Alkylation Reactions at the Benzo Moiety of 2,4‐Dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes – Model Compounds of Colchicinoids

Alkylation reactions of 3‐(X‐sulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalene‐2,4‐diols (X=Ph, morpholin‐4‐yl) and their dimethyl ethers were studied. The diols form with K₂CO₃/MeI in aqueous media the 1‐methylated benzoheptalenes, but in yields not surpassing 20% (Table 1). On the other hand, 2,4‐dimethoxybenzo[a]heptalenes can easily be lithiated at C(3) with BuLi and then treated with alkyl iodides to give the 3‐alkylated forms in good yield (Table 2). Surprising is the reaction with two equiv. or more of t‐BuLi since the alkylation at C(4) is accompanied by the reductive elimination of the X‐sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 3). Most exciting is also the course of 2,4‐dimethoxy‐3‐(phenylsulfonyl)benzo[a]heptalenes in the presence of an excess of MeLi. After the expected exchange of MeO against Me at C(4) (Scheme 6), rearrangement takes place under formation of 4‐benzyl‐2‐methoxybenzo[a]heptalenes and concomitant loss of the sulfonyl group at C(3) (Table 4). In the case of X=morpholin‐4‐yl, rearrangement cannot occur. However, the intermediate benzyl anions of Type E (Scheme 8) react easily with O₂ of the air to build up corresponding benzo[a]heptalene‐4‐methanols (Table 6).     

Preparation and Characterization of New C2‐ and C1‐Symmetric Nitrogen,Oxygen, Phosphorous,and Sulfur Derivatives and Analogs of TADDOL. Part I

The chloro alcohols 4 – 6 derived from TADDOLs (=α,α,α′,α′‐tetraaryl‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4,5‐dimethanols) are used to prepare corresponding sulfanyl alcohols, ethers, and amines (Scheme 1 and Table 1). The dithiol analog of TADDOL and derivatives thereof, 45 – 49 , were also synthesized. The crystal structures of 16 representatives of this series of compounds are reported (Figs. 1–3 and Scheme 2). The thiols were employed in Cu‐catalyzed enantioselective conjugate additions of Grignard reagents to cyclic enones, with cycloheptenone giving the best results (er up to 94 : 6). The enantioselectivity reverses from Si‐addition with the sulfanyl alcohol to Re‐addition with the alkoxy or dimethylamino thiols (Table 4). Cu^I‐Thiolates, 50 – 53 , could be isolated in up to 84% yield (Scheme 2) and were shown to have tetranuclear structures in the gas phase (by ESI‐MS), in solution (CH₂Cl₂, THF; by vapor‐pressure osmometry and by NMR pulsed‐gradient diffusion measurements; Table 5), and in the solid state (X‐ray crystal structures in Scheme 2). The Cu complex 50 of the sulfanyl alcohol is stable in air and in the presence of weak aqueous acid, and it is a highly active catalyst (0.5 mol‐%) for the 1,4‐additions, leading to the same enantio‐ and regioselectivities observed with the in situ generated catalyst (6.5 mol‐%; Scheme 3). Since the reaction mixtures contain additional metal salts (MgX₂, LiX) it is not possible at this stage, to propose a mechanistic model for the conjugate additions.     

Introduction of Adjacent Oxygen‐Functionalities in Dimethyl Heptalenedicarboxylates

