Precision of Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Depth Profile Measurements and an Updated Uncertainty Estimator

Background

Measurement precision and uncertainty estimation are important factors for all residual stress measurement techniques. The values of these quantities can help to determine whether a particular measurement technique would be viable option.

Objective

This paper determines the precision of hole-drilling residual stress measurement using repeatability studies and develops an updated uncertainty estimator.

Methods

Two repeatability studies were performed on test specimens extracted from aluminum and titanium shot peened plates. Each repeatability study included 12 hole-drilling measurements performed using a bespoke automated milling machine. Repeatability standard deviations were determined for each population. The repeatability studies were replicated using a commercially available manual hole-drilling milling machine (RS-200, Micro-Measurements). An updated uncertainty estimator was developed and was assessed using an acceptance criterion. The acceptance criterion compared an expected percentage of points (68%) to the fraction of points in the stress versus depth profile where the measured stresses ± its total uncertainty contained the mean stress of the repeatability studies.

Results

Both repeatability studies showed larger repeatability standard deviations at the surface that decay quickly (over about 0.3 mm). The repeatability standard deviation was significantly smaller in the aluminum plate (max ≈ 15 MPa, RMS?≈?6.4 MPa) than in the titanium plate (max ≈ 60 MPa, RMS?≈?21.0 MPa). The repeatability standard deviations were significantly larger when using the manual milling machine in the aluminum plate (RMS?≈?21.7 MPa), and for the titanium plate (RMS?≈?18.9 MPa).

Conclusions

The single measurement uncertainty estimate met a defined acceptance criterion based on the confidence interval of the uncertainty estimate.

     

Validation of a Contour Method Single-Measurement Uncertainty Estimator

This work validates an analytical single-measurement uncertainty estimator for contour method measurement by comparing it with a first-order uncertainty estimate provided by a repeatability study. The validation was performed on five different specimen types. The specimen types cover a range of geometries, materials, and stress conditions that represent typical structural applications. The specimen types include: an aluminum T-section, a stainless steel plate with a dissimilar metal slot-filled weld, a stainless steel forging, a titanium plate with an electron beam slot-filled weld, and a nickel disk forging. For each specimen, the residual stress was measured using the contour method on replicate specimens to assess measurement precision. The uncertainty associated with each contour method measurement was also calculated using a recently published single-measurement uncertainty estimator. Comparisons were then made between the estimated uncertainty and the demonstrated measurement precision. These results show that the single-measurement analytical uncertainty estimate has good correlation with the demonstrated repeatability. The spatial distributions of estimated uncertainty were found to be similar among the conditions evaluated, with the uncertainty relatively constant in the interior and larger along the boundaries of the measurement plane.     

Assessment of Primary Slice Release Residual Stress Mapping in a Range of Specimen Types

This paper further explores the primary slice removal technique for planar mapping of multiple components of residual stress and describes application to specimens with a range of alloys, geometries, and stress distributions. Primary slice release (PSR) mapping is a combination of contour and slitting measurements that relies on decomposing the stress in a specimen into the stress remaining in a thin slice and the stress released when the slice is removed from a larger body. An initial contour method measurement determines a map of the out-of-plane stress on a plane of interest. Subsequently, removal of thin slices and a series of slitting measurements determines a map of one or both in-plane stress components. Four PSR biaxial mapping measurements were performed using an aluminum T-section, a stainless steel plate with a dissimilar metal slot-filled weld, a titanium plate with an electron beam slot-filled weld, and a nickel disk forging. Each PSR mapping measurement described herein has one (or more) complementary validation measurement to confirm the technique. Uncertainty estimates are included for both the PSR mapping measurements and the validation measurements. Agreement was found between the PSR mapping measurements and validation measurements showing that PSR mapping is a viable technique for measuring residual stress fields.     

An Uncertainty Estimator for Slitting Method Residual Stress Measurements Including the Influence of Regularization

This paper describes the development of a new uncertainty estimator for slitting method residual stress measurements. The new uncertainty estimator accounts for uncertainty in the regularization-based smoothing included in the residual stress calculation procedure, which is called regularization uncertainty. The work describes a means to quantify regularization uncertainty and then, in the context of a numerical experiment, compares estimated uncertainty to known errors. The paper further compares a first-order uncertainty estimate, established by a repeatability experiment, to the new uncertainty estimator and finds good correlation between the two estimates of precision. Furthermore, the work establishes a procedure for automated determination of the regularization parameter value that minimizes total uncertainty. In summary, the work shows that uncertainty in the regularization parameter is a significant contributor to the total uncertainty in slitting method measurements and that the new uncertainty estimator provides a reasonable estimate of single measurement uncertainty.

     

A real-time fluorogenic phospholipase A(2) assay for biochemical and cellular activity measurements

A fluorogenic analog of the PLA(2) substrate PC, named Dabcyl-BODIPY-PC, or simply DBPC, was synthesized with a fluorescence quencher (Dabcyl, 4-[(4-[N,N-dimethylamino]phenyl)azo]benzoic acid) in the sn-1 acyl chain and a BODIPY fluor in the sn-2 acyl chain. DBPC was recognized by sPLA(2) from each of the four sources examined (bee venom, human synovial fluid, cobra venom, and bovine pancreas). A dramatic and quantifiable fluorescence enhancement of DBPC occurred upon phospholipase digestion both in the presence and absence of excess PC. Both real-time and endpoint assays for PLA(2) were sensitive, consistent, and rapid. Thus, DBPC can be used as a sensitive fluorogenic probe for in vitro high-throughput screening assays for PLA(2) activation and inhibition and would expedite studies of PLA(2) in cellular signaling, in vitro screening for drug discovery, and subcellular localization of enzyme activity.