Generating dual Baer modules via fully invariant submodules

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a concept of a dual F-Baer module M where F is the fully invariant submodule of M, by this means we deal with generating dual Baer modules. We investigate direct sums of dual F -Baer modules M by exerting the notion of relatively dual F-Baer modules. We also obtain applications of dual F-Baer modules to rings and the preradical Z*(·).     

Principally Quasi-Baer skew Generalized Power Series modules

Let R be a ring and S a strictly totally ordered monoid. Let ω: S → End(R) be a monoid homomorphism. Let M _R be an ω-compatible module and either R satisfies the ascending chain conditions (ACC) on left annihilator ideals or every S-indexed subset of right semicentral idempotents in R has a generalized S-indexed join. We show that M _R is p.q.-Baer if and only if the generalized power series module M[[S]] _{R[[S, ω]]} is p.q.-Baer. As a consequence, we deduce that for an ω-compatible ring R, the skew generalized power series ring R[[S, ω]] is right p.q.-Baer if and only if R is right p.q.-Baer and either R satisfies the ACC on left annihilator ideals or any S-indexed subset of right semicentral idempotents in R has a generalized S-indexed join in R. Examples to illustrate and delimit the theory are provided.     

T-Semisimple Modules and T-Semisimple Rings

We define and investigate t-semisimple modules as a generalization of semisimple modules. A module M is called t-semisimple if every submodule N contains a direct summand K of M such that K is t-essential in N. T-semisimple modules are Morita invariant and they form a strict subclass of t-extending modules. Many equivalent conditions for a module M to be t-semisimple are found. Accordingly, M is t-semisiple, if and only if, M = Z ₂(M) ⊕ S(M) (where Z ₂(M) is the Goldie torsion submodule and S(M) is the sum of nonsingular simple submodules). A ring R is called right t-semisimple if R _R is t-semisimple. Various characterizations of right t-semisimple rings are given. For some types of rings, conditions equivalent to being t-semisimple are found, and this property is investigated in terms of chain conditions.     

On Copure Projective Modules and Copure Projective Dimensions

Let R be any ring. A right R-module M is called n-copure projective if Ext¹(M, N) = 0 for any right R-module N with fd(N) ≤ n, and M is said to be strongly copure projective if Ext ⁱ (M, F) = 0 for all flat right R-modules F and all i ≥ 1. In this article, firstly, we present some general properties of n-copure projective modules and strongly copure projective modules. Then we define and investigate copure projective dimensions of modules and rings. Finally, more properties and applications of n-copure projective modules, strongly copure projective modules and copure projective dimensions are given over coherent rings with finite self-FP-injective dimension.     

On a class of semicommutative modules

Let R be a ring with identity, M a right R-module and S = End _R (M). In this note, we introduce S-semicommutative, S-Baer, S-q.-Baer and S-p.q.-Baer modules. We study the relations between these classes of modules. Also we prove if M is an S-semicommutative module, then M is an S-p.q.-Baer module if and only if M[x] is an S[x]-p.q.-Baer module, M is an S-Baer module if and only if M[x] is an S[x]-Baer module, M is an S-q.-Baer module if and only if M[x] is an S[x]-q.-Baer module.     

On Fully Idempotent Modules

A submodule N of a module M is idempotent if N = Hom(M, N)N. The module M is fully idempotent if every submodule of M is idempotent. We prove that over a commutative ring, cyclic idempotent submodules of any module are direct summands. Counterexamples are given to show that this result is not true in general. It is shown that over commutative Noetherian rings, the fully idempotent modules are precisely the semisimple modules. We also show that the commutative rings over which every module is fully idempotent are exactly the semisimple rings. Idempotent submodules of free modules are characterized.     

Asymptotic Sequences over a Module

Let (R, 𝔪) be a Noetherian local ring and M be a submodule of the free module F = R ^r with height(I _r (M)) > 0. Asymptotic sequences over M will be defined analogous to Rees’ definition of asymptotic sequences over an ideal. It is then shown that all maximal asymptotic sequences over M have the same length. This length gives a bound on the analytic spread of M. Namely, if s is the length of a maximal asymptotic sequence over M then l(M) ≤dim R + rank M ? 1 ? s. Equality holds if R is quasi-unmixed.     

