快速溶剂萃取-红外分光光度法测定低含量油污染土壤中总石油烃的含量

研究快速溶剂萃取对低含量油污染土壤中总石油烃的萃取效果,并与索氏提取、超声萃取、微波萃取进行比较。制备了模拟污染样品,并以单因素和正交试验优化快速溶剂萃取条件,红外分光光度法测定石油烃含量。结果表明快速溶剂萃取低含量油污染土壤中总石油烃的最佳条件为:压力为1.03×10~7Pa时,萃取15min,萃取温度100℃,循环4次,氮气吹扫45s,萃取剂为丙酮-二氯甲烷(1+1)混合液。按上述方法对不同污灌年限的土壤进行总石油烃含量测定,得到新疆某污灌区土壤中石油烃的质量分数为211.05~389.50mg·kg~(-1),测定值的相对标准偏差(n=5)为2.3%~6.4%。     

超声微波协同萃取-气相色谱法测定土壤中邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物

研究了超声微波协同萃取-气相色谱测定土壤中的邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物。考察了萃取溶剂、微波功率、萃取时间等因素对回收率的影响,得到了最佳萃取条件为:以正己烷/丙酮(1∶1)为萃取剂,溶剂用量为60 mL,微波辐射功率为100 W(超声功率固定为50 W),萃取12 min。该条件下,模拟土样中酞酸酯的平均回收率可达92.5%。方法的检出限为0.05~0.16 mg/kg,相对标准偏差(RSD)5.8%。与直接超声、开放式微波萃取法相比,此法具有明显的优势。方法用于实际土样的测定,所得结果与索氏抽提的结果相当。     

超声萃取-气相色谱法测定土壤中石油烃

采用探头式超声波发生器萃取-气相色谱-火焰离子检测法(GC-FID)测定土壤中33种石油烃(C8~C40)。采用正交试验考察了萃取剂及其用量、超声时间和萃取次数等4个因素对土壤中石油烃的萃取效果的影响,得到最佳萃取条件为:10.00g样品用30mL二氯甲烷超声萃取10min,萃取2次。33种石油烃的线性范围在500mg·L~(-1)内,检出限(3s)为0.10~0.40mg·L~(-1)。加标回收率为83.2%~106%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=7)为0.80%~5.5%。     

气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)法测定ABS木塑材料中十溴二苯醚

建立了索氏提取和超声萃取前处理方式,气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)联用法测定丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯共聚物(ABS)木塑材料中十溴二苯醚(DecaBDE)的分析方法。通过正交实验分析提取溶剂、样品质量和提取时间三个因素的显著性,并优化了参数。在优化条件下,索氏提取和超声萃取法的平均回收率均大于80%,精密度均小于10%。经F检验和T检验显著性统计,两种前处理方法的精密度和准确度不存在差异。相对于传统的索氏提取法,超声萃取法具有操作简单、溶剂用量少和省时的特点,可以较好地应用于木塑材料中十溴二苯醚检测。     

气相色谱-串联质谱多离子监测分析土壤中的有机氯农药残留

采用气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-EI-MS/MS)联用技术,结合索氏萃取提取及佛罗里硅土净化分析土壤中有机氯农药残留.通过对检测模式、母离子选择、碰撞能量、多反应监测的选择等条件优化,可实现20种有机氯农药的基线分离.在优化的条件下,有机氯农药的定量限为5.6×10-4～9.6 ng/mL;样品加标回收率为51.6%～130%.     

GC-MS法测定ABS木塑材料中十溴二苯醚

建立了索氏提取和超声萃取-GC-MS法测定丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯共聚物(ABS)木塑材料中十溴二苯醚的分析方法。通过正交试验分析提取溶剂、样品质量和提取时间三个因素的显著性,并优化了参数。在优化条件下,索氏提取和超声萃取法的平均回收率均大于80%,精密度均小于10%。经F检验和T检验显著性统计,两种前处理方法的精密度和准确度不存在差异。相对于传统的索氏提取法,超声萃取法具有操作简单、溶剂用量少和省时的特点,可以较好的应用于木塑材料中十溴二苯醚检测。     

微波间歇萃取-分光光度法测定三七中总皂苷

本文建立了采用微波辅助间歇提取三七样品中的总皂苷,并以分光光度法测定其含量的实验方法。分别通过单因素实验和正交实验设计,优化了萃取溶剂浓度、溶剂用量、微波功率和微波辐射时间等提取条件,确定了微波辅助萃取法提取三七中皂苷类化合物的最佳条件为:使用浓度为60%的乙醇,在液固比100∶1的条件下,以255 W的微波功率,微波间歇萃取10×20 s。在上述最优条件下进行了精密度和回收率实验,加入回收率在97.7%~101.8%之间,RSD为1.54%(n=5)。与传统的索氏提取法和超声波提取法比较,微波辅助萃取法具有操作简便,宽速,重现性好等特点,实验结果表明此方法可推广应用于各类中草药中总皂苷的含量测定。     

