A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

On the eccentric distance sum of graphs

The eccentric distance sum is a novel topological index that offers a vast potential for structure activity/property relationships. For a graph G, it is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈Vε(v)D(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and D(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. Motivated by [G. Yu, L. Feng, A. Ili?, On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 375 (2011) 934-944], in this paper we characterize the extremal trees and graphs with maximal eccentric distance sum. Various lower and upper bounds for the eccentric distance sum in terms of other graph invariants including the Wiener index, the degree distance, eccentric connectivity index, independence number, connectivity, matching number, chromatic number and clique number are established. In addition, we present explicit formulae for the values of eccentric distance sum for the Cartesian product, applied to some graphs of chemical interest (like nanotubes and nanotori).     

Subdivided trees are integral sum graphs

A graph G=(V,E) is an integral sum graph (ISG) if there exists a labeling S(G)⊂Z such that V=S(G) and for every pair of distinct vertices u,v∈V, uv is an edge if and only if u+v∈V. A vertex in a graph is called a fork if its degree is not 2. In 1998, Chen proved that every tree whose forks are at distance at least 4 from each other is an ISG. In 2004, He et al. reduced the distance to 3. In this paper we reduce the distance further to 2, i.e. we prove that every tree whose forks are at least distance 2 apart is an ISG.     

Global defensive alliances in star graphs

A defensive alliance in a graph G=(V,E) is a set of vertices S⊆V satisfying the condition that, for each v∈S, at least one half of its closed neighbors are in S. A defensive alliance S is called a critical defensive alliance if any vertex is removed from S, then the resulting vertex set is not a defensive alliance any more. An alliance S is called global if every vertex in V(G)?S is adjacent to at least one member of the alliance S. In this paper, we shall propose a way for finding a critical global defensive alliance of star graphs. After counting the number of vertices in the critical global defensive alliance, we can derive an upper bound to the size of the minimum global defensive alliances in star graphs.     

The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if every vertex u∈V−S is dominated by some vertex v∈S. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. For the generalized Petersen graph G(n), Behzad et al. [A. Behzad, M. Behzad, C.E. Praeger, On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 603-610] proved that and conjectured that the upper bound is the exact domination number. In this paper we prove this conjecture.     

Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph without 4-cycles and without two 3-cycles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5-choosable. This improves a result in [M. Montassier, P. Ochem, A. Raspaud, On the acyclic choosability of graphs, J. Graph Theory 51 (2006) 281-300], which says that planar graphs of girth at least 5 are acyclically 5-choosable.     

Rooted directed path graphs are leaf powers

Leaf powers are a graph class which has been introduced to model the problem of reconstructing phylogenetic trees. A graph G=(V,E) is called k-leaf power if it admits a k-leaf root, i.e., a tree T with leaves V such that uv is an edge in G if and only if the distance between u and v in T is at most k. Moroever, a graph is simply called leaf power if it is a k-leaf power for some k∈N. This paper characterizes leaf powers in terms of their relation to several other known graph classes. It also addresses the problem of deciding whether a given graph is a k-leaf power.We show that the class of leaf powers coincides with fixed tolerance NeST graphs, a well-known graph class with absolutely different motivations. After this, we provide the largest currently known proper subclass of leaf powers, i.e, the class of rooted directed path graphs.Subsequently, we study the leaf rank problem, the algorithmic challenge of determining the minimum k for which a given graph is a k-leaf power. Firstly, we give a lower bound on the leaf rank of a graph in terms of the complexity of its separators. Secondly, we use this measure to show that the leaf rank is unbounded on both the class of ptolemaic and the class of unit interval graphs. Finally, we provide efficient algorithms to compute 2|V|-leaf roots for given ptolemaic or (unit) interval graphs G=(V,E).     

The vertex linear arboricity of distance graphs

A distance graph is a graph G(R,D) with the set of all points of the real line as vertex set and two vertices u,v∈R are adjacent if and only if |u-v|∈D where the distance set D is a subset of the positive real numbers. Here, the vertex linear arboricity of G(R,D) is determined when D is an interval between 1 and δ. In particular, the vertex linear arboricity of integer distance graphs G(D) is discussed, too.     

