Tuning the localization of finely dispersed cellulose nanocrystal in poly (lactic acid)/bio‐polyamide11 blends

A versatile approach to control the localization of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) in PLA/PA11 blends is presented. A PEO/CNC mixture with a high level of CNC dispersion is prepared through a combination of high pressure homogenization and freeze‐drying. The prepared PEO/CNC mixture is then incorporated into the PLA/PA11 blends using two different strategies. Typically for CNC/PLA/PA11, the CNCs selectively localize in PA11. However, PEO‐coated CNC particles segregate into PLA irrespective of whether the PEO/CNC mixture is premixed with PLA or PA11. It is suggested that a strong interaction between PEO and CNC particles combined with the PLA/PEO miscibility facilitates the localization of PEO‐coated CNC in the PLA. The localization of PEO‐coated CNC in the PLA has no effect on the morphology of the PLA‐5PEO/PA11 with matrix/dispersed phase form. However, 2 wt % PEO‐coated CNC in the co‐continuous (PLA‐5PEO)/PA11 50/50 vol % blend diminishes the phase thickness from 11 ± 1 to 4 ± 1.5 μm. This is attributed to a retarded relaxation of the PLA phase. This work outlines a strategy to control the CNC localization into a given polymeric phase in a binary polymer–polymer mixture. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2018 , 56, 576–587     

Phase behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) and sulfonated polystyrene blends with and without solvent

The phase behavior of poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene-co-sodium sulfonated styrene) (SPS) blends has been examined as a function of copolymer composition. The mixtures show complex coacervation in dilute benzene/methanol (9/1, v/v) solution. The presence of intermolecular interactions between PEO and SPS in solution is verified by viscometry. Interaction between PEO and SPS in the solid state was supported by small-angle x-ray scattering; however, binary blends containing low PEO content show high miscibility, whereas the blends with high PEO content show phase separation.     

Interactions between cellulose nanocrystals and anionic and neutral polymers in aqueous solutions

Physical structures of aqueous cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) suspensions in anionic polyelectrolyte carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and non-ionic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were investigated by studying their cross polarized, polarized optical microscope (POM) images and dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, ¹H spin–lattice relaxation nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data. The presence of anionic CMC and nonionic PEO in CNC suspensions led to two different kind of interactions. Semi-dilute CNC suspensions showed first gel-like behavior then phase separation by adding only semi-dilute un-entangled CMC polymer solutions, whereas the addition of PEO didn’t cause any significant change. POM images showed the phase transitions of CNC suspensions in the presence of CMC solutions from the isotropic state to nematic and chiral nematic phases. Dynamic light scattering, zeta potential and ¹H spin–lattice relaxation NMR data presented further arguments to explain polymer-CNC interactions in CMC and PEO solutions. ¹H NMR solvent relaxation technique determined the adsorption and depletion interactions between polymers and CNC. The minima in spin–spin specific relaxation rate constant showed the depletion of CNC nanoparticles in CMC. It is believed that the depletion flocculation was the case for the effects of CMC polymer chains in CNC suspensions. PEO was adsorbed on CNC surfaces and caused only weak depletion interactions due to the presence of soft particles.     

Solution processing of polymer semiconductor: Insulator blends—Tailored optical properties through liquid–liquid phase separation control

It has been demonstrated that the 0‐0 absorption transition of poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) in blends with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) could be rationally tuned through the control of the liquid–liquid phase separation process during solution deposition. Pronounced J‐like aggregation behavior, characteristic for systems of a low exciton band width, was found for blends where the most pronounced liquid–liquid phase separation occurred in solution, leading to domains of P3HT and PEO of high phase purity. Since liquid–liquid phase separation could be readily manipulated either by the solution temperature, solute concentration, or deposition temperature, to name a few parameters, our findings promise the design from the out‐set of semiconductor:insulator architectures of pre‐defined properties by manipulation of the interaction parameter between the solutes as well as the respective solute:solvent system using classical polymer science principles. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2015 , 53, 304–310     

