Optimal business policies for a supplier–transporter–buyer channel with a price-sensitive demand

As the third party logistics partners (carriers) taking a more and more significant role in supply chain practices and customer service performance improvement, there is an emerging need for the studies on optimal channel coordination policies for business processes involving not only supplier and buyer (retailer), but also transportation partners. In this paper, we explicitly add a transportation partner with concave cost functions into the analysis for supplier–buyer channel coordination policies, and analyse the impact of coordination and pricing policies on supply chain profitability. The market demand is assumed to be a decreasing convex function of buyer's selling price (x), D(x)=d/x². Under this assumption, we quantify the improvement on total supply chain profitability when moving from a non-cooperative environment to a fully cooperative environment, and show that the joint annual profit of three partners in a cooperative environment can be at least twice of what may be achieved by three independently operated companies in a leader–follower business game. While in a real-world business environment, a perfect collaboration is hard to achieve, this result can be used to provide a quick estimation on the upper bound on the budget for profit sharing or discount offers among the supply chain partners.     

Profit allocation games in supply chains

The paper considers a supply chain where a number of agents are connected in some network relationship. Game theory is a very powerful framework for studying decision making problems, involving a group of agents in a supply chain. Allocation games examine the allocation of value among agents connected by a network. The ongoing actions in the supply chain are a mix of cooperative and non-cooperative behavior of the participants. The paper proposes a two-stage procedure for profit allocation based on combination of non-cooperative and cooperative game approaches. In the first stage, retailers meet customer price-dependent stochastic demand and seek to maximize total profit from the sale. Retailers are trying to align goals with producers on a contract basis and share the total profit with them. In the second stage, the cooperating producers allocate individual profits.     

含有混合销售渠道的供应链合作策略研究

本文通过Stackelberg博弈方法研究含有混合销售渠道的供应链中双渠道制造商参与的不同合作策略对供应链中企业的定价和利润的影响。研究表明:在有双渠道制造商参与的合作中,合作策略不仅增加了合作联盟的利润,而且也能够增加合作联盟外其他成员的利润;供应链中参与合作的企业越多,给供应链带来的总利润也越大;在参与合作联盟的成员数相同的条件下,供应链的纵向合作比横向合作给供应链能够带来更多的利润。最后,通过数值实验验证了上述结论。     

供应中断下具有随机需求的闭环供应链最优差别定价模型

研究了在供应中断下具有随机需求的闭环供应链系统的最优差别定价模型.基于博弈论的理论和方法分别在集中式和分散式决策情形下,确定了最优批发价、最优销售价、最优订购量及系统利润.最后通过数值例子对最优差别定价模型进行了实证分析.     

考虑延迟现象的质量改进投入和营销努力动态协同策略

利用时滞微分方程刻画质量改进投入对品牌商誉提升的延迟现象,分别构建了制造商和零售商采取非合作博弈、合作博弈以及成本分担的部分合作博弈(制造商参与营销的单向部分合作博弈、零售商参与生产的单向部分合作博弈、制造商参与营销及零售商参与生产的双向部分合作博弈)五种决策模式下的微分博弈模型。借助哈密尔顿极大值原理,求解得到五种情形下的制造商最优质量改进投入策略和零售商的最优营销努力策略以及供应链利润。对比五种博弈模式下的结果发现:1)延时现象会降低制造商进行质量改进投入的积极性,但对零售商营销努力无影响;品牌商誉在延迟现象影响下出现先衰减后提升的演进规律;2)合作博弈对于供应链绩效总是最优的,三种成本分担的部分合作博弈契约虽不能实现供应链的完全协调,但可以对非合作博弈情形进行帕累托改进;3)对比两种单向部分合作博弈,在提高供应链利润方面,制造商参与营销的成本分担契约优于零售商参与生产的成本分担契约;4)三种成本分担契约中,双向合作的部分合作博弈是供应链的最优选择,但随着延迟时间增大,其帕累托改进效果将不再明显。     

Research on coordination mechanism in three-level green supply chain under non-cooperative game

In view of the three-level green supply chain system in which market demand correlates with product green degree, game theory is applied to study four models, namely cooperative decision-making, three-level leader–follower game, Stackelberg game I and Stackelberg game II. Theoretical analysis shows that the profits of both the supply chain system and participating members reach the optimal level under cooperative decision-making, while the decision results of participating members as well as the channel profit are far from satisfactory under the non-cooperative game. By building a revenue sharing mechanism, Shapley value method coordination mechanism and asymmetric Nash negotiation mechanism, supply chain members are motivated to respond positively to the cooperation in producing and marketing green products, the optimal income distribution coefficient of participating members is given, and the income of each member is increased substantially as is compared with that under the non-cooperative game. Also, by determining the cooperative parameter, green supply chain managers may effectively get involved in the aforementioned coordination mechanisms to intervene and regulate the green channel so as to promote the smooth operation of green supply chain.     

