Multiparty secret sharing of quantum information via cavity QED

The scheme on multiparty secret sharing of an atomic quantum state information via entanglement swapping in cavity QED [Y.Q. Zhang, X.R. Jin, S. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 341 (2005) 380] is revisited and accordingly an improved version is proposed. The possible decoherence effect in the original version can be avoided after revision of assuming the prior distribution of entanglement. Moreover, the success probability of teleportation has been raised from 6.25% in the original version to 100% in the present version.     

Dynamics of Two-Photon Lasers with

[1]C.O.Weiss and R.Vilaseca,Dynamics of Lasers,VCH,Weinheim (1991); Instabilities and Chaos in Quantum Optics,eds.F.T.Arecchi and R.G.Harrison,Springer-Verlag,Berlin (1987). [2]H.Haken,Phys.Lett.A 53 (1975) 77. [3]Ju Rui,Huang Hong-Bin,Yang Peng,Xie Xia,and Zhao Huan,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 44 (2005) 65; Ju Rui,Zhang Ya-Jun,Huang Hong-Bin,and Zhao Huan,Acta Phys.Sin.53 (2004) 2191 (in Chinese). [4]C.Z.Ning and H.Haken,Z.Phys.B 77 (1989) 247; B 77 (1989) 157; B 77 (1989) 163; J.Zakrenwski and M.Lewenstein,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) 2057. [5]G.J.deValearcel,E.Roldan,and R.Vilaseca,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) R2674; Phys.Rev.A 49 (1994) 1243. [6]X.Xie,H.B.Huang,F.Qian,Y.J.Zhang,P.Yang,and G.X.Qi,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 46 (2006) 1042. [7]X.L.Deng,H.Q.Ma,B.D.Chen,and H.B.Huang,Phys.Lett.A 290 (2001) 77. [8]C.Benkert,and M.O.Scully,Phys.Rev.A 42 (1990) 2817. [9]M.O.Scully and M.S.Zubairy,Quantum Optics,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge (1997).     

Quantum secure direct communication based on order rearrangement of single photons

We present an improvement of the protocol proposed by Lucamarini and Mancini [M. Lucamarini, S. Mancini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 140501] with techniques used in the protocol presented by Zhu et al. [A.D. Zhu, Y. Xia, Q.B. Fan, S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 022338], namely the secret transmitting order of particles.     

Comment on: “Three-party quantum secure direct communication based on GHZ states” [Phys. Lett. A 354 (2006) 67]

The GHZ-state-based quantum secure direct communication (QSDC) protocol [X.-R. Jin, et al., Phys. Lett. A 354 (2006) 67] and its improved version [Z. Man, Y. Xia, Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 15] are analyzed from the aspect of security. It shows that much information of the transmitted secret message will be leaked out in both protocols.     

Nanoscale oscillatory fracture propagation in metallic glasses

We describe the oscillatory crack propagation for small propagation velocities at the atomistic scale that was recently observed for brittle metallic glasses [G. Wang, Y.T. Wang, Y.H. Liu, M.X. Pan, D.Q. Zhao, W.H. Wang, Appl. Lett. 89 (2006) 121909; G. Wang, D.Q. Zhao, H.Y. Bai, M.X. Pan, A.L. Xia, B.S. Han, X.K. Xi, Y. Wu, W.H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 235501]. Based on a simple model of crack propagation [Y. Braiman, T. Egami, Phys. Rev. E, 77 (2008) 065101(R)], we derived and analyzed expressions for the feature size, oscillation period, and maximum strain accumulated in the material.     

Re-study of Nucleon Pole Contribution in J/

[1]V.D.Burkert,Phys.Lett.B 72 (1997) 109. [2]S.Capstick and W.Roberts,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.45 (2000) S241,and references therein. [3]B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 675 (2000) 167c; B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 684 (2001) 330; BES Collaboration (J.Z.Bai,et al.) Phys.Lett.B 510 (2001) 75; BES Collaboration (M.Ablikim,et al.),hep-ex/0405030. [4]R.Sinha and Susumu Okubo,Phys.Rev.D 30 (1984)2333. [5]W.H.Liang,P.N.Shen,B.S.Zou,and A.Faessler,Euro.Phys.J A 21 (2004) 487. [6]Particle Data Group,Euro.Phys.J.C 15 (2000) 1. [7]K.Tsushima,A.Sibrtsev,and A.W.Thomas,Phys.Lett.B 390 (1997) 29. [8]J.Kogut,Rev.Mod.Phys.51 (1979) 659; Rev.Mod.Phys.55 (1983) 775. [9]Q.Haider and L.C.Liu,J.Phys.G 22 (1996) 1187; L.C.Liu and W.X.Ma,J.Phys.G 26 (2000) L59. [10]V.G.J.Stoks,R.A.M.Klomp,C.P.F.Terheggen,and J.J.de Swart,Phys.Rev.C 49 (1994) 2950. [11]H.Haberzettl,C.Bennhold,T.Mart,and T.Feuster,Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) R40. [12]Y.Oh,A.I.Titov,and T.-S.H.Lee,Phys.Rev.C 63(2001) 25201.     