Chitin–cellulose blends: phase properties in dimethylacetamide–LiCl

Chitin–cellulose blends dissolved in dimethylacetamide containing LiCl (7% w/w) have been studied in a wide concentration range, from very dilute solutions to medium concentrations and up to solid films (absence of diluent). The intrinsic viscosities at various chitin–cellulose ratios, as well as the phase diagram behavior, imply a good compatibility between the components. The result is confirmed by the infrared measurements on solid films. The lack of anisotropic phase formation in chitin–diluent binary solutions and the anomalous trend of v′_CH–CE line on the phase diagram are both interpreted on the basis of aggregation phenomena.     

Enhanced ionic conductivity in PEO/PMMA glassy miscible blends: Role of nano‐confinement of minority component chains

AC impedance spectroscopy was used to investigate the ionic conductivity of solution cast poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends doped with lithium perchlorate. At low PEO contents (below overlap weight fraction w^*), ionic conductivities are almost low. This could be due to nearly distant PEO chains in blend, which means ion transportation cannot be performed adequately. However, at weight fractions well above w^*, a significant increase in ionic conductivity was observed. This enhanced ionic conductivity mimics the PEO segmental relaxation in rigid PMMA matrix, which can be attributed to the accelerated motions of confined PEO chains in PMMA matrix. At PEO content higher than 20 wt % the conductivity measured at room temperature drops due to crystallization of PEO. However by increasing temperature to temperatures well above the melting point of PEO, a sudden increase of conductivity was observed which was attributed to phase transition from crystalline to amorphous state. The results indicate that some PEO/PMMA blends with well enough PEO content, which are structurally solid, can be considered as an interesting candidate for usage as solid‐state electrolytes in Lithium batteries. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 2065–2071, 2010     

Nanostructured thermoset epoxy resin templated by an amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐poly(dimethylsiloxane) diblock copolymer

An amphiphilic poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PEO–PDMS) diblock copolymer was used to template a bisphenol A type epoxy resin (ER); nanostructured thermoset blends of ER and PEO–PDMS were prepared with 4,4′‐methylenedianiline (MDA) as the curing agent. The phase behavior, crystallization, hydrogen‐bonding interactions, and nanoscale structures were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering. The uncured ER was miscible with the poly(ethylene oxide) block of PEO–PDMS, and the uncured blends were not macroscopically phase‐separated. Macroscopic phase separation took place in the MDA‐cured ER/PEO–PDMS blends containing 60–80 wt % PEO–PDMS diblock copolymer. However, the composition‐dependent nanostructures were formed in the cured blends with 10–50 wt % PEO–PDMS, which did not show macroscopic phase separation. The poly(dimethylsiloxane) microdomains with sizes of 10–20 nm were dispersed in a continuous ER‐rich phase; the average distance between the neighboring microdomains was in the range of 20–50 nm. The miscibility between the cured ER and the poly(ethylene oxide) block of PEO–PDMS was ascribed to the favorable hydrogen‐bonding interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 3042–3052, 2006     

Diphenol miscibility effect on the immiscible polyester/polyether binary blends through intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction

Miscibility and hydrogen bonding interaction have been investigated for the binary blends of poly(butylene adipate‐co‐44 mol % butylene terephthalate)[P(BA‐co‐BT)] with 4,4'‐thiodiphenol (TDP) and poly(ethylene‐ oxide)(PEO) with TDP; and the ternary blends of P(BA‐co‐BT)/PEO/TDP by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The DSC results indicated that the binary blends of P(BA‐co‐BT)/TDP and PEO/TDP were miscible because each blend showed only one composition‐dependent glass‐transition over the entire range of the blend composition. The formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of TDP and the carbonyl groups of P(BA‐co‐BT), and between the hydroxyl groups of TDP and the ether groups of PEO was confirmed by the FTIR spectra. According to the glass‐transition temperature measured by DSC, P(BA‐co‐BT) and PEO, their binary blends were immiscible over the entire range of blend composition, however, the miscibility between P(BA‐co‐BT) and PEO was enhanced through the TDP‐mediated intermolecular hydrogen bonding interaction. It was concluded that TDP content of about 5–10% may possibily enhance miscibility between P(BA‐co‐BT) and PEO via a hydrogen bonding interaction. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2971–2982, 2004     

