只有产出(投入)BC~2模型中决策单元效率的几何刻画

在DEA方法中,DEA有效和弱DEA有效的决策单元位于生产前沿面上,非弱DEA有效的DEA无效决策单元位于生产可能集的内部而非生产前沿面上.通过引入生产可能集与生产前沿面移动的思想,证明只有产出(投入)的BC²模型评价下的决策单元的最优值与相应的生产前沿面的移动值存在倒数关系,以双产出(投入)情形图示说明,明确了决策单元在生产可能集中所处的位置.     

具有偏好锥的链式网络DEA模型

对链式网络DEA模型进行推广,将"偏好锥"引入网络DEA模型.针对中间产出重要性以及决策者评价时的偏好,建立带有产出锥和投入锥相应的两阶段生产可能集,对具有"偏好锥"的链式网络DEA模型,证明了决策单元为网络DEA有效的充要条件,给出了网络DEA有效性与各阶段弱DEA有效性的关系.另外,文章结合具体算例说明了偏好锥的变化对效率评价的影响.关于两阶段的模型以及相关结论可以推广到多阶段网络结构.     

DEA的交形式生产可能集及其应用

DEA理论、模型及方法可用以评价给定决策单元之间的相对有效性,其在经济学中的应用体现在经验生产可能集的构造上.DEA的生产可能集有两种等价形式—和形式及交形式.相比较而言,交形式更具几何直观性及计算便利性.     

Incorporating performance measures with target levels in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique for evaluating relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs) which have multiple performance measures. These performance measures have to be classified as either inputs or outputs in DEA. DEA assumes that higher output levels and/or lower input levels indicate better performance. This study is motivated by the fact that there are performance measures (or factors) that cannot be classified as an input or output, because they have target levels with which all DMUs strive to achieve in order to attain the best practice, and any deviations from the target levels are not desirable and may indicate inefficiency. We show how such performance measures with target levels can be incorporated in DEA. We formulate a new production possibility set by extending the standard DEA production possibility set under variable returns-to-scale assumption based on a set of axiomatic properties postulated to suit the case of targeted factors. We develop three efficiency measures by extending the standard radial, slacks-based, and Nerlove–Luenberger measures. We illustrate the proposed model and efficiency measures by applying them to the efficiency evaluation of 36 US universities.     

在DEA中有关输出与输入的比值的模型的探讨

对以决策单元的输出与输入的比值为目标函数的多目标规划模型,证明了有关它与(弱)DEA有效(C2R)关系的三个定理.     

A full-scale investigation of the directional returns to scale in data envelopment analysis

Returns to scale is considered as one of the important concepts in data envelopment analysis (DEA) which can be useful for deciding to increase or decrease the size of a particular decision making unit. Traditional returns to scale on the efficient surface of the production possibility set with variable returns to scale (VRS) technology is introduced as a ratio of proportional changes of output components to proportional changes of input components. However, a problem which may arise in the real world is the impossibility or undesirability of proportional change in the input or output components. One of the attempts which is made to solve the aforementioned problem is the work of Yang et al., 2014. They have introduced the “directional returns to scale” in the DEA framework and have proposed some procedures to estimate and measure it. In this paper, the introduced directional returns to scale is investigated from a new perspective based on the defining hyperplanes of the production possibility set with VRS technology. We propose some algebraic equations and linear programming models which in addition to measuring the directional returns to scale, they enable us to analyse it. Moreover, we introduce the concepts of the best input and output direction vectors for expansion of input components or compression of output components, respectively, and propose two linear programming models in order to obtain these directions. The presented equations and models are demonstrated using a case study and numerical examples.     

非期望产出的DEA效率评价

将非期望产出作为投入应用到传统DEA模型上,解决了非期望产出生产活动的效率评价问题.结合生产可能集,将非期望产出直接反映到生产可能集中,建立了基于投入导向的径向和非径向两种DEA模型.并对两种DEA模型效率值的大小关系、相对有效性的等价性问题进行了证明,指出非径向DEA模型更能准确的实现效率定量评价.     

DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation

This paper discusses the “inverse” data envelopment analysis (DEA) problem with preference cone constraints. An inverse DEA model can be used for a decision making unit (DMU) to estimate its input/output levels when some or all of its input/output entities are revised, given its current DEA efficiency level. The extension of introducing additional preference cones to the previously developed inverse DEA model allows the decision makers to incorporate their preferences or important policies over inputs/outputs into the production analysis and resource allocation process. We provide the properties of the inverse DEA problem through a discussion of its related multi-objective and weighted sum single-objective programming problems. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the application procedure of our extended inverse DEA model. In particular, we demonstrate how to apply the model to the case of a local home electrical appliance group company for its resource reallocation decisions.     

