非结构网格二阶有限体积法中黏性通量离散格式精度分析与改进

非结构网格二阶有限体积离散方法广泛应用于计算流体力学工程实践中,研究非结构网格二阶精度有限体积离散方法的计算精度具有现实意义. 计算精度主要受到网格和计算方法的影响,本文从单元梯度重构方法、黏性通量中的界面梯度计算方法两个方面考察黏性流动模拟精度的影响因素. 首先从理论上分析了黏性通量离散中的“奇偶失联”问题,并通过基于标量扩散方程的制造解方法验证了“奇偶失联”导致的精度下降现象,进一步通过引入差分修正项消除了“奇偶失联”并提高了扩散方程计算精度;其次,在不同类型、不同质量的网格上进行基于扩散方程的制造解精度测试,考察单元梯度重构方法、界面梯度计算方法对扩散方程计算精度的影响,结果显示,单元梯度重构精度和界面梯度计算方法均对扩散方程计算精度起重要作用;最后对三个黏性流动算例(二维层流平板、二维湍流平板和二维翼型近尾迹流动)进行网格收敛性研究,初步验证了本文的结论,得到了计算精度和网格收敛性均较好的黏性通量计算格式.      

非结构网格二阶有限体积法中黏性通量离散格式精度分析与改进

非结构网格二阶有限体积离散方法广泛应用于计算流体力学工程实践中,研究非结构网格二阶精度有限体积离散方法的计算精度具有现实意义.计算精度主要受到网格和计算方法的影响,本文从单元梯度重构方法、黏性通量中的界面梯度计算方法两个方面考察黏性流动模拟精度的影响因素.首先从理论上分析了黏性通量离散中的"奇偶失联"问题,并通过基于标量扩散方程的制造解方法验证了"奇偶失联"导致的精度下降现象,进一步通过引入差分修正项消除了"奇偶失联"并提高了扩散方程计算精度;其次,在不同类型、不同质量的网格上进行基于扩散方程的制造解精度测试,考察单元梯度重构方法、界面梯度计算方法对扩散方程计算精度的影响,结果显示,单元梯度重构精度和界面梯度计算方法均对扩散方程计算精度起重要作用;最后对三个黏性流动算例(二维层流平板、二维湍流平板和二维翼型近尾迹流动)进行网格收敛性研究,初步验证了本文的结论,得到了计算精度和网格收敛性均较好的黏性通量计算格式.     

非结构网格质量对梯度重构及无粘流动模拟精度的影响

综合利用理论分析和数值测试手段,研究了非结构格心型有限体积离散中梯度重构算法的计算精度,分别给出了非结构算法中常用的基于Green-Gauss公式(GG方法)和基于Least squares方法(LSQ方法)的梯度重构方法达到至少一阶精度的条件。其中,GG方法在面积分低阶项不能互相抵消的情况下,要求面心插值精度达到至少二阶;而LSQ方法对于任意网格均能实现梯度重构一阶精度。在各向同性网格上的梯度重构精度数值测试验证了数学推导结论;进一步通过制造解方法量化无粘流动数值离散误差,结合网格收敛性测试研究了网格质量(网格点随机扰动、网格弯曲度和网格倾斜度等因素)以及网格类型(三角形和四边形)对无粘流动模拟精度的影响,验证了理论分析结论。     

