钌（Ⅱ）多吡啶配合物的合成、荧光性质及与脱氧核糖核酸DNA的作用机制研究

设计合成含多个配位中心的多吡啶配体ODCIP(3,4-二氯基苯并咪唑并[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉)及其钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶配合物[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2 .运用元素分析、红外光谱、核磁谱和质谱对配体及配合物进行结构表征.利用紫外吸收光谱、荧光光谱和粘度法研究了[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2 与DNA(脱氧核糖核酸)的作用机制、与Co2 配位后与DNA的作用机制及其荧光变化情况.结果表明[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2 与DNA通过部分插入模式作用,[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2 与Co2 配位形成的双核配合物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)Co]4 也能与DNA插入结合.进一步利用稳态荧光发射光谱、荧光淬灭实验等方法研究了单核配合物[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2 和双核配合物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)Co]4 的荧光性质.     

钌(II)多吡啶配合物的合成、荧光性质及与脱氧核糖核酸DNA的 作用机制研究

设计合成含多个配位中心的多吡啶配体ODCIP (3,4-二氯基苯并咪唑并[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉)及其钌(II)多吡啶配合物[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2＋. 运用元素分析、红外光谱、核磁谱和质谱对配体及配合物进行结构表征. 利用紫外吸收光谱、荧光光谱和粘度法研究了[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2＋与DNA(脱氧核糖核酸)的作用机制、与Co2＋配位后与DNA的作用机制及其荧光变化情况. 结果表明[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2＋与DNA通过部分插入模式作用, [Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2＋与Co2＋配位形成的双核配合物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)Co]4＋也能与DNA插入结合. 进一步利用稳态荧光发射光谱、荧光淬灭实验等方法研究了单核配合物[Ru(bpy)2ODCIP]2＋和双核配合物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)Co]4＋的荧光性质.     

钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶配合物与DNA相互作用的光切割与荧光性质研究

利用琼脂糖凝胶电泳法研究了钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶配位物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)]2+(bpy:2,2'-联吡啶,ODCIP:含多个配位中心的多吡啶配体,3,4-二氯基-咪唑并[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉)对pBR322质粒DNA的光切割作用及其可能机理,并运用紫外可见吸收光谱、荧光光谱和琼脂糖凝胶电泳法研究了[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)]2+与Zn2+配位后与DNA的光谱性质和光切割作用.结果表明[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)]2+对DNA有较好的光切割作用,其机理可能是产生了超氧阴离子自由基和单线态氧.[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)]2+与Zn2+配位可能形成的双核配位物[Ru(bpy)2(ODCIP)Zn]4+与DNA也能进行插入结合,对DNA的光切割效果并没有明显增强。     

新型双核配合物的形成、与DNA的作用机制及荧光性质研究

利用紫外、荧光和粘度等方法研究了含不同配体的钌(II)配合物[Ru(phen)₂CImP]^2＋(CImP＝3,4-二羟基-咪唑并[4,5-i][1,10]邻菲咯啉)和[Ru(phen)₂TPPZ]^2＋(TPPZ＝四吡啶[3,2-a:2',3'-c:3',2'-h:2'',3''-j]吩嗪)与DNA的作用机制, 并研究了配合物与Zn^2＋配合后荧光性质变化. 结果表明[Ru(phen)₂TPPZ]^2＋与DNA以插入模式作用, 而[Ru(phen)₂CImP]^2＋与DNA则以沟面结合模式作用. 向配合物溶液中滴加Zn^2＋后, 配合物[Ru(phen)₂TPPZ]^2＋和[Ru(phen)₂CImP]^2＋均可以与Zn^2＋形成双核配合物[Ru(phen)₂(TPPZ)Zn]^4＋和[Ru(phen)₂(CImP)Zn]^4＋, 配合物的荧光减弱. 与DNA作用后, 配合物仍可以与Zn^2＋配位形成双核配合物, 但[Ru(phen)₂(TPPZ)Zn]^4＋保持插入模式与DNA作用, 配合物的荧光减弱. 而[Ru(phen)₂(CImP)Zn]^4＋与DNA则由沟面结合改为插入结合, 配合物的荧光增强.     

