在DEA中有关输出与输入的比值的模型的探讨

对以决策单元的输出与输入的比值为目标函数的多目标规划模型,证明了有关它与(弱)DEA有效(C2R)关系的三个定理.     

用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

DEA中有效值的一种求法与保序的条件

对DEA中决策单元的有效值,本文给出了求它的二个定理,并给出了在导入新的决策单元后其保序的充分条件,最后举例说明这条件不成立时的结果.     

对DEA中有效单元排序的一种新方法

文章对数据包络分析(DEA)的强有效性问题提出了一种新的研究方法.利用有效值和负有效值来构造复合输入和输出这种方法可以实现有效决策单元的完全排序.文章还给出了新方法中模型的一些性质.最后,用两个例子来检验此方法并和其他模型的计算结果进行了比较.     

Interval DEA模型中决策单元的投影问题

在传统的DEA模型中,最优相对效率模型是在不大于1的范围内研究决策单元的效率的,最差相对效率模型是在不小于1的范围内研究决策单元的效率,这两种模型在研究投影问题时,是在不同的范围内进行的,有一定的片面性.将在interval DEA模型中,研究决策单元的投影问题,该模型是在相同的约束域内研究最优和最差相对效率模型,得出的结论将更加全面,通过两个定理给出了非DEA有效的决策单元在DEA有效面上的投影表达式和非DEA无效的决策单元在DEA无效面上的投影表达式.同时,通过一个实例对决策单元在interval DEA模型中的投影结果与在传统的DEA模型的投影结果进行了比较,发现投影结果比传统模型得到的投影结果对实际的生产有更强的指导意义.     

使决策单元变为DEA有效的偏差和最小法

某决策单元为非 DEA有效 ( C2 R或 C2 GS2 ) ,为了将它变为 DEA有效 ,在找出其对应点附近的一些有效前沿面的基础上 ,给出了使其对应点与这些有效前沿面上的点的输入、输出的偏差和最小的方法 .     

技术有效的决策单元与DEA有效性(C~2GS~2)

对李光金、阎洪先生所定义的技术有效的决策单元,证明了它是DEA有效(C~2GS~2)的,而且讨论了将非有效的决策单元转变为有效.     

指标可取区间数的决策单元的DEA评价

对输入、输出取区间数的一些决策单元,在给出有关DEA的定理的基础上,对评价它们的方法作了进一步探讨.     

一种基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法的完善和扩展

本文对文[1]中提出的基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法进行了完善和扩展。首先,根据CCR模型,给出了两类特殊的DEA模型,分别是仅有投入数据的DEA模型和仅有产出数据的DEA模型;其次,基于这两个模型,应用上述方法实现了对仅有投入(或产出)数据的决策单元的排序;第三,给出了排序方法中参数a的计算方法;最后,通过修正排序模型,有效提高了排序方法的计算精度。改进后的排序方法避免了两个决策单元因为相对效率值过小而不能排序的情形,其应用范围也进一步扩大。     

基于DEA结果修正模型的公路网交通效益评价

为了更好地对公路网建设的交通效益进行评价,构建了公路网交通效益指标体系,并采用数据包络分析(DEA)方法进行相对有效性评价与分析.鉴于全排序的客观要求,在CCR的基础上提出了基于系统潜能损失的结果修正模型,并引入了最劣决策单元对其进行DEA再评价.以9个公路网为蓝本采集指标数据,进行了基于DEA结果修正模型的交通效益评价,并与选取的9个公路网的实际运行情况做了对比分析.     

链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data

The purpose of this paper is to develop a new DEA with an interval efficiency. An original DEA model is to evaluate each DMU optimistically. There is another model called “Inverted DEA” to evaluate each DMU pessimistically. But, there are no relations essentially between DEA and inverted DEA. Thus, we formulate a DEA model with an interval efficiency which consists of efficiencies obtained from the optimistic and pessimistic viewpoints. Thus, two end points can construct an interval efficiency. With the same idea, we deal with the interval inefficiency model which is inverse to interval efficiency. Finally, we extend the proposed DEA model to interval data and fuzzy data.     

An inverse optimization model for imprecise data envelopment analysis

Inverse data envelopment analysis (InDEA) is a well-known approach for short-term forecasting of a given decision-making unit (DMU). The conventional InDEA models use the production possibility set (PPS) that is composed of an evaluated DMU with current inputs and outputs. In this paper, we replace the fluctuated DMU with a modified DMU involving renewal inputs and outputs in the PPS since the DMU with current data cannot be allowed to establish the new PPS. Besides, the classical DEA models such as InDEA are assumed to consider perfect knowledge of the input and output values but in numerous situations, this assumption may not be realistic. The observed values of the data in these situations can sometimes be defined as interval numbers instead of crisp numbers. Here, we extend the InDEA model to interval data for evaluating the relative efficiency of DMUs. The proposed models determine the lower and upper bounds of the inputs of a given DMU separately when its interval outputs are changed in the performance analysis process. We aim to remain the current interval efficiency of a considered DMU and the interval efficiencies of the remaining DMUs fixed or even improve compared with the current interval efficiencies.     

