图的倍图与补倍图

计算机科学数据库的关系中遇到了可归为倍图或补倍图的参数和哈密顿圈的问题．对简单图C，如果V（D（G））：V（G）∪V（G′）E（D（G））=E（C）∪E（C″）U{vivj′｜vi∈V（G），Vj′∈V（G′）且vivj∈E（G））那么，称D（C）是C的倍图，如果V（D（G））=V（C）∪V（G′），E（D（C））：E（C）∪E（G′）∪{vivj′}vi∈V（G），vj′∈V（G’）and vivj∈（G）），称D（C）是G的补倍图，这里G′是G的拷贝．本文研究了D（G）和D的色数，边色数，欧拉性，哈密顿性和提出了D（G） 的边色数是D（G）的最大度等公开问题．     

双线性型图与交错型图不是完美图

本文证明了双线性型图与交错型图都不是完美图,从而解决了双线性型图与交错型图的完美图判别问题.     

准模糊图拟阵基图

在准模糊图拟阵的基础上,提出准模糊图拟阵的基图,并讨论准模糊图拟阵基图的性质和特征。     

随机映射图的局部图

讨论了当n趋向无穷大时,n个顶点的随机映射图的k-局部图收敛于随机生长过程时刻k的二叉图,这儿,k-局部图是随机映射图前k个顶点{1,2,…,k}所生成的最小图.在这种意义下,称随机映射图为渐近二叉的.     

随机映射图的局部图

讨论了当n趋向无穷大时,n个顶点的随机映射图的k-局部图收敛于随机生长过程时刻k的二叉图,这儿,k-局部图足随机映射图前k个顶点{1,2,…,k}所生成的最小图.在这种意义下,称随机映射图为渐近二叉的.     

门槛图与度极大图

证明了门槛图与度极大图是一类图的两种不同说法,同时用图的对角限制极左矩阵刻画这一类图的结构。     

图的子图序列和图的子林分解

在文献[1]里,Michael.O.Albertson和David Berman对任意图G定义了一个函数f(G): 他们猜想当G是平面图时,f(G)的下界至少是1/2。如果这个猜想成立,则可以利用这结果,而不用四色定理来解决Erds-Vising问题.(在文献[2],251页,问题36).同时他们提出了对于其它类型图G,f(G)的下界问题.本文首先引进了子图序列概念,并用它作为工具来估计f(G)的下界.主要给出了在亏格大于零的定向曲面上图G的f(G)下确界。     

消去图、覆盖图和均匀图的若干结果

设 G是一个图 ,g,f是定义在图 G的顶点集上的两个整数值函数 ,且g≤f.图 G的一个 ( g,f) -因子是 G的一个支撑子图 F,使对任意的 x∈V( F)有g( x)≤ d F( x)≤ f ( x) .文中推广了 ( g,f) -消去图、( g,f ) -覆盖图和 ( g,f) -均匀图的概念 ,给出了在 g相似文献   

一般图的哈密顿图的研究进展

1991年刘振宏和李明楚在南京大学召开的首届哈密顿图研讨会的综述文章中说"要给出一个一般图具有哈密顿圈的充分条件是一件非常不容易的事"。因哈密顿图是含哈密顿圈的图类,如此哈密顿图主要有六个方向:哈密顿圈、哈密顿连通、泛圈图、点泛圈图、泛连通图、最短路径泛圈图。本文中,我们就给出一般图的这些领域新进展的小综述。     

Hexavalent symmetric graphs of order 9p

A graph is symmetric if its automorphism group acts transitively on the set of arcs of the graph. In this paper, we classify hexavalent symmetric graphs of order $9p$ for each prime $p$.     

三度边正则图的三个无限族

图X称为边正则图，若X的自同构群Aut(X)在X的边集上的作用是正则的．本文考察了三度边正则图与四度Cayley图的关系，给出了一个由四度Cayley图构造三度边正则图的方法，并且构造了边正则图的三个无限族．     

Hypohamiltonian Planar Cubic Graphs with Girth 5

A graph is called hypohamiltonian if it is not hamiltonian but becomes hamiltonian if any vertex is removed. Many hypohamiltonian planar cubic graphs have been found, starting with constructions of Thomassen in 1981. However, all the examples found until now had 4‐cycles. In this note we present the first examples of hypohamiltonian planar cubic graphs with cyclic connectivity 5, and thus girth 5. We show by computer search that the smallest members of this class are three graphs with 76 vertices.     