Parameter identification of chaos system based on unknown parameter observer

Parameter identification of chaos system based on unknown parameter observer is discussed generally. Based on the work of Guan et al. [X.P. Guan, H.P. Peng, L.X. Li, et al., Acta Phys. Sinica 50 (2001) 26], the design of unknown parameter observer is improved. The application of the improved approach is extended greatly. The works in some literatures [X.P. Guan, H.P. Peng, L.X. Li, et al., Acta Phys. Sinica 50 (2001) 26; J.H. Lü, S.C. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 286 (2001) 148; X.Q. Wu, J.A. Lu, Chaos Solitons Fractals 18 (2003) 721; J. Liu, S.H. Chen, J. Xie, Chaos Solitons Fractals 19 (2004) 533] are only the special cases of our Corollaries 1 and 2. Some observers for Lü system and a new chaos system are designed to test our improved method, and simulations results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the improved approach.     

Simple Collaboration Eavesdropping on the Improved Multiparty Quantum Secret Sharing Protocol

We propose a new attack strategy for the improvement n-party (n≥4) case [S. Lin, F. Gao, Q.Y. Wen, F.C. Zhu in Opt. Commun. 281:4553, 2008] of the multiparty quantum secret sharing protocol [Z.J. Zhang, G. Gao, X. Wang, L.F. Han, S.H. Shi in Opt. Commun. 269:418, 2007]. Our attack strategy is an interesting collaboration eavesdropping and much simpler than that in the paper [T.Y. Wang, Q.Y. Wen, F. Gao, S. Lin, F.C. Zhu in Phys. Lett. A 373:65, 2008].     

Reexamining the security of the improved quantum secret sharing scheme

We find that, in the improvement [S.J. Qin et al., Phys. Lett. A 357 (2006) 101] of the multiparty quantum secret sharing [Z.J. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 044301], Charlie can solely obtain Alice’s secret messages without Bob’s helps. In other words, the improved secret sharing scheme is still insecure. In the end, we further modify Qin et al. improved three-party quantum secret sharing scheme and make it really secure.     

Comment on: “Synchronization of two chaotic nonlinear gyros using active control” [Phys. Lett. A 343 (2005) 153]

A modification to the control law presented in [Y. Lei, W. Xu, H. Zheng, Synchronization of two chaotic nonlinear gyros using active control, Phys. Lett. A 343 (2005) 153] is proposed.     

Top Quark Flavor Changing Decay t

[1]R. Casalbuoani, A. Deandrea, and M. Oertel, JHEP 032(2004) 0402. [2]G. Hooft, In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). [3]J. Belazey, Searches for New Physics at Hadron Coliders,Northern Illinois University (2005). [4]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett.B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]. [5]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001 [hep-ph/0207243]. [6]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A.E. Nelson,JHEP 0207 (2002) 304 [hep-ph/0206021]. [7]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, A.E. Nelson, T.Gregoire, and J. G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 021 [hepph/0206020]. [8]T. Gregoire and J.G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 019[hep-ph/0206023]. [9]For a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 117 (2003) 40. [10]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, T. Gregoire, and J.G.Jacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 020 [hep-ph/0202089]. [11]or a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys.Proc. Suppl. 117 (2003) 40 [hep-ph/0210415]. [12]E. Katz, J. Lee, A.E. Nelson, and D.G. Walker, hepph/0312287. [13]M. Beneke, I. Efthymiopoulos, M.L. Mangano, et al., hepph/0003033. [14]D.O. Carlson and C.-P. Yuan, hep-ph/9211289. [15]R. Frey, D. Gerdes, and J. Jaros, hep-ph/9704243. [16]G. Eilam, J.L. Hewett, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 44(1991) 1473; W.S. Hou, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 179; K.Agashe and M. Graesser, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 4445;M. Hosch, K. Whisnant, and B.L. Young, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 5725. [17]C.S. Li, R.J. Oakes, and J.M. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 49(1994) 293, Erratum-ibid. D 56 (1997) 3156; G. Couture,C. Hamzaoui, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995)1713; G. Couture, M. Frank, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev.D 56 (1997) 4213; G.M. de Divitiis, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 45. [18]B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu, Phys. Lett. B 435(1998) 401. [19]B. Mele, hep-ph/0003064. [20]J.M. Yang and C.S. Li, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3412,Erratum, ibid. D 51 (1995) 3974; J.G. Inglada, hepph/9906517. [21]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 41 (2004)241. [22]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 40 (2003)171. [23]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, Phys.Rev. D 67 (2003) 095004. [24]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001. [25]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, hepph/0302188. [26]A.J. Buras, A. Poschenrieder, and S. Uhlig, hepph/0410309. [27]S. Eidelman, et al., Phys. Lett. B 592 (2004) 1. [28]F. Legerlehner, DESY 01-029, hep-ph/0105283.     

