基于中空纤维的液相微萃取技术的研究进展

基于中空纤维的液相微萃取集采样、萃取、浓缩于一体,具有成本低,溶剂用量少,易与高效液相色谱、气相色谱、毛细管电泳联用等特点。该技术不仅可实现较高的回收率和富集效率,而且具有突出的样品净化功能,是一种环境友好的样品前处理新技术。该文对基于中空纤维的液相微萃取的装置、操作模式、基本原理及近年来应用研究的进展进行了综述。     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取-高效液相色谱测定有机化合物正辛醇/水分配系数

提出了一种中空纤维膜液相微萃取-高效液相色谱直接测定有机化合物正辛醇/水分配系数的新方法,并用该方法测定了不同脂溶性有机化合物的正辛醇/水分配系数。由于中空纤维膜液相微萃取有机萃取剂用量很少,故能显著提高萃取时的传质速度,缩短萃取时间。正辛醇装入中空纤维膜内,在萃取过程中,正辛醇相和水相不会形成乳化层。萃取完成后,可直接取出正辛醇相的样品进行分析,lgK测定能在30 m in内完成。本研究对6种化合物进行了测定,测定结果用文献报道值和经典摇瓶法进行了验证。表明方法快速、准确、样品消耗量少。     

分散液相微萃取技术研究进展

分散液相微萃取是最近发展起来的一种新型样品前处理技术,该方法操作简单、成本低、富集效率高、所需有机溶剂用量极少,是一种环境友好的液相微萃取新技术.与悬滴液相微萃取和中空纤维液相微萃取相比,萃取时间大为缩短.分散液相微萃取可与气相色谱、液相色谱和原子吸收分光光度计等仪器联用,并已在环境样品、食品样品分析中得到了较广泛的应用.本文对分散液相微萃取的基本原理、影响富集效率的因素和目前的应用研究进展进行了评述.     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定醋酸氯己定痔疮栓中的醋酸氯己定

建立了中空纤维膜液相微萃取-高效液相色谱（HPLC）测定醋酸氯己定痔疮栓中醋酸氯己定含量的方法。将样品用醋酸水溶液萃取5次,配成样品溶液,然后用装有正辛醇的中空纤维膜进行液相微萃取,萃取液用高效液相色谱测定。醋酸氯己定的质量浓度为0.5 ～ 16 mg/L时与其峰面积呈良好的线性关系,加样回收率大于98.0%,相对标准偏差低于4.0%。该方法样品处理简单、快速,灵敏度与不经过液相微萃取的HPLC方法相比提高了约24倍,醋酸氯己定痔疮栓中的其他物质对测定无干扰。     

分子印迹固-液微萃取联用技术检测复杂样品痕量三嗪类除草剂

本文结合分子印迹固相微萃取与中空纤维液相微萃取技术的优点,发展了分子印迹固-液微萃取(MIP-SLME)样品前处理联用技术.设计联用萃取技术装置,以自制的特丁津MIP-SPME涂层研究MIP-SLME技术的萃取条件和萃取性能,建立特丁津MIP-SLME/HPLC联用分析方法,实现复杂生物、环境样品中痕量三嗪类除草剂多残留同时分析.     

中空纤维碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取机理及其应用

讨论了以中空纤维为载体的碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取机理,建立了中空纤维碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液协同微萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定复杂样品中微量咖啡酸、阿魏酸和肉桂酸含量的方法.以2.5 cm长的聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维为碳纳米管正辛醇分散液载体,供相为分析物的HCl(pH 2.1)溶液,接受相为pH 12.7的NaOH溶液,在35℃下,搅拌萃取60 min,萃取液进行高效液相色谱紫外检测.在优化的实验条件下,分析物的线性范围均在0.05～50 μg/L,r＞0.9990 (n=5);检出限均为0.015μg/L;日内与日间精密度均小于9.8％(n=9),平均回收率为93.8％～115.2％;富集倍数分别为514,942和1084倍.在以中空纤维为支持体的碳纳米管/正辛醇微萃取中,碳纳米管/正辛醇分散液嵌入中空纤维管壁上的微孔中形成了碳纳米管/正辛醇固-液微萃取单元束,对苯丙烯酸类化合物起到协同萃取作用.     

