固相微萃取-气相色谱串联质谱法检测北京大气细颗粒物中的多环芳烃

采用固相微萃取与气相色谱串联质谱联用,建立了快捷测定大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)中16种优控多环芳烃的方法.目标物先用二氯甲烷富集浓缩,然后用100 μm聚二甲基硅氧烷萃取纤维,通过超声萃取方式,在60℃条件下,萃取30 min.在优化的在多反应监测模式下,方法回收率在56.8％ ～ 106.0％之间,检出限为0.022～0.056 ng/m3.应用此方法检测了清华大学采样点采取的2013年1月1到15日北京PM2.5空气样品中的16种PAHs,实验结果表明,PAHs总质量浓度在290～1812 ng/m3之间,其中四环PAHs的总质量浓度最大(145 ～937 ng/m3),其次是五环PAHs(总质量浓度81.1～664.5 ng/m3),分子质量浓度较高的依次是荧蒽、芘、苯并(b)荧蒽、(蕴)、苯并(a)芘、苯并(k)荧蒽、苯并(a)蒽和菲,PAHs的污染主要来源于化石燃料燃烧和机动车排放.     

固相膜萃取-超高效液相色谱-荧光法测定极地水体中多环芳烃

采用C<,18>固相膜萃取对样品进行富集净化,以二氯甲烷洗脱目标化合物,采用UPLC荧光可变波长进行分离分析.可在5min内实现15种多环芳烃分析,方法检出限分别为:萘为0.3ng/L,苊、芴、菲和苯并(a)蒽为0.26ng/L,蒽、荧蒽、苯并(b)荧蒽和茚并(1,2,3-cd)芘为0.28ng/L;芘、屈、苯并(k)荧蒽、苯并(a)芘和二苯并(a,h)蒽为0.24ng/L;苯并(g,h,i)苝为2.6ng/L.加标回收率在67%～87%之间,RSD均小于10%.可应用于极地环境中痕量多环芳烃样品的检测分析.     

大气气溶胶中多环芳烃的特征光谱检测技术研究

采用紫外-可见分光光度法、傅立叶红外光谱法和恒能量同步荧光分析法进行实验室模拟测试,检测蒽、苯并[a]芘、荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[ghi]苝5种多环芳烃(PAHs),对比分析了各检测技术的灵敏度、精密度、检出限、线性范围、混合组分图谱分离度等指标。结果表明,恒能量同步荧光法的选择性最好,灵敏度(0.046 0~1.360 5Io.ng-1)和精密度(平均空白的RSD为4.1%)均最高,检出限(0.038~0.427μg.L-1)最低,线性范围较宽(0.126~7 157μg.L-1),是3种光谱分析法中最适合无分离在线检测气溶胶中多组分PAHs的方法。将该方法应用于实际大气环境气溶胶样品中各PAHs成分的定性鉴别和定量检测,5种PAHs均被检出,各物质的特征峰分离效果好,峰形明显,能满足实际测量的分析要求。     

气相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定卷烟滤嘴中15种多环芳烃

建立了气相色谱-串联质谱同时检测卷烟滤嘴中15种多环芳烃的方法。卷烟滤嘴用二氯甲烷振荡萃取后,经0.22μm有机相滤膜过滤,采用DB-5MS色谱柱(30 m×0.25 mm,0.25μm)进行分离,电子轰击源、正离子模式下以多反应监测模式进行检测,内标法进行定量。15种多环芳烃(苊烯、苊、芴、菲、蒽、荧蒽、芘、苯并[a]蒽、屈、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、苯并[g,h,i]苝和茚并[1,2,3-c,d]芘)的线性关系良好,相关系数(R~2)为0.991 4~0.999 9。15种多环芳烃在低、中、高3个添加水平下的平均回收率为81.6%~111.2%;除了芴在低添加水平时相对标准偏差为19.2%外,其他相对标准偏差均小于16%。15种多环芳烃的检出限为0.02~0.24 ng/滤嘴,定量限为0.04~0.80 ng/滤嘴。方法前处理简便,具有快速、准确、灵敏度高及重复性好的优点,适用于卷烟滤嘴中多环芳烃的分析。     