Validating absolute weight bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models

The Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) DEA model and its linear forms maximise the efficiency of the assessed decision making unit (DMU) and, at the same time, the ratio of this efficiency to the maximum efficiency taken across all the DMUs, the latter naturally always being equal to one. It has been shown recently that, in the presence of absolute weight bounds, these models may not maximise the ratio of these efficiencies, a fact that may cause problems with the interpretation and use of the optimal primal and dual solutions. For example, an inefficient DMU may have greater efficiency than its target unit for some weights. This paper investigates the problem in greater detail; it shows that, in the linear DEA model maximising the total virtual output of the assessed DMU, the problem occurs only if upper bounds are imposed on the output weights. A similar result is established for the model that minimises the total virtual input.     

Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions

In models of data envelopment analysis (DEA), an optimal set of input and output weights is generally assumed to represent the assessed decision making unit (DMU) in the best light in comparison to all the other DMUs. The paper shows that this may not be correct if absolute weight bounds or some other weight restrictions are added to the model. A consequence may be that the model will underestimate the relative efficiency of DMUs. The incorporation of weight restrictions in a maximin DEA model is suggested. This model can be further converted to more operational forms, which are similar to the classical DEA models.     

Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is commonly employed to evaluate the efficiency performance of a decision making unit (DMU) that transforms exogenous inputs into final outputs. In such a black-box DEA approach, details of an internal production process of the DMU are typically ignored and hence the locations of inefficiency are not adequately provided. In view of this, DEA researchers have recently developed various network approaches by looking into the black box, where the inputs that enter the box and the outputs that come out of it are only considered. However, most of these network approaches evaluate divisional efficiency by using an optimal solution of their respective optimization problem. If such an optimal solution is used in the case when there are multiple optima, then managerial guidance based on this solution alone may be inappropriate because more appropriate targets from the viewpoint of management may be ignored. Taking this fact into account, therefore, we propose a network approach for identifying the efficiency status of each DMU and its divisions. This approach provides a practical computational procedure.     

Context-dependent data envelopment analysis with cross-efficiency evaluation

To address some problems with the original context-dependent data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper proposes a new version of context-dependent DEA; this version is based on cross-efficiency evaluations. One of the problems with the original context-dependent DEA is that the attractiveness and progress measures only represent the radial distance between the decision-making unit (DMU) under evaluation and the evaluation context. This representation only shows how distinct the DMU is from a single specific DMU on the evaluation context, not from the entire evaluation context overall. Another problem is that the magnitude of attractiveness and progress scores in the original context-dependent DEA may not have significant meanings. It may not be proper to say that a DMU is more attractive simply because it has a higher attractiveness score for the same reason that the performance of inefficient DMUs cannot be compared with one another simply based on their efficiency scores. We incorporate cross-efficiency evaluations into the context-dependent DEA to overcome the preceding shortcomings of the original context-dependent DEA. We also demonstrate the proposed model's appropriateness and usefulness with an illustrative example.     

层次系统DEA模型的研究

经典的DEA模型视决策单元为黑匣子,不考虑内部结构.实际上,决策单元DMU可能具有各种各样的结构.对DMU进行效率评价时,尽管最初的输入和最终的输出相同,但考虑DMU结构与忽视DMU结构得到的效率不同.基于这样一种思想,提出了一种基于层次系统的DEA模型.     

The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data-oriented approach for evaluating the performances of a set of peer entities called decision-making units (DMUs), whose performance is determined based on multiple measures. The traditional DEA, which is based on the concept of efficiency frontier (output frontier), determines the best efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. Based on these scores, DMUs are classified into DEA-efficient (optimistic efficient) or DEA-non-efficient (optimistic non-efficient) units, and the DEA-efficient DMUs determine the efficiency frontier. There is a comparable approach which uses the concept of inefficiency frontier (input frontier) for determining the worst relative efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs on the inefficiency frontier are specified as DEA-inefficient or pessimistic inefficient, and those that do not lie on the inefficient frontier, are declared to be DEA-non-inefficient or pessimistic non-inefficient. In this paper, we argue that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously, and any approach that considers only one of them will be biased. For measuring the overall performance of the DMUs, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval, and we call the proposed DEA models for efficiency measurement the bounded DEA models. In this way, the efficiency interval provides the decision maker with all the possible values of efficiency, which reflect various perspectives. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed DEA models.     

DTZ model with independent subsystems

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming approach to assess relative efficiency of a group of decision-making units. In view of the defects of existing models in evaluating efficiency of the system with P independent subsystems, Yang et al. [10] introduced YMK model with the assumption that decision-making unit (DMU) is independent of each other. But in some production systems, decision-making units usually have some relationships in this way or that. In this paper, DEA model is given by assuming that DMUs can cooperate with others in its subgroups. Some property and the efficiency relationship of the whole system and its subsystems are given.