取代酞菁光敏剂的光动力疗法研究进展

酞菁类化合物作为新一代光敏剂用于光动力学治疗癌症,因表现出良好的光动力活性、靶组织选择性和低毒等优点而备受关注。本文对近几年取代酞菁光敏剂的光动力疗法研究进展作一简单介绍。     

肿瘤光动力治疗临床应用的光敏剂及其研究概况

光动力治疗是一种非侵蚀性并具有一定靶向性的肿瘤治疗新方法。 光动力治疗需要光敏剂、光和氧结合产生光动力反应。 光敏剂是光动力治疗的关键和物质基础。 本文概括介绍了已上市的和已被批准进入临床试验中的光敏剂,并根据其分子的骨架结构,将其分为分卟啉类、二氢卟吩（叶绿素）类和菌绿素/酞菁三类。 同时从理想光敏剂应具备特点出发,探讨了研究中的光敏剂和光动力治疗的发展前景。     

联合化疗与光动力治疗于一体的水溶性铜(Ⅱ)、镍(Ⅱ)酞菁的合成及体外抗癌活性

以邻苯二腈法合成了全水溶性铜酞菁(Cu Pc)6与镍酞菁(Ni Pc)7。对该类酞菁进行了光物理化学特性测试及体外细胞生物试验。结果表明:合成的铜酞菁6与镍酞菁7不仅水溶性好,而且对光热都十分稳定,并能有效产生单线态氧。体外细胞测试证实,铜酞菁6与镍酞菁7表现出了对癌细胞的避光下的抑制效应以及光照下的光动力治疗效应,显示了金属配合物化疗效应与光动力治疗的协同抗癌活性。     

酞菁在光动力治疗中的应用

光动力治疗因具有低毒、副作用小、抗癌广谱、高选择性等优势,正吸引着人们越来越多的关注。提高光敏剂的选择性和光毒性已经成为研究的热点。本文简单介绍了光敏剂的发展历程,并对酞菁类第三代光动力治疗光敏剂的最新研究进展进行了论述。     

酞菁在光动力治疗中的应用

光动力治疗因具有低毒、副作用小、抗癌广谱、高选择性等优势, 正吸引着人们越来越多的关注。提高光敏剂的选择性和光毒性已经成为研究的热点。本文简单介绍了光敏剂的发展历程, 并对酞菁类第三代光动力治疗光敏剂的最新研究进展进行了论述。     

用于光动力治疗酞菁类光敏剂的合成研究进展

简单介绍了光动力疗法的作用原理和机制,重点对多氟取代酞菁的几种主要合成方法进行了介绍。     

酞菁配合物的结构与其光动力抗癌活性

光动力治疗是一种正在发展中的治疗癌症的新方法.主要是利用抗癌光敏剂可优先在 肿瘤组织中富集的特性和随后在适当波长的光照下所引发的光敏化反应来杀死癌肿瘤.自198 5年以来,酞菁配合物作为抗癌光敏剂的研究越来越引人注目. 此文在总结51篇参考文献的 基础上,提出了酞菁配合物的结构与其光动力抗癌活性的某些相关性,着重讨论了中心离子 、环取代基、轴向配体对光动力活性和相关物化性质的影响.得出的一个主要的结论是两亲 性酞菁是极具潜力的光敏剂.     

卟啉类光敏剂在光动力治疗中的应用研究

作为光动力疗法中至关重要的决定性因素,光敏剂的研究受到越来越多的重视.重点综述了多种新型卟啉类化合物、酞菁类化合物和二氢卟吩类化合物的合成及其在光动力治疗中的应用研究.     

靶标性酞菁类光敏剂的光动力疗法研究进展

光动力治疗（Photodynamic therapy,PDT）作为一种有别于传统癌症治疗方式的新型疗法,近些年来受到了科学家们越来越多的关注.它凭借着自身创伤性小,毒性低微,适用性好,可协同手术治疗以及可重复治疗等独特优势,在许多肿瘤的治疗方面有着广泛的应用.本文简要概述了光动力疗法的原理以及光敏剂的发展历程,并对理想光敏剂的特点作了总结.目前,以酞菁类化合物为主的第三代光敏剂已经成为光动力疗法的研究热点,然而如何提高光敏剂分子的靶向性达到精准的光动力治疗仍然是亟待解决的问题.因此,主要综述了近年来靶向性酞菁类光敏剂的研究进展,并对未来光敏剂的重点研究方向做出了展望.从目前来看,如何克服癌症低氧微环境的限制,发展Type I型不依赖氧的体系以及光穿透力强的靶向光敏剂在光动力治疗方面存在着巨大的潜质,有望成为新一代十分优良的光动力疗法用光敏剂.     