液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法分析葡萄汁中多酚类化合物

建立了一种基于液相微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定葡萄汁中鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的分析方法. 比较了单液滴液相微萃取和中空纤维液相微萃取两种萃取模式, 选择了单液滴液相微萃取作为3种多酚类化合物的液相微萃取模式. 考察了搅拌速度、萃取时间、料液相pH和料液相离子强度的影响. 鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的富集倍数分别为48.4、 79.4和155.8, 方法的线性范围为0.0050～5.0 μg/mL, 鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的检出限分别为0.015, 0.0020, 0.0080 μg/mL, 相对标准偏差分别为2.0%, 1.8%和1.7%. 用于实际样品葡萄汁的分析, 加标回收率在81.9%～102.3%之间.     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取-高效液相色谱联用技术测定尿液中痕量己烯雌酚

采用中空纤维液相微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定了尿液样品中的痕量己烯雌酚;考察了样品相酸度、中间相种类、接收相浓度、搅拌速度、萃取时间等对液-液-液三相微萃取效率的影响,进而确定了最佳萃取条件.结果表明,当样品相pH为2.5,中间相为甲苯,接收相为3μL 0.25mol/L氢氧化钠溶液,搅拌速度为800r/min,萃取时间为50min时,萃取效率最佳.在最佳萃取条件下,样品的回收率为76.4%,相对标准偏差为3.8%.     

水和生物体液中曲马多镇痛药的中空纤维膜液相微萃取

使用中空纤维膜液相微萃取技术(LPME-HFM)建立了从水和生物样品(尿和血浆)中提取曲马多的方法。在室温(20 ℃)下用聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维膜过滤提取样品。萃取过程中用4 μL甲苯作为萃取溶剂。用度冷丁作为内标,气相色谱法-氢火焰离子化检测器分析测定,最低检测限达0.01 mg/L(自来水、尿)或0.05 mg/L(血浆)。和传统的液液萃取方法相比,该方法集萃取和浓缩一步完成,更简便、快速、绿色环保。     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法检测尿液中的苯丙胺类兴奋剂

建立了尿液中痕量苯丙胺类毒品的中空纤维膜液相微萃取-气相色谱/质谱检测方法。采用中空纤维膜液相微萃取技术萃取尿液中4种苯丙胺类毒品,研究萃取剂类型、体积、溶液pH、萃取时间和温度等对萃取效果的影响。尿液中4种苯丙胺类毒品的最佳萃取条件为:样品溶液pH 13,甲苯为萃取剂,搅拌速度500 r/min,30℃条件下萃取15 min;此条件下苯丙胺(AM)、甲基苯丙胺(MAM)、3,4-亚甲二氧基苯丙胺(MDA)、3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)的检出限(S/N=3)分别为1.0,0.75,1.0,0.64 ng/mL,相对标准偏差分别为6.62%,3.98%,4.57%,2.35%,富集倍数分别为155,170,132,218倍。本方法可用于尿液中痕量苯丙胺类毒品的分析测定。     

On‐line extraction and determination of two herbicides: Comparison between two modes of three‐phase hollow fiber microextraction

Two different modes of three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction were studied for the extraction of two herbicides, bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron. In these two modes, the acceptor phases in the lumen of the hollow fiber were aqueous and organic solvents. The extraction and determination were performed using an automated hollow fiber microextraction instrument followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography. For both three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction modes, the effect of the main parameters on the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized by central composite design. Under optimal conditions, both modes showed good linearity and repeatability, but the three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents has a better extraction efficiency and figures of merit. The calibration curves for three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction with an organic acceptor phase were linear in the range of 0.3–200 and 0.1–150 μg/L and the limits of detection were 0.1 and 0.06 μg/L for bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron, respectively. For the conventional three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, the calibration curves were linear in the range of 3.0–250 and 15–400 μg/L and LODs were 1.0 and 5.0 μg/L for bensulfuron‐methyl and linuron, respectively. The real sample analysis was carried out by three‐phase hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents because of its more favorable characteristics.     