The bromination of dimethyl 8‐methoxy‐1,6,10‐trimethylheptalene‐4,5‐dicarboxylate ( 6 ; Scheme 2) with N‐bromosuccinimide (NBS) in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) leads in acceptable yields to the corresponding 9‐bromoheptalenedicarboxylate 10 (Table 1). Ether cleavage of 6 with chlorotrimethylsilane (Me₃SiCl)/NaI results in the formation of oxoheptalenedicarboxylate 13 in good yield (Scheme 4). The latter can be acetyloxylated to the (acetyloxy)oxoheptalenedicarboxylate 14 with Pb(OAc)₄ in benzene (Scheme 5). Oxo derivative 14 , in turn, can be selectively O‐methylated with dimethyl sulfate (DMS) in acetone to the (acetyloxy)methoxyheptalenedicarboxylates 15 and 15′ (Scheme 6). The AcO group of the latter can be transformed into a benzyl or methyl ether group by treatment with MeONa in DMF, followed by the addition of benzyl bromide or methyl iodide (cf. Scheme 9). Reduction of the ester groups of dimethyl 7,8‐dimethoxy‐5,6,10‐trimethylheptalene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate ( 25′ ) with diisobutylaluminium hydride (DIBAH) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) leads to the formation of the corresponding dimethanol 26′ , which can be cyclized oxidatively (IBX, dimethyl sulfoxide) to 8,9‐dimethoxy‐6,7,11‐trimethylheptaleno[1,2‐c]furan ( 27 ; Scheme 11).     

Synthesis of Bis‐Heterocyclic 1H‐Imidazole 3‐Oxides from 3‐Oxido‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carbohydrazides

The reaction of 1H‐imidazole‐4‐carbohydrazides 1 , which are conveniently accessible by treatment of the corresponding esters with NH₂NH₂?H₂O, with isothiocyanates in refluxing EtOH led to thiosemicarbazides (=hydrazinecarbothioamides) 4 in high yields (Scheme 2). Whereas 4 in boiling aqueous NaOH yielded 2,4‐dihydro‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thiones 5 , the reaction in concentrated H₂SO₄ at room temperature gave 1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amines 6 . Similarly, the reaction of 1 with butyl isocyanate led to semicarbazides 7 , which, under basic conditions, undergo cyclization to give 2,4‐dihydro‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐ones 8 (Scheme 3). Treatment of 1 with Ac₂O yielded the diacylhydrazine derivatives 9 exclusively, and the alternative isomerization of 1 to imidazol‐2‐ones was not observed (Scheme 4). It is important to note that, in all these transformations, the imidazole N‐oxide residue is retained. Furthermore, it was shown that imidazole N‐oxides bearing a 1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thione or 1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine moiety undergo the S‐transfer reaction to give bis‐heterocyclic 1H‐imidazole‐2‐thiones 11 by treatment with 2,2,4,4‐tetramethylcyclobutane‐1,3‐dithione (Scheme 5).     

Synthesis of New Bis‐imidazole Derivatives

The reaction of aldimines with α‐(hydroxyimino) ketones of type 10 (1,2‐diketone monooximes) was used to prepare 2‐unsubstituted imidazole 3‐oxides 11 bearing an alkanol chain at N(1) (Scheme 2, Table 1). These products were transformed into the corresponding 2H‐imidazol‐2‐ones 13 and 2H‐imidazole‐2‐thiones 14 by treatment with Ac₂O and 2,2,4,4‐tetramethylcyclobutane‐1,3‐dithione, respectively (Scheme 3). The three‐component reaction of 10 , formaldehyde, and an alkane‐1,ω‐diamine 15 gave the bis[1H‐imidazole 3‐oxides] 16 (Scheme 4, Table 2). With Ac₂O, 2,2,4,4‐tetramethylcyclobutane‐1,3‐dithione or Raney‐Ni, the latter reacted to give the corresponding bis[2H‐imidazol‐2‐ones] 19 and 20 , bis[2H‐imidazol‐2‐thione] 21 , and bis[imidazole] 22 , respectively (Schemes 5 and 6). The structures of 11a and 16b were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

The Stereoselective Synthesis of 2‐Aryl‐2‐hydroxybutanoic Acid via Menthyl Chiral Auxiliaries

In the presence of titanium(IV) tetraethoxide ((EtO)₄Ti), menthyl arylglyoxylates are prepared by transesterification of ethyl arylglyoxylates and natural (−)‐(1R,2S,5R)‐menthol. Using menthyl as a chiral auxiliary, the corresponding novel (R)‐menthyl 2‐aryl‐2‐hydroxybutanoates are synthesized by the addition of Et₂Zn with menthyl arylglyoxylates. The structures of the products are characterized by IR and ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. The diastereoselectivities are analyzed by HPLC. The addition reactions are completed with good yields and high diastereoisomeric excess (de up to 95%), and, after hydrolysis, the (R)‐2‐aryl‐2‐hydroxybutanoic acids are obtained with high optical purities.     