Geodesic-pancyclic graphs

A shortest path connecting two vertices u and v is called a u-v geodesic. The distance between u and v in a graph G, denoted by d_G(u,v), is the number of edges in a u-v geodesic. A graph G with n vertices is panconnected if, for each pair of vertices u,v∈V(G) and for each integer k with d_G(u,v)?k?n-1, there is a path of length k in G that connects u and v. A graph G with n vertices is geodesic-pancyclic if, for each pair of vertices u,v∈V(G), every u-v geodesic lies on every cycle of length k satisfying max{2d_G(u,v),3}?k?n. In this paper, we study sufficient conditions of geodesic-pancyclic graphs. In particular, we show that most of the known sufficient conditions of panconnected graphs can be applied to geodesic-pancyclic graphs.     

On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V(G). The eccentric distance sum of G is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈V(G)ε(v)DG(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and DG(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. In this paper we characterize the extremal unicyclic graphs among n-vertex unicyclic graphs with given girth having the minimal and second minimal eccentric distance sum. In addition, we characterize the extremal trees with given diameter and minimal eccentric distance sum.     

A characterization of block graphs

A block graph is a graph whose blocks are cliques. For each edge e=uv of a graph G, let N_e(u) denote the set of all vertices in G which are closer to u than v. In this paper we prove that a graph G is a block graph if and only if it satisfies two conditions: (a) The shortest path between any two vertices of G is unique; and (b) For each edge e=uv∈E(G), if x∈N_e(u) and y∈N_e(v), then, and only then, the shortest path between x and y contains the edge e. This confirms a conjecture of Dobrynin and Gutman [A.A. Dobrynin, I. Gutman, On a graph invariant related to the sum of all distances in a graph, Publ. Inst. Math., Beograd. 56 (1994) 18-22].     

Constructing and classifying neighborhood anti-Sperner graphs

For a simple graph G let N_G(u) be the (open) neighborhood of vertex u∈V(G). Then G is neighborhood anti-Sperner (NAS) if for every u there is a v∈V(G)?{u} with N_G(u)⊆N_G(v). And a graph H is neighborhood distinct (ND) if every neighborhood is distinct, i.e., if N_H(u)≠N_H(v) when u≠v, for all u and v∈V(H).In Porter and Yucas [T.D. Porter, J.L. Yucas. Graphs whose vertex-neighborhoods are anti-sperner, Bulletin of the Institute of Combinatorics and its Applications 44 (2005) 69-77] a characterization of regular NAS graphs was given: ‘each regular NAS graph can be obtained from a host graph by replacing vertices by null graphs of appropriate sizes, and then joining these null graphs in a prescribed manner’. We extend this characterization to all NAS graphs, and give algorithms to construct all NAS graphs from host ND graphs. Then we find and classify all connected r-regular NAS graphs for r=0,1,…,6.     

Bipartite graphs are not universal fixers

For any permutation π of the vertex set of a graph G, the graph πG is obtained from two copies G^′ and G^″ of G by joining u∈V(G^′) and v∈V(G^″) if and only if v=π(u). Denote the domination number of G by γ(G). For all permutations π of V(G), γ(G)≤γ(πG)≤2γ(G). If γ(πG)=γ(G) for all π, then G is called a universal fixer. We prove that graphs without 5-cycles are not universal fixers, from which it follows that bipartite graphs are not universal fixers.     

Cyclic orthogonal double covers of 4-regular circulant graphs

An orthogonal double cover (ODC) of a graph H is a collection G={G_v:v∈V(H)} of |V(H)| subgraphs of H such that every edge of H is contained in exactly two members of G and for any two members G_u and G_v in G, |E(G_u)∩E(G_v)| is 1 if u and v are adjacent in H and it is 0 if u and v are nonadjacent in H. An ODC G of H is cyclic (CODC) if the cyclic group of order |V(H)| is a subgroup of the automorphism group of G. In this paper, we are concerned with CODCs of 4-regular circulant graphs.     

Upper bounds on the upper signed total domination number of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A function f:V→{−1,+1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function g, f≠g, for which g(v)≤f(v) for every v∈V. The weight of a signed total dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices of G. The upper signed total domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal signed total dominating function on G. In this paper we present a sharp upper bound on the upper signed total domination number of an arbitrary graph. This result generalizes previous results for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs.     