Effect of aging on fractional crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) component in poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

The effect of aging on the fractional crystallization of the poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) component in the PEO/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blend has been investigated. The partial miscibility of the PEO/PHB blends with high PEO molecular weight (M_v = 2.0 × 10⁵ g/mol) was confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The fractional crystallization behavior of the PEO component in the PEO/PHB blends with low PEO content (not more than 30 wt% of PEO), before and after aging under vacuum at 25 °C for 6 months, were compared by DSC, fourier transform infrared microscopic spectroscopy, small angle X‐ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. It was confirmed that nearly all the PEO components remain trapped within interlamellar regions of PHB for the PEO/PHB blends before aging. Under this condition, the crystallization of PEO is basically induced by much less active heterogeneities or homogeneous nucleation at high supercoolings. While, after the same PEO/PHB samples were stored at 25 °C in vacuum for 6 months, a part of the PEO component was expelled from the interlamellar region of PHB. Under this condition, the expelled PEO forms many separate domains with bigger size and crystallizes at low supercoolings by active heterogeneous nucleation, whereas the crystallization of PEO in the interlamellar region is still mainly induced by less active heterogeneities or homogeneous nucleation at extreme supercoolings. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 2665–2676, 2005     

Phase behavior and crystallization of a poly(ethylene oxide)/cellulose acetate butyrate blend

The phase behavior of a partially miscible blend of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) and the crystalline microstructure of PEO in the blend were studied with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy, and synchrotron small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) methods. PEO/CAB showed a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of 168 °C at the critical composition of PEO of 60 wt %. All blend compositions showed a single glass‐transition temperature (T_g) when they were prepared at temperatures lower than the LCST. However, with increasing CAB content, T_g of the blend changed abruptly at 70 wt % CAB; that is, a cusp existed. Below 70 wt % CAB, the change in T_g with blend composition was predicted by the Brau–Kovacs equation, whereas this change was predicted by the Fox equation at higher CAB contents. A gradual but small depression of the melting point of PEO in the blend with an increasing amount of CAB suggested that the PEO/CAB blends exhibited a weak intermolecular interaction. From DSC and SAXS experiments, it was found that amorphous CAB was incorporated into the interlamellar region of PEO for blends with less than 20 wt % CAB, whereas it was segregated to exist in the interfibrillar region in PEO for other blends with larger amounts of CAB. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 1673–1681, 2002     

PSt-b-PEO增容PA6/PS共混体系的研究

采用动态力学方法（ＤＭＡ），形态学方法（ＳＥＭ），研究了ＰＳｔ ｂ ＰＥＯ存在下尼龙６（ＰＡ６）／聚苯乙烯（ＰＳ）共混体系的相容性．研究表明，ＰＡ６和ＰＳ的简单共混体系，分散相相畴尺寸大，相界面清晰，断裂面光滑，呈脆性断裂，相容性极差，属不相容体系．而加入少量ＰＳｔ ｂ ＰＥＯ后分散相尺寸变小，界面层变厚，界面粘结力增强，表现出韧性特征．     

STUDIES OF THE CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR IN THE CRYSTALLINE/AMORPHOUS POLYMER BLENDS: POLY(ETHYLENE OXIDE)/POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) AND POLY(ETHYLENE OXIDE)/POLY(VINYL ACETATE)

The crystallization process of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)and PEO/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends has been characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared(FTIR) spectra in conjunction with Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) measurements. Thecrystallinity of PEO varies consistently with PEO content in PEO/PVAc blends and the PEO/PMMAblends containing 50 wt% or less PMMA. For the PEO/PMMA blends containing 60 wt% ormore PMMA, the crystallinity of PEO decreases more than PEO content but develops with crystal-lization time. These results can be explained in terms of difference between the crystallization tem-perature (T_c) and glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends as a function of content of amorphouscomponent.     

