水溶性桥联双卟啉与DNA相互作用的研究

以4,4'-二羧酸-2,2'-联吡啶为桥联试剂, 合成了一种含8个阳离子的水溶性桥联双卟啉(PD). 以5,10,15,20-四(4-N-甲基吡啶盐)卟啉(H₂TMPyP)为参照物, 使用紫外-可见光谱、荧光光谱、圆二色谱研究了水溶性双卟啉与小牛胸腺DNA (CT DNA)的相互作用, 以溴化乙啶(EB)竞争法测定了PD与CT DNA的表观键合常数(K_app)为1.2×10⁶ L•mol^－1 (H₂TMPyP为6.9×10⁶ L•mol^－1), 并使用凝胶电泳研究了PD对pBR322质粒DNA的切割能力. 实验结果表明PD与CT DNA的作用方式是插入和外部结合的混合模式.     

咪唑修饰的卟啉化合物的合成及其对卤素离子的选择性识别

设计合成了以卟啉为分子“探针”的咪唑修饰的卟啉类化合物4和5. 通过对核磁共振氢谱、紫外-可见光谱及荧光发射光谱的研究显示, 化合物5通过卟啉环中心的锌及2个咪唑环上的活性氢与卤素离子形成三点键合超分子络合物, 并能选择性识别氟离子和氯离子(键合常数分别为5.95×10⁴和7.17×10⁴ mol^-1·L).     

水溶性锌卟啉配合物的合成、表征及其与CTDNA的作用

合成了5,10,15,20-四[4-(3'-丙氧基吡啶溴化盐)苯基]卟啉(TPPBr)及其锌卟啉配合物TPPBr(Zn),用红外光谱、核磁共振和紫外光谱进行了表征.利用紫外-可见光谱、荧光光谱、圆二色谱和黏度实验研究了TPPBr(Zn)与小牛胸腺DNA(CTDNA)的相互作用,并计算了TPPBr(Zn)与CTDNA作用的表观键合常数为2.64×10⁵L/mol.进而证明了TPPBr(Zn)与CTDNA以外部自堆积和静电结合的混合模式作用.     

四苯基钴卟啉化合物催化过亚硝酸根分解的研究

利用紫外-可见分光光度计在乙醇介质中研究了合成的4种对位取代四苯基钴卟啉对过亚硝酸根分解的催化作用. 首次发现钴卟啉可以催化ONOO^－分解, 且对位带吸电子基团的钴卟啉比对位带供电子基团的钴卟啉催化活性高. TPPCoCl, T(p-CH₃)PPCoCl, T(p-OCH₃)PPCoCl和T(p-Cl)PPCoCl在乙醇中的k_cat分别为1.69×10², 1.52×10², 1.43×10²和1.20×10³ mol^－1•L•s^－1. 动力学曲线和时间分辨谱证明这些钴卟啉是通过形成中间体催化过亚硝酸根分解的.     

薄层光谱电化学法测定辅酶B12模型化合物的生成速率常数

用薄层光谱电化学方法和单电位-计时吸收光谱法(SPS-CA),测得钴四苯基卟啉(CoTPP)分别与碘甲烷、苄基氯和氯丁烷形成含σ钴-碳键辅酶B₁₂模型化合物的速率常数为11.09、1.62×10²和6.93×10^-2mol^-1·L·s^-1。钴卟啉与这3种卤代烷的反应是二级反应,对各自的反应物Co(Ⅰ)TPP和卤代烷都是一级反应。     

水溶性羧酸咔咯铁(Ⅲ)配合物对DNA的氧化断裂作用

合成了5,10,15-三(4-羧基-苯基)咔咯铁配合物(Fe^ⅢTCPC), 采用紫外-可见光谱、 荧光光谱、 圆二色光谱和黏度法研究了Fe^ⅢTCPC与小牛胸腺DNA(ct-DNA)的相互作用, 并用琼脂糖凝胶电泳研究了氧化剂参与下Fe^ⅢTCPC对pBR22 DNA的氧化断裂能力. 结果表明, Fe^ⅢTCPC与DNA的作用方式为外部结合模式, 其结合常数K_b=1.96×10⁵ L/mol. 在过氧化氢(H₂O₂)或叔丁基过氧化氢(TBHP)为氧化剂条件下, Fe^ⅢTCPC展现出良好的DNA氧化断裂能力, 且TBHP的氧化断裂效率比H₂O₂好. 用H₂O₂和TBHP为氧化剂时, Fe^ⅢTCPC可能是通过活性Fe^Ⅴ-oxo机制对DNA氧化断裂.     