Edge-primitive Cayley graphs on abelian groups and dihedral groups

A graph is called edge-primitive if its automorphism group acts primitively on its edge set. In 1973, Weiss (1973) determined all edge-primitive graphs of valency three, and recently Guo et al. (2013,2015) classified edge-primitive graphs of valencies four and five. In this paper, we determine all edge-primitive Cayley graphs on abelian groups and dihedral groups.     

Semisymmetric cubic graphs as regular covers of K 3,3

A regular graph X is called semisymmetric if it is edge-transitive but not vertex-transitive. For G ≤ AutX, we call a G-cover X semisymmetric if X is semisymmetric, and call a G-cover X one-regular if Aut X acts regularly on its arc-set. In this paper, we give the sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of one-regular or semisymmetric Zn-Covers of K3,3. Also, an infinite family of semisymmetric Zn×Zn-covers of K3,3 are constructed.     

Classification of a family of symmetric graphs with complete 2-arc-transitive quotients

In this paper we give a classification of a family of symmetric graphs with complete 2-arc-transitive quotients. Of particular interest are two subfamilies of graphs which admit an arc-transitive action of a projective linear group. The graphs in these subfamilies can be defined in terms of the cross ratio of certain 4-tuples of elements of a finite projective line, and thus may be called the second type ‘cross ratio graphs’, which are different from the ‘cross ratio graphs’ studied in [A. Gardiner, C. E. Praeger, S. Zhou, Cross-ratio graphs, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 64 (2001), 257–272]. We also give a combinatorial characterisation of such second type cross ratio graphs.     

A Local Analysis of Imprimitive Symmetric Graphs

Let Г be a G-symmetric graph admitting a nontrivial G-invariant partition . Let Г be the quotient graph of Г with respect to . For each block B ∊ , the setwise stabiliser G_B of B in G induces natural actions on B and on the neighbourhood Г (B) of B in Г . Let G_(B) and G_[B] be respectively the kernels of these actions. In this paper we study certain “local actions" induced by G_(B) and G_[B], such as the action of G_[B] on B and the action of G_(B) on Г (B), and their influence on the structure of Г. Supported by a Discovery Project Grant (DP0558677) from the Australian Research Council and a Melbourne Early Career Researcher Grant from The University of Melbourne.     

On triconnected and cubic plane graphs on given point sets

Let S be a set of n4 points in general position in the plane, and let h<n be the number of extreme points of S. We show how to construct a 3-connected plane graph with vertex set S, having max{3n/2,n+h−1} edges, and we prove that there is no 3-connected plane graph on top of S with a smaller number of edges. In particular, this implies that S admits a 3-connected cubic plane graph if and only if n4 is even and hn/2+1. The same bounds also hold when 3-edge-connectivity is considered. We also give a partial characterization of the point sets in the plane that can be the vertex set of a cubic plane graph.     

On the Dot Product Graph of a Commutative Ring

Let A be a commutative ring with nonzero identity, 1 ≤ n < ∞ be an integer, and R = A × A × … ×A (n times). The total dot product graph of R is the (undirected) graph TD(R) with vertices R* = R?{(0, 0,…, 0)}, and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if x·y = 0 ∈ A (where x·y denote the normal dot product of x and y). Let Z(R) denote the set of all zero-divisors of R. Then the zero-divisor dot product graph of R is the induced subgraph ZD(R) of TD(R) with vertices Z(R)* = Z(R)?{(0, 0,…, 0)}. It follows that each edge (path) of the classical zero-divisor graph Γ(R) is an edge (path) of ZD(R). We observe that if n = 1, then TD(R) is a disconnected graph and ZD(R) is identical to the well-known zero-divisor graph of R in the sense of Beck–Anderson–Livingston, and hence it is connected. In this paper, we study both graphs TD(R) and ZD(R). For a commutative ring A and n ≥ 3, we show that TD(R) (ZD(R)) is connected with diameter two (at most three) and with girth three. Among other things, for n ≥ 2, we show that ZD(R) is identical to the zero-divisor graph of R if and only if either n = 2 and A is an integral domain or R is ring-isomorphic to ?₂ × ?₂ × ?₂.