Computer simulation studies of the miscibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based blends

By means of the molecular dynamics simulation method, the miscibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/polyethylene (PHB/PE) blend has been investigated. Two glass transition temperatures of the PHB/PE are found by scrutinizing its volume-temperature curve, and this result is qualitatively in agreement with the experimental results. To further analyze the miscibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based blends, the Flory-Huggins parameters of PHB/PE, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PHB/PEO), poly(ethylene oxide)/polyethylene (PEO/PE) have been calculated via a Monte Carlo scheme, and the morphology of the PHB/PEO and the PHB/PE blend has been simulated using dissipative particle dynamics method. The time evolution of dividing interface for PHB/PEO/PE blend shows a dynamic phase separation process. All these results indicate that PHB and PEO tend to mix together, whereas PE aggregates to form PE-rich domains in the PHB/PE and PHB/PEO/PE blends.     

Compatibility of poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(vinyl acetate) blends

The compatibility of poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(vinyl acetate) (PEO-PVA) blends was examined at five compositions covering the complete range. Samples were prepared by coprecipitation and solution casting. Dynamic mechanical properties were studied at 110 Hz between ?120 and 65°C for dry, quenched, and annealed samples. The study also included tensile testing at 25°C, examination of blend morphology, and DSC measurements at elevated temperatures. Optical microscopy revealed that crystallization of PEO proceeds essentially unhindered at up to 25% poly(vinyl acetate) content by weight. Higher levels of this component drastically reduce spherulite size, and at the highest PVA compositions there was no evidence of crystallization. Thermomechanical spectra of quenched and annealed samples indicate limited mixing of the two components except for the higher (>75%) PVA compositions. Tensile properties show a mutual reinforcement at 10-25% PVA content due to possible polymer segment association. The melting-point depression of PEO is significant above 25% PVA and has been attributed to morphological changes of the PEO crystalline phase.     

Organizing thermodynamic data obtained from multicomponent polymer electrolytes: Salt‐containing polymer blends and block copolymers

The objective of this review is to organize literature data on the thermodynamic properties of salt‐containing polystyrene/poly(ethylene oxide) (PS/PEO) blends and polystyrene‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (SEO) diblock copolymers. These systems are of interest due to their potential to serve as electrolytes in all‐solid rechargeable lithium batteries. Mean‐field theories, developed for pure polymer blends and block copolymers, are used to describe phenomenon seen in salt‐containing systems. An effective Flory–Huggins interaction parameter, χ_eff , that increases linearly with salt concentration is used to describe the effect of salt addition for both blends and block copolymers. Segregation strength, χ_effN , where N is the chain length of the homopolymers or block copolymers, is used to map phase behavior of salty systems as a function of composition. Domain spacing of salt‐containing block copolymers is normalized to account for the effect of copolymer composition using an expression obtained in the weak segregation limit. The phase behavior of salty blends, salty block copolymers, and domain spacings of the latter systems, are presented as a function of chain length, composition and salt concentration on universal plots. While the proposed framework has limitations, the universal plots should serve as a starting point for organizing data from other salt‐containing polymer mixtures. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019 , 57, 1177–1187     

Phase behavior,crystallization, and nanostructures in thermoset blends of epoxy resin and amphiphilic star‐shaped block copolymers

