L-半胱氨酸衍生物配体交换手性色谱固定相

应用密闭微波萃取装置对芦荟中的有效成分芦荟甙进行了微波萃取研究,并利用透射电子显微镜对微波萃取机理进行了初步探讨,讨论了不同萃取剂、溶剂浓度、萃取时间和微波功率等对提取率的影响,在萃取剂为乙醇-水体系,溶剂（乙醇）体积分数为70％、萃取时间为4min及微波功率为340W的条件下,萃取效果最佳,与索氏提取及超声波萃取法相比,本法具有萃取速度快、提取率高及溶剂用量少等特点。     

密闭微波辅助萃取天麻中天麻素的研究

应用密闭微波萃取装置,对中药天麻中有效成分天麻素的萃取进行了研究。分别讨论了药材颗粒粒径、提取溶剂浓度、微波提取时间和提取剂的用量对微波萃取天麻素的影响。结果表明:当药材粒径<50μm,乙醇体积分数为50%,微波辐射时间为2min,提取剂质量为药材质量的30倍时,天麻素提取率最高。此外,将微波萃取与索氏萃取和超声波萃取进行了比较。     

密闭微波辅助萃取丹参中有效成分的研究

应用具有压力控制附件的MSP-100D密闭微波萃取装置,对丹参中的有效成分丹参酮、丹参酮A及隐丹参酮进行微波萃取研究.在乙醇体积分数为90%,微波辐射时间为4min,溶剂体积对样品质量比为20∶1和样品粒径为120目的条件下,有效成分提取率最佳.对比了密闭微波萃取同索氏萃取和超声萃取丹参有效成分的差异.     

密闭微波辅助萃取当归粉中的阿魏酸

利用密闭微波样品制备系统(具有压力控制部件),对当归中的有效成分阿魏酸的萃取进行研究,比较了密闭微波萃取同超声波萃取和索氏萃取阿魏酸提取率的差异.结果表明:微波萃取与其他两种萃取方法相比,具有速度快和萃取率高的特点.并得到了阿魏酸提取的最佳条件:微波功率为400 W,萃取剂为90%的乙醇(体积分数),固-液比为1∶15,微波辐射为240 s,当归粒径为75μm.     

气相色谱法测定芦荟及芦荟干粉中的多糖

提取芦荟及芦荟干粉样品中的多糖，将多糖水解为单糖之后衍生化反应，用气相色谱法进行分析，实验选择了最佳分离条件，以木糖醇为内标物，用OV-225与OS-138为色谱柱固定液，使衍生物得到了很好的分离，结果表明：未经水解的芦荟中含有少量的单糖以葡萄糖的形式存在，水解后的单糖主要为甘露糖和葡萄糖，这与用乙醇沉淀多糖后测定结果一致，即芦荟及芦荟干粉中的多糖主要为甘露聚糖和甘露葡聚糖。     

气相色谱法测定芦荟及芦荟干粉中的多糖

用气相色谱法测定了芦荟及芦荟干粉样品中的多糖。实验以木糖醇为内标物,采用以OV-225与OS-138为固定液的色谱柱,使多糖水解为单糖后的衍生物得到了分离。结果表明:未经水解的芦荟中含有少量的单糖,主要为葡萄糖;水解后的单糖主要为甘露糖和葡萄糖。这与用乙醇沉淀多糖后的测定结果(即芦荟及芦荟干粉中的多糖主要为甘露聚糖和葡甘露聚糖)是一致的。     

超声微波协同萃取/气相色谱法测定土壤中的多溴联苯醚

建立了同时测定土壤中7种多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)的超声微波协同萃取/气相色谱测定方法.考察了萃取溶剂的种类和用量、微波功率、萃取时间等因素对模拟土壤中PBDEs回收率的影响,得到了最佳萃取条件:萃取剂为50 mL正己烷-丙酮(1:1),微波辐射功率为90W,萃取时间为10 min.在最佳条件下,PB-DEs在10～40...     