表面增强拉曼光谱结合主成分分析快速筛查食品接触材料中多环芳烃

建立了表面增强拉曼/主成分分析快速筛查食品接触材料中4种多环芳烃的分析方法。采用纳米银溶胶作为增强基底,碘化钾为絮凝剂,实现了4种多环芳烃（芘、荧蒽、苯并［b］荧蒽、苯并［k］荧蒽）的表面增强拉曼分析。针对食品接触材料中4种多环芳烃拉曼谱峰重叠难以鉴别区分的问题,采用主成分分析法分别对同浓度多环芳烃、不同浓度多环芳烃以及多环芳烃混合样品进行分析。结果表明,4种多环芳烃均可得到较好的鉴别。该方法成功用于食品接触材料迁移液中4种多环芳烃的快速筛查。     

全自动固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定卷烟主流烟气中的3种多环芳烃

以全自动固相萃取技术净化主流烟气萃取液,建立了卷烟主流烟气中苯并［a］芘、苯并［a］蒽和屈艹 3种多环芳烃的气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)测定方法。以吸烟机抽吸卷烟,并以剑桥滤片捕集卷烟主流烟气,然后以含氘代苯并［a］芘内标的环己烷溶液萃取滤片,萃取液经全自动固相萃取仪净化后以GC-MS/MS分离检测。结果表明,苯并［a］芘、苯并［a］蒽和屈艹 的检出限分别为0.05、0.16和0.23 ng/cig,回收率为91.5%～102.1%,相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于5%。该方法的自动化程度高、操作简便、检出限低、重复性好,适用于卷烟主流烟气中苯并［a］芘、苯并［a］蒽 3种多环芳烃释放量的检测。     

超声提取-高效液相色谱法测定纺织品中5种同分异构CMR物质

采用超声提取结合高效液相色谱同时测定纺织品中5种同分异构CMR物质[苯并(j)荧蒽(BjF)、苯并(e)芘(BeP)、苯并(b)荧蒽(BbF)、苯并(k)荧蒽(BkF)和苯并(a)芘(BaP)]的含量。样品0.500 g经20 mL体积比为1:1的甲醇-四氢呋喃混合溶剂于30℃超声提取30 min,提取液在Agilent Eclipse PAH色谱柱上分离,以乙腈-水混合液为流动相进行梯度洗脱,采用荧光检测器进行检测。结果表明:5种同分异构CMR物质的质量浓度在5.0～150 μg·L~(-1)内与其峰面积呈线性关系,检出限(3S/N)均为1.0 μg·L~(-1)。加标回收率为98.6%～103%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)为 2.9～3.7%。     

冷冻研磨超声浸提分离-气相色谱-质谱法测定充油丁苯橡胶中8种多环芳烃的含量

为从充油丁苯橡胶样品中分离提取其中所含8种多环芳烃化合物(PAHs,包括苯并[a]蒽、艹屈、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[j]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[e]芘、苯并[a]芘及二苯并[a,h]蒽),采用了冷冻研磨、超声浸提法。试验选择了5件样品分别将其粉碎至约2mm~3的颗粒,并取一定量的颗粒样品置于研磨仪中进行冷冻研磨至粉末状态。称取加工成粉末状的样品1.00g,加入正己烷-丙酮(1+1)混合溶液10mL,在40℃超声提取35min。将所得提取液氮吹浓缩至近干,用正己烷1mL溶解残渣,所得溶液经滤膜过滤,滤液供气相色谱-质谱分析。采用VB-17MS毛细管色谱柱,在90～300℃温度区间按程序升温模式进行分离。在质谱分析中,用电子轰击离子源和选择离子监测模式。测得8种PAHs的线性范围均在0.05～5.0mg·L~(-1)之间,检出限(3S/N)在0.01～0.02mg·L~(-1)之间。在样品溶液中加入混合标准溶液进行回收试验,测得回收率在84.5%～106%之间,并从测定值计算其相对标准偏差(n=6)在1.6%～4.9%之间。     