HyperFLOW软件非结构网格亚跨声速湍流模拟的验证与确认

计算流体力学(computational fluid dynamics,CFD)数值模拟在航空航天等领域发挥越来越重要的作用,然而CFD数值模拟结果的可信度仍然需要通过不断地验证与确认来提高.本文给出了从制造解精度测试、简单到复杂外形湍流模拟网格收敛性研究等三个方面开展CFD软件验证与确认的方法,并对自主研发的CFD软件平台HyperFLOW在非结构网格上模拟亚跨声速湍流问题的能力进行了验证与确认.首先通过基于Euler方程和标量扩散方程的制造解精度测试,分别验证了HyperFLOW在非结构网格上对Euler方程和黏性项的求解精度,结果表明其能够在任意非结构网格上达到设计的二阶精度. 其次,通过NASATurbulence Modeling Resource中的湍流平板、二维翼型近尾迹流动、二维Bump等几个典型的亚声速湍流算例的网格收敛性研究,量化考察了数值结果的观测精度阶和网格收敛性指数,并与国外知名CFD解算器CFL3D,FUN3D的计算结果进行了对比,验证了HyperFLOW对简单湍流问题的模拟能力,且具有良好的网格收敛性和计算精度(阶). 最后,通过NASA CommonResearchModel标模定升力系数的网格收敛性研究和升阻极曲线预测,验证了软件在复杂外形亚跨声速湍流流动数值模拟中也具有良好的可信度.      

HyperFLOW软件非结构网格亚跨声速湍流模拟的验证与确认

计算流体力学(computational fluid dynamics, CFD)数值模拟在航空航天等领域发挥越来越重要的作用,然而CFD数值模拟结果的可信度仍然需要通过不断地验证与确认来提高.本文给出了从制造解精度测试、简单到复杂外形湍流模拟网格收敛性研究等三个方面开展CFD软件验证与确认的方法,并对自主研发的CFD软件平台HyperFLOW在非结构网格上模拟亚跨声速湍流问题的能力进行了验证与确认.首先通过基于Euler方程和标量扩散方程的制造解精度测试,分别验证了HyperFLOW在非结构网格上对Euler方程和黏性项的求解精度,结果表明其能够在任意非结构网格上达到设计的二阶精度.其次,通过NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource中的湍流平板、二维翼型近尾迹流动、二维Bump等几个典型的亚声速湍流算例的网格收敛性研究,量化考察了数值结果的观测精度阶和网格收敛性指数,并与国外知名CFD解算器CFL3D,FUN3D的计算结果进行了对比,验证了HyperFLOW对简单湍流问题的模拟能力,且具有良好的网格收敛性和计算精度(阶).最后,通过NASA Common Research Model标模定升力系数的网格收敛性研究和升阻极曲线预测,验证了软件在复杂外形亚跨声速湍流流动数值模拟中也具有良好的可信度.     

对流扩散方程的绝对稳定高阶中心差分格式

将作者提出的数值摄动算法改进为区分离散单元内上游和下游并分别对通量进行高精度重构的双重数值摄动算法,与原(单重)摄动算法相比,双重摄动算法既提高了格式精度又明显扩大了格式的稳定域范围.利用双重摄动算法,即分别利用上游和下游基点变量的摄动重构将高阶流体力学关系及迎风机制耦合进二阶中心格式之中,由此构建了对流扩散方程的对网格Reynolds数的任意值均稳定(绝对稳定)高精度(四阶和八阶精度)三基点中心TVD差分格式,通过解析分析以及3个算例计算证实了构建格式的优良性能;3个算例包括一维线性、非线性(Burgers方程)和二维变系数对流扩散方程.数值计算表明:构建的格式在粗网格下不振荡,构建格式在粗网格时的最大误差L_∞和均方误差L_2与二阶中心格式在细网格时的相应误差一致,对线性方程,构建格式在细网格下可达到L_2精度阶.     

适用于任意网格拓扑和质量的格心有限体积法

针对格心有限体积法的离散精度易受网格类型影响的问题,基于最小二乘原理,提出了一种适用于任意网格拓扑和网格质量的有限体积方法.在解的光滑区能保证二阶精度,可光滑、陡峭地捕捉激波等强间断面.精度与网格无关,且算法统一的特性使其非常适用于网格自适应和多重网格等计算应用,同时也降低了网格生成和流场求解的复杂性.跨音速算例的网格含有多种网格拓扑,计算结果表明发展的线性重构方法(linearreconstruction method,LRM)适用于不同的网格拓扑,计算得到的激波位置准确、陡峭,未产生数值振荡.运用Ringleb流动考查了该方法对低质量网格的收敛性,与传统方法相比,线性重构方法(LRM)不仅平均误差较小,而且误差随网格尺度的收敛性也更好,其精度接近二阶.三段翼型的黏性绕流计算进一步表明网格质量对其精度的影响较小.     