具有产品回收的闭环供应链差别定价策略研究

研究一个制造商与一个销售商组成的具有产品回收的闭环供应链差别定价问题.利用博弈理论对几种差别定价模型进行了分析,得到了闭环供应链成员的最优定价策略和最终利润.进一步对几种模型的效率进行了分析,发现分散式决策使得整个闭环供应链利润损失了25%,最后提出一种收益共享协调差别定价策略,使得分散式闭环供应链的效率与集成式闭环供应链效率等同.     

基于供应商视角的提前订货协调研究

本文针对一个供应商和零售商组成的供应链系统,主要研究零售商如何设计提前订货折扣来吸引顾客提前订货;而供应商如何根据市场需求的不确定性,设计零售商提前订货资金的付款时间等问题。在供应商-Stackelberg框架下,以期望利润为目标,建立了相应的决策模型。通过对模型的分析求解,给出了不同市场环境下供应商要求零售商支付提前订货资金的策略。最后,用算例验证了模型和理论分析的可行性。     

考虑互惠偏好的闭环供应链系统合作机制研究

将互惠偏好引入到闭环供应链系统合作机制中,研究了由一个制造商,一个零售商和一个再制造商组成的三层闭环供应链,运用Stackelberg博弈理论分析了闭环供应链整体及各成员的最优决策问题,并对5种情形(决策模式)下的均衡结果进行比较分析.研究发现在考虑互惠偏好行为下,分散决策模式和局部联盟决策模式下的系统利润低于集中决策模式下的收益;新产品和再制造产品的销售量(零售价格)与制造商对零售商的互惠偏好系数呈正(负)相关,与零售商对制造商的互惠偏好系数呈负(正)相关;5种决策模式的供应链系统利润与制造商对零售商的互惠偏好系数呈正相关,与零售商对制造商的互惠偏好系数呈负相关.     

零售商主导的模糊供应链博弈——考虑销售努力的情形

以包含一个制造商与一个零售商的两级供应链为研究对象,考虑零售商居于主导地位并付出销售努力时供应链各成员的决策。结合经济环境的不确定性,将市场需求函数和制造商的制造成本、零售商的经营成本视为模糊变量;运用斯塔克尔伯格模型刻画零售商和制造商之间的博弈过程,并引入期望值模型、机会约束模型来解决最优决策问题;通过一个数值算例证明了供应链博弈模型的有效性。研究表明,在均衡结果中,考虑到零售商所承担的销售努力成本,其总体期望值利润相比于制造商而言偏低,但单位产品边际利润较高。原因在于,零售商的主导地位使其不仅通过销售努力提高产品销量,提高了供应链的整体利润,同时也能够采用压低批发价格的方式,使自身在供应链中获取更多收益。     

A game theoretic approach to coordinate pricing and vertical co-op advertising in manufacturer-retailer supply chains

Vertical cooperative (co-op) advertising is a marketing strategy in which the retailer runs local advertising and the manufacturer pays for a portion of its entire costs. This paper considers vertical co-op advertising along with pricing decisions in a supply chain; this consists of one manufacturer and one retailer where demand is influenced by both price and advertisement. Four game-theoretic models are established in order to study the effect of supply chain power balance on the optimal decisions of supply chain members. Comparisons and insights are developed. These embrace three non-cooperative games including Nash, Stackelberg-manufacturer and Stackelberg-retailer, and one cooperative game. In the latter case, both the manufacturer and the retailer reach the highest profit level; subsequently, the feasibility of bargaining game is discussed in a bid to determine a scheme to share the extra joint profit.     

政府激励下秸秆发电供应链的演化博弈模型与分析

农户供应链的序贯决策模型,得出了供应链三方的最优决策;对比了政府激励下供应链各主体决策及利润的变化,分析了政府激励的重要性;其次,建立了在政府激励作用下,发电厂、中间商之间的演化博弈模型,并得出了合理的激励策略。最后,以某地区秸秆发电供应为例,对电厂和中间商之间的合作关系进行分析,验证模型的正确性。揭示了秸秆发电供应链合作中的规律,对电厂、中间商制定合理的激励策略具有参考价值,同时为政府调控政策提供理论依据,从而建立持久的合作关系,推动秸秆发电行业的发展。     