Convexity in oriented graphs

For vertices u and v in an oriented graph D, the closed interval I[u,v] consists of u and v together with all vertices lying in a u−v geodesic or v−u geodesic in D. For S⊆V(D), I[S] is the union of all closed intervals I[u,v] with u,v∈S. A set S is convex if I[S]=S. The convexity number con(D) is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of V(D). The nontrivial connected oriented graphs of order n with convexity number n−1 are characterized. It is shown that there is no connected oriented graph of order at least 4 with convexity number 2 and that every pair k, n of integers with 1⩽k⩽n−1 and k≠2 is realizable as the convexity number and order, respectively, of some connected oriented graph. For a nontrivial connected graph G, the lower orientable convexity number con⁻(G) is the minimum convexity number among all orientations of G and the upper orientable convexity number con⁺(G) is the maximum such convexity number. It is shown that con⁺(G)=n−1 for every graph G of order n⩾2. The lower orientable convexity numbers of some well-known graphs are determined, with special attention given to outerplanar graphs.     

Cycle-magic graphs

A simple graph G=(V,E) admits a cycle-covering if every edge in E belongs at least to one subgraph of G isomorphic to a given cycle C. Then the graph G is C-magic if there exists a total labelling f:V∪E→{1,2,…,|V|+|E|} such that, for every subgraph H^′=(V^′,E^′) of G isomorphic to C, ∑_v∈V^′f(v)+∑_e∈E^′f(e) is constant. When f(V)={1,…,|V|}, then G is said to be C-supermagic.We study the cyclic-magic and cyclic-supermagic behavior of several classes of connected graphs. We give several families of C_r-magic graphs for each r?3. The results rely on a technique of partitioning sets of integers with special properties.     

Distance-hereditary graphs and signpost systems

An ordered pair (U,R) is called a signpost system if U is a finite nonempty set, R⊆U×U×U, and the following axioms hold for all u,v,w∈U: (1) if (u,v,w)∈R, then (v,u,u)∈R; (2) if (u,v,w)∈R, then (v,u,w)∉R; (3) if u≠v, then there exists t∈U such that (u,t,v)∈R. (If F is a (finite) connected graph with vertex set U and distance function d, then U together with the set of all ordered triples (u,v,w) of vertices in F such that d(u,v)=1 and d(v,w)=d(u,w)−1 is an example of a signpost system). If (U,R) is a signpost system and G is a graph, then G is called the underlying graph of (U,R) if V(G)=U and xy∈E(G) if and only if (x,y,y)∈R (for all x,y∈U). It is possible to say that a signpost system shows a way how to travel in its underlying graph. The following result is proved: Let (U,R) be a signpost system and let G denote the underlying graph of (U,R). Then G is connected and every induced path in G is a geodesic in G if and only if (U,R) satisfies axioms (4)-(8) stated in this paper; note that axioms (4)-(8)-similarly as axioms (1)-(3)-can be formulated in the language of the first-order logic.     

The signed star domination numbers of the Cartesian product graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)→{-1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function of G if for every v∈V(G), where E_G(v)={uv∈E(G)|u∈V(G)}. The minimum of the values of , taken over all signed star dominating functions f on G, is called the signed star domination number of G and is denoted by γ_SS(G). In this paper, a sharp upper bound of γ_SS(G×H) is presented.     

Local coloring of Kneser graphs

A local coloring of a graph G is a function c:V(G)→N having the property that for each set S⊆V(G) with 2≤|S|≤3, there exist vertices u,v∈S such that |c(u)−c(v)|≥m_S, where m_S is the number of edges of the induced subgraph 〈S〉. The maximum color assigned by a local coloring c to a vertex of G is called the value of c and is denoted by χ_?(c). The local chromatic number of G is χ_?(G)=min{χ_?(c)}, where the minimum is taken over all local colorings c of G. The local coloring of graphs was introduced by Chartrand et al. [G. Chartrand, E. Salehi, P. Zhang, On local colorings of graphs, Congressus Numerantium 163 (2003) 207-221]. In this paper the local coloring of Kneser graphs is studied and the local chromatic number of the Kneser graph K(n,k) for some values of n and k is determined.