Novel approach to microwave-assisted extraction and micro-solid-phase extraction from soil using graphite fibers as sorbent

A single-step extraction-cleanup procedure involving microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and micro-solid-phase extraction (micro-SPE) has been developed for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil samples. Micro-SPE is a relatively new extraction procedure that makes use of a sorbent enclosed within a sealed polypropylene membrane envelope. In the present work, for the first time, graphite fiber was used as a sorbent material for extraction. MAE-micro-SPE was used to cleanup sediment samples and to extract and preconcentrate five PAHs in sediment samples prepared as slurries with addition of water. The best extraction conditions comprised of microwave heating at 50 degrees C for a duration of 20 min, and an elution (desorption) time of 5 min using acetonitrile with sonication. Using gas chromatography (GC)-flame ionization detection (FID), the limits of detection (LODs) of the PAHs ranged between 2.2 and 3.6 ng/g. With GC-mass spectrometry (MS), LODs were between 0.0017 and 0.0057 ng/g. The linear ranges were between 0.1 and 50 or 100 microg/g for GC-FID analysis, and 1 and 500 or 1000 ng/g for GC-MS analysis. Granular activated carbon was also used for the micro-SPE device but was found to be not as efficient in the PAH extraction. The MAE-micro-SPE method was successfully used for the extraction of PAHs in river and marine sediments, demonstrating its applicability to real environmental solid matrixes.     

Optimisation of supercritical fluid extraction of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from spiked soil and marine sediment standard reference material

 For the determination of 16 PAHs in soils and sediment samples by GC/FID and GC/MS, the dynamic off-line supercritical fluid extraction with both pure and modified carbon dioxide has been evaluated. The optimisation of extraction parameters was performed for four individual groups of PAHs according to their number of aromatic rings (2–3 rings, 4 rings, 5 rings and 6 rings) by varying pressure (200–510 bar), temperature (50–150 °C), extraction fluid volume (10–50 ml), and the methanol modifier concentration (0–10%). Using a five level spherical factorial experimental design the number of experiments required for optimisation was 45. In spiked soil samples extraction efficiencies of 80–100% were achieved for the individual groups of PAHs. At the optimal set of conditions 10–30% lower recoveries of PAHs were obtained for the standard reference material NIST SRM 1941a (marine sediment). The largest differences between extraction recoveries of native and spiked PAHs occurred at high molecular weight PAHs. Using SFE efficiency data for the standard reference material, cluster analysis proved that dividing the 16 PAHs into four groups according to their number of aromatic rings was appropriate and correct. Received: 2 February 1996/Revised: 26 November 1996/Accepted: 30 November 1996     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments using a new ASE-SFE extraction technique

In order to determine PAHs in marine sediment samples by GC/MS(SIM) a new extraction approach of ASE-SFE was evaluated using combined accelerated solvent extraction (ASE, dynamic and static mode) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE, dynamic mode) without further purification of the sample. The solvents used for ASE-SFE were methylene chloride and carbon dioxide. The recovery data, precision and accuracy of the whole method were evaluated statistically. The average recoveries of PAHs, based on deuterated internal standards were 77% for 2-3-ring PAHs, 85% for 4-ring PAHs, 88% for 5-ring PAHs and 97% for 6-ring PAHs. The extraction time required for the ASE-SFE technique was 30 min, which is longer than in the case of independent use of ASE and shorter compared to SFE. ASE-SFE recoveries of PAHs from SRM marine sediment are comparable for (2-3-ring, 4-ring PAHs) or higher (5-ring, 6-ring PAHs) than reported for the conventional extraction methods of ASE and SFE. Method detection limits of (MDL) were statistically estimated. MDL values obtained for 15 PAHs compounds vary between 0.06 ngg(-1) and 3.54 ngg(-1).     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments using a new ASE-SFE extraction technique

In order to determine PAHs in marine sediment samples by GC/MS(SIM) a new extraction approach of ASE-SFE was evaluated using combined accelerated solvent extraction (ASE, dynamic and static mode) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE, dynamic mode) without further purification of the sample. The solvents used for ASE-SFE were methylene chloride and carbon dioxide. The recovery data, precision and accuracy of the whole method were evaluated statistically. The average recoveries of PAHs, based on deuterated internal standards were 77% for 2–3-ring PAHs, 85% for 4-ring PAHs, 88% for ¶5-ring PAHs and 97% for 6-ring PAHs. The extraction time required for the ASE-SFE technique was 30 min, which is longer than in the case of independent use of ASE and shorter compared to SFE. ASE-SFE recoveries of PAHs from SRM marine sediment are comparable for (2–3-ring, 4-ring PAHs) or higher (5-ring, 6-ring PAHs) than reported for the conventional extraction methods of ASE and SFE. Method detection limits of (MDL) were statistically estimated. MDL values obtained for 15 PAHs compounds vary between 0.06 ngg^?1 and 3.54 ngg^?1.     