钌多吡啶配合物的合成及插入配体的位阻效应对键合DNA的影响

合成了2,3-二甲基-1,4,8,9-四氮三联苯(dmtatp)和2,3-二苯基-1,4,8,9-四氮三联苯(dptatp)两种新配体及它们与2,2′-联吡啶和钌(Ⅱ)的混配物[Ru(bpy)₂dmtatp]²⁺(1)和[Ru(bpy)₂dptatp]²⁺(2),用电子吸收光谱、稳态荧光、粘度测定和圆二色谱研究了配合物与小牛胸腺DNA的相互作用。结合我们以前对配合物[Ru(bpy)₂tatp]²⁺(3)(tatp为1,4,8,9-四氮三联苯)与小牛胸腺DNA的作用研究,得出配合物与DNA的键合强度顺序为:[Ru(bpy)₂tatp]²⁺>[Ru(bpy)₂dptatp]²⁺>[Ru(bpy)₂dmtatp]²⁺,这与插入配体的位阻效应的减少趋势相一致。同时,还测定了配合物与DNA的键合常数。     

双核钌(II)多吡啶配合物与酵母RNA的相互作用研究

用紫外-可见吸收光谱和荧光光谱滴定、稳态荧光淬灭和反向盐滴定实验研究了双核钌(II)配合物[(bpy)2Ru(ebipcH2)Ru(bpy)2](ClO4)4 {bpy=2,2'-联吡啶; ebipcH2=N-乙基-4,7-二(咪唑-[4,5-f]-(1,10-邻菲啰啉)-2-基)咔唑}与酵母RNA 的相互作用. 结果表明该双核配合物以插入方式与酵母RNA 作用, 在生理盐浓度下(≈150 mmol/L NaCl)该配合物与RNA 的相互作用明显强于DNA.     

钌配合物[Ru(bpy)2(PNT)]2+的合成、表征及与DNA相互作用研究

以cis-Ru(bpy)2Cl2·2H2O与PNT为原料合成钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶配合物[Ru(bpy)2(PNT)]2+(bpy=2,2’-联吡啶, PNT=2-[4’-(5-四唑基)苯基]咪唑-[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉), 通过元素分析、质谱和核磁共振波谱对该化合物进行了结构表征. 利用紫外-可见吸收光谱、荧光光谱、热变性和黏度实验研究了配合物与CT-DNA的相互作用, 实验结果表明, 该配合物以部分插入模式与DNA结合.     

配体的空间构型及疏水性对钌（Ⅱ）多吡啶配合物与DNA作用的影响

合成了4－氰基苯基咪唑并[5,6-f]邻菲咯啉（CYIP）和2－羧基苯基咪唑并[5, 6-f]邻菲咯啉（COIP）两种新配体及它们的钌混配配合物[Ru(bpy)2CYIP](ClO4)2 ·H2O（Rul）（bpy=2,2′-联吡啶），[Ru(phen)2CYIP](ClO4)2·H2O(Ru2) (phen=1,10-邻菲咯啉），[Ru(bpy)2COIP](ClO4)2·3H2O(Ru3)和[Ru(phen)2COIP] (ClO4)2·H2O(Ru4)，并用红外光谱、紫外光谱、核磁和质谱对它们进行了表征。 通过循环伏安法研究了这些配合物的电化学性质。采用电子吸收光谱、稳态荧光、 圆二色谱和粘度测定研究了配合物与小牛胸腺DNA的相互作用。结果表明配合物 Rul和Ru2通过CYIP配体以插入的方式与DNA结合，而配合物Ru3和Ru4则通过COIP配 体以部分插入的方式与DNA结合。     

噻吩基钌配合物与酵母RNA的相互作用研究

通过紫外-可见吸收光谱和荧光光谱滴定、稳态荧光猝灭以及盐效应实验研究了噻吩基钌配合物[Ru(bpy)2(Htip)]Cl2(1)、[Ru(Htip)2(dppz)]Cl2(2)、[Ru(Htip)3]Cl2(3)和[Ru2(bpy)4(H2bipt)]Cl4(4){bpy=2,2'-联吡啶;Htip=2-噻吩咪唑[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉;H2bipt=2,5-二(2-咪唑[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲咯啉)噻吩;dppz=二吡啶并[3,2-a:2',3'-c]吩嗪}与酵母RNA(yeast-RNA)的相互作用,并比较了该类配合物与yeast-RNA和小牛胸腺DNA(ct-DNA)的键合性质。结果表明,该类噻吩基钌配合物是较强的RNA嵌入试剂,其中配合物2和3的RNA键合强度大于其DNA键合强度;此系列配合物在低盐和高盐浓度时均能与RNA较强地结合,即使在100 mmol/L Na Cl条件下仍具有较大的RNA键合常数;配合物1与RNA键合时荧光强度下降,配合物2在水溶液中以及与RNA键合时几乎无荧光,而它们与DNA作用时荧光强度明显增大,显示出良好的区分RNA和DNA的荧光特性。     