Reactions of Imidoyl Isoselenocyanates with Aromatic 2‐Amino N‐Heterocycles and 1‐Methyl‐1H‐imidazole

The reaction of N‐phenylimidoyl isoselenocyanates 1 with 2‐amino‐1,3‐thiazoles 10 in acetone proceeded smoothly at room temperature to give 4H‐1,3‐thiazolo[3,2‐a] [1,3,5]triazine‐4‐selones 13 in fair yields (Scheme 2). Under the same conditions, 1 and 2‐amino‐3‐methylpyridine ( 11 ) underwent an addition reaction, followed by a spontaneous oxidation, to yield the 3H‐4λ⁴‐[1,2,4]selenadiazolo[1′,5′:1,5] [1,2,4]selenadiazolo[2,3‐a]pyridine 14 (Scheme 3). The structure of 14 was established by X‐ray crystallography (Fig. 1). Finally, the reaction of 1‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole ( 12 ) and 1 led to 3‐methyl‐1‐(N‐phenylbenzimidoyl)‐1H‐imidazolium selenocyanates 15 (Scheme 4). In all three cases, an initially formed selenourea derivative is proposed as an intermediate.     

Preparation and Structures of 2‐Substituted 5‐Benzyl‐3‐methylimidazolidin‐4‐one‐Derived Iminium Salts,Reactive Intermediates in Organocatalytic Transformations Involving α,β‐Unsaturated Aldehydes

Preparations of the title compounds, 5 – 7 (Scheme 1 and Table 1), of their ammonium salts, 9 – 11 (Scheme 2 and Table 2), and of the corresponding cinnamaldehyde‐derived iminium salts 12 – 14 (Scheme 3 and Table 3) are reported. The X‐ray crystal structures of 15 cinnamyliminium PF₆ salts have been determined (Table 4). Selected ¹H‐NMR data (Table 5) of the ammonium and iminium salts are discussed, and structures in solution are compared with those in the solid state.     

Synthesis of Poly‐Aib Oligopeptides and Aib‐Containing Peptides via the ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Method’, and Their Crystal Structures

The protected poly‐Aib oligopeptides Z‐(Aib)_n‐N(Me)Ph with n=2–6 were prepared according to the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’, i.e., by coupling amino or peptide acids with 2,2,N‐trimethyl‐N‐phenyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐amine ( 1a ) as an Aib synthon (Scheme 2). Following the same concept, the segments Z‐(Aib)₃‐OH ( 9 ) and H‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 20 ) were synthesized, and their subsequent coupling with N,N′‐dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)/ZnCl₂ led to the protected heptapeptide Z‐(Aib)₃‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 21 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of the poly‐Aib oligopeptide amides were established by X‐ray crystallography confirming the 3₁₀‐helical conformation of Aib peptides.     

Synthesis of 1,3‐Selenazol‐2(3H)‐imines

The reaction of N,N′‐diarylselenoureas 16 with phenacyl bromide in EtOH under reflux, followed by treatment with NH₃, gave N,3‐diaryl‐4‐phenyl‐1,3‐selenazol‐2(3H)‐imines 13 in high yields (Scheme 2). A reaction mechanism via formation of the corresponding Se‐(benzoylmethyl)isoselenoureas 18 and subsequent cyclocondensation is proposed (Scheme 3). The N,N′‐diarylselenoureas 16 were conveniently prepared by the reaction of aryl isoselenocyanates 15 with 4‐substituted anilines. The structures of 13a and 13c were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Practical Stereo‐ and Regioselective,Copper(I)‐Promoted Strecker Synthesis of Sugar‐Modified α,β‐Unsaturated Imines

The regio‐ and stereoselective, Lewis acid catalyzed Strecker reaction between Me₃SiCN and different aldimines incorporating a 2,3,4,6‐tetrakis‐O‐pivaloyl‐D ‐glucopyranosyl (Piv₄Glc) chiral auxiliary has been worked out. Depending on the conditions used, high yields (up to 95%) and good diastereoselectivities (de > 86%) were achieved under mild conditions (Table 1), especially with CuBr ? Me₂S as catalyst. Our protocol allows the ready preparation of asymmetric β,γ‐unsaturated α‐amino acids such as (R)‐2‐amino‐4‐phenylbut‐3‐enoic acid ( 13 ; Scheme 2) and congeners thereof.     