Pair-Breaking Critical Current Density of Two-Band Superconductor MgB2

[1]J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagava, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani,and J. Akimitsu, Nature 410 (2001) 63. [2]C. Buzea and T. Yamashita, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 14(2001) R115. [3]S. Budko, G. Lapertot, C. Petrovic, C.E. Gunningham, N.Anderson, and P.C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001)1877. [4]H. Kotegawa, K. Ishida, Y. Kitaoka, T. Muranaka, and J. Akimitsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 127001. [5]J. Kortus, I.I. Mazin, K.D. Belashchenko, V.P. Antropov,and L.L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 4656. [6]A. Liu, I.I. Mazin, and J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(2001) 087005. [7]X.K. Chen, M.J. Konstantinovich, J.C. Irwin, D.D.Lawrie, and J.P. Frank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)157002. [8]H. Giublio, D. Roditchev, W. Sacks, R. Lamy, D.X.Thanh, J. Kleins, S. Miraglia, D. Fruchart, J. Markus,and P. Monod, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 177008. [9]F. Bouquet, R.A. Fisher, N.E. Phillips, D.G. Hinks, and J.D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 04700. [10]S.V. Shulga, S.-L. Drechsler, H. Echrig, H. Rosner, and W. Pickett, Cond-mat/0103154 (2001). [11]A.A. Golubov, J. Kortus, O.V. Dolgov, O. Jepsen, Y.Kong, O.K. Andersen, B.J. Gibson, K. Ahn, and R.K.Kremer, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 1353. [12]H. Doh, M. Sigrist, B.K. Chao, and Sung-Ik Lee, Phys.Rev. Lett. 85 (1999) 5350. [13]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, and A. Gencer, Supercond. Sci.Techn. 15 (2002) L13. [14]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, A. Gencer, and A. Kiliq, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 15 (2002) L17. [15]I.N. Askerzade and A. Gencer, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71(2002) 1637. [16]I.N. Askerzade, Physica C 397 (2003) 99. [17]V.V. Anshukova, B.M. Bulychev, A.I. Golovashkin, L.I.Ivanova, A.A. Minakov, and A.P. Rusakov, Phys. Solid State 45 (2003) 1207. [18]A.A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals,North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988). [19]M.N. Kunchur, S.I. Lee, and W.N. Kang, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 064516.     

Improvement of Security of Three-Party Quantum Secure Direct Communication Based on GHZ States

A protocol for three-party quantum secure direct communication based on Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger （GHZ） states was recently proposed by 3in et al. [Phys. Lett. A 354 （2006） 67] By analysing the protocol we find some security loopholes, e.g. one bit of secret messages of a party （Alice in the original paper） can always be leaked straight to the public without any eavesdropping. These problems suggested previously are discussed and possible solutions are presented to improve the security of the original protocol.     

Classical Communication and Entanglement Cost in Preparing a Class of Multi-qubit States

Recently, several similar protocols [J. Opt. B 4 （2002） 380; Phys. Lett. A 316 （2003） 159; Phys. Lett. A 355 （2006） 285; Phys. Lett. A 336 （2005） 317] for remotely preparing a class of multi-qubit states （i.e, α[0...0〉 ＋β[1... 1〉） were proposed, respectively. In this paper, by applying the controlled-not （CNOT） gate, a new simple protocol is proposed for remotely preparing such class of states. Compared to the previous protocols, both classical communication cost and required quantum entanglement in our protocol are remarkably reduced. Moreover, the difficulty of identifying some quantum states in our protocol is also degraded. Hence our protocol is more economical and feasible.     

Stochastic asymptotic stability of Markovian jumping neural networks with Markov mode estimation and mode-dependent delays

In a previous work [Z.D. Wang, Y.R. Liu, L. Yu, X.H. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 346] an exponential stability analysis for a class of Markovian jumping neural networks (MJNNs) was presented. In this Letter we employ the same technique to extend the results for MJNNs with time-varying delays and mode estimation, appropriate for active fault-tolerant control systems.     