meso-5,10,15,20-四[4-(N-吡咯烷基)苯基]卟啉的合成及对牛血清白蛋白的作用

基于卟啉对癌细胞的特殊亲和作用和吡咯烷化合物的抗肿瘤及抗癌活性,设计并合成了具有吡咯烷结构的新型卟啉化合物--meso-5,10,15,20-四[4-(N-吡咯烷基)苯基]卟啉(TBPPH₂),利用荧光光度法和紫外-可见分光光度法研究了TBPPH₂与牛血清白蛋白(BSA)的相互作用.实验发现,TBPPH₂利用疏水作用力进入BSA的疏水性腔,与BSA形成配合物并引起BSA的静态荧光猝灭.在TBPPH₂与BSA的相互作用过程中,TBPPH₂与BSA以摩尔比1∶1牢固结合,TBPPH₂与BSA分子中色氨酸间的最近距离r=2.4nm.反应平衡常数K_A=2.51×10⁴L/mol,反应熵变ΔS=84.18J/(mol·K),TBPPH₂与BSA的结合常数K_B=5.13×10⁵L/mol.研究结果表明,吡咯烷基卟啉可能成为一类新型的抗肿瘤及抗病毒药物.     

手性钌配合物的合成、抗肿瘤活性及其与血清蛋白的相互作用

合成了手性钌配合物Δ, Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂(pyip)]²⁺, 通过元素分析、核磁共振、质谱和CD光谱对配合物进行了表征. 采用MTT法评价了3种异构体对多种肿瘤细胞株的体外抗肿瘤活性以及对正常细胞的毒性. 结果表明, Δ-[Ru(bpy)₂(pyip)]²⁺的抗肿瘤活性明显优于其异构体, 对A375, SW480, MCF-7和A549的半数抑制浓度低于顺铂. 通过荧光光谱法研究了在生理pH条件下, 手性钌配合物与牛血清白蛋白(BSA)之间的结合作用以及荧光猝灭机制. 依据Scatchard方程测定了结合常数和结合位点数, 根据热力学方程讨论了两者间的主要作用力类型. 结果表明, 钌配合物对牛血清白蛋白的荧光猝灭机制为静态猝灭. Δ-1, 1和Λ-1与牛血清白蛋白的结合常数分别为1.16×10⁵, 5.12×10⁴和3.64×10⁴, 结合位点数均为1, 主要作用力类型是静电作用. 钌配合物在体内能够被血清蛋白存储转运且结合时对蛋白构象无影响.     

儿茶酚胺衍生物与DNA之间相互作用的光谱和电化学法研究

用光谱和电化学方法研究了儿茶酚胺衍生物与小牛胸腺DNA之间的作用机制.结果表明,低浓度的多巴酚丁胺和肾上腺素与DNA之间主要为静电作用;而在高浓度时,则主要为插入作用.对于多巴胺,在5.00×10^-5～9.00×10^-4mol/L范围内,它与DNA之间主要为插入作用.同时,采用电化学方法测得多巴胺、肾上腺素和多巴酚丁胺与DNA之间的表观结合常数分别为1.55×10³,9.77×10³和1.74×10⁴L/mol.     