Environmental and bioanalytical applications of hollow fiber membrane liquid-phase microextraction: a review

In hollow fiber membrane liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), target analytes are extracted from aqueous samples and into a supported liquid membrane (SLM) sustained in the pores in the wall of a small porous hollow fiber, and further into an acceptor phase present inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. The acceptor phase can be organic, providing a two-phase extraction system compatible with capillary gas chromatography, or the acceptor phase can be aqueous resulting in a three-phase system compatible with high-performance liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis. Due to high enrichment, efficient sample clean-up, and the low consumption of organic solvent, substantial interest has been devoted to LPME in recent years. This paper reviews important applications of LPME with special focus on bioanalytical and environmental chemistry, and also covers a new possible direction for LPME namely electromembrane extraction, where analytes are extracted through the SLM and into the acceptor phase by the application of electrical potentials.     

Automated hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction followed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry for the determination of benzodiazepine drugs in biological samples

In this study, two‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction and three‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents were compared for extraction of oxazepam and Lorazepam. Separations were performed on a liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry instrument. Under optimal conditions, three‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents has a better extraction efficiency. In a urine sample, for three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents, the calibration curves were found to be linear in the range of 0.6–200 and 0.9–200 μg L^?1 and the limits of detection were 0.2 and 0.3 μg L^?1 for oxazepam and lorazepam, respectively. For two‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, the calibration curves were found to be linear in the range of 1–200 and 1.5–200 μg L^?1 and the limits of detection were 0.3 and 0.5 μg L^?1 for oxazepam and lorazepam, respectively. In a urine sample, for three‐phase hollow‐fiber‐based liquid‐phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents, relative standard deviations in the range of 4.2–4.5% and preconcentration factors in the range of 70–180 were obtained for oxazepam and lorazepam, respectively. Also for the two‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, preconcentration factors in the range of 101–257 were obtained for oxazepam and lorazepam, respectively.     

Liquid–liquid–solid microextraction based on membrane-protected molecularly imprinted polymer fiber for trace analysis of triazines in complex aqueous samples

A novel liquid–liquid–solid microextraction (LLSME) technique based on porous membrane-protected molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-coated silica fiber has been developed. In this technique, a MIP-coated silica fiber was protected with a length of porous polypropylene hollow fiber membrane which was filled with water-immiscible organic phase. Subsequently the whole device was immersed into aqueous sample for extraction. The LLSME technique was a three-phase microextraction approach. The target analytes were firstly extracted from the aqueous sample through a few microliters of organic phase residing in the pores and lumen of the membrane, and were then finally extracted onto the MIP fiber. A terbutylazine MIP-coated silica fiber was adopted as an example to demonstrate the feasibility of the novel LLSME method. The extraction parameters such as the organic solvent, extraction and desorption time were investigated. Comparison of the LLSME technique was made with molecularly imprinted polymer based solid-phase microextraction (MIP-SPME) and hollow fiber membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME), respectively. The LLSME, integrating the advantages of high selectivity of MIP-SPME and enrichment and sample cleanup capability of the HF-LPME into a single device, is a promising sample preparation method for complex samples. Moreover, the new technique overcomes the problem of disturbance from water when the MIP-SPME fiber was exposed directly to aqueous samples. Applications to analysis of triazine herbicides in sludge water, watermelon, milk and urine samples were evaluated to access the real sample application of the LLSME method by coupling with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Low limits of detection (0.006–0.02 μg L⁻¹), satisfactory recoveries and good repeatability for real sample (RSD 1.2–9.6%, n = 5) were obtained. The method was demonstrated to be a fast, selective and sensitive pretreatment method for trace analysis of triazines in complex aqueous samples.     

Screening and quantification of anticancer compounds in traditional Chinese medicine by hollow fiber cell fishing and hollow fiber liquid/solid‐phase microextraction

Hollow fiber cell fishing, based on HepG‐2, SKOV‐3, and ACHN cancer cells, and hollow fiber liquid/solid microextraction with HPLC were developed and introduced for researching the anticancer activity of Rhizoma Curcumae Longae, Radix Curcumae, and Rhizoma Curcumae. The structures of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin screened were identified and their contents were determined. The compound target fishing factors and cell apoptosis rates under the effect of the three medicines were determined. The binding sites (cell membrane and cell organelle) and binding target (phospholipase C) on the cell were researched. Hollow fiber liquid/solid‐phase microextraction mechanism was analyzed and expounded. Before the application, cell seeding time, growth state and survival rate, compound nonspecific binding, positive and negative controls, repeatability in hollow fiber cell fishing with high‐performance liquid chromatography; extraction solvent, sample pH, salt concentration, agitation speed, extraction time, temperature and sample volume in hollow fiber liquid/solid‐phase microextraction with high‐performance liquid chromatography were investigated. The results demonstrated that the proposed strategy is a simple and quick method to identify bioactive compounds at the cellular level as well as determine their contents (particularly trace levels of the bioactive compounds), analyze multicompound and multitarget entirety effects, and elucidate the efficacious material base in traditional medicine.     