快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱法测定土壤中石油烃(C10～C40)

土壤样品颗粒以丙酮与正己烷以体积比1∶1组成的混合液进行萃取,萃取温度为100℃,萃取时间为8min。萃取液经氮吹浓缩后,采用全自动固相萃取仪净化后浓缩至1.0mL。采用气相色谱法测定浓缩液中石油烃(C_(10)～C_(40))的含量,采用DB-5HT石英毛细管色谱柱(30m×0.32mm,0.10μm)分离,火焰离子化检测器测定。石油烃(C_(10)～C_(40))的线性范围在9 300mg·L~(-1)以内,检出限为2 mg·kg~(-1)。以空白土壤样品为基体进行加标回收试验,所得回收率为87.5%～96.0%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)为1.2%～4.5%。     

超声萃取沉积物中六氯苯的研究

研究了沉积物中六氯苯的超声萃取条件,并采用气相色谱进行定量分析。研究结果表明,在以10 mL可密闭耐压试管为萃取容器,6 mL丙酮∶正己烷(体积比1∶1)为萃取溶剂,超声功率90 W,萃取时间40 min,温度35~40℃,2次萃取的优化条件下,六氯苯稳定性较好。该方法的平均回收率为84.8%,相对标准偏差为1.92%(n=10),检出限为0.071μg/kg。本法与传统的索氏提取法和浸泡振荡法相比,具有萃取效率高、萃取时间短、溶剂用量小、操作简单等优点,并成功用于实际样品的测定。     

UAE/SPE-GS/MS法同时测定纺织废物中17种氯苯类污染物

本文建立了超声波辅助萃取/固相萃取法-气质联用法(UAE/SPE-GS/MS)同时测定纺织固废物中17种氯苯类污染物的分析方法。从超声萃取溶剂、超声萃取时间、超声萃取温度和固相萃取小柱等前处理条件进行优化,以保留时间定性,外标法定量。结果表明,纺织固废样品在超声50℃的水浴中经二氯甲烷溶剂超声萃取30min后,再通过弗罗里硅土(Florisil)固相萃取柱净化,测得17种氯苯类污染物的回收率为80%～107.6%,相对偏差RSD(n=10)小于5.5%。     

微波辅助萃取与超声波萃取丹参中丹酚酸B的比较研究

本文对微波辅助萃取和超声波萃取丹参中丹酚酸B进行了比较研究,并用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定了丹参中丹酚酸B.考察了微波辅助萃取和超声波萃取参数的影响,在各自最佳萃取条件下进行了丹参中的丹酚酸B提取率的比对,结果表明:微波辅助萃取6 min的提取率高于超声波萃取30 min的提取率.微波辅助萃取法与超声波萃取法相比具有省时、高效和溶剂用量少的特点.利用指纹图谱比较了两种萃取方式提取的化学成分的差异,结果显示两种萃取方法提取的主要成分组成基本相同,其共有成分比例相近.     

Ultrasonic/Soxhlet/supercritical fluid extraction kinetics of pyrethrins from flowers and allethrin from paper strips

Three different extraction methods (ultrasonic extraction (USE), Soxhlet extraction (SOX) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)) were compared for the extraction of pyrethrins from chrysanthemic flowers and commercial insecticide powder. Allethrin was extracted from paper strips. All extracts and the kinetics were analyzed by supercritical fluid chromatography and flame ionization detector. Received: 18 January 1999 / Revised: 29 June 1999 / /Accepted: 30 June 1999     

Ultrasonic/Soxhlet/supercritical fluid extraction kinetics of pyrethrins from flowers and allethrin from paper strips

Three different extraction methods (ultrasonic extraction (USE), Soxhlet extraction (SOX) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)) were compared for the extraction of pyrethrins from chrysanthemic flowers and commercial insecticide powder. Allethrin was extracted from paper strips. All extracts and the kinetics were analyzed by supercritical fluid chromatography and flame ionization detector. Received: 18 January 1999 / Revised: 29 June 1999 / /Accepted: 30 June 1999     

Determination of vitexin and isovitexin in pigeonpea using ultrasonic extraction followed by LC-MS