翻白草中熊果酸的微波提取工艺研究

采用单因素实验与正交实验法结合,以提取剂浓度、固液比、微波功率、微波提取时间为考察因素,以熊果酸提取率作为评价指标,优化了熊果酸的微波提取工艺。最优微波提取条件为:90 % 乙醇作为提取剂、料液比1∶20 g/mL、微波功率250 W、微波提取时间120 s。     

藜蒿中黄酮类化合物的微波辅助萃取研究

应用密闭微波萃取装置，分别对藜蒿茎和藜蒿叶中黄酮类化合物进行微波萃取研究。采用正交试验方法得到微波提取藜蒿中黄酮类化合物的最佳条件。微波提取藜蒿茎的最佳条件为乙醇体积分数70％，微波功率800W，提取温度80℃和料液比1：20；微波提取藜蒿叶的最佳条件为乙醇体积分数70％，微波功率600W，照射时间12min，提取温度70℃和料液比1：20；在最佳条件下，藜蒿茎和叶中总黄酮提取率分别为6．43％和7．01％。并将微波萃取与乙醇回流提取进行了比较。     

气相色谱-质谱法测定苦参中生物碱

以乙醇为溶剂用微波辐射溶剂回流提取法提取苦参中生物碱,经蒸发除去乙醇后提取物残渣用稀盐酸溶解,所得溶液用氯仿萃取除去其中的杂质,所得水相经碱化后再次用氯仿萃取使生物碱溶入氯仿中.蒸发除去萃取液中氯仿,残留物溶于一定量的甲醇中,用作气相色谱-质谱分析.应用此方法分离并测定了苦参中7种生物碱.结果表明:常规的溶剂回流提法(即不用微波辐射)相比较,微波辐射溶剂回流提取法的提取率明显提高.     

Microwave assisted extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from atmospheric particulate samples

For several years, microwave assisted extraction (MAE) was applied to extract organic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls, etc., from soils, sediments and standard reference materials. Very few authors applied this methodology for the extraction of PAHs from atmospheric particulate matter. In the present study, MAE of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with hexane/acetone (1:1) from real atmospheric particulate samples was investigated and the effect of microwave energy and irradiation time studied. The yields of extracted compounds obtained by microwave irradiation were compared with those obtained using traditional Soxhlet extraction. MAE was evaluated using spiked real atmospheric particulate samples and two standard reference materials. Analytical determinations of PAHs were carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection. The best recoveries were achieved with a microwave energy of 400 W and an irradiation time of 20 min.     

Harmful azo colorants in leather. Determination based on their cleavage and extraction of corresponding carcinogenic aromatic amines using modern extraction techniques

This study concerns the possibilities of using microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) or supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for detection of harmful azo colorants in leather. After degreasing of the leather sample with SFE there follows a reductive cleavage of the azo colorants to their corresponding aromatic amines in the MAE or SFE equipment. The aromatic amines are subsequently extracted using either MAE or SFE and then finally determined by liquid chromatography with diode-array detection. The results have been compared with recoveries obtained using the German DIN method 53316. This standard method, based on conventional solvent extraction, is used in several European countries. Overall much better recoveries were obtained using MAE or SFE. With both MAE and SFE the amine recoveries of spiked leather samples were generally above 50%. The average recoveries were 62% for MAE and 60% for SFE (solvent collection) compared to 24% with the DIN method. For genuine leather samples the recoveries decreased, especially for benzidine. In this case the average values for MAE, SFE and DIN were 54, 38 and 19%, respectively. The quantification limits in leather samples using MAE or SFE were below 1 mg/kg for all amines investigated. The within-laboratory precision was generally better than 10%, varying somewhat with the analyte considered. With the proposed methodology, the amount of hazardous organic solvents used could be decreased and the sample throughput increased with at least a factor of two with less manual handling compared to the DIN method.     