Hollow‐fiber‐supported liquid membrane microextraction of amlodipine and atorvastatin

A simple, environmentally friendly, and efficient method, based on hollow‐fiber‐supported liquid membrane microextraction, followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography has been developed for the extraction and determination of amlodipine (AML) and atorvastatin (ATO) in water and urine samples. The AML in two‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid microextraction is extracted from 24.0 mL of the aqueous sample into an organic phase with microliter volume located inside the pores and lumen of a polypropylene hollow fiber as acceptor phase, but the ATO in three‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid microextraction is extracted from aqueous donor phase to organic phase and then back‐extracted to the aqueous acceptor phase, which can be directly injected into the high‐performance liquid chromatograph for analysis. The preconcentration factors in a range of 34–135 were obtained under the optimum conditions. The calibration curves were linear (R² ≥ 0.990) in the concentration range of 2.0–200 μg/L for AML and 5.0–200 μg/L for ATO. The limits of detection for AML and ATO were 0.5 and 2.0 μg/L, respectively. Tap water and human urine samples were successfully analyzed for the existence of AML and ATO using the proposed methods.     

Three-phase system in solvent bar microextraction: An approach for the sample preparation of ionizable organic compounds prior to liquid chromatography

In this article, a simple new solvent microextraction technique is described for the extraction of ionizable organic compounds. This involves performing simultaneous forward- and back-extraction across an organic film immobilized in the pores of a porous polypropylene hollow fiber. Four chlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicides were chosen as model compounds. The target compounds are extracted from the stirred acidic aqueous sample (adjusted to 0.5 M HCl; donor phase) through a thin film of an organic solvent residing in the pores of a polypropylene hollow fiber; they are then finally extracted into another alkaline aqueous phase (1 M NaOH; acceptor phase). Both ends of the fiber are pressure-sealed. The acceptor phase was analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC). This method gave good enrichment (by a factor of 438-553) of the analytes in 40 min extraction time with reasonably good reproducibility. The analytical potential of the method was demonstrated by applying the method to spiked river water sample.     

Applications of titania and zirconia hollow fibers in sorptive microextraction of N,N-dimethylacetamide from water sample

The convenient fabrications of titania and zirconia hollow fiber with three-dimensional porous structure using polypropylene hollow fibers as templates were developed. And an analytical method based on enrichment and extraction of analytes in the water sample, hollow fiber sorptive microextraction in combined with gas chromatography has been developed for the rapid analysis of N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) in the environmental samples. The results showed that zirconia hollow fiber gave higher extraction performance of DMA than that of titania hollow fiber. The method validations, including linearity, limit of detection, limit of qualification, precision, and repeatability were investigated. Linearity for six-point calibration curve was excellent with zirconia hollow fiber having r² value greater than 0.9993 at the linearity range of 0.001-1.0 mg mL⁻¹. In addition, it seems that hollow fiber sorptive extraction is a promising technique for the enrichment and purification of analytes extracted directly from liquid samples without any other pretreatment.     

Three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on a magnetofluid for the analysis of aristolochic acids in plasma by high‐performance liquid chromatography

A new and fast sample preparation technique based on three‐phase hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction with a magnetofluid was developed and successfully used to quantify the aristolochic acid I (AA‐I) and AA‐II in plasma after oral administration of Caulis akebiae extract. Analysis was accomplished by reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Parameters that affect the hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction processes, such as the solvent type, pH of donor and acceptor phases, content of magnetofluid, salt content, stirring speed, hollow fiber length, extraction temperature, and extraction time, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized conditions, the preconcentration factors for AA‐I and AA‐II were >627. The calibration curve for two AAs was linear in the range of 0.1–10 ng/mL with the correlation coefficients >0.9997. The intraday and interday precision was <5.71% and the LODs were 11 pg/mL for AA‐I and 13 pg/mL for AA‐II (S/N = 3). The separation and determination of the two AAs in plasma after oral administration of C. akebiae extract were completed by the validated method.