四磺酸基酞菁锌的合成及其与牛血清白蛋白作用的研究

酞菁化合物及其金属配合物是一类光氧化还原反应的有效光敏剂,对恶性肿瘤具有荧光定位诊断和光动力治疗作用,并对金黄色葡萄球菌、链球菌以及某些寄生虫具有光灭活作用,已引起人们越来越多的兴趣[1].尤其是含不同数目磺酸取代基的酞菁金属配合物被认为是一种较有效的光动力治疗光敏剂.     

Strategies for enhanced photodynamic therapy effects

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality for the selective destruction of cancerous and nonneoplastic pathologies that involves the simultaneous presence of light, oxygen and a light-activatable chemical called a photosensitizer (PS) to achieve a cytotoxic effect. The photophysics and mechanisms of cell killing by PDT have been extensively studied in recent years, and PDT has received regulatory approval for the treatment of a number of diseases worldwide. As the application of this treatment modality expands with regard to both anatomical sites and disease stages, it will be important to develop strategies for enhancing PDT outcomes. This article focuses on two broad approaches for PDT enhancement: (1) mechanism-based combination treatments in which PDT and a second modality can be designed to either increase the susceptibility of tumor cells to PDT or nullify the treatment outcome-mitigating molecular responses triggered by PDT of tumors, and (2) the more recent approaches of PS targeting, either by specific cellular function-sensitive linkages or via conjugation to macromolecules.     

Tumor Oxygenation Changes Post-Photodynamic Therapy

Abstract— Tumor oxygenation after a photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment is a critical factor for understanding the post-treatment metabolic pathway of the tumor. It also provides important information for designing combination therapy of PDT and other oxygen-dependent anticancer modalities. In this study, mammary carcinoma in flank and hind leg of C3H mice were subjected to PDT at either subcurative or curative level (12.5 mg/kg Photofrin; 200 or 600 J/cm², respectively). The before and post-PDT tumor oxygenation was measured with an oxygen-sensitive microelectrode. The data revealed that tumor oxygenation at the time of PDT has a profound effect on posttreatment tumor oxygenation, which may largely be due to an interplay between direct PDT cytotoxicity and PDT damage to the tumor microvasculature. Transient reoxygenation occurred after PDT, which may provide a window for improved combination therapy for other oxygen-dependent modalities.     

IL-10 does not play a role in cutaneous Photofrin photodynamic therapy-induced suppression of the contact hypersensitivity response.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment of both malignant and benign skin diseases has proven to be effective, and its use is increasing worldwide. However, preclinical studies using murine models have shown that PDT of the skin inhibits cell-mediated immune reactions, as measured by the suppression of the contact hypersensitivity (CHS) reaction. We have previously demonstrated that PDT enhances IL-10 expression in treated skin, and that the kinetics of induction of IL-10 is similar to the kinetics of suppression of systemic CHS reactions by cutaneous PDT. In the following report we have expanded upon these studies to demonstrate that cutaneous PDT, using Photofrin, induces elevated levels of systemic IL-10 that persist for at least 28 days following treatment. The increase in systemic IL-10 correlates to a prolonged suppression of CHS of at least 28 days following cutaneous PDT. IL-10 has been implicated as the causative agent in the suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB and transdermal PDT. However, in the studies reported here we demonstrate that the suppression of CHS by cutaneous PDT occurs via an IL-10 independent mechanism, as administration of anti-IL-10 antibodies had no effect on the ability of PDT to induce CHS suppression. These results were further confirmed using IL-10 knockout (KO) mice. Cutaneous PDT of IL-10 KO mice resulted in CHS suppression that was not significantly different from suppression induced in wild-type mice. Thus, it appears as though IL-10 does not play a role in CHS suppression by cutaneous PDT. Suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB and transdermal PDT is reversible by IL-12, which is critical for the development of these reactions. We show that administration of exogenous IL-12 is also able to reverse CHS suppression induced by cutaneous PDT, suggesting that whereas suppression of cell-mediated immune reactions by UVB, transdermal PDT and cutaneous PDT occurs via different mechanisms, a common regulatory point exists.     

Photodynamic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancer

The clinical application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for gastrointestinal (GI) neoplastic lesions has been developed with appreciation for the great efforts and kind support of Dr. Tom Dougherty and his followers’ contributions. There are several published studies on clinical PDT in the field of GI oncology. Esophageal cancer was one of the first clinical indications for PDT that was approved as an endoscopic procedure in both the United States and Japan. PDT was initially used as a palliative local treatment for patients with obstructive esophageal cancer. PDT is also indicated for eradicative therapy for dysplastic Barret’s esophagus, which is the precursor state of esophageal adenocarcinoma, with the support of level one evidence. In Japan, PDT was approved as a curative treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma lesions, which are difficult to treat with endoscopic resection. Further, PDT using second-generation photosensitizers is approved for early local failure after radiotherapy, for which treatment with other modalities is difficult. PDT has also been assessed in other GI cancers, including gastric cancer, biliary cancer and pancreatic cancer. In this review, we overview the history and state of PDT for GI cancer.     

