Synthesis and inverse virtual screening of new bi-cyclic structures towards cancer-relevant cellular targets

Structural Chemistry - We report here synthetic approaches to access new classes of small molecules based on three heterocyclic scaffolds, i.e. 3,7-dihydropyrimido[4,5-d]pyridazine-4,8-dione,...     

New 3,6‐Disubstituted Pyrazolo[1,5‐a]quinazolines as Ligands to GABAA Receptor Subtype

A new series of 3,6‐disubstituted pyrazolo[1,5‐a]quinazolines (PQs) and their 4,5‐dihydro derivatives as isomer of the potent 3,8‐PQ previously reported by us as high affine GABA_A receptor subtype ligands, have been synthesized and evaluated. These new compounds have been obtained exploiting a different synthetic pathway with respect to the corresponding 3,8‐disubstituted isomers, proposing again the same groups present in the reference 3,8‐PQ. The movement of the substituents from position 8 to position 6 is detrimental for binding recognition, suggesting that the substituents at position 6 are not properly oriented to form adequate interaction with hydrogen bond point and lipophilic area in the receptor protein, as demonstrated in molecular modeling studies.     

The use of commercially available personal UV-meters does cause less safe tanning habits: a randomized-controlled trial

UV Index information is currently recommended as a vehicle to raise public awareness about the risk of sun-exposure. It remains unknown to what extent this information can change personal sun-protective behavior. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of UV-Index (UV-I) information provided by low cost, commercially available UV-I sensors on major indicators of sun-tanning behavior. A randomized-controlled trial was carried out on 94 healthy volunteers aged 21-23 years. After the exclusion of subjects with photosensitive disorders (n=3), 91 subjects were randomized in two arms after stratification based on phototype and sex. Both arms received a diary to be filled every day with a log of intentional sun-exposure during summer. Subjects in the intervention group also received a commercially available UV-I sensor. The UV-I sensors were switched on and the UV-value was recorded in 77% of days with sun-exposure. During days of sun-exposure, subjects randomized to the intervention group had longer average time of sun-exposure (227.7 vs 208.7 min per day, P=0.003), also between noon and 4 pm (P<0.001), and less frequently adopted sun protective measures than controls (hat [6.4%vs 10.2%, P=0.007], sunglasses [23.9%vs 30.8%, P=0.003], sunscreen [41.4%vs 47.2%, P=0.02]) and they experienced more frequent sunburns (27.8%vs 21.5%, P=0.004). The odd ratio of sunburns was 1.60 for subjects in the intervention group compared with controls (after adjustment for sex, sunscreen use and skin type). The mean UV-I value recorded by volunteers was lower (5.6 [SD+/-0.9]) than that (7.3 [SD+/-0.46]) recorded by a professional instrument in the same period at the same latitude. Poststudy laboratory tests showed that the sensor was able to detect only about 60% of the solar diffuse radiation. The use of UV-I sensors changed the sun protective behavior of sunbathers in the direction of less use of sun protective measures. One possible explanation is that the low cost UV-meters may have functioned incorrectly and under-reported UV exposure. This may have led to an underestimation of UV-I values, erroneously reassuring subjects and causing a less protective sunbathing behavior. Another hypothesis relies on a cognitive pitfall in the subjects' dealing with intermediate UV-I values, as they may have been discouraged in the use of sunscreen as they did not feel that they had yet been exposed to very harmful UV radiation.