δ-M-Small and δ-Harada Modules

Let M be a right R-module and N ∈ σ[M]. A submodule K of N is called δ-M-small if, whenever N = K + X with N/X M-singular, we have N = X. N is called a δ-M-small module if N? K, K is δ-M-small in L for some K, L ∈ σ[M]. In this article, we prove that if M is a finitely generated self-projective generator in σ[M], then M is a Noetherian QF-module if and only if every module in σ[M] is a direct sum of a projective module in σ[M] and a δ-M-small module. As a generalization of a Harada module, a module M is called a δ-Harada module if every injective module in σ[M] is δ _M -lifting. Some properties of δ-Harada modules are investigated and a characterization of a Harada module is also obtained.     

Semiregular Modules with Respect to a Fully Invariant Submodule

Abstract

Let M be a left R-module and F a submodule of M for any ring R. We call M F-semiregular if for every x ∈ M, there exists a decomposition M = A ⊕ B such that A is projective, A ≤ Rx and Rx ∩ B ≤ F. This definition extends several notions in the literature. We investigate some equivalent conditions to F-semiregular modules and consider some certain fully invariant submodules such as Z(M), Soc(M), δ(M). We prove, among others, that if M is a finitely generated projective module, then M is quasi-injective if and only if M is Z(M)-semiregular and M ⊕ M is CS. If M is projective Soc(M)-semiregular module, then M is semiregular. We also characterize QF-rings R with J(R)² = 0.     

On dual of square free modules

A module M is said to be square free if whenever its submodule is isomorphic to N² = N⊕N for some module N, then N = 0. Dually, a module M is said to be d-square free (dual square free) if whenever its factor module is isomorphic to N² for some module N, then N = 0. In this paper, we give some fundamental properties of d-square free modules and study rings whose d-square free modules are closed under submodules or essential extensions.     

t-Extending Modules and t-Baer Modules

We introduce the notions of “t-extending modules,” and “t-Baer modules,” which are generalizations of extending modules. The second notion is also a generalization of nonsingular Baer modules. We show that a homomorphic image (hence a direct summand) of a t-extending module and a direct summand of a t-Baer module inherits the property. It is shown that a module M is t-extending if and only if M is t-Baer and t-cononsingular. The rings for which every free right module is t-extending are called right Σ-t-extending. The class of right Σ-t-extending rings properly contains the class of right Σ-extending rings. Among other equivalent conditions for such rings, it is shown that a ring R is right Σ-t-extending, if and only if, every right R-module is t-extending, if and only if, every right R-module is t-Baer, if and only if, every nonsingular right R-module is projective. Moreover, it is proved that for a ring R, every free right R-module is t-Baer if and only if Z ₂(R _R ) is a direct summand of R and every submodule of a direct product of nonsingular projective R-modules is projective.     

Simple-Baer Rings and Minannihilator Modules

Let R be a ring. M is said to be a minannihilator left R-module if r _M l _R (I) = IM for any simple right ideal I of R. A right R-module N is called simple-flat if Nl _R (I) = l _N (I) for any simple right ideal I of R. R is said to be a left simple-Baer (resp., left simple-coherent) ring if the left annihilator of every simple right ideal is a direct summand of _R R (resp., finitely generated). We first obtain some properties of minannihilator and simple-flat modules. Then we characterize simple-coherent rings, simple-Baer rings, and universally mininjective rings using minannihilator and simple-flat modules.     

On Isolated Submodules

Let R be a ring with identity and let M be a unital left R-module. A proper submodule L of M is radical if L is an intersection of prime submodules of M. Moreover, a submodule L of M is isolated if, for each proper submodule N of L, there exists a prime submodule K of M such that N ? K but L ? K. It is proved that every proper submodule of M is radical (and hence every submodule of M is isolated) if and only if N ∩ IM = IN for every submodule N of M and every (left primitive) ideal I of R. In case, R/P is an Artinian ring for every left primitive ideal P of R it is proved that a finitely generated submodule N of a nonzero left R-module M is isolated if and only if PN = N ∩ PM for every left primitive ideal P of R. If R is a commutative ring, then a finitely generated submodule N of a projective R-module M is isolated if and only if N is a direct summand of M.     