Synthesis and Structure of O,O‐Diethyl N‐[(trans‐4‐Aryl‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐oxido‐2λ5‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphorinan‐2‐yl)methyl]phosphoramidothioates

A study on the synthesis of the novel N‐(cyclic phosphonate)‐substituted phosphoramidothioates, i.e., O,O‐diethyl N‐[(trans‐4‐aryl‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐oxido‐2λ⁵‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphorinan‐2‐yl)methyl]phosphoramidothioates 4a – l , from O,O‐diethyl phosphoramidothioate ( 1 ), a benzaldehyde or ketone 2 , and a 1,3,2‐dioxaphosphorinane 2‐oxide 3 was carried out (Scheme 1 and Table 1). Some of their stereoisomers were isolated, and their structure was established. The presence of acetyl chloride was essential for this reaction and accelerated the process of intramolecular dehydration of intermediate 5 forming the corresponding Schiff base 7 (Scheme 2).     

Chiral Lithiated Phosphoric Triamides: Structure,Reactivity, and Salt Effects

The theoretical structure of a cyclic phosphoric triamide 3 and of its monolithiated isomers 4 – 6 was calculated by ab initio methods (Fig. 1, Tables 1 and 2). The global minimum in 4 consists of a five-membered Li−C−N−P−O chelate. The intermediates 5 and 6 are, relative to 4 , energetically unfavorable by 15 and 18 kcal mol⁻¹, respectively, due to distortion in order to accommodate the N-complexation of the Li⁺ ions. NMR Investigations (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, and ⁷Li) of the lithiated bicyclic phosphoric triamide 1 were performed (Tables 3 – 5). The lithium aminomethanide 2 is characterized by a sp³-hybridized anion supporting Li−C contacts. The anions exist in a monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution (Scheme 2). Trapping reactions of rac- 2 with carbonyl compounds generated the corresponding amino-alcohol derivatives with high diastereoselectivities (Scheme 3, Table 6). A rational for the stereochemical outcome is given (Fig. 4). In the presence of LiBr, a P−N bond cleavage occurred on reaction of rac- 2 with aldehydes, which allowed the synthesis of (1-hydroxylalkyl)phosphonic diamides (Scheme 5, Table 7).     

Model Construction for the A–B–C Ring System of Lysergic Acid via Vilsmeier–Haack‐Type Cyclization of 1H‐Indole‐4‐propanoic Acid Derivatives

Vilsmeier–Haack‐type cyclization of 1H‐indole‐4‐propanoic acid derivatives was examined as model construction for the A–B–C ring system of lysergic acid ( 1 ). Smooth cyclization from the 4 position of 1H‐indole to the 3 position was achieved by Vilsmeier–Haack reaction in the presence of K₂CO₃ in MeCN, and the best substrate was found to be the N,N‐dimethylcarboxamide 9 (Table 1). The modified method can be successfully applied to an α‐amino acid derivative protected with an N‐acetyl function, i.e., to 27 (Table 2); however, loss of optical purity was observed in the cyclization when a chiral substrate (S)‐ 27 was used (Scheme 5). On the other hand, the intramolecular Pummerer reaction of the corresponding sulfoxide 20 afforded an S‐containing tricyclic system 22 , which was formed by a cyclization to the 5 position (Scheme 3).     