Static subcritical water extraction with simultaneous solid-phase extraction for determining polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on environmental solids

A rapid and very simple method for extracting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soils, sediments, and air particulate matter has been developed by coupling static subcritical water extraction with styrene-divinylbenzene (SDB-XC) extraction discs. Soil, water, and the SDB-XC disc are placed in a sealed extraction cell, heated to 250 degrees C for 15 to 60 min, cooled, and the PAHs recovered from the disc with acetone/methylene chloride. If the cells are mixed during heating, all PAHs with molecular weights from 128 to 276 are quantitatively (>90%) extracted and collected on the sorbent disc and are then recovered by shaking with acetone/methylene chloride. After water extraction, the sorbent discs can be stored in autosampler vials without loss of the PAHs, thus providing a convenient method of shipping PAH extracts from field sites to the analytical laboratory. The method gives good quantitative agreement with standard Soxhlet extraction, and with certified reference materials for PAH concentrations on soil, sediment (SRM 1944), and air particulate matter (SRM 1649a).     

Comparisons of soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, supercritical fluid extraction and subcritical water extraction for environmental solids: recovery, selectivity and effects on sample matrix

Extractions of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil from a former manufactured gas plant site were performed with a Soxhlet apparatus (18 h), by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (50 min at 100 degrees C), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) (1 h at 150 degrees C with pure CO2), and subcritical water (1 h at 250 degrees C, or 30 min at 300 degrees C). Although minor differences in recoveries for some PAHs resulted from the different methods, quantitative agreement between all of the methods was generally good. However, the extract quality differed greatly. The organic solvent extracts (Soxhlet and PLE) were much darker, while the extracts from subcritical water (collected in toluene) were orange, and the extracts from SFE (collected in CH2Cl2) were light yellow. The organic solvent extracts also yielded more artifact peaks in the gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry and GC-flame ionization detection chromatograms, especially compared to supercritical CO2. Based on elemental analysis (carbon and nitrogen) of the soil residues after each extraction, subcritical water, PLE, and Soxhlet extraction had poor selectivity for PAHs versus bulk soil organic matter (approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of the bulk soil organic matter was extracted along with the PAHs), while SFE with pure CO2 removed only 8% of the bulk organic matrix. Selectivities for different compound classes also vary with extraction method. Extraction of urban air particulate matter with organic solvents yields very high concentrations of n- and branched alkanes (approximately C18 to C30) from diesel exhaust as well as lower levels of PAHs, and no selectivity between the bulk alkanes and PAHs is obtained during organic solvent extraction. Some moderate selectivity with supercritical CO2 can be achieved by first extracting the bulk alkanes at mild conditions, followed by stronger conditions to extract the remaining PAHs, i.e., the least polar organics are the easiest organics to extract with pure CO2. In direct contrast, subcritical water prefers the more polar analytes, i.e., PAHs were efficiently extracted from urban air particulates at 250 degrees C, with little or no extraction of the alkanes. Finally, recent work has demonstrated that many pollutant molecules become "sequestered" as they age for decades in the environment (i.e., more tightly bound to soil particles and less available to organisms or transport). Therefore, it may be more important for an extraction method to only recover pollutant molecules that are environmentally-relevant, rather than the conventional attempts to extract all pollutant molecules regardless of how tightly bound they are to the soil or sediment matrix. Initial work comparing SFE extraction behavior using mild to strong conditions with bioremediation behavior of PAHs shows great promise to develop extraction methodology to measure environmentally-relevant concentrations of pollutants in addition to their total concentrations.     