基于非结构/混合网格的高阶精度格式研究进展

尽管以二阶精度格式为基础的计算流体力学(CFD) 方法和软件已经在航空航天飞行器设计中发挥了重要的作用, 但是由于二阶精度格式的耗散和色散较大, 对于湍流、分离等多尺度流动现象的模拟, 现有成熟的CFD 软件仍难以给出满意的结果, 为此CFD 工作者发展了众多的高阶精度计算格式. 如果以适应的计算网格来分类, 一般可以分为基于结构网格的有限差分格式、基于非结构/混合网格的有限体积法和有限元方法,以及各种类型的混合方法. 由于非结构/混合网格具有良好的几何适应性, 基于非结构/混合网格的高阶精度格式近年来备受关注. 本文综述了近年来基于非结构/混合网格的高阶精度格式研究进展, 重点介绍了空间离散方法, 主要包括k-Exact 和ENO/WENO 等有限体积方法, 间断伽辽金(DG) 有限元方法, 有限谱体积(SV) 和有限谱差分(SD) 方法, 以及近来发展的各种DG/FV 混合算法和将各种方法统一在一个框架内的CPR (correctionprocedure via reconstruction) 方法等. 随后简要介绍了高阶精度格式应用于复杂外形流动数值模拟的一些需要关注的问题, 包括曲边界的处理方法、间断侦测和限制器、各种加速收敛技术等. 在综述过程中, 介绍了各种方法的优势与不足, 其间介绍了作者发展的基于"静动态混合重构" 的DG/FV 混合算法. 最后展望了基于非结构/混合网格的高阶精度格式的未来发展趋势及应用前景.     

计算含动边界非定常流动的无网格算法

在无网格算法中考虑了含动边界的流动问题,研究了可以计算处理包含一定位移及扭转动边界非定常流动的算法.创建了无网格算法的动点法则,并引入抗扭方法对弹簧方法进行改进来处理离散点运动,提高了方法的可用度及精度.发展了求解基于无网格的ALE方程组的算法,在点云离散的基础上采用曲面逼近计算空间导数及HLLC格式计算数值通量,运用四步龙格-库塔法进行时间推进.在跨、超音速条件下,计算模拟了典型翼型简谐振动流场,计算结果与实验结果及文献对比吻合,验证了该算法的正确性.     

基于WENO重构的真正多维黎曼求解器

具有良好守恒性与网格适应性的有限体积格式在流体力学的数值计算中占有重要地位。其中，求解数值流通量是实施有限体积法的关键步骤。一维情形下，通过求解局部黎曼问题来获得数值流通量的相关理论已经比较成熟。但是在计算多维问题时，传统的维度分裂方法仅考虑沿界面法向传播的信息，这不仅影响格式的精度，还可能会造成数值不稳定性从而诱发非物理现象。本文基于对流-压力通量分裂方法来构造真正多维的黎曼求解器，通过求解网格顶点处的多维黎曼问题来实现格式的多维特性。采用五阶WENO重构方法来获得空间的高阶精度，时间离散采用三阶TVD龙格-库塔格式。一系列数值实验的结果表明，真正多维的黎曼求解器不仅具有更高的分辨率还能有效克服多维强激波模拟中的数值不稳定性。     

The residual formulation of the method of manufactured solutions for computationally efficient solution verification