A method based on ultrasonic extraction (USE) followed by LC-MS is presented for the determination of vitexin and isovitexin in pigeonpea extracts in this study. The influential parameters of the USE procedure were optimized, and the optimal conditions were as follows: extraction solvent, 60% ethanol solution; liquid/solid ratio 10:1 (mL/g), extraction power, 250 W; temperature, 40-50 degrees C; and three extraction cycles, each cycle 15 min. Validation of the USE method was performed in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. RSDs for extraction yields were lower than 5.85 and 8.09%, respectively. The LOD and LOQ of chromatographic determination were 0.96 and 3.2 ng/mL for vitexin and 0.84 and 2.8 ng/mL for isovitexin. The method was also successfully applied for the determination of vitexin and isovitexin in stems, leaves, and root extracts of pigeonpea. From all these results, we may conclude that the developed method is appropriate for the quality control of pigeonpea and other plant extract products developed from pigeonpea.     

Monitoring of the pesticide diazinon in soil, stem and surface water of rice fields.

Diazinon is an organophosphorus insecticide (OPP) that is used as a pesticide for Chilo suppressalis (WLK) (Lep., Pyralidae) in rice fields. The extraction of diazinon from soil and the stems of rice plants has been carried out by microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and the results compared with ultrasonic extraction (USE). The best parameters for MAE are hexane-acetone (8:2 v/v) as a solvent, a 2.5 min extraction time, and 20 ml of the solvent volume. Also, surface-water samples of the rice fields were extracted by solid phase extraction (SPE) using a C18 disc. The optimum conditions of SPE were a sample volume of 750 ml, a pH of 7 and high ionic strength of water. The extracted samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The relative standard deviation (RSD) and regression coefficients related to the linearity were <3.5% (n = 5) and 0.99, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) is 0.1 ng ml(-1) with selected ion monitoring (SIM) at 137 m/z. The average recoveries of diazinon in soil and stem samples by MAE and surface-water by SPE were 98% (+/-3), 94% (+/-5) and 87% (+/-3), respectively. In June, the concentration of diazinon in soil and stem samples of the rice plants in Guilan province is high (55 ng ml(-1)) and in September is low (2 ng ml(-1)). In surface-water samples, the results are converse. In November, diazinon can not be detected in soil, stem or surface-water samples. Diazinon is degraded to diethylthiophosphoric acid. Also, three microorganism genera (Pseudomonas sp, Flavobacterium sp and Agrobacterium sp) have been found to degrade diazinon in soil and surface water.     

Fast miniaturised sample preparation for the screening and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in sludge

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sludge are usually extracted by a technique such as Soxhlet with subsequent fractionation prior to long GC runs using GC-ECD or GC-HRMS. In this study, the extraction of selected chlorinated biphenyls (CBs) from a spiked sludge sample by three rapid techniques, i.e. ultrasonic (USE), pressurised-liquid (PLE), and microwave-assisted (MAE) extraction using a domestic microwave, was studied, with subsequent direct GC-ECD, GC-MS, or GC x GC-microECD analysis of the extracts. The main goal was to select an appropriate, and miniaturised, extraction method after only a brief optimisation and demonstrate the power of GC x GC analysis of dirty extracts. For PLE similar CB recoveries were found when extracting with either n-hexane or n-hexane/acetone (1/1). For USE and MAE, n-hexane/acetone (1/1) was the preferred extraction solvent. USE gave the best recoveries (80-95%; except 130% for CB 105). The only clean-up needed prior to GC-MS or GC x GC-gECD analysis was the removal of sulphur-containing compounds. GC-ECD was not suitable for these dirty extracts. The lowest LODs for the CBs (20 fg or 0.1 ng/g sludge) were found when combining USE and GC x GC-microECD, because of the powerful extraction, high separation power and excellent detectability provided by this technique.     

烟草中有机氯类农药多残留分析前处理方法对比研究

以烟草中有机氯类农药为研究对象,从检出限、回收率、重复性和色谱图4个方面系统比较了机械振荡萃取法、超声波溶剂萃取法、微波辅助萃取法和加速溶剂萃取法4种常用前处理方法。由于加速溶剂萃取法是在高温高压下进行萃取,在提取出残留农药的同时,也提取出更多的干扰物。机械振荡法、超声波溶剂萃取法和微波辅助萃取法各项结果差别较小,其中机械振荡萃取法回收率和重复性最好,但提取时间较长。考虑溶剂消耗和提取时间等方面的因素,微波辅助萃取是较理想的样品前处理方法。     