Simultaneous extraction of several persistent organic pollutants in sediment using focused ultrasonic solid-liquid extraction

Focused ultrasonic solid-liquid extraction (FUSLE) has been optimised for simultaneous analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), phthalate esters (PEs), and nonylphenols (NPs) in sediment samples. Optimisation was performed using naturally polluted freeze-dried sediment samples. The variables studied during the optimisation process were: percentage of maximum power (10-60%), extraction time (10-300 s), number of cycles (1-9), composition of the extraction solvent (acetone-n-hexane, 10:90-90:10), and sample mass (0.1-1 g). The volume of the extractant was constant (10 mL) and the extraction was performed at 0 degrees C in an ice-bath during the optimisation process. All these variables were studied using an experimental design approach by means of The Unscrambler software. The extraction time and the operational variables (number of cycles and power) had no statistically significant effect in the extraction and they were held at 2 min, 20% power, and seven cycles, respectively. The mass and the addition of non-polar solvent (n-hexane) had a negative effect in the extraction yield and, thus, the mass was held at 0.5 g and pure acetone was used as extraction solvent. After those variables were optimised, the effect of the extraction temperature (0 degrees C or room temperature) was also studied. The validation of the extraction method was performed using NIST-1944 reference material in the case of PAHs and PCBs. Because no certified reference sediment is available for PEs and NPs, the results obtained for FUSLE were compared with those obtained for microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) under conditions optimised elsewhere. In all the cases the analysis were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Good accuracy were achieved in all cases. The limits of detection (LODs) obtained were between 0.10 and 1.70 ng g(-1) for PAHs (except for naphthalene 5.33 ng g(-1)), 0.02 and 0.16 ng g(-1) for PCBs, 46 and 188 ng g(-1) for PEs, and 0.6 and 12.4 microg g(-1) for NPs. The precision was around 5-10% for most of the PAHs and PCBs and around 2-10% for most of the PEs and NPs.     

Miniaturised pressurised liquid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil and sediment with subsequent large-volume injection-gas chromatography

Analyte extraction is the main limitation when developing at-line, or on-line, procedures for the preparation of (semi)solid environmental samples. Pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) is an analyte- and matrix-independent technique which provides cleaner extracts than the time-consuming classical procedures. In the study, the practicality of miniaturised PLE performed in a stainless-steel cell, and combined with subsequent large-volume injection (LVI)-GC-MS was studied. As an example, the new system was applied to the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils and a sediment. Variables affecting the PLE efficiency, such as pressure and temperature of the extraction solvent and total solvent volume, were studied. Toluene was selected as extraction solvent and a total solvent volume of 100 microl was used for the 10 min static-dynamic PLE of 50-mg samples. Additional clean-up or filtration of the sample extracts was not required. Detection limits using LVI-GC-MS were below 9 ng/g soil for the 13 PAHs more volatile than indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene in real soil samples and the repeatability of the complete PLE plus LVI-GC-MS method for the analysis of the endogenous PAH was better than 15%. Comparison of PLE and Soxhlet or liquid-partitioning extraction results for the analysis of non-spiked samples showed that the efficiency of PLE is the same or better than for the other two extraction methods assayed.     

Vortex‐assisted extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment by high performance liquid chromatography

A simple, rapid, and efficient method, vortex‐assisted extraction followed by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) has been developed for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment samples prior to analysis by high performance liquid chromatography fluorescence detection. Acetonitrile was used as collecting solvent for the extraction of PAHs from sediment by vortex‐assisted extraction. In DLLME, PAHs were rapidly transferred from acetonitrile to dichloromethane. Under the optimum conditions, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 10 to 2100 ng g^?1 for fluorene, anthracene, chrysene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and benzo[a]pyrene, and 20 to 2100 ng g^?1 for other target analytes. Coefficients of determinations ranged from 0.9986 to 0.9994. The limits of detection, based on signal‐to‐noise ratio of three, ranged from 2.3 to 6.8 ng g^?1. Reproducibility and recoveries was assessed by extracting a series of six independent sediment samples, which were spiked with different concentration levels. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied in analyses of real nature sediment samples. The proposed method extended and improved the application of DLLME to solid samples, which greatly shorten the extraction time and simplified the extraction process.     