5-氟尿嘧啶修饰卟啉的合成及抗肿瘤活性

合成了一种5-氟尿嘧啶修饰的自由卟啉(5-[2-(5-氟尿嘧啶-3-基)乙氧基苯基]-10,15,20-三(4-甲氧基苯基)卟啉)及其2种金属卟啉配合物:5-[2-(5-氟尿嘧啶-3-基)乙氧基苯基]-10,15,20-三(4-甲氧基苯基)锰卟啉和5-[2-(5-氟尿嘧啶-3-基)乙氧基苯基]-10,15,20-三(4-甲氧基苯基)锌卟啉。 通过紫外可见光谱(UV-Vis)、红外光谱(IR)和核磁共振谱氢谱(¹H NMR)对目标化合物进行了结构表征。 用噻唑蓝法(MTT法)测定了自由卟啉、锰卟啉及锌卟啉分别对肺腺癌细胞株A549、肝癌细胞株Bel7402和人结肠癌细胞株HCT-8的抑制活性。 其中,锰卟啉对人结肠癌细胞株HCT-8的半抑制浓度为IC₅₀为17.8 mg/L,具有一定的细胞毒作用。     

Interaction of water-soluble bridged porphyrin with DNA

A water-soluble porphyrin dimer (Por Dimer) containing eight positive charges, bridged by 4,4′-dicarboxy-2,2′-bipyridine, has been synthesized. With Meso-tetrakis(N-methyl-pyridium-4-yl)porphyrin (H₂TMPyP) as the reference compound, the water-soluble porphyrin dimer was investigated for its interaction with DNA by absorption, fluorescence, and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The apparent affinity binding constant (K _app = 1.2 × 10⁶) of Por Dimer binding to CT DNA was measured by a competition method with ethidium bromide (EB) (that of H₂TMPyP was 6.9 × 10⁶). The cleavage ability of Por Dimer to pBR322 plasmid DNA was studied by gel electrophoresis. The results suggest that the binding modes of Por Dimer were complex and involve both intercalation and outside binding. __________ Translated from Acta Chimica Sinica, 2007, 65(22): 2597–2603     

Morphological characterization of amidinophenylporphyrins interacting with DNA by photo irradiation

5,10,15,20-Tetrakis（4-amidinophenyl）porphyrin（Por 1）,its Zn complex（Por 2）and amidinophenyl bispophyrin（Por 3）interacting with calf thymus DNA were investigated by scanning electron microscopy（SEM）and the shape and size of the porphyrin–DNA complexes were observed after photo irradiation.The results showed that the shape and size of DNA had signifcant differences with blank group by virtue of the interaction between the porphyrins and ct-DNA.This suggests the morphological characterization could be used to study the interaction and judge DNA photocleavage activity indirectly through the photo irradiation of porphyrins.     

Reactivity of dioxoosmium(VI) porphyrins toward arylhydrazine. Isolation of hydrazidoosmium and amidoosmium porphyrins

Reactions of dioxoosmium(VI) porphyrins [Os(VI)(Por)O(2)] with excess 1,1-diphenylhydrazine in tetrahydrofuran at ca. 55 degrees C for 15 min afforded bis(hydrazido(1-))osmium(IV) porphyrins [Os(IV)(Por)(NHNPh(2))(2)] (1a, Por = TPP (meso-tetraphenylporphyrinato dianion); 1b, Por = TTP (meso-tetrakis(p-tolyl)porphyrinato dianion)), hydroxo(amido)osmium(IV) porphyrins [Os(IV)(Por)(NPh(2))(OH)] (2a, Por = TPP; 2b, Por = TTP), and bis(hydrazido(2-))osmium(VI) porphyrin [Os(VI)(Por)(NNPh(2))(2)] (3c, Por = TMP (meso-tetramesitylporphyrinato dianion)). The same reaction under harsher conditions (in refluxing tetrahydrofuran for ca. 1 h) gave a nitridoosmium(VI) porphyrin, [Os(VI)(Por)(N)(OH)] (4b, Por = TTP). Oxidation of 1a,b with bromine in dichloromethane afforded bis(hydrazido(2-)) complexes [Os(VI)(TPP)(NNPh(2))(2)] (3a) and [Os(VI)(TTP)(NNPh(2))(2)] (3b), respectively. All the new osmium porphyrins were identified by (1)H NMR, IR, and UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry; the structure of 2b was determined by X-ray crystallography (Os-NPh(2) = 1.944(6) A, Os-OH = 1.952(5) A).     