DNA调制多吡啶钌(Ⅱ)配合物在ITO上的电化学及光致发光性能研究

本文应用伏安法、荧光光谱和荧光显微镜研究了多吡啶钌髤配合物[Ru(bpy)3]2+(Ru1)、[Ru(bpy)2phen]2+(Ru2)和[Ru(bpy)2tatp]2+(Ru3)(bpy=2,2′-联吡啶,phen=1,10-邻菲咯啉,tatp=1,4,8,9-四氮三联苯)在ITO上的电化学行为、光致发光性能及DNA在其中的调制作用。结果表明,Ru1、Ru2、Ru3分别在1.020、1.026、1.081V条件电位下在ITO电极上呈现出清晰的扩散控制波,随着连续伏安扫描次数的增加,较负电位下逐渐呈现出明显的吸附控制波。DNA的加入,尽管减小了这3种配合物在缓冲溶液中的扩散系数,但能促进其在ITO上的吸附组装。不管有无DNA存在,这3种钌髤配合物的组装强度均为Ru3Ru2Ru1。此外,在450nm波长光激发下,在ITO上的Ru1、Ru2、Ru3分别在576、588、610nm波长下呈现明显的发射峰,其量子产率按Ru1、Ru2、Ru3顺序增强。DNA的加入增大了Ru2和Ru3的发光强度和量子产率。该研究为具有氧化还原和光致发光活性生物分子器件的构筑提供一种新的思路。     

[Ru(bpy)_2tpphz]~(2+)与Zn~(2+)形成的双核配合物的荧光性质研究

近年来,钌多吡啶配合物与DNA的作用得到了比较广泛的研究,并且发展了一系列具有特定功能的钌配合物犤1犦。如传统的DNA分子光开关犤Ru(bpy)2dppz犦2+和犤Ru(phen)2dppz犦2+犤2,3犦(bpy=2,2'-联吡啶,phen=1,10-菲咯啉,dppz=二吡啶犤3,2-a:2',3'-c犦吩嗪)。这些配合物与DNA具有较强的结合力,在水溶液中几乎不发光,但在DNA存在下则有强烈荧光发出。这是由于配合物插入DNA的碱基对之后,保护了dppz的吡嗪环上的N原子,使其免受水分子的进攻从而导致配合物荧光的恢复。但是对于大多数的多吡啶钌配合物来讲,由于其自身较强的背景荧光或与DN…     

多吡啶钴(Ⅲ)配合物与Zn2+形成的新型“关-开”荧光探针

近十几年来,对小分子过渡金属配合物与大分子DNA键合与识别机理的研究一直是国际上生物无机化学领域十分活跃的研究课题[1￣3],已发展了一系列具有特定功能的配合物,如DNA结构探针和DNA荧光探针等。与其他类型的金属配合物相比,八面体过渡金属多吡啶配合物具有丰富的光化学和光物理信息,当这些配合物与DNA相互作用时,由于结构匹配或微环境的差异,配合物的光谱特征会出现不同程度的改变,从而达到对DNA的检测。传统的DNA荧光探针有[Ru(bpy)2dppz]2 和[Ru(phen)2dppz]2 (bpy=2,2′-联吡啶,phen=1,10-菲咯啉,dppz=二吡啶[3,2-a∶2′,3′…     

Chemical control of the DNA light switch: cycling the switch ON and OFF

The emission of the DNA light-switch complex [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, tpphz = tetrapyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c:3' ',2' '-h:2' ',3' '-j]phenazine) can be reversibly turned ON and OFF over several cycles. The tpphz and taptp (taptp = 4,5,9,18-tetraazaphenanthreno[9,10-b] triphenylene) ligands in [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+ and [Ru(bpy)2(taptp)]2+, respectively, intercalate between the DNA bases, and a 50-fold increase in emission intensity of [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+ is observed upon DNA intercalation. The [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+ DNA light switch can be turned OFF statically in the presence of Co2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+, and the emission can be fully restored by the addition of EDTA. Cycling of the DNA light switch OFF and ON can be accomplished through the successive introduction of Co2+ and EDTA, respectively, to solutions of DNA-bound [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+. Owing to the absence of additional coordination sites, the emission of DNA-intercalated [Ru(bpy)2(taptp)]2+ is not quenched by transition metal ions in solution. To our knowledge, this work presents the first example of a reversible DNA light switch.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes of 1,12-diazaperylene and their interactions with DNA