Direct automatic screening of soils for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons based on microwave-assisted extraction/fluorescence detection and on-line liquid chromatographic confirmation

An integrated screening-confirmation system for PAHs in soils is presented. The sample screening configuration comprises on-line microwave-assisted extraction of the selected pollutants, followed by continuous preconcentration and sample clean-up on RP-C18. Those samples for which the total concentration is close to or above the threshold limit established (10 microg/g) are subjected to liquid chromatographic separation for confirmation. An evaluation of the qualitative data obtained was also carried out, by calculating the unreliability zone as well as the false positive and false negative rates. The whole method (extraction/determination/confirmation) was validated using industrial soil and harbour sediment certified reference materials (IRMM, European Commission CRM 524 and CRM 535). Application to the screening of solid environmental samples with subsequent confirmation of the results is also presented.     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments by high-performance liquid chromatography after microwave-assisted extraction with micellar media

A simple and rapid method is developed for extraction and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in marine sediments. The procedure was based on the microwave-assisted extraction of PAHs in marine sediment samples using a micellar medium of Polyoxyethylene 10 lauryl ether as extractant. Two-level factorial designs have been used to optimize the microwave extraction process. The analysis of extracts has been carried out by HPLC with UV detection. Fortified sediments gave an average recovery between 85.70 and 100.73%, with a relative standard deviation of 1.77-7.0% for PAHs with a ring number higher than three.     

Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of hydrocarbons in marine sediments: comparison with the Soxhlet extraction method

Microwave energy was applied to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and linear aliphatic hydrocarbons (LAHs) from marine sediments. The influence of experimental conditions, such as different extracting solvents and mixtures, microwave power, irradiation time and number of samples extracted per run has been tested using real marine sediment samples; volume of the solvent, sample quantity and matrix effects were also evaluated. The yield of extracted compounds obtained by microwave irradiation was compared with that obtained using the traditional Soxhlet extraction. The best results were achieved with a mixture of acetone and hexane (1:1), and recoveries ranged from 92 to 106%. The extraction time is dependent on the irradiation power and the number of samples extracted per run, so when the irradiation power was set to 500 W, the extraction times varied from 6 min for 1 sample to 18 min for 8 samples. Analytical determinations were carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an ultraviolet-visible photodiode-array detector for PAHs and gas chromatography (GC) using a FID detector for LAHs. To test the accuracy of the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique, optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material (SRM 1941), obtaining acceptable results.     

Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of hydrocarbons in marine sediments: comparison with the Soxhlet extraction method

Microwave energy was applied to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and linear aliphatic hydrocarbons (LAHs) from marine sediments. The influence of experimental conditions, such as different extracting solvents and mixtures, microwave power, irradiation time and number of samples extracted per run has been tested using real marine sediment samples; volume of the solvent, sample quantity and matrix effects were also evaluated. The yield of extracted compounds obtained by microwave irradiation was compared with that obtained using the traditional Soxhlet extraction. The best results were achieved with a mixture of acetone and hexane ¶(1?:?1), and recoveries ranged from 92 to 106%. The extraction time is dependent on the irradiation power and the number of samples extracted per run, so when the irradiation power was set to 500 W, the extraction times varied from 6 min for 1 sample to 18 min for 8 samples. Analytical determinations were carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an ultraviolet-visible photodiode-array detector for PAHs and gas chromatography (GC) using a FID detector for LAHs. To test the accuracy of the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique, optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material (SRM 1941), obtaining acceptable results.     

Differences in the yields of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by pressurized liquid extraction and the Japanese official method

To improve the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from sediment samples, we optimized the conditions of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE). The yields increased as the extraction temperature increased from 100 to 190 degrees C, but the effect of increasing pressure (from 15 to 20 MPa) was small. Parameters of 190 degrees C and 20 MPa, near the maximum of the equipment, gave the highest yield. Under these conditions, the yields of 17 PAHs were 1.5 - 34 times those obtained by the Japanese official method (shaking and ultrasonic extraction with acetone at room temperature).     

Pressurised liquid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils

The reliability and efficiency of the pressurised liquid extraction technique (PLE) for extracting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from contaminated soil has been investigated. Experimental design was used to study the influence of seven extraction variables (sample load, solvents used, solvent ratios, pressure, temperature, extraction time, and rinse volume). The results show that large sample loads in combination with small solvent volumes may result in low extraction efficiency. They also indicate that the recovery of low-molecular-mass PAHs is reduced by low extraction temperatures. The exact settings of the other variables are, however, less significant for the extraction efficiency. Repeated extractions at optimised settings of the tested variables show that PLE is an exhaustive extraction technique that generally results in high yields. In addition, extraction of a certified reference material (CRM 103-100) revealed that the method is both accurate and precise. Another finding was that adding the internal standard on top of the soil in the extraction cell causes considerable over-estimation of the concentrations when large samples are extracted with small solvent volumes. This is because the PLE-cell resembles a chromatographic column, so compounds added to the top of the soil layer have a longer distance to travel through the soil compared to the average distance of the native compounds, which are distributed evenly throughout the column. We therefore recommend that the internal standard should be added to the extract immediately after the extraction or, alternatively, carefully mixed with the sample prior to extraction.     

