. 371, viz that µ(R) is a puresubgroup of _R^*t, does not hold for all rings R. Thus this condition,which appears to be essential for the validity of the theorem,should be included in the hypotheses. It holds, for example,if µ(R) is a direct summand of µ(F).     

Are All Uniform Algebras Amnm?

A Banach algebra a is AMNM if whenever a linear functional on a and a positive number satisfy |(ab)–(a)(b)|||a||·||b||for all a, b a, there is a multiplicative linear functional on a such that ||–||=o(1) as 0. K. Jarosz [1] asked whetherevery Banach algebra, or every uniform algebra, is AMNM. B.E. Johnson [3] studied the AMNM property and constructed a commutativesemisimple Banach algebra that is not AMNM. In this note weconstruct uniform algebras that are not AMNM. 1991 MathematicsSubject Classification 46J10.     

Uncountable Saturated Structures have the Small Index Property

We prove the following theorem. Let m be an uncountable saturatedstructure of cardinality = ^< and assume that G is a subgroupof Aut (m) whose index is less than or equal to . Then thereexists a subset A of cardinality strictly less than such thatevery automorphism of m leaving A pointwise fixed is in G.     

An Algebraic Obstruction to Isomorphism of Markov Shifts with Group Alphabets

Given a compact group G, a standard construction of a Z² Markovshift _G with alphabet G is described. The cardinality of G (ifG is finite) or the topological dimension of G (if G is a torus)is shown to be an invariant of measurable isomorphism for _G.We show that if G is sufficiently non-abelian (for instanceA₅, PSL₂(F₇) or a Suzuki simple group) and H is any abeliangroup with |H| = |G|, then _G and H are not isomorphic. Thusthe cardinality of G is seen to be necessary but not sufficientto determine the measurable structure of _G.     

The Symmetrized Bidisc and Lempert's Theorem

Let G C² be the open symmetrized bidisc, namely G = {(₁ + ₂,₁₂) : |₁| < 1, |₂| < 1}. In this paper, a proof is giventhat G is not biholomorphic to any convex domain in C². By combiningthis result with earlier work of Agler and Young, the authorshows that G is a bounded domain on which the Carathéodorydistance and the Kobayashi distance coincide, but which is notbiholomorphic to a convex set. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification32F45 (primary), 15A18 (secondary).     

The Representation of Some Integers as a Subset Sum

Let A N. The cardinality (the sum of the elements) of A willbe denoted by |A| ((A)). Let m N and p be a prime. Let A {1, 2,...,p}. We prove thefollowing results. If |A| [(p+m–2)/m]+m, then for every integer x such that0 x p – 1, there is B A such that |B| = m and (B) x mod p. Moreover, the bound is attained. If |A| [(p+m–2)/m]+m!, then there is B A such that |B| 0 mod m and (B) = (m – 1)!p. If |A| [(p + 1)/3]+29, then for every even integer x such that4p s x p(p + 170)/48, there is S A such that x = (S). In particular,for every even integer a 2 such that p 192a – 170, thereare an integer j 0 and S A such that (S) = a^j+1.     

Quasi-Affinity in certain Classes of Operators

The family of operators S + V (, C, Re > 0), where V isan injective S-Volterra operator (that is, [S, V[ = V²) and— A — V^–1 generates a uniformly bounded C₀-semigroup,is studied in the context of similarity and of the weaker quasi-affinityrelation. It is shown that S is similar to S + V for all , C,Re > 1, and is a quasi-affine transform of S + tV for allt 0 and 0 < < 1.     

Discontinuous Homomorphisms from Non-Commutative Banach Algebras

In the 1970s, a question of Kaplansky about discontinuous homomorphismsfrom certain commutative Banach algebras was resolved. Let Abe the commutative C*-algebra C(), where is an infinite compactspace. Then, if the continuum hypothesis (CH) be assumed, thereis a discontinuous homomorphism from C() into a Banach algebra[2, 7]. In fact, let A be a commutative Banach algebra. Then(with (CH)) there is a discontinuous homomorphism from A intoa Banach algebra whenever the character space _A of A is infinite[3, Theorem 3] and also whenever there is a non-maximal, primeideal P in A such that |A/P|=2^₀ [4, 8]. (It is an open questionwhether or not every infinite-dimensional, commutative Banachalgebra A satisfies this latter condition.) 1991 MathematicsSubject Classification 46H40.     

Frame duality properties for projective unitary representations

Let be a projective unitary representation of a countable groupG on a separable Hilbert space H. If the set B of Bessel vectorsfor is dense in H, then for any vector x H the analysis operator_x makes sense as a densely defined operator from B to ²(G)-space.Two vectors x and y are called -orthogonal if the range spacesof _x and _y are orthogonal, and they are -weakly equivalent ifthe closures of the ranges of _x and _y are the same. These propertiesare characterized in terms of the commutant of the representation.It is proved that a natural geometric invariant (the orthogonalityindex) of the representation agrees with the cyclic multiplicityof the commutant of (G). These results are then applied to Gaborsystems. A sample result is an alternate proof of the knowntheorem that a Gabor sequence is complete in L²( ^d) ifand only if the corresponding adjoint Gabor sequence is ²-linearlyindependent. Some other applications are also discussed.     