Comparison of four extraction methods for the analysis of 24 pesticides in soil samples with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-ion trap-mass spectrometry

With a view to analyse multiresidues of pesticides in soil samples, a new ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE) was compared to the European Norm DIN 12393 for foodstuff (extraction with acetone, partitioning with ethylacetate/cyclohexane and clean-up with gel permeation chromatography (GPC)), the QuECheRS method and a pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) method. Pesticides were analysed with both GC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS. The reference materials were the EUROSOIL 7 and its subsoil SO26 as well as a sea sand. All the substances were observed to be linear in the range of 4-800 ng g(-1) for the European Norm DIN 12393, 7-1400 ng g(-1) for the USE method and 20-4000 ng g(-1) for the QueCheRS and the PLE methods. Limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ) were with HPLC between 0.006 and 0.23 ng g(-1) and between 0.022 and 0.77 ng g(-1), respectively, with the exception of diuron (LOD up to 11.8 ng g(-1); LOQ up to 39.2 ng g(-1)). With GC they ranged from 3.0 to 87.5 ng g(-1) and from 10 to 292 ng g(-1), respectively. All substances could be recovered with USE as well as with the QuECheRS method; the European Norm DIN 12393 could not recover carbendazim and metamitron; the PLE carbendazim, metamitron and monolinuron. For the remaining substances, recoveries at a 500 ng g(-1) fortification level ranged from 10.9 to 96.3% with the USE. In comparison, the QuECheRS method was the most efficient extraction method with recoveries from 27.3 to 120.9%. It was followed by the European Norm DIN 12393 with recoveries between 6.8 and 108.1% and the PLE with recoveries from 12.2 to 153.2%. Recoveries were higher from the EUROSOIL 7 than from the SO 26. The repeatability expressed in term of standard deviation was below 20% for all substances and all materials.     

Assessment of pesticide contamination in soil samples from an intensive horticulture area, using ultrasonic extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

In order to reduce the amount of sample to be collected and the time consumed in the analytical process, a broad range of analytes should be preferably considered in the same analytical procedure. A suitable methodology for pesticide residue analysis in soil samples was developed based on ultrasonic extraction (USE) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). For this study, different classes of pesticides were selected, both recent and old persistent molecules: parent compounds and degradation products, namely organochlorine, organophosphorous and pyrethroid insecticides, triazine and acetanilide herbicides and other miscellaneous pesticides. Pesticide residues could be detected in the low- to sub-ppb range (0.05–7.0 μg kg⁻¹) with good precision (7.5–20.5%, average 13.7% R.S.D.) and extraction efficiency (69–118%, average 88%) for the great majority of analytes. This methodology has been applied in a monitoring program of soil samples from an intensive horticulture area in Póvoa de Varzim, North of Portugal. The pesticides detected in four sampling programs (2001/2002) were the following: lindane, dieldrin, endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, 4,4′-DDE, 4,4′-DDD, atrazine, desethylatrazine, alachlor, dimethoate, chlorpyrifos, pendimethalin, procymidone and chlorfenvinphos. Pesticide contamination was investigated at three depths and in different soil and crop types to assess the influence of soil characteristics and trends over time.     

Determination of sudan dyes in red wine and fruit juice using ionic liquid-based liquid-liquid microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography

The liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) was developed for extracting sudan dyes from red wine and fruit juice. Room temperature ionic liquid was used as the extraction solvent. The target analytes were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The extraction parameters were optimized. The optimal conditions are as follows: volume of [C(6)MIM][PF(6)] 50 μL; the extraction time 10 min; pH value of the sample solution 7.0; NaCl concentration in sample solution 5%. The extraction recoveries for the analytes in red wine and fruit samples are 86.79-108.28 and 68.54-85.66%, whereas RSDs are 1.42-5.12 and 1.43-6.19%, respectively. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.428 and 1.426 ng/mL for sudan I, 0.938 and 3.127 ng/mL for sudan II, 1.334 and 4.445 ng/mL for sudan III, 1.454 and 4.846 ng/mL for sudan IV, respectively. Compared with conventional liquid-liquid extraction (CLLE) and ultrasonic extraction (UE), when LLME was applied, the sample amount was less (LLME: 4 mL; CLLE: 10 mL; UE: 10 mL), the extraction time was shorter (LLME: 15 min; CLLE: 110 min; UE: 50 min) and the extraction solvent amount was less (LLME: 0.05 mL IL; CLLE: 15 mL hexane; UE: 20 mL hexane). The proposed method offers a simple, rapid and efficient sample preparation for determining sudan dyes in red wine and fruit juice samples.