加速溶剂萃取/气相色谱-质谱测定海洋沉积物中的痕量多环芳烃

沉积物是多环芳烃(polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,PAHs)在环境中迁移归趋的一个重要的汇[1]。沉积物中多环芳烃的提取方法主要有索氏提取、超声波提取、微波萃取、加速溶剂提取及超临界流体萃取等。其中加速溶剂提取(accelerated solvent extraction,ASE)由于提取速度快,溶     

Dynamic extraction in rotating coiled columns, a new approach to direct recovery of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soils

A new approach to the direct recovery of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from environmental solid samples has been proposed. It has been shown that rotating coiled columns (RCCs) earlier used mainly in countercurrent chromatography can be successfully applied to the fast continuous-flow extraction of PAHs from soils. A particulate solid sample was retained in the rotating column as the stationary phase under the action of centrifugal forces while a mixture of organic solvents (acetone-cyclohexane, 1:1, v/v) was continuously pumped through. The separation procedure requires less than half an hour, complete automation being possible. No clean-up step is needed before the subsequent HPLC- analysis of extracts. Besides, the dynamic multistage extraction performed in the rotating column at room temperature and normal pressure may have nearly the same efficiency as accelerated batch solvent extraction repeated three times at 150 degrees C and 14 MPa. Contents of PAHs in extracts obtained by using both methods are in good agreement with the certified data on the PAHs concentrations in the soil samples. The use of appropriate "mild" solvents for the dynamic extraction in rotating columns may be very perspective for the simulation of naturally occurring processes and determination of environmentally-relevant forms of PAHs and other pollutants in environmental solids. A particular emphasis could be placed on time-resolved (kinetic) studies of the mobilization of toxicants in soil systems.     

Coupling superheated water extraction with enzyme immunoassay for an efficient and fast PAH screening in soil

The coupling of an enzyme immunoassay with a superheated water extraction is an attractive technique because of the reduced use of hazardous solvents, due to their hostile impact on the environment. This paper describes the use of superheated water extraction and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in native (not spiked) surface soil and sediment samples. The extraction recoveries with superheated water were comparable to those achieved with conventional Soxhlet techniques. The benefits of superheated water extraction-EIA includes replacement of harmful organic solvents used in extraction, fast extractions (15-30 min.) with an inexpensive extractant, reduced number of steps in the determination of the target compounds, and the application of sensitive and relatively inexpensive assays. Further advantages of the superheated water extraction are higher extraction efficiencies compared with the methanol based extraction kits associated with the EIA and direct measurement of the extracts with EIA. Both techniques can be used as efficient screening methods in the field since the type of equipment used in superheated water extraction and EIA can be loaded into a van and operated on a car battery or a small generator.     

Dispersive solid-phase extraction clean up combined with Soxhlet extraction for the determination of 16 PAHs in soil samples by GC-MS

Dichloromethane soil samples extracts were prepared using Soxhlet extraction technique, and after clean-up step, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was carried out. A comparison of dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) and column chromatography (cC), as clean-up techniques, was evaluated. Six different sorbents (silica, diatomaceous earth, primary–secondary amine, C18, clinoptilolite and florisil) were tested as dispersive clean-up sorbents versus activated silica and alumina for cC. Best results for three concentration levels among dSPE were obtained using diatomaceous earth, with recovery values in the range of 75–112% for 13 of 16 analysed compounds, while cC recoveries were in the range of 75–111% for all analysed PAHs. Analysis of 12 soil samples from urban area of Ni? (Serbia) singled out acenaphthene as the most abundant compound.     

Comparison of the behavior of 13C- and deuterium-labeled polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in analyses by isotope dilution mass spectrometry in combination with pressurized liquid extraction

We examined the differences found in the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment samples when determined by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using 13C-labeled PAHs (13C-PAHs) and deuterium-labeled PAHs (PAHs-d) as internal standards. The samples were analyzed by pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The observed concentrations with PAHs-d as internal standards were significantly (p<0.05) lower (1.9-4.3%) than those determined with 13C-PAHs. The most important factor responsible for the high recovery of PAHs-d relative to 13C-PAHs and native PAHs is the higher stability of PAHs-d during the PLE process.