Synthesis,DNA binding mode,singlet oxygen photogeneration and DNA photocleavage activity of ruthenium compounds with porphyrin–imidazo[4,5‐f]phenanthroline conjugated ligand

Using 1,10‐phenanothroline‐5,6‐dione and 10,20‐bis(4‐methylphenyl)porphyrin copper as starting materials, a conjugated porphyrin–imidazo[4,5‐f]‐1,10‐phenanothroline ligand (Por 1 ) was prepared. Subsequently, the copper complex of Por 1 was reacted with Ru(1,10‐phenanothroline)₂Cl₂ to yield ruthenium compound Por 2 . After removal of copper metal under acid condition, the free base porphyrin of Por 2 (Por 3 ) was prepared. The structure of these compounds was confirmed using UV–visible, ¹H NMR, mass and infrared spectroscopies and elemental analysis. Through UV–visible, fluorescence and circular dichroism analyses, the interaction modes between Por 1 – 3 and calf thymus DNA were investigated. Por 1 interacted with DNA via outside groove face, but Por 2 and Por 3 showed intercalative interaction with DNA. Binding constants between Por 1 – 3 and DNA were 7.79 × 10⁵, 1.29 × 10⁶ and 1.32 × 10⁶ M^?1, respectively. With 5,10,15,20‐tetraphenylporphyrin (H₂TPP) as a control, the singlet oxygen (¹O₂) generation of Por 1 – 3 was measured using the 1,3‐diphenylisobenzofuran method. The ¹O₂ generation rate of Por 1 – 3 followed the order: Por 3 >Por 1 >H₂TPPP >Por 2 . Por 1 and Por 3 showed better ¹O₂ quantum yields than Por 2 , which were almost threefold higher than that of H₂TPP. The DNA cleavage ability of Por 1 – 3 was analyzed using gel electrophoresis. Por 3 showed higher DNA photocleavage activity, with more than 50% photocleavage rate at 20 μM. These results suggest that amphipathic (hydrophilic/lipophilic) Por 3 with conjugated Por 1 ligand is a potential photosensitizer in cancer therapy.     

Tuning the reactivity of dioxoruthenium(VI) porphyrins toward an arylimine by altering porphyrin substituents

Reaction of dioxoruthenium(VI) porphyrins [Ru(VI)(Por)O2] with arylimine HN=CPh2 in dichloromethane afforded bis(methyleneamido)ruthenium(IV) porphyrins [Ru(IV)(Por)(N=CPh2)2] for Por = 4-Cl-TPP and TMP; (methyleneamido)hydroxoruthenium(IV) porphyrins [Ru(IV)(Por)(N=CPh2)(OH)] for Por = TPP and TTP; and bis(arylimine)ruthenium(II) porphyrins [Ru(II)(Por)(HN=CPh2)2] for Por = 3,5-Cl2TPP and 3,5-(CF3)2TPP. In dichloromethane solution exposed to air, complex [Ru(II)(3,5-Cl2TPP)(HN=CPh2)2] underwent oxidative deprotonation to form [Ru(IV)(3,5-Cl2TPP)(N=CPh2)2]. The new ruthenium porphyrins were identified by 1H NMR, UV-vis, IR, and mass spectroscopy, along with elemental analysis. X-ray crystal structure determinations of [Ru(IV)(4-Cl-TPP)(N=CPh2)2], [Ru(IV)(TPP)(N=CPh2)(OH)], and [Ru(II)(3,5-(CF3)2TPP)(HN=CPh2)2] revealed the Ru-N(methyleneamido) or Ru-N(arylimine) distances of 1.897(5) A (average), 1.808(4) A, and 2.044(2) A (average), respectively.     