二阶段加法DEA模型的生产可能集与生产前沿面

针对二阶段加法DEA模型的中间要素的特殊性,构造生产可能集及其公理体系,由此定义生产前沿面,并建立DEA有效和生产前沿面之间的等价关系.通过构造一个多目标规划模型,建立该问题的Pareto有效解与DEA有效之间的等价关系.     

The extension and integration of the inverse DEA method

The inverse DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) method is primarily used to analyse the changing relationship between the inputs and outputs of a DMU (Decision-Making Unit) when its efficiency is kept constant or set to a target value. However, the existing inverse DEA method cannot be applied directly to estimate all the changing relationships. For example, the existing DEA models fail to estimate the input variations when the supervisor wants to maintain the DMU’s output-oriented efficiency during the downscaling of production. This paper analyses all the possible changing relationships that need to be solved by the inverse DEA method and develops different models for both the output and input orientations, accomplishing the extension and integration of the inverse DEA model. For illustration of our results, a numerical example is given.     

A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for measuring the relative efficiencies of a set of decision making units (DMUs) that use multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. Crisp input and output data are fundamentally indispensable in conventional DEA. However, the observed values of the input and output data in real-world problems are sometimes imprecise or vague. Many researchers have proposed various fuzzy methods for dealing with the imprecise and ambiguous data in DEA. In this study, we provide a taxonomy and review of the fuzzy DEA methods. We present a classification scheme with four primary categories, namely, the tolerance approach, the α-level based approach, the fuzzy ranking approach and the possibility approach. We discuss each classification scheme and group the fuzzy DEA papers published in the literature over the past 20 years. To the best of our knowledge, this paper appears to be the only review and complete source of references on fuzzy DEA.     

Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions

Existing measures of input allocative efficiency may be biased when estimated via data envelopment analysis (DEA) because of the possibility of slack in the constraints defining the reference technology. In this paper we derive a new measure of input allocative efficiency and compare it to existing measures. We measure efficiency by comparing the actual outputs of a decision-making unit relative to Koopmans’ efficient subset of the direct and indirect output possibility sets. We estimate the existing measures and our new measure of input allocative efficiency for a sample of public school districts operating in Texas.     

Estimating output gains by means of Luenberger efficiency measures

In this paper we propose a new measure of input allocative efficiency that we estimate using directional distance functions. Our new measure compares the gain in output if a firm reduces technical inefficiency for the direct production possibility set and the gain in output if the firm reduces technical inefficiency for the indirect production possibility set. Because the directional distance function uses a translated origin, the gain in output from an optimal reallocation of inputs can be estimated for non-radial expansions in output. We estimate efficiency for Japanese banks during 1992–1999. The gains in outputs from reducing allocative inefficiency by reallocating inputs are greater than the gains in outputs that can be attained by reducing technical inefficiency.     

A bi-objective generalized data envelopment analysis model and point-to-set mapping projection

This work introduces a bi-objective generalized data envelopment analysis (Bi-GDEA) model and defines its efficiency. We show the equivalence between the Bi-GDEA efficiency and the non-dominated solutions of the multi-objective programming problem defined on the production possibility set (PPS) and discuss the returns to scale under the Bi-GDEA model. The most essential contribution is that we further define a point-to-set mapping and the mapping projection of a decision making unit (DMU) on the frontier of the PPS under the Bi-GDEA model. We give an effective approach for the construction of the point-to-set-mapping projection which distinguishes our model from other non-radial models for simultaneously considering input and output. The Bi-GDEA model represents decision makers’ specific preference on input and output and the point-to-set mapping projection provides decision makers with more possibility to determine different input and output alternatives when considering efficiency improvement. Numerical examples are employed for the illustration of the procedure of point-to-set mapping.     