Influence of photosensitizer solvent on the mechanisms of photoactivated killing of Enterococcus faecalis

This study evaluated the mechanisms involved and the influence of photosensitizer solvent in the killing of Enterococcus faecalis using photodynamic therapy (PDT). Enterococcus faecalis cells incubated with 100 microm methylene blue dissolved in water and in MIX (a mixture of glycerol:ethanol:water) were irradiated with 664 nm diode laser (63.69 J cm(-2)). The effect of PDT on the viability of bacteria, and the functional integrity of cell wall, chromosomal DNA and membrane proteins were analyzed. The bactericidal action of PDT was significantly higher when a MIX-based photosensitizer solvent was used (P<0.001). Fluorimetric and fluorescence microscopy-based analysis showed the functional impairment of E. faecalis cell wall which was significantly higher when a MIX-based photosensitizer solvent was used (P<0.001). PDT with MIX-based photosensitizer solvent showed extensive damage to chromosomal DNA. However, both PDT conditions showed similar trend in the degradation of membrane proteins, although cross-linked proteins were evident only in PDT conducted with MIX-based photosensitizer solvent. The findings from our study showed that PDT destroyed the functional integrity of cell wall, DNA and membrane proteins of E. faecalis. The degrees of damage on these targets were influenced by the photosensitizer solvent used during PDT.     

Porphyrin and Nonporphyrin Photosensitizers in Oncology: Preclinical and Clinical Advances in Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is now a well-recognized modality for the treatment of cancer. While PDT has developed progressively over the last century, great advances have been observed in the field in recent years. The concept of dual selectivity of PDT agents is now widely accepted due to the relative specificity and selectivity of PDT along with the absence of harmful side effects often encountered with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Traditionally, porphyrin-based photosensitizers have dominated the PDT field but these first generation photosensitizers have several disadvantages, with poor light absorption and cutaneous photosensitivity being the predominant side effects. As a result, the requirement for new photosensitizers, including second generation porphyrins and porphyrin derivatives as well as third generation photosensitizers has arisen, with the aim of alleviating the problems encountered with first generation porphyrins and improving the efficacy of PDT. The investigation of nonporphyrin photosensitizers for the development of novel PDT agents has been considerably less extensive than porphyrin-based compounds; however, structural modification of nonporphyrin photosensitizers has allowed for manipulation of the photochemotherapeutic properties. The aim of this review is to provide an insight into PDT photosensitizers clinically approved for application in oncology, as well as those which show significant potential in ongoing preclinical studies.     

Combination of surgical resection and photodynamic therapy of 9L gliosarcoma in the nude rat

The objective of the present study was to investigate the treatment of 9L gliosarcoma brain tumor in the rat with the combination of surgical resection and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Nude rats with intracranial 7-day-old 9L gliomas were randomly subjected to no treatment, PDT alone (Photofrin: 2 mg kg(-1), optical: 80 J cm(-2)), surgical resection alone or resection combined with 2 mg kg(-1) Photofrin-mediated PDT at an optical dose of 80 J cm(-2). All animals were sacrificed 14 days after tumor implantation. Hematoxylin-and-eosin and immunohistochemical stainings were performed to assess the tumor volume and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the brain adjacent to the tumor (BAT) as well as the tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation. Our data show that both surgical resection alone and PDT alone significantly decreased tumor volume, but furthermore, surgical resection combined with PDT significantly reduced the tumor volume and reduced local tumor infiltration compared to either surgical resection or PDT treatment alone. PDT treatment with or without resection increased tumor apoptosis, but resection alone did not alter the tumor cell apoptosis compared with a nontreatment control group. Both surgical resection alone and PDT alone induced a significant increase in VEGF expression in the BAT; however intraoperative PDT did not further increase VEGF expression, compared with surgery alone or PDT alone. No significant differences were found in tumor cell proliferation as indicated by Ki67 immunoreactivity among the four groups. Our results suggest that PDT enhances the efficacy of surgical resection in the management of malignant gliomas without increasing VEGF expression in the BAT.     

Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: state of the art

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic killing of periodontopathogenic bacteria may be an alternative to the systemic application of antibacterial drugs used in the treatment of periodontal diseases. Even though the method is still in the experimental stage, increasing bacterial resistance problems may promote the introduction of photodynamic therapy (PDT) into periodontal practice. AIM: In this review a literature survey is given of PDT as seen from a periodontal perspective. METHODS: In this review, the present knowledge and experience of PDT is summarized. Literature data are presented on drawbacks of conventional antibiotics, the mechanism of PDT, bactericidal effects of PDT as well as results of clinical efforts. The future prospects of the method are discussed. RESULTS: The application of photosensitizing dyes and their excitation by visible light enables effective killing of periodontopathogens. Encouraging studies using PDT in periodontitis and in peri-implantitis are known. CONCLUSION: Even though PDT is still in experimental stages of development and testing, the method may be an adjunct to conventional antibacterial measures in periodontology. Clinical follow-up studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the procedure.