Microwave-assisted extraction of coumarin and related compounds from Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas as an alternative to Soxhlet and ultrasound-assisted extraction

Soxhlet extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction (USAE) and microwaves-assisted extraction (MAE) in closed system have been investigated to determine the content of coumarin, o-coumaric and melilotic acids in flowering tops of Melilotus officinalis. The extracts were analyzed with an appropriate HPLC procedure. The reproducibility of extraction and of chromatographic analysis was proved. Taking into account the extraction yield, the cost and the time, we studied the effects of extraction variables on the yield of the above-mentioned compounds. Better results were obtained with MAE (50% v/v aqueous ethanol, two heating cycles of 5 min, 50 degrees C). On the basis of the ratio extraction yield/extraction time, we therefore propose MAE as the most efficient method.     

Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of hydrocarbons in marine sediments: comparison with the Soxhlet extraction method

Microwave energy was applied to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and linear aliphatic hydrocarbons (LAHs) from marine sediments. The influence of experimental conditions, such as different extracting solvents and mixtures, microwave power, irradiation time and number of samples extracted per run has been tested using real marine sediment samples; volume of the solvent, sample quantity and matrix effects were also evaluated. The yield of extracted compounds obtained by microwave irradiation was compared with that obtained using the traditional Soxhlet extraction. The best results were achieved with a mixture of acetone and hexane (1:1), and recoveries ranged from 92 to 106%. The extraction time is dependent on the irradiation power and the number of samples extracted per run, so when the irradiation power was set to 500 W, the extraction times varied from 6 min for 1 sample to 18 min for 8 samples. Analytical determinations were carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an ultraviolet-visible photodiode-array detector for PAHs and gas chromatography (GC) using a FID detector for LAHs. To test the accuracy of the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique, optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material (SRM 1941), obtaining acceptable results.     

微波辅助萃取与超声波萃取丹参中丹酚酸B的比较研究

本文对微波辅助萃取和超声波萃取丹参中丹酚酸B进行了比较研究,并用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定了丹参中丹酚酸B.考察了微波辅助萃取和超声波萃取参数的影响,在各自最佳萃取条件下进行了丹参中的丹酚酸B提取率的比对,结果表明:微波辅助萃取6 min的提取率高于超声波萃取30 min的提取率.微波辅助萃取法与超声波萃取法相比具有省时、高效和溶剂用量少的特点.利用指纹图谱比较了两种萃取方式提取的化学成分的差异,结果显示两种萃取方法提取的主要成分组成基本相同,其共有成分比例相近.     

Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of hydrocarbons in marine sediments: comparison with the Soxhlet extraction method

Microwave energy was applied to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and linear aliphatic hydrocarbons (LAHs) from marine sediments. The influence of experimental conditions, such as different extracting solvents and mixtures, microwave power, irradiation time and number of samples extracted per run has been tested using real marine sediment samples; volume of the solvent, sample quantity and matrix effects were also evaluated. The yield of extracted compounds obtained by microwave irradiation was compared with that obtained using the traditional Soxhlet extraction. The best results were achieved with a mixture of acetone and hexane ¶(1?:?1), and recoveries ranged from 92 to 106%. The extraction time is dependent on the irradiation power and the number of samples extracted per run, so when the irradiation power was set to 500 W, the extraction times varied from 6 min for 1 sample to 18 min for 8 samples. Analytical determinations were carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an ultraviolet-visible photodiode-array detector for PAHs and gas chromatography (GC) using a FID detector for LAHs. To test the accuracy of the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique, optimized methodology was applied to the analysis of standard reference material (SRM 1941), obtaining acceptable results.     