高效液相色谱法测定大气PM2.5中多环芳烃不确定度评定

根据JJF 1059.1—2012《测量不确定度评定与表示》,对高效液相色谱法测定大气细颗粒物(PM_(2.5))中多环芳烃(PAHs)含量的不确定度进行评定。依据中国疾病预防控制中心《空气污染(雾霾)对人群健康影响监测与防护工作手册(2020)》进行采样和检测,从样品采集、样品提取、标准溶液配制、标准曲线拟合、测量重复性5个方面分析多环芳烃含量的不确定度。苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘的测定结果分别为(1.16±0.0554)、(0.987±0.0596)、(0.486±0.0384)ng/m³(k=2)。测量结果的不确定度主要来自标准曲线拟合和标准溶液配制,应加强这两方面的质量控制。     

GC–MS法同时测定聚氨酯塑胶跑道中16种多环芳烃

建立气相色谱–质谱法同时测定聚氨酯塑胶跑道中16种多环芳烃如萘、苊、二氢苊、芴、菲、蒽、荧蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、芘、苯并[a]蒽、屈、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘、1-甲基奈、2-甲基萘的检测方法。样品采用甲苯为提取剂,经超声提取和硅胶柱净化后,用气相色谱–质谱法测定16种多环芳烃残留量。16种多环芳烃的质量浓度在0.2~10.0 mg/kg范围内与色谱峰面积呈良好的线性,线性相关系数r20.998,检出限为5.0~60.0μg/kg。回收率为72.4%~101.6%,测定结果的相对标准偏差为0.9%~7.2%(n=6)。该方法准确度高、精密度好,适用于聚氨酯塑胶跑道中多环芳烃多残留检测。     

Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formed during the pyrolysis of phenylalanine

The formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) during pyrolysis process of phenylalanine had been studied. Ten PAHs, including fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using selective ion monitoring mode. This technique offers the capability to analyze trace amounts of PAHs in phenylalanine pyrolyzates. The pyrolysis was carried out in a micro-furnace with quartz furnace liner. The injection was conducted with glass pelletizer syringe to avoid metal contamination. Qualitative results were obtained at 900 degrees C and quantitative analysis of 10 PAHs was done for 700 and 900 degrees C.     

Supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from liver samples and determination by HPLC-FL

An extraction/clean-up procedure by SFE was developed for isolating PAHs from liver samples for subsequent HPLC-FL determination of ten PAHs in the enriched extract. Recoveries (90-115%) and RSD % (< or =7.7) were satisfactory. When applied to 11 samples of bird of prey (Tyto alba) protected species and classified of special interest, from the Galicia (Northwest to Spain), benzo[ghi]perylene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene were undetectable; chrysene and benzo[a]pyrene are only detected in one sample; benzo[a]anthracene and benzo[k]fluoranthene are only quantified in one sample and benzo[b]fluoranthene in two samples. The other PAHs, anthracene, fluoranthene and pyrene are present in almost all the samples.     

Results of a European inter-laboratory comparison study on the determination of EU priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in edible vegetable oils

A collaborative study on the analysis for 15 + 1 EU priority PAHs in edible oils was organised to investigate the state-of-the-art of respective analytical methods. Three spiked vegetable oils, one contaminated native sunflower oil, and one standard solution were investigated in this study. The results of 52 laboratories using either high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection or gas chromatography with mass-selective detectors were evaluated by application of robust statistics. About 95% of the laboratories were able to quantify benzo[a]pyrene together with five other PAHs included in the commonly known list of 16 US-EPA PAHs. About 80% of the participants also quantified seven additional PAHs in most samples, two of which were benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluoranthene, which were also known from the EPA list. Only about 50% of the participants quantified cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, benzo[j]fluoranthene, and benzo[c]fluorene. The robust relative standard deviations of the submitted results without discrimination between the methods applied ranged between 100% for 5-methylchrysene in spiked olive oil and 11% for the same analyte in spiked sunflower oil. The results clearly showed that for these analytes the methods of analysis are not yet well established in European laboratories, and more collaborative trials are needed to promote further development and to improve the performances of the respective methods.     