Four complexes of the ligand 1,12-diazaperylene (DAP) have been prepared, [Ru(bpy)n(DAP)(3-n)]2+ where n = 0-2 and [Ru(DAP)3]2+. The [Ru(DAP)3]2+ complex was characterized by X-ray analysis and was found to exhibit the expected propeller-like structure with significant intermolecular pi-stacking interactions. The three Ru(II) complexes showed self-consistent optoelectronic properties with similar ligand-centered pi-pi* absorptions in the range of 333-468 nm and MLCT bands associated with the DAP which increased in intensity and decreased in energy as the number of DAP ligands varied from 1 to 3. Hypochromicity and viscosity changes were observed that were consistent with DAP intercalation into DNA, and binding constants were measured in the range of 1.4-1.6 x 10(6) M(-1) for the mixed ligand complexes. Furthermore, the complex [Ru(bpy)2(DAP)]2+ was found to photocleave plasmid DNA upon irradiation with visible light.     

The characterization of the high-frequency vibronic contributions to the 77 K emission spectra of ruthenium-am(m)ine-bipyridyl complexes, their attenuation with decreasing energy gaps, and the implications of strong electronic coupling for inverted-region electron transfer

The 77 K emission spectra of a series of [Ru(Am)6-2n(bpy)n]2+ complexes (n = 1-3) have been determined in order to evaluate the effects of appreciable excited state (e)/ground state (g) configurational mixing on the properties of simple electron-transfer systems. The principal focus is on the vibronic contributions, and the correlated distortions of the bipyridine ligand in the emitting MLCT excited state. To address the issues that are involved, the emission band shape at 77 K is interpreted as the sum of a fundamental component, corresponding to the {e,0'} --> {g,0} transition, and progressions in the ground-state vibrational modes that correlate with the excited-state distortion. Literature values of the vibrational parameters determined from the resonance-Raman (rR) for [Ru(NH3)4bpy]2+ and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ are used to model the emission spectra and to evaluate the spectral analysis. The Gaussian fundamental component with an energy Ef and bandwidth Deltanu1/2 is deconvoluted from the observed emission spectrum. The first-, second-, and third-order terms in the progressions of the vibrational modes that contribute to the band shape are evaluated as the sums of Gaussian-shaped contributions of width Deltanu1/2. The fundamental and the rR parameters give an excellent fit of the observed emission spectrum of [Ru(NH3)4bpy]2+, but not as good for the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ emission spectrum probably because the Franck-Condon excited state probed by the rR is different in symmetry from the emitting MLCT excited state. Variations in vibronic contributions for the series of complexes are evaluated in terms of reorganizational energy profiles (emreps, Lambdax) derived from the observed spectra, and modeled using the rR parameters. This modeling demonstrates that most of the intensity of the vibronic envelopes obtained from the frozen solution emission spectra arises from the overlapping of first-order vibronic contributions of significant bandwidth with additional convoluted contributions of higher order vibronic terms. The emrep amplitudes of these complexes have their maxima at about 1500 cm(-1) in frozen solution, and Lambdax(max) decreases systematically by approximately 2-fold as Ef decreases from 17,220 for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to 12,040 cm(-1) for [Ru(NH3)4bpy]2+ through the series of complexes. Corrections for higher order contributions and bandwidth differences based on the modeling with rR parameters indicate that the variations in Lambdax(max) imply somewhat larger decreases in first-order bpy vibrational reorganizational energies. The large attenuation of vibrational reorganizational energies of the [Ru(Am)6-2n(bpy)n]2+ complexes contrasts with the apparent similarity of reorganizational energy amplitudes for the absorption and emission of [Ru(NH3)4bpy]2+. These observations are consistent with increasing and very substantial excited-state/ground-state configurational mixing and decreasing excited-state distortion as Ef decreases, but more severe attenuation for singlet/singlet than triplet/singlet mixing (alphage > alphaeg for the configurational mixing coefficients at the ground-state and excited-state potential energy minima, respectively); it is inferred that 0.18 > or = alphage2 > or = 0.09 for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and 0.37 > or = alphage2 > or = 0.18 for [Ru(NH3)4bpy]2+ in DMSO/water glasses, where the ranges are based on models that there is or is not a spin restriction on configurational mixing (alphage > alphaeg and alphage = alphaeg), respectively, for these complexes.     