Microwave‐assisted extraction with water for fast extraction and simultaneous RP‐HPLC determination of phenolic acids in Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae

An optimized microwave‐assisted extraction method using water (MAE‐W) as the extractant and an efficient HPLC analysis method were first developed for the fast extraction and simultaneous determination of D (+)‐(3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl) lactic acid (Dla), salvianolic acid B (SaB), and lithospermic acid (La) in Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae. The key parameters of MAE‐W were optimized. It was found that the degradation of SaB was inhibited when using the optimized MAE‐W and the stable content of Dla, La, and SaB in danshen was obtained. Furthermore, compared to the conventional extraction methods, the proposed MAE‐W is a more rapid method with higher yield and lower solvent consumption with a reproducibility (RSD <6%). In addition, using water as extractant is safe and helpful for environment protection, which could be referred to as green extraction. The separation and quantitative determination of the three compounds was carried out by a developed reverse‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatographic (RP‐HPLC) method with UV detection. Highly efficient separation was obtained using gradient solvent system. The optimized HPLC analysis method was validated to have specificity, linearity, precision, and accuracy. The results indicated that MAE‐W followed by HPLC–UV determination is an appropriate alternative to previously proposed method for quality control of Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae.     

Determination of parabens and endocrine-disrupting alkylphenols in soil by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry following matrix solid-phase dispersion or in-column microwave-assisted extraction: a comparative study

Two rapid methods were evaluated for the simultaneous extraction of seven parabens and two alkylphenols from soil based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). Soil extracts were derivatized with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and analyzed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Extraction and clean-up of samples were carried out by both methods in a single step. A glass sample holder, inside the microwave cell, was used in MAE to allow the simultaneous extraction and clean-up of samples and shorten the MAE procedure. The detection limits achieved by MSPD were lower than those obtained by MAE because the presence of matrix interferences increased with this extraction method. The extraction yields obtained by MSPD and MAE for three different types of soils were compared. Both procedures showed good recoveries and sensitivity for the determination of parabens and alkylphenols in two of the soils assayed, however, only MSPD yielded good recoveries with the other soil. Finally, MSPD was applied to the analysis of soils collected in different sites of Spain. In most of the samples analyzed, methylparaben and butylparaben were detected at levels ranging from 1.21 to 8.04 ng g⁻¹ dry weight and 0.48 to 1.02 ng g⁻¹ dry weight, respectively.     

Microwave-assisted extraction in closed vessel in food analysis

Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) is an important technique in analytical chemistry. It offers several advantages over traditional extraction methods, such as improved extraction efficiency, shorter extraction times, reduced solvent consumption, and enhanced analyte recovery. Using microwaves, heat is directly applied to the sample, leading to rapid and efficient extraction of target compounds by enhancing the solubility and diffusion of the target compounds, thus requiring lower solvent volume. Therefore, MAE can be considered a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective option facilitating the transition toward greener and more sustainable analytical chemistry workflows. This contribution systematically reviews the application of MAE to a selection of target compounds/compounds classes of relevance for food quality and safety assessment. As inclusion criteria, MAE active temperature control and molecularly-resolved characterization of the extracts were considered. Contents include a brief introduction of the principles of operation, available systems characteristics, and key parameters influencing extraction efficiency and selectivity. The application section covers functional food components (e.g., phenols, diterpenes, and carotenoids), lipids, contaminants (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and mineral oil hydrocarbons), pesticides, veterinary drug residues, and a selection of process contaminants and xenobiotics of relevance for food safety.     

Application of ionic liquids in the microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plants

Ionic liquids (ILs) solutions as solvents were successfully applied in the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plants. ILs, its concentration and MAE conditions were investigated in order to extract polyphenolic compounds effectively from Psidium guajava Linn. (P. guajava) leaves and Smilax china (S. china) tubers. The results obtained indicated that the anions and cations of ILs had influences on the extraction of polyphenolic compounds as well as the ILs with electron-rich aromatic π-system enhanced extraction ability. Under the optimized conditions, the extraction yields of the polyphenolic compounds were in the range of 79.5-93.8% with one-step extraction, and meanwhile the recoveries were in the range of 85.2-103% with relative standard deviations (R.S.D.s) lower than 5.6%. Compared to conventional extraction procedures, the results suggested that the proposed method was effective and alternative for the extraction of polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plants. In addition, the extraction mechanisms and the structures of samples before and after extraction were also investigated. ILs solutions as green solvents in the MAE of polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plant samples showed a great promising prospect.