Optimization of the matrix solid-phase dispersion sample preparation procedure for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils: comparison with microwave-assisted extraction

A fast and simple preparation procedure based on the matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) technique is proposed for the first time for the isolation of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil samples. Naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene, and indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene were considered in the study. Extraction and clean-up of samples were carried out in a single step. The main parameters that affect extraction yield, such as dispersant, type and amount of additives, clean-up co-sorbent and extractive solvent were evaluated and optimized. The addition of an alkali solution in MSPD was required to provide quantitative recoveries. Analytical determinations were carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. Quantification limits (between 0.01 and 0.6 ng g(-1) dry mass) were well below the regulatory limits for all the compounds considered. The extraction yields for the different compounds obtained by MSPD were compared with the yields obtained by microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). To test the accuracy of the MSPD technique, the optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material BCR-524 (contaminated industrial soil), with excellent results.     

Resolution of 13 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by constant-wavelength synchronous spectrofluorometry.

A method capable of determining 13 PAHs (acenaphthene, anthracene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenzo[ah]anthracene, fluoranthene, fluorene, indene[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, phenanthrene and pyrene) in a mixture of 16 EPA PAHs by second derivative synchronous spectrofluorometry in the constant wavelength mode was developed. It has not been possible to determine the following PAHs in the mixture: acenaphthylene, benzo[ghi]perylene and naphthalene. The approach studied allows the sensitive, rapid and inexpensive identification and quantitation of 13 PAHs in a solution of hexane. The detection limits are <1 microg L(-1) (except for chrysene and phenanthrene).     

The development of solid-surface fluorescence characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for potential screening tests in environmental samples

This paper presents the characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in solid-surface fluorescence as the first step for obtaining new optical sensors for PAHs screening. The fluorescence properties of the EPA-PAHs (naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene) on five types of solid-surfaces were evaluated. The experimental variables (pH and percentage of organic solvent in samples) were studied, obtaining different possibilities for making individual sensors for some of these PAHs and the best conditions for developing sensors for PAH screening were also studied.     

Collection and analytical characterisation of the atmospheric particulate in the city of Bari

In this paper an application of new procedures for atmospheric particulate analysis is illustrated. PM10, PAHs (benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benzo[j]fluoranthene (BjF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), indeno[1, 2, 3-cd]pyrene (Ip), dibenzo[a, h]anthracene (DbA)) and heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Zn, Co, Mn, Cd, Fe and Pb) were investigated. PM10 determination was performed by gravimetric method, PAHs were measured by GC-MS, and heavy metals by HPIC. An air quality monitoring campaign on the territory of Bari municipality has been organised, and its results are shown.     

高效液相色谱-荧光检测法测定橄榄油中4种多环芳烃

建立了高效液相色谱-荧光检测(HPLC-FLD)测定橄榄油中苯并[a]蒽、屈艹、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘4种多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析方法。橄榄油样品经异丙醇稀释,采用具有π-π特异性作用的固相萃取柱净化,Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse PAH色谱柱(100 m m×2.1 m m,1.8μm)分离,以水-乙腈为流动相,梯度洗脱,实现了4种化合物的基线分离,并用基质匹配校准溶液进行外标法定量。4种多环芳烃的线性范围为2.4~40μg/L,相关系数(r)为0.999 0~0.999 9,方法的定量限为0.147~0.413μg/L,加标回收率为95.5%~103.2%,日内和日间精密度(RSD)分别为0.10%~1.69%和2.48%~2.93%(n=5)。该法具有灵敏度高、检出限低、重复性好等特点,适用于橄榄油中4种PAHs快速、准确的定量检测。     

Supercritical fluid extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from liver samples and determination by HPLC-FL

An extraction/clean-up procedure by SFE was developed for isolating PAHs from liver samples for subsequent HPLC-FL determination of ten PAHs in the enriched extract. Recoveries (90–115%) and RSD % (≤ 7.7) were satisfactory. When applied to 11 samples of bird of prey (Tyto alba) protected species and classified of special interest, from the Galicia (Northwest to Spain), benzo[ghi]perylene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene were undetectable; chrysene and benzo[a]pyrene are only detected in one sample; benzo[a]anthracene and benzo[k]fluoranthene are only quantified in one sample and benzo[b]fluoranthene in two samples. The other PAHs, anthracene, fluoranthene and pyrene are present in almost all the samples.