The method of manufactured solutions (MMS) is a solution verification methodology for determining whether the implementation of a discretization method is achieving its theoretical order of accuracy. This methodology combines the advantages of grid refinement studies and comparison with exact solution, by modifying the governing equations solved within a code by adding a source term to drive the solution towards a predetermined analytic function. By solving the modified equations on a sequence of grids and comparing the differences between the converged solution and manufactured solution, the order of accuracy of the implementation can be investigated. However, in its current form, converged solutions on a sequence of grids are required which can be quite costly and difficult to obtain. In this paper, by comparing the MMS to the method for determining the theoretical order of accuracy of a discretization method, the residual formulation of the MMS is developed. This new formulation only requires that the residual of the discretized governing equations to be calculated and not the solution to the discretized equations, thus avoiding the computational cost and difficulties inherent in obtaining converged solutions. Furthermore, since only the residuals are interrogated, individual components of the flow solver can be tested, in isolation, allowing the MMS to be used more effectively in locating errors within the code. This new approach is demonstrated to yield the same order of accuracy as the original MMS using three different cases—one-dimensional porous media equation, one-dimensional St Venant equations and two-dimensional unstructured Navier–Stokes simulations.     

Verification of a mixed high‐order accurate DNS code for laminar turbulent transition by the method of manufactured solutions

This paper presents results on a verification test of a Direct Numerical Simulation code of mixed high‐order of accuracy using the method of manufactured solutions (MMS). This test is based on the formulation of an analytical solution for the Navier–Stokes equations modified by the addition of a source term. The present numerical code was aimed at simulating the temporal evolution of instability waves in a plane Poiseuille flow. The governing equations were solved in a vorticity–velocity formulation for a two‐dimensional incompressible flow. The code employed two different numerical schemes. One used mixed high‐order compact and non‐compact finite‐differences from fourth‐order to sixth‐order of accuracy. The other scheme used spectral methods instead of finite‐difference methods for the streamwise direction, which was periodic. In the present test, particular attention was paid to the boundary conditions of the physical problem of interest. Indeed, the verification procedure using MMS can be more demanding than the often used comparison with Linear Stability Theory. That is particularly because in the latter test no attention is paid to the nonlinear terms. For the present verification test, it was possible to manufacture an analytical solution that reproduced some aspects of an instability wave in a nonlinear stage. Although the results of the verification by MMS for this mixed‐order numerical scheme had to be interpreted with care, the test was very useful as it gave confidence that the code was free of programming errors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

二维拉氏辐射流体力学人为解构造方法

人为构造解方法是复杂多物理过程耦合程序正确性验证的重要方法之一，适用于二维拉氏大变形网格的流体、辐射耦合人为解模型较为少见。针对拉氏辐射流体力学程序正确性验证的需要，从二维拉氏辐射流体力学方程组出发，基于坐标变换技术，给出了拉氏空间到欧氏空间的物理变量导数关系式，开展了辐射流体耦合的人为解构造方法研究，构造了一类质量方程无源项的二维人为解模型，并应用于非结构拉氏程序LAD2D辐射流体力学计算的正确性考核，为流体运动网格上的辐射扩散计算提供了一种有效手段。数值结果显示观测到的数值模拟收敛阶与理论分析一致。     

Effect of regularized delta function on accuracy of immersed boundary method

The immersed boundary method is an effective technique for modeling and simulating fluid-structure interactions especially in the area of biomechanics. The effect of the regularized delta function on the accuracy is an important subject in the property study. A method of manufactured solutions is used in the research. The computational code is first verified to be mistake-free by using smooth manufactured solutions. Then, a jump in the manufactured solution for pressure is introduced to study the accuracy of the immersed boundary method. Four kinds of regularized delta functions are used to test the effect on the accuracy analysis. By analyzing the discretization errors, the accuracy of the immersed boundary method is proved to be first-order. The results show that the regularized delta function cannot improve the accuracy, but it can change the discretization errors in the entire computational domain.     