Indium(III) Chloride‐Catalyzed Conversion of {[(Benzyloxy)carbonyl]amino}‐Substituted Sulfones with 2‐[(Trimethylsilyl)oxy]furan: A Facile Access to γ‐Butenolactone Derivatives Containing a Protected Amino Group

Treatment of {[(benzyloxy)carbonyl]amino}‐substituted sulfones 1 with 2‐[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]furan ( 2 ) in the presence of InCl₃ as a catalyst at room temperature produced the γ‐butenolactone derivatives 3 and 4 containing a protected amino group (Scheme 1). The products were formed in high yields (81–92%) within 3–10 h favoring the anti‐isomer 3 .     

Ring Enlargement and Sulfur‐Transfer Processes in SiO2‐Catalyzed Reactions of Thiocarbonyl Compounds with Optically Active Oxiranes

The reactions of 1,3‐dioxolane‐2‐thione ( 3 ) with (S)‐2‐methyloxirane ((S)‐ 1 ) and with (R)‐2‐phenyloxirane ((R)‐ 2 ) in the presence of SiO₂ in anhydrous dichloroalkanes led to the optically active spirocyclic 1,3‐oxathiolanes 8 with Me at C(7) and 9 with Ph at C(8), respectively (Schemes 2 and 3). The analogous reaction of 1,3‐dimethylimidazolidine‐2‐thione ( 4a ) with (R)‐ 2 yielded stereoselectively (S)‐2‐phenylthiirane ((S)‐ 10 ) in 83% yield and 97% ee together with 1,3‐dimethylimidazolidin‐2‐one ( 11a ). In the cases of 3‐phenyloxazolidine‐2‐thione ( 4b ) and 3‐phenylthiazolidine‐2‐thione ( 4c ), the reaction with (RS)‐ 2 yielded the racemic thiirane (RS)‐ 10 , and the corresponding carbonyl compounds 11b and 11c (Scheme 4 and Table 1). The analogous reaction of 4a with 1,2‐epoxycyclohexane (= 7‐oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane; 7 ) afforded thiirane 12 and the corresponding carbonyl compound 11a (Scheme 5). On the other hand, the BF₃‐catalyzed reaction of imidazolidine‐2‐thione ( 5 ) with (RS)‐ 2 yielded the imidazolidine‐2‐thione derivative 13 almost quantitatively (Scheme 6). In a refluxing xylene solution, 1,3‐diacetylimidazolidine‐2‐thione ( 6 ) and (RS)‐ 2 reacted to give two imidazolidine‐2‐thione derivatives, 13 and 14 (Scheme 7). The structures of 13 and 14 were established by X‐ray crystallography (Fig.).     

Stereoselective Synthesis of [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐Hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐D‐valine]]‐ and [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐Hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐L‐valine]cyclosporin A

Addition of various amines to the 3,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)acrylamides 10a and 10b gave the tripeptides 11a – 11f , mostly as mixtures of epimers (Scheme 3). The crystalline tripeptide 11f ₂ was found to be the N‐terminal (2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐substituted (R,S,S)‐ester HOCH₂CH₂O‐D ‐Val(F₆)‐MeLeu‐Ala‐O^tBu by X‐ray crystallography. The C‐terminal‐protected tripeptide 11f ₂ was condensed with the N‐terminus octapeptide 2b to the depsipeptide 12a which was thermally rearranged to the undecapeptide 13a (Scheme 4). The condensation of the epimeric tripeptide 11f ₁ with the octapeptide 2b gave the undecapeptide 13b directly. The undecapeptides 13a and 13b were fully deprotected and cyclized to the [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐D ‐valine]]‐ and [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐L ‐valine]]cyclosporins 14a and 14b , respectively (Scheme 5). Rate differences observed for the thermal rearrangements of 12a to 13a and of 12b to 13b are discussed.     