Reactivity of dioxoruthenium(VI) porphyrins toward amines. Synthesis and characterization of bis(arylamine)ruthenium(II), bis(arylamido)- and bis(diphenylamido)ruthenium(IV), and oxo(tert-butylimido)ruthenium(VI) porphyrins

Reactions of dioxoruthenium(VI) porphyrins, [Ru(VI)O2(Por)], with p-chloroaniline, trimethylamine, tert-butylamine, p-nitroaniline, and diphenylamine afforded bis(amine)ruthenium(II) porphyrins, [Ru(II)(Por)(L)2] (L-p-ClC6H4NH2, Me3N, Por=TTP, 4-Cl-TPP; L=tBuNH2, Por = TPP, 3,4,5-MeO-TPP, TTP, 4-Cl-TPP, 3,5-Cl-TPP) and bis(amido)ruthenium(IV) porphyrins, [Ru(IV)(Por)(X)2] (X=p-NO2C6H4NH, Por=TTP, 4-Cl-TPP; X = Ph2N, Por = 3,4,5-MeO-TPP, 3,5-Cl-TPP), respectively. Oxidative deprotonation of [Ru(II)(Por)(NH2-p-C6H4Cl)2] in chloroform by air generated bis(arylamido)ruthenium(IV) porphyrins, [RuIV(Por)(NH-p-C6H4Cl)2] (Por=TTP. 4-Cl-TPP). Oxidation of [RuII(Por)-(NH2tBu)2] by bromine in dichloromethane in the presence of tert-butylamine and traces of water produced oxo(imido)ruthenium(VI) porphyrins, [RuVI-O(Por)(NtBu)] (Por=TPP, 3,4,5-MeO-TPP, TTP, 4-Cl-TPP, 3,5-Cl-TPP). These new classes of ruthenium complexes were characterized by 1H NMR, IR, and UV/visible spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. The structure of [Ru(IV)(TTP)(NH-p-C6H4Cl)2 . CH2Cl2 was determined by X-ray crystallography. The Ru-N bond length and the Ru-N-C angle of the Ru-NHAr moiety are 1.956(7) A and 135.8(6) degrees, respectively.     

Interaction and photodynamic activity of cationic porphyrin derivatives bearing different patterns of charge distribution with GMP and DNA

The interaction of amphiphilic cationic porphyrins, containing different patterns of meso-substitution by 4-(3-N,N,N-trimethylammoniumpropoxy)phenyl (A) and 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl (B) groups, with guanosine 5′-monophosphate (GMP) and calf thymus DNA have been studied by optical methods in phosphate buffer solution. The properties of these synthetic porphyrins were compared with those of representative standard of anionic 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-sulphonatophenyl)porphyrin (TPPS₄⁴⁻) and cationic 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-N,N,N-trimethylammonium phenyl)porphyrin (TMAP⁴⁺). Stable complexes with GMP were found for cationic porphyrins, except for monocationic AB₃⁺. The binding constant (K_GMP  10⁴ M⁻¹) follows the order: A₃B³⁺  ABAB²⁺ > A₄⁴⁺  TMAP⁴⁺. Also, interaction with DNA was observed for all evaluated cationic porphyrins. For these related cationic porphyrins, the binding constant (K_DNA  10⁵ M⁻¹) increases with the number of cationic charges. On the other hand, the photodynamic activity of porphyrins was analyzed in solution of GMP and DNA. Monocationic AB₃⁺ is a less effective sensitizer to oxidize GMP in comparison with the other cationic porphyrins, in agreement with the lack of detected interaction with this nucleotide. The electrophoretic analysis of DNA indicates that photocleavage takes place when the samples are exposed to photoexcited tricationic and tetracationic porphyrins. In the presence of sodium azide the DNA decomposition was diminished. Also, reduction in the DNA photocleavage was observed under anoxic condition, indicating that oxygen is essential for DNA photocleavage sensitized by these cationic porphyrins. In addition, an increase in DNA degradation was not observed in deuteriated water. Therefore, an important contribution of type I photoreaction processes could be occurring in the DNA photodamage sensitized by these cationic porphyrins. These results provide a better understanding of the characteristics needed for sensitizers to produce efficient DNA photocleavage.     