The Potential for Endogeneity Bias in Data Envelopment Analysis

Data envelopment analysis has become an important technique for modelling the relationship between inputs and outputs in the production process, particularly in the public sector. However, whenever measures of the output of public sector activity receive public attention, there is a strong possibility that there will be a feedback from the achieved output to the resources devoted to the activity. In other words, the level of resources is endogenous. The implications of such endogeneity for standard econometric estimation techniques are well known, and methods exist to deal with the problem. Most commentators have assumed that endogeneity poses no analogous problems for DEA because the technique merely places an envelope around feasible production possibilities. Using Monte Carlo simulation techniques, however, this paper shows that the efficiency estimates generated by DEA in the presence of endogeneity can be subject to bias, in the sense that inefficient units using low levels of the endogenous resource may be set tougher efficiency targets than equally inefficient units using more of the resource, particularly when sample sizes are small. The paper concludes that, in such circumstances, great caution should be exercised when comparing efficiency measures for units using different levels of the endogenous input.     

Network DEA efficiency in input–output models: With an application to OECD countries

We undertake network efficiency analysis within an input–output model that allows us to assess potential technical efficiency gains by comparing technologies corresponding to different economies. Input–output tables represent a network where different sectoral nodes use primary inputs (endowments) to produce intermediate input and outputs (according to sectoral technologies), and satisfy final demand (preferences). Within the input–output framework it is possible to optimize primary inputs allocation, intermediate production and final demand production by way of non-parametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques. DEA allows us to model the different subtechnologies corresponding to alternative production processes, to assess efficient resource allocation among them, and to determine potential output gains if inefficiencies were dealt with. The proposed model optimizes the underlying multi-stage technologies that the input–output system comprises identifying the best practice economies. The model is applied to a set of OECD countries.     

Identifying the anchor points in DEA using sensitivity analysis in linear programming

In this paper, the anchor points in DEA, as an important subset of the set of extreme efficient points of the production possibility set (PPS), are studied. A basic definition, utilizing the multiplier DEA models, is given. Then, two theorems are proved which provide necessary and sufficient conditions for characterization of these points. The main results of the paper lead to a new interesting connection between DEA and sensitivity analysis in linear programming theory. By utilizing the established theoretical results, a successful procedure for identification of the anchor points is presented.     

Statistical inference for DEA estimators of directional distances

In productivity and efficiency analysis, the technical efficiency of a production unit is measured through its distance to the efficient frontier of the production set. The most familiar non-parametric methods use Farrell–Debreu, Shephard, or hyperbolic radial measures. These approaches require that inputs and outputs be non-negative, which can be problematic when using financial data. Recently, Chambers et al. (1998) have introduced directional distance functions which can be viewed as additive (rather than multiplicative) measures efficiency. Directional distance functions are not restricted to non-negative input and output quantities; in addition, the traditional input and output-oriented measures are nested as special cases of directional distance functions. Consequently, directional distances provide greater flexibility. However, until now, only free disposal hull (FDH) estimators of directional distances (and their conditional and robust extensions) have known statistical properties (Simar and Vanhems, 2012). This paper develops the statistical properties of directional d estimators, which are especially useful when the production set is assumed convex. We first establish that the directional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) estimators share the known properties of the traditional radial DEA estimators. We then use these properties to develop consistent bootstrap procedures for statistical inference about directional distance, estimation of confidence intervals, and bias correction. The methods are illustrated in some empirical examples.     

Further study of production possibility set and performance evaluation model in supply chain DEA

Performance evaluation is an importance issue in supply chain management. Yang et al. (Ann. Oper. Res. 38(6):195–211, 2011) defined two types of supply chain production possibility sets and proved the equivalence between them. Based on the sub-perfect CRS production possibility set, they proposed a supply chain DEA model to appraise the overall technical efficiency of supply chains. The relationship among efficiency scores of the proposed model, CCR models of system and subsystems are discussed. However, we find that the equivalence between the two types of supply chain production possibility sets is not correct. The proofs of their three theorems are all problematic. In this paper, we correct some results and give three new proofs.     

Finding common weights based on the DM's preference information

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is basically a linear programming-based technique used for measuring the relative performance of organizational units, referred to as Decision Making Units (DMUs). The flexibility in selecting the weights in standard DEA models deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. Moreover, these weights are not suitable to measure the preferences of a decision maker (DM). For dealing with the first difficulty, the concept of common weights was proposed in the DEA literature. But, none of the common weights approaches address the second difficulty. This paper proposes an alternative approach that we term as ‘preference common weights’, which is both practical and intellectually consistent with the DEA philosophy. To do this, we introduce a multiple objective linear programming model in which objective functions are input/output variables subject to the constraints similar to the equations that define production possibility set of standard DEA models. Then by using the Zionts–Wallenius method, we can generate common weights as the DM's underlying value structure about objective functions.