A Useful Modification of the Evans Auxiliary: 4-Isopropyl-5,5-diphenyloxazolidin-2-one

The 4-isopropyl-5,5-diphenyloxazolidinone ( 1 ) is readily prepared from (R)- or (S)-valine ester, PhMgBr, and ethyl chlorocarbonate. It has a melting point of ca. 250°, a low solubility in most organic solvents, and a C=O group which is sterically protected from nucleophilic attack. Thus, the soluble N-acyl-oxazolidinones ( 7 – 16 ) can be prepared from 1 with BuLi at temperatures around 0° instead of −78° (Scheme 3), their Li enolates can be generated with BuLi, rather than with LDA, and deacylation in the final step of the procedure can be achieved with NaOH at ambient temperatures (Scheme 12), with facile recovery of the precipitating auxiliary 1 (filtering, washing, and drying). The following reactions of N-acyl-oxazolidinones from 1 have been investigated: alkylations (Scheme 4), aminomethylations and hydroxymethylations (Scheme 5), aldol additions (Schemes 6 and 7), Michael additions (Schemes 9 and 10), and a (4+2) cycloaddition (Scheme 11). The well-known features of reactions following the Evans methodology (yield, diastereoselectivity, dependence on conditions, counter ions, additives etc.) prevail in these transformations. Most products, however, have higher melting points and a much more pronounced crystallization tendency than those derived from conventional oxazolidinones, and can thus be purified by recrystallization, avoiding chromatography (Table 1). The disadvantage of 1 having a higher molecular weight (ca. 150 Da) than the non-phenyl-substituted auxiliary is more than compensated by the ease of its application, especially on large scale. A number of crystal structures of oxazolidinones derived from 1 and a TiCl₄ complex of an oxazolidinone are described and discussed in view of the diastereoselective-reaction mechanisms.     

Nucleosides and Oligonucleotides with Diynyl Side Chains: Base Pairing and Functionalization of 2′‐Deoxyuridine Derivatives by the Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Alkyne?Azide ‘Click’ Cycloaddition

Oligonucleotides containing the 5‐substituted 2′‐deoxyuridines 1b or 1d bearing side chains with terminal C?C bonds are described, and their duplex stability is compared with oligonucleotides containing the 5‐alkynyl compounds 1a or 1c with only one nonterminal C?C bond in the side chain. For this, 5‐iodo‐2′‐deoxyuridine ( 3 ) and diynes or alkynes were employed as starting materials in the Sonogashira cross‐coupling reaction (Scheme 1). Phosphoramidites 2b – d were prepared (Scheme 3) and used as building blocks in solid‐phase synthesis. T_m Measurements demonstrated that DNA duplexes containing the octa‐1,7‐diynyl side chain or a diprop‐2‐ynyl ether residue, i.e., containing 1b or 1d , are more stable than those containing only one triple bond, i.e., 1a or 1c (Table 3). The diyne‐modified nucleosides were employed in further functionalization reactions by using the protocol of the Cu^I‐catalyzed Huisgen–Meldal–Sharpless [2+3] cycloaddition (‘click chemistry’) (Scheme 2). An aliphatic azide, i. e., 3′‐azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine (AZT; 4 ), as well as the aromatic azido compound 5 were linked to the terminal alkyne group resulting in 1H‐1,2,3‐triazole‐modified derivatives 6 and 7 , respectively (Scheme 2), of which 6 forms a stable duplex DNA (Table 3). The Husigen–Meldal–Sharpless cycloaddition was also performed with oligonucleotides (Schemes 4 and 5).     

Synthesis and Reactivity of π‐Electron‐Deficient (Arylsulfonyl)acetates

Different π‐electron‐deficient (arylsulfonyl)acetates 9 were synthesized (Scheme 1, Table 1), and their behavior as soft nucleophiles in the dialkylation reaction under phase‐transfer catalysis conditions was studied (Schemes 2 and 3, Tables 2 and 3). The [3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]sulfonyl group was shown to be the best substituent for the stereoselective synthesis of (E)‐aconitates 18 via an alkylation hydro‐sulfonyl‐elimination integrated process under very mild phase‐transfer‐catalysis conditions (Scheme 5, Table 4). Sulfonylacetates 9h , i also underwent smooth Diels‐Alder reactions with acyclic and cyclic dienes via in situ formation of the appropriate dienophile through a Knoevenagel condensation with paraformaldehyde (Scheme 6). Reductive desulfonylation with Zn and NH₄Cl in THF was shown to be an efficient method for removal of the synthetically useful sulfonyl moiety (Scheme 7).