The Glauberman Correspondence and Subgroups of Operator Groups: a Counterexample

Let G and A be finite groups with coprime orders, and supposethat A acts on G by automorphisms. Let (G, A):Irr_A(G)Irr(C_G(A))be the Glauberman–Isaacs correspondence. Let B A andIrr_A(G). We exhibit a counterexample to the conjecture that(G, A) is an irreducible constituent of the restriction of (G,B) to C_G(A). 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 20C15.     

Hopf C*-Algebras

In this paper we define and study Hopf C^*-algebras. Roughlyspeaking, a Hopf C^*-algebra is a C^*-algebra A with a comultiplication: A M(A A) such that the maps a b (a)(1 b) and a (a 1)(b)have their range in A A and are injective after being extendedto a larger natural domain, the Haagerup tensor product A _hA. In a purely algebraic setting, these conditions on are closelyrelated to the existence of a counit and antipode. In this topologicalcontext, things turn out to be much more subtle, but neverthelessone can show the existence of a suitable counit and antipodeunder these conditions. The basic example is the C^*-algebra C₀(G) of continuous complexfunctions tending to zero at infinity on a locally compact groupwhere the comultiplication is obtained by dualizing the groupmultiplication. But also the reduced group C^*-algebra of a locally compact group with thewell-known comultiplication falls in this category. In factall locally compact quantum groups in the sense of Kustermansand the first author (such as the compact and discrete ones)as well as most of the known examples are included. This theory differs from other similar approaches in that thereis no Haar measure assumed. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46L65, 46L07, 46L89.     

An Invariant for Fraction Fields of McConnell Algebras

In their seminal work [1] on the fields of fractions of theenveloping algebra of an algebraic Lie algebra, Gel'fand andKirillov formulate the following conjecture. Assume that g isa finite-dimensional algebraic Lie algebra over a field of characteristiczero. Then D(g) is a Weyl skew-field over a purely transcendentalextension of the base field. They showed that neither the conjecture nor its negation holdsfor all non-algebraic algebras. In [2], A. Joseph gave a particularlyeasy non-algebraic counterexample devised by L. Makar-Limanov:this is a non-algebraic 5-dimensional solvable Lie algebra,providing a counterexample despite the fact that the centreis one-dimensional. Besides, he raised a question of generalizationof this method for any completely solvable Lie algebra. On the other hand, consider A(V, , ), the McConnell algebrafor the triple (V, , ) as defined in [4, 14.8.4] and below.McConnell in [3] described the completely prime quotients ofthe enveloping algebra of a solvable Lie algebra in terms ofA(V, , ), and found a complete set of invariants to separatethem. In [2], A. Joseph raised the question whether the fieldsof fractions of these McConnell algebras remain non-isomorphic.The purpose of this note is to extend the work of L. Makar-Limanovreported in [2, Section 6], and so provide an integer-valuedinvariant which, for McConnell algebras defined over Z, saysprecisely when this skew-field is isomorphic to a Weyl skew-field:this number has simply to be positive. This result thereforegives a large supply of skew-fields which ‘resemble’a Weyl skew-field very nearly, but nevertheless are not isomorphicto it. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification 17B35.     

On Extensions of Myers' Theorem

Let M be a compact Riemannian manifold, and let h be a smoothfunction on M. Let p^h(x) = inf||–₁(Ric_x(,)–2Hess(h_x(,)).Here Ric_x denotes the Ricci curvature at x and Hess(h) is theHessian of h. Then M has finite fundamental group if ^h–p^h<0. Here ^h =:+2L_h is the Bismut-Witten Laplacian. This leadsto a quick proof of recent results on extension of Myers' theoremto manifolds with mostly positive curvature. There is also asimilar result for noncompact manifolds.     

Orbits in the Maximal Ideal Space of H{infty}

Let H be the Banach algebra of bounded analytic functions inthe open unit disc D. We can define the rotation in the maximalideal space M(H). For a point x in M(H)\D, an orbit O(x) isnot closed in M(H). It is proved that there exists a point xin M(H) such that x is not contained in the Shilov boundaryX and cl O(x), the closure of O(x), contains X, and there existsa point y in M(H)\(D X) such that cl O(y) X. The rotationpresents many problems concerning H. The purpose of this paperis to discuss these problems.     

Cardinal Invariants and Eventually Different Functions

In this paper we study several kinds of maximal almost disjointfamilies. In the main result of this paper we show that forsuccessor cardinals , there is an unexpected connection betweeninvariants a_e(), b() and a certain cardinal invariant m_d(⁺)on ⁺. As a corollary we get for example the following result.For a successor cardinal , even assuming that ^< = and 2= ⁺, the following is not provable in Zermelo–Fraenkelset theory. There is a ⁺-cc poset which does not collapse andwhich forces a() = ⁺ < a_e() = ⁺⁺ = 2. We also apply the ideasfrom the proofs of these results to study a = a() and non(M).2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 03E17 (primary), 03E05(secondary).     