Study of a staggered fourth‐order compact scheme for unsteady incompressible viscous flows

The objective of this paper is the development and assessment of a fourth‐order compact scheme for unsteady incompressible viscous flows. A brief review of the main developments of compact and high‐order schemes for incompressible flows is given. A numerical method is then presented for the simulation of unsteady incompressible flows based on fourth‐order compact discretization with physical boundary conditions implemented directly into the scheme. The equations are discretized on a staggered Cartesian non‐uniform grid and preserve a form of kinetic energy in the inviscid limit when a skew‐symmetric form of the convective terms is used. The accuracy and efficiency of the method are demonstrated in several inviscid and viscous flow problems. Results obtained with different combinations of second‐ and fourth‐order spatial discretizations and together with either the skew‐symmetric or divergence form of the convective term are compared. The performance of these schemes is further demonstrated by two challenging flow problems, linear instability in plane channel flow and a two‐dimensional dipole–wall interaction. Results show that the compact scheme is efficient and that the divergence and skew‐symmetric forms of the convective terms produce very similar results. In some but not all cases, a gain in accuracy and computational time is obtained with a high‐order discretization of only the convective and diffusive terms. Finally, the benefits of compact schemes with respect to second‐order schemes is discussed in the case of the fully developed turbulent channel flow. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A comparative investigation of hydrofoil at angles of attack

In this paper, a numerical investigation of incompressible flow around a hydrofoil is presented. The laminar flow was modeled at different angles of attack. Momentum and continuity equations were coupled by the artificial compressibility scheme. In finite‐volume method, convective fluxes were calculated and compared by four schemes. Flux averaging with pressure correction was used. The other characteristic‐based (CB) methods consisted of Roe scheme and original CB scheme. A revised CB scheme was implemented in this research, which demonstrated very accurate solutions with respect to others. The results confirmed the superiority of the revised upwind scheme regarding accuracy and convergence without any requirement to artificial viscosity. The problem was studied at high Reynolds numbers at the onset of turbulence. For time discretization, the fifth‐order Runge–Kutta scheme was used. Results were compared with those of others in which good agreement was observed. Numerical experiments were performed on the NACA0012 hydrofoil. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Accuracy analysis of immersed boundary method using method of manufactured solutions

The immersed boundary method is an effective technique for modeling and simulating fluid-structure interactions especially in the area of biomechanics.This paper analyzes the accuracy of the immersed boundary method.The procedure contains two parts,i.e.,the code verification and the accuracy analysis.The code verification provides the confidence that the code used is free of mistakes,and the accuracy analysis gives the order of accuracy of the immersed boundary method.The method of manufactured solutions is taken as a means for both parts.In the first part,the numerical code employs a second-order discretization scheme,i.e.,it has second-order accuracy in theory.It matches the calculated order of accuracy obtained in the numerical calculation for all variables.This means that the code contains no mistake,which is a premise of the subsequent work.The second part introduces a jump in the manufactured solution for the pressure and adds the corresponding singular forcing terms in the momentum equations.By analyzing the discretization errors,the accuracy of the immersed boundary method is proven to be first order even though the discretization scheme is second order.It has been found that the coarser mesh may not be sensitive enough to capture the influence of the immersed boundary,and the refinement on the Lagrangian markers barely has any effect on the numerical calculation.     

Verification of Euler/Navier–Stokes codes using the method of manufactured solutions

The method of manufactured solutions is used to verify the order of accuracy of two finite‐volume Euler and Navier–Stokes codes. The Premo code employs a node‐centred approach using unstructured meshes, while the Wind code employs a similar scheme on structured meshes. Both codes use Roe's upwind method with MUSCL extrapolation for the convective terms and central differences for the diffusion terms, thus yielding a numerical scheme that is formally second‐order accurate. The method of manufactured solutions is employed to generate exact solutions to the governing Euler and Navier–Stokes equations in two dimensions along with additional source terms. These exact solutions are then used to accurately evaluate the discretization error in the numerical solutions. Through global discretization error analyses, the spatial order of accuracy is observed to be second order for both codes, thus giving a high degree of confidence that the two codes are free from coding mistakes in the options exercised. Examples of coding mistakes discovered using the method are also given. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.