Properties of Modules and Rings Relative to Some Matrices

Let R be a ring and  _β×α(R) (?   _β×α(R)) the set of all β × α full (row finite) matrices over R where α and β ≥ 1 are two cardinal numbers. A left R-module M is said to be “injective relative” to a matrix A ? ?   _β×α(R) if every R-homomorphism from R ^(β) A to M extends to one from R ^(α) to M. It is proved that M is injective relative to A if and only if it is A-pure in every module which contains M as a submodule. A right R-module N is called flat relative to a matrix A ?  _β×α(R) if the canonical map μ: N? R ^(β) A → N ^α is a monomorphism. This extends the notion of (m, n)-flat modules so that n-projectivity, finitely projectivity, and τ-flatness can be redefined in terms of flatness relative to certain matrices. R is called left coherent relative to a matrix A ?  _β×α(R) if R ^(β) A is a left R-ML module. Some results on τ-coherent rings and (m, n)-coherent rings are extended.     

McCoy modules and related modules over commutative rings

Let M be a left R-module. Then M is a McCoy (resp., dual McCoy) module if for nonzero f(X)∈R[X] and m(X)∈M[X], f(X)m(X) = 0 implies there exists a nonzero r∈R (resp., m∈M) with rm(X) = 0 (resp., f(X)m = 0). We show that for R commutative every R-module is dual McCoy, but give an example of a non-McCoy module. A number of other results concerning (dual) McCoy modules as well as arithmetical, Gaussian, and Armendariz modules are given.     

Multiplication Modules in Which Every Prime Submodule is Contained in a Unique Maximal Submodule

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring. An R-module M is called a multiplication module if for each submodule N of M, N?=?IM for some ideal I of R. An R-module M is called a pm-module, i.e., M is pm, if every prime submodule of M is contained in a unique maximal submodule of M. In this paper the following results are obtained. (1) If R is pm, then any multiplication R-module M is pm. (2) If M is finitely generated, then M is a multiplication module if and only if Spec(M) is a spectral space if and only if Spec(M)?=?{PM?|?P?∈?Spec(R) and P???M ^⊥}. (3) If M is a finitely generated multiplication R-module, then: (i) M is pm if and only if Max(M) is a retract of Spec(M) if and only if Spec(M) is normal if and only if M is a weakly Gelfand module; (ii) M is a Gelfand module if and only if Mod(M) is normal. (4) If M is a multiplication R-module, then Spec(M) is normal if and only if Mod(M) is weakly normal.     

Principally quasi-injective modules

An R-module M is called principally quasi-injective if each R-hornomorphism from a principal submodule of M to M can be extended to an endomorphism of M. Many properties of principally injective rings and quasi-injective modules are extended to these modules. As one application, we show that, for a finite-dimensional quasi-injective module M in which every maximal uniform submodule is fully invariant, there is a bijection between the set of indecomposable summands of M and the maximal left ideals of the endomorphism ring of M

Throughout this paper all rings R are associative with unity, and all modules are unital. We denote the Jacobson radical, the socle and the singular submodule of a module M by J(M), soc(M) and Z(M), respectively, and we write J(M) = J. The notation N ?^ess M means that N is an essential submodule of M.     

Mod-Retractable Rings

A right module M over a ring R is said to be retractable if Hom _R (M, N) ≠ 0 for each nonzero submodule N of M. We show that M ? _R RG is a retractable RG-module if and only if M _R is retractable for every finite group G. The ring R is (finitely) mod-retractable if every (finitely generated) right R-module is retractable. Some comparisons between max rings, semiartinian rings, perfect rings, noetherian rings, nonsingular rings, and mod-retractable rings are investigated. In particular, we prove ring-theoretical criteria of right mod-retractability for classes of all commutative, left perfect, and right noetherian rings.     

Idealization and Theorems of D. D. Anderson

All rings are commutative with identity and all modules are unital. Anderson proved that a submodule N of an R-module M is multiplication (resp. join principal) if and only if 0₍₊₎ N is a multiplication (resp. join principal) ideal or R(M). The idealization of M. In this article we develop more fully the tool of idealization of a module, particularly in the context of multiplication modules, generalizing Anderson's theorems and discussing the behavior under idealization of some ideals and some submodules associated with a module.     

Some remarks on multiplication ideals,ii

Let R bea commutative ring with identity. An R-module (ideal of R) A is called a multiplication module (ideal) if for each submodule N of A there exists an ideal I of R with N = I A. We give several characterizations of multiplication modules. Using the method of idealization we show how to reduce questions concerning multiplication modules to multiplication ideals. For example, we show that if S is a commutative R-algebra and ψ: M→an R-module homomorphism where M is a multiplication R-module and N is an S-module, then Sψ(M) is a multiplication S-module.