Correction: on the Intersection Matrices of Curves lying on Irregular Algebraic Surfaces

Professor W. F. Hammond has kindly drawn my attention to a blunderin 4 of the above paper. He referred to the ( – 2r) xß submatrix D of the skew-symmetric matrix displayednear the top of page 181, of which it is asserted that it issquare and non-singular, and pointed out that, from the factthat the matrix of which D forms part is regular, it may onlybe deduced that the columns of D are linearly independent; thatis, it only follows that – 2r ß. The validity of the equation – 2r = ß is essentialto the succeeding argument and, fortunately, may be establishedby alternative means. Using the nomenclature of the paper, wehave on F the set ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^* of independent3-cycles (independent because they cut independent 1-cycleson the curve C), which may be completed, to form a basis forsuch cycles on F, by a further set ₁', ..., _2q–2r–pof independent 3-cycles, each of which meets C in a cycle homologousto zero on C. The cycles ₁^*, ..., ^* are invariant cycles andare independent on F so that, if > 2r + ß, thereis a non-trivial linear combination ^* of these having zero intersectionon C with each of the cycles ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^*.Thus we have. (^* ._k^*)c = 0 = (^* ._i^*)c i.e. (^* ._k^*) = 0 = (^* ._i^* on F (1 k 2r; 1 i ß). Furthermore, (_j . C) 0 on C and we have (^* ._j .C)_C = 0 i.e. (^* ._j) = 0 on F (1 j 2q – 2r – ß). It now follows that ^* 0 on F (for it has zero intersectionwith every member of a basic set of 3-cycles on F). But thiscondradicts the assumption that ^* is a non-trivial linear combinationof the independent cycles ₁^*, ...,^*; and hence < 2r + ß.     

Packing, Tiling, Orthogonality and Completeness

Let R^d be an open set of measure 1. An open set DR^d is calleda ‘tight orthogonal packing region’ for if D–Ddoes not intersect the zeros of the Fourier transform of theindicator function of , and D has measure 1. Suppose that isa discrete subset of R^d. The main contribution of this paperis a new way of proving the following result: D tiles R^d whentranslated at the locations if and only if the set of exponentialsE = {exp 2i, x: } is an orthonormal basis for L²(). (This resulthas been proved by different methods by Lagarias, Reeds andWang [9] and, in the case of being the cube, by Iosevich andPedersen [3]. When is the unit cube in R^d, it is a tight orthogonalpacking region of itself.) In our approach, orthogonality ofE is viewed as a statement about ‘packing’ R^d withtranslates of a certain non-negative function and, additionally,we have completeness of E in L²() if and only if the above-mentionedpacking is in fact a tiling. We then formulate the tiling conditionin Fourier analytic language, and use this to prove our result.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 52C22, 42B99, 11K70.     

Tensor Products of C*-Algebras Over Abelian Subalgebras

Suppose that A is a C*-algebra and C is a unital abelian C*-subalgebrawhich is isomorphic to a unital subalgebra of the centre ofM(A), the multiplier algebra of A. Letting = , so that we maywrite C = C(), we call A a C()-algebra (following Blanchard[7]). Suppose that B is another C()-algebra, then we form A_CB, the algebraic tensor product of A with B over C as follows:A B is the algebraic tensor product over C, I_C = {ⁿ_i–1(f_i 1–1f_i)x|f_iC, xAB} is the ideal in AB generated by f1–1f|fC,and A _CB = AB/I_C. Then A_CB is an involutive algebra over C,and we shall be interested in deciding when A_CB is a pre-C*-algebra;that is, when is there a C*-norm on A_C B? There is a C*-semi-norm,which we denote by ||·||_C-min, which is minimal in thesense that it is dominated by any semi-norm whose kernel containsthe kernel of ||·||_C-min. Moreover, if A _C B has a C*-norm,then ||·||_C-min is a C*-norm on A_C B. The problem isto decide when ||·||_C-min is a norm. It was shown byBlanchard [7, Proposition 3.1] that when A and B are continuousfields and C is separable, then ||·||_C-min is a norm.In this paper we show that ||·||_C-min is a norm whenC is a von Neumann algebra, and then we examine some consequences.     

Finite CI-Groups are Soluble

For a finite group G and a subset S of G with 1 S and S = S^–1,the Cayley graph Cay(G, S) is the graph with vertex set G suchthat {x, y} is an edge if and only if yx^–1 S. The groupG is called a CI-group if, for all subsets S and T of G\{1},Cay(G, S) Cay(G, T) if and only if S = T for some Aut(G).In this paper, for each prime p 1 (mod 4), a symmetric graph(p) is constructed from PSL(2, p) such that Aut (p) = Z₂ x PSL(2,p); it is then shown that A₅ is not a CI-group, and that allfinite CI-groups are soluble. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification05C25.