This article reports thermoset blends of bisphenol A‐type epoxy resin (ER) and two amphiphilic four‐arm star‐shaped diblock copolymers based on hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and hydrophobic poly(propylene oxide) (PPO). 4,4′‐Methylenedianiline (MDA) was used as a curing agent. The first star‐shaped diblock copolymer with 70 wt % ethylene oxide (EO), denoted as (PPO‐PEO)₄, consists of four PPO‐PEO diblock arms with PPO blocks attached on an ethylenediamine core; the second one with 40 wt % EO, denoted as (PEO‐PPO)₄, contains four PEO‐PPO diblock arms with PEO blocks attached on an ethylenediamine core. The phase behavior, crystallization, and nanoscale structures were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, transmission electron microscopy, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering. It was found that the MDA‐cured ER/(PPO‐PEO)₄ blends are not macroscopically phase‐separated over the entire blend composition range. There exist, however, two microphases in the ER/(PPO‐PEO)₄ blends. The PPO blocks form a separated microphase, whereas the ER and the PEO blocks, which are miscible, form another microphase. The ER/(PPO‐PEO)₄ blends show composition‐dependent nanostructures on the order of 10?30 nm. The 80/20 ER/(PPO‐PEO)₄ blend displays spherical PPO micelles uniformly dispersed in a continuous ER‐rich matrix. The 60/40 ER/(PPO‐PEO)₄ blend displays a combined morphology of worm‐like micelles and spherical micelles with characteristic of a bicontinuous microphase structure. Macroscopic phase separation took place in the MDA‐cured ER/(PEO‐PPO)₄ blends. The MDA‐cured ER/(PEO‐PPO)₄ blends with (PEO‐PPO)₄ content up to 50 wt % exhibit phase‐separated structures on the order of 0.5–1 μm. This can be considered to be due to the different EO content and block sequence of the (PEO‐PPO)₄ copolymer. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 975–985, 2006     

Photochemical stability of collagen/poly(ethylene oxide) blends

The photochemical stability of the blends of collagen and poly(ethylene oxide) PEO has been studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), UV–vis spectroscopy and viscosimetry. Surface properties before and after UV irradiation were observed using an optical microscope.Collagen and PEO were immiscible in diluted solution and only small interactions between the two components in the solid state were observed. New materials based on the blending of collagen and PEO that we obtained have a different photochemical stability than those of single components. In general, collagen/PEO blends are less stable under UV irradiation than pure collagen. The influence of PEO on the photochemical stability of collagen depends on the concentration of this polymer in the blend. Microscopic photographs show that the surface characteristics of thin films of collagen/PEO blends are not drastically altered after UV irradiation.     

New super‐tough poly(butylene terephthalate) materials based on compatibilized blends with metallocenic poly(ethylene‐octene) copolymer

New super‐tough poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/poly(ethylene‐octene) copolymer (PEO) blends containing 2 wt% poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (EGMA) as a compatibilizer were obtained by extrusion and injection molding. The blends comprised of an amorphous PBT‐rich phase with some miscibilized EGMA, a pure PEO amorphous phase, and a crystalline PBT phase that was not influenced by the presence of either PEO or EGMA. The blends showed a fine particle size up to 20 wt% PEO content. Super‐tough blends were obtained with PEO contents equal to or higher than 10%. The maximum toughness was very high (above 710 J/m) and was attained with 20% PEO without chemical modification of the commercial components used. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Compatibility in poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The compatibility of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO-PMMA) blends were examined covering the complete composition range. Up to 20% of PEO content films were transparent and glass transition temperatures were determined by DSC and by refractive index vs. temperature measurements. Only one T_g was obtained for these samples and the relationship between T_g and composition has been evaluated. At higher PEO content crystallization took place and the films were opaque. Melting temperatuures of PEO in blends were determined by DSC. Melting point depression was observed for increasing proportion of PMMA and the binary interaction parameter has been calculated.     

Polymer chain diffusion in polymer blends: A theoretical interpretation based on a memory function formalism

The diffusion of polymer chains in miscible polymer blends with large dynamic asymmetry—those where the two blend components display very different segmental mobility—is not well understood yet. In the extreme case of the blend system of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA), the diffusion coefficient of PEO chains in the blend can change by more than five orders of magnitude while the segmental time scale hardly changes with respect to that of pure PEO. This behavior is not observed in blend systems with small or moderate dynamic asymmetry as, for instance, polyisoprene/poly(vinyl ethylene) blends. These two very different behaviors can be understood and quantitatively explained in a unified way in the framework of a memory function formalism, which takes into account the effect of the collective dynamics on the chain dynamics of a tagged chain. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019 , 57, 1239–1245