Comment on: “Globally exponential synchronization in array of asymmetric coupled neural networks” [Phys. Lett. A 369 (2007) 444]

In this Letter, we indicate that the proposed sufficient condition in Letter [J.Q. Lu, W.C. Ho, M. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 369 (2007) 444] does not hold when coupling matrix G satisfies Assumption 3 in Letter [J.Q. Lu, W.C. Ho, M. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 369 (2007) 444]. Besides, there are some mistakes in deducing Theorem 1. The mistakes have been corrected and a correct version is given in this Letter.     

Hawking radiation,effective actions and covariant boundary conditions

From an appropriate expression for the effective action, the Hawking radiation from charged black holes is derived, using only covariant boundary conditions at the event horizon. The connection of our approach with the Unruh vacuum and the recent analysis [S.P. Robinson, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 011303, gr-qc/0502074; S. Iso, H. Umetsu, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 151302, hep-th/0602146; R. Banerjee, S. Kulkarni, arXiv: 0707.2449 [hep-th]] of Hawking radiation using anomalies is established.     

Shape Coexistence for 179Hg in Relativistic Mean-Field Theory

[1]J.H. Hamilton,A. VRamayya, W.T. Pinkston, et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 239. [2]R. Julin, K. Helariutta, and M. Muikku, J. Phys. G 27(2001) R109. [3]J.H. Hamilton, Nukleonika 24 (1979) 561. [4]W.C. Ma, et al., Phys. Lett. B 139 (1984) 276. [5]R. Bengtsson, et al., Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 1. [6]S. Yoshida and N. Takigawa, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1996)1255. [7]T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65(2002) 054320. [8]F.G. Condev, M.P. Carpenter, R.V.F. Janssens, et al.,Phys. Lett. B 528 (2002) 221. [9]D.G. Jenkins, A.N. Andreyev, R.D. Page, et al., Phys.Rev. C 66 (2002) 011301(R). [10]B.D. Serot and J.D. Walecka, Adv. Nuc]. Phys. 16 (1986)1. [11]P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 193. [12]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3963. [13]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 460. [14]S.K. Patra, S. Yoshida, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1924. [15]S. Yoshida, S.K. Patra, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1938. [16]G.A. Lalazissis and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998)225. [17]Jun-Qing Li, Zhong-Yu Ma, Bao-Qiu Chen, and Yong Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 064305. [18]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 565 (1993) 1. [19]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595 (1995)409. [20]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 624 (1997) 1. [21]P. MOller and J.R. Nix, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Table 59 (1995) 307.     

Single-oscillator model and determination of optical constants of spray pyrolyzed amorphous SnO<Subscript>2</Subscript> thin films

It has recently been shown that growth of a multilayer structure with one or more delta-layers at high temperature leads to spreading and asymmetrization of the dopant distribution [see, for example, E.F.J. Schubert, Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 8, 2980 (1990), A.M. Nazmul, S. Sugahara, M. Tanaka, J. Crystal Growth 251, 303 (2003); R.C. Newman, M.J. Ashwin, M.R. Fahy, L. Hart, S.N. Holmes, C. Roberts, X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 8769 (1996); E.F. Schubert, J.M. Kuo, R.F. Kopf, H.S. Luftman, L.C. Hopkins, N.J. Sauer, J. Appl. Phys. 67, 1969 (1990); P.M. Zagwijn, J.F. van der Veen, E. Vlieg, A.H. Reader, D.J. Gravesteijn, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 4933 (1995); W.S. Hobson, S.J. Pearton, E.F. Schubert, G. Cabaniss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1546 (1989); Delta Doping of Semiconductors, edited by E.F. Schubert (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996); Yu.N. Drozdov, N.B. Baidus', B.N. Zvonkov, M.N. Drozdov, O.I. Khrykin, V.I. Shashkin, Semiconductors 37, 194 (2003); E. Skuras, A.R. Long, B. Vogele, M.C. Holland, C.R. Stanley, E.A. Johnson, M. van der Burgt, H. Yaguchi, J. Singleton, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10712 (1999); G. Li, C. Jagadish, Solid-State Electronics 41, 1207 (1997)]. In this work analytical and numerical analysis of dopant dynamics in a delta-doped area of a multilayer structure has been accomplished using Fick's second law. Some reasons for asymmetrization of a delta-dopant distribution are illustrated. The spreading of a delta-layer has been estimated using example materials of a multilayer structure, a delta-layer and an overlayer.     

Comment on: “Efficient high-capacity quantum secret sharing with two-photon entanglement” [Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 1957]

In a recent Letter [F.G. Deng, X.H. Li, H.Y. Zhou, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 1957], an efficient high-capacity quantum secret sharing scheme was proposed. However, in this comment, it is shown that the protocol does not complete the task of secret sharing well when the message sender uses the nonorthogonal entangled states as the quantum information carriers. Finally a feasible improvement of this quantum secret sharing protocol is proposed.