Role of electronic structure on DNA light-switch behavior of Ru(II) intercalators

A series of ruthenium(II) complexes possessing ligands with an extended pi system were synthesized and characterized. The complexes are derived from [Ru(bpy)3](2+) (1, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) and include [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)](2+) (2, tpphz = tetrapyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c:3',2'-h:2',3'-j]phenazine), [Ru(bpy)2(dppx)](2+) (3, dppx = 7,8-dimethyldipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine), [Ru(bpy)2(dppm2)](2+) (4, dppm2 = 6-methyldipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine), and [Ru(bpy)2(dppp2)](2+) (5, dppp2 = pyrido[2',3':5,6]pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline). The excited-state properties of these complexes, including their DNA "light-switch" behavior, were compared to those of [Ru(bpy)2(dppz)](2+) (6, dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine). Whereas 2, 3, and 4 can be classified as DNA light-switch complexes, 5 exhibits negligible luminescence enhancement in the presence of DNA. Because relative viscosity experiments show that 2-6 bind to DNA by intercalation, their electronic absorption and emission spectra, electrochemistry, and temperature dependence of the luminescence were used to explain the observed differences. The small energy gap between the lowest-lying dark excited state and the bright state in 2-4 and 6 is related to the ability of these complexes to exhibit DNA light-switch behavior, whereas the large energy gap in 5 precludes the emission enhancement in the presence of DNA. The effect of the energy gap among low-lying states on the photophysical properties of 1-6 is discussed. In addition, DFT and TD-DFT calculations support the conclusions from the experiments.     

Intercalation is not required for DNA light-switch behavior

The DNA light-switch complex [Ru(bpy)2(tpphz)]2+ (1, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, tpphz = tetrapyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c:3',2'-h:2',3'-j]phenazine) is luminescent when bound to DNA and in organic solvents and weakly emissive in water. To date, light-switch behavior by transition metal complexes has generally been regarded as confirmation of DNA intercalation. In contrast, the present work demonstrates that the nonintercalating bimetallic complex [(bpy)2Ru(tpphz)Ru(bpy)2]4+ (2) behaves as a DNA light-switch. Weak emission from the 3MLCT excited state of 2 is observed in water with lambda(em) = 623 nm (phi(em) = 1.4 x 10(-4)), and a red shift (lambda(em) = 702 nm) and 40-fold increase in intensity are observed upon addition of 100 microM calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA). Addition of increasing concentrations of 2 to 1 mM herring sperm DNA does not result in an increase in the viscosity of the solution, indicating that the complex is not an intercalator. Additionally, experiments were conducted to ensure that the emission enhancement did not arise from threading intercalation of the complex. The in situ generation of 2 intercalated between the base pairs of ct-DNA in a threading fashion, however, exhibits emission maximum at 685 nm, which is blue-shifted from that of surface-bound 2. DFT calculations show low-lying orbitals in 2 that are expected to exhibit nonemissive character when contributing to the MLCT state, in accord with the lower emission intensity observed for 2 relative to that for 1. To our knowledge, the present work is the first example of a nonintercalating light-switch metal complex, thus showing that light-switch behavior cannot be used exclusively as confirmation of intercalation.     

新型多吡啶配体的设计及其对配合物与DNA作用机制的影响

近年来 ,以钌 ( )多吡啶配合物为探针研究 DNA的结构已成为生物无机化学领域中的一个热点[1,2 ] .这些配合物由于热力学稳定性好 ,光化学和光物理信息丰富 ,在研究 DNA内部的电子转移和Fig.1　 Structures of the ligandsDNA的结构识别等方面均有重要的作用[3～ 7] .在配合物与 DNA的相互作用中 ,配合物的形状、大小以及中心离子电荷等都有一定的影响[8] ,其中 ,配合物的形状起着至关重要的作用 ,与 DNA的形状匹配的配合物与DNA的结合较强 .这些配合物中通常含有平面性较大的芳香环配体 ,可插入到 DNA的碱基对之间 ,并与 DNA具有…