Aggregation and solution behavior of 5-(1-(4-carboxybutyl) pyridinum-4-yl) 10,15,20-tris (1-methylpyridinium-4-yl) porphyrin: A resonance light scattering, fluorescence and absorption spectroscopic study

Aggregation behavior of water soluble porphyrins, 5-(1-(4-carboxybutyl) pyridinum-4-yl) 10,15,20-tris (1-methylpyridinium-4-yl) porphyrin (5-CBPyP) in the presence of various concentrations of calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) and sodium chloride were studied in comparison with meso-tetrakis (4-N-methyl pyridinum) porphyrin (TMPyP), by optical absorption, fluorescence and resonance light scattering (RLS) spectroscopies. Both porphyrins obey Beer’s law in extended range of concentration. Optical absorption and RLS measurements demonstrated nonaggregation for both porphyrins under increasing concentration of ct-DNA and NaCl. However, in comparison, 5-CBPyP had less tendency for aggregation that may be taken as an advantage for its probable application in photodynamic therapy of cancer. The trend of changes in absorption spectra of both porphyrins in the presence of ct-DNA indicates the homogeneous intercalation binding mode. The values of (2.81 ± 0.28) × 10⁶ M^?1 and (0.95 ± 0.09) × 10⁶ M^?1 were obtained for apparent binding constant of TMPyP and 5-CBPyP from analysis of optical absorption data, respectively. This indicates the less affinity of 5-CBPyP to ct-DNA in comparison with TMPyP. The binding of both porphyrins to ct-DNA quenches fluorescence emission of Ethidium bromide (EB) that is bound to ct-DNA. The quenching process obeys linear Stern-Volmer relationship indicating the displacement of EB from its binding sites by these porphyrins. The results of this technique also represent the intercalation mode of binding for both porphyrins and higher binding affinity of TMPyP compared with 5-CBPyP.     

Study on the interaction of new water-soluble porphyrin with DNA

A porphyrin meso-tetrakis{[4-(1-pyridyl)propoxy]phenyl}porphyrin (TPyPP) and its Ni complex (TPyPP(Ni)) have been synthesized and characterized by 1H NMR, UV-vis spectra. The interaction of two porphyrins with calf thymus-DNA (CT-DNA) has been explored by UV-vis, fluorescence and circular dichroic spectroscopy and viscosity measurements. The results suggest that these porphyrins can bind to DNA by the same binding mode. TPyPP outside binds by self-stack with DNA both at low drug load r (=[porphyrin]/[DNA]) and high drug load. Though TPyPP(Ni) has center metal nickel, binding mode with DNA has little difference compared with TPyPP, dominating out-binding mode with different direction along DNA. The binding constants of the TPyPP and TPyPP(Ni) to DNA were 4.65 x 10(5) M(-1) and 3.2 x 10(5) M(-1), respectively. A colored precipitate was found after time in two porphyrin's viscosity measurement. The reasonable interpretation is the porphyrins with alkyl connected N-position of pyridine can strongly interact with the anionic phosphates of DNA and lead to hydrophobic complex.     

Ruthenium complexes with a terminal hydrazido ligand. Synthesis, spectroscopy, and X-ray crystal structure

Bis(1,1-diphenylhydrazido(1-))ruthenium(IV) porphyrins, [Ru(IV)(Por)(NHNPh2)2] (Por = TPP, TTP, 4-Cl-TPP, 4-MeO-TPP), were prepared in approximately 60% yields through the reaction of dioxoruthenium(VI) porphyrins, [Ru(VI)(Por)O2], with 1,1-diphenylhydrazine in ethanol. This new type of ruthenium complex has been characterized by 1H NMR, IR, UV-vis, and FABMS with elemental analysis. The crystal structure of [Ru(IV)(TTP)(NHNPh2)2], which reveals an eta1-coordination mode for both hydrazido axial ligands, has been determined. The average Ru-NHNPh2 distance and Ru-N-N angle were found to be 1.911(3) A and 141.1(3) degrees, respectively. The porphyrin ring exhibits a ruffling distortion that is unprecedentedly large for ruthenium complexes with simple porphyrinato ligands (such as TTP). This is probably due to the steric effect of the axial hydrazido(1-) ligands.