基于风险厌恶零售商的双渠道闭环供应链运作策略

在对称信息框架下,针对零售商存在风险厌恶特性的双渠道闭环供应链,基于Stackelberg博弈理论探讨了不同的回收再制造模式下(制造商不回收再制造、制造商独立回收再制造、制造商依托零售商回收再制造)供应链各主体的运作决策。研究发现,在不同回收再制造模式下,制造商与风险厌恶的零售商合作能够获得更多收益。市场波动的增大对供应链各主体并非始终是有害的,随着市场波动的增大,带有风险厌恶的零售商收益不断减小,而风险中性的双渠道制造商收益逐步增大,零售商风险厌恶特性为制造商带来了更多的收益。制造商独立回收再制造以及通过零售商进行回收再制造时,双渠道产品定价均低于不进行任何回收再制造模式下的定价,双渠道需求和利润均高于不进行任何回收再制造模式下的渠道需求和利润,即回收再制造模式不仅为下游顾客带来了更多的消费实惠,同时也为供应链各主体带来了更多的收益。     

考虑政府约束的再制造闭环供应链差别定价博弈模型

本文考虑政府对废弃产品回收的奖惩约束措施,针对一类由制造商、零售商构成的再制造闭环供应链系统,基于博弈论方法研究了新产品和再制造品存在定价差别时集中决策和分散决策模式下的定价策略,得出了闭环供应链成员的最优定价策略和利润,并分析了政府约束措施对闭环供应链运作的影响。研究表明:集中决策下供应链效率高于Stackelberg博弈分散决策,为此设计了一个收益共享协调定价契约实现了闭环供应链的协调,进而分析了政府回收约束情况下再制造过程利润超过制造过程的再制造优先条件。算例分析验证了定价策略及协调机制的有效性。     

二级供应链上不完美互补产品的定价决策

建立一个由两个制造商和一个零售商组成供应链模型,以求解制造商和零售商的最优定价决策,其中两个制造商向零售商批发的产品是不完美互补的,且零售商采取混合捆绑策略销售这两种产品。考虑三种情形下的决策:(1)完全非合作博弈;(2)局部合作博弈;(3)合作博弈。通过比较前两种情形下的决策,利用Nash协商模型求解得到消除水平和垂直供应链冲突的最优定价决策。与完全非合作博弈决策相比,局部合作博弈决策对制造商是有利的,在一定的条件下也可以实现对零售商收益的帕累托改进;而合作博弈决策在任何情况下都要明显地优于完全非合作博弈决策以及局部合作博弈决策,同时合作博弈决策下的最优产品需求量相比局部合作博弈决策下的最优产品需求量提高了一倍。最后,通过数值试验验证了文章所得结论。     

需求拉动型供应链突发风险传递模型

研究突发事件风险在需求拉动型供应链中传递的效应和规律。以博弈论思想为指导,分析了突发事件风险在需求拉动型供应链中传递的过程,建立了相应的风险传递模型,计算了供应链双方利润的需求风险弹性系数。研究表明:供应链双方利润与市场容量呈正相关,与价格敏感系数呈负相关;突发事件引起的市场容量变化对供应链双方利润的影响要远大于价格弹性系数变化对供应链双方利润的影响;无论供应链成本如何变化,供应链各方利润对需求总量和需求倾向的各风险弹性系数恒大于1,说明下游需求的小幅变动可能引起上游利润的大幅变动,证明了牛鞭效应的存在。     

Manufacturer’s revenue-sharing contract and retail competition

This paper investigates a revenue-sharing contract for coordinating a supply chain comprising one manufacturer and two competing retailers. The manufacturer, as a Stackelberg leader, offers a revenue-sharing contract to two competing retailers who face stochastic demand before the selling season. Under the offered contract terms, the competing retailers are to determine the quantities to be ordered from the manufacturer, prior to the season, and the retail price at which to sell the items during the season. The process of pricing and ordering is expected to result in an equilibrium as in the Bayesian Nash game. On the basis of anticipated responses and actions of the retailers, the manufacturer designs the revenue-sharing contract. Adopting the classic newsvendor problem model framework and using numerical methods, the study finds that the provision of revenue-sharing in the contract can obtain better performance than a price-only contract. However, the benefits earned under the revenue-sharing contract by different supply chain partners differ because of the impact of demand variability and price-sensitivity factors. The paper also analyses the impact of demand variability on decisions about optimal retail price, order quantity and profit sharing between the manufacturer and the retailers. Lastly, it investigates how the competition (between retailers) factor influences the decision-making of supply chain members in response to uncertain demand and profit variability.     

“农超对接”下配送中心与n个超市的合作机制研究

“农超对接”已经成为我国农产品在城市与乡村等地流通的重要形式,近年来我国超市业发展迅速但也出现了效率低与利润分配不公等关键问题迫切需要解决。为此,本文提出了一个简单的合作博弈模型:由1个配送中心和n个超市构成一个供应链系统。首先,我们通过配送中心对这n个超市配置库存资源:专项使用库存与共享使用库存,并表明这能够有效地提高配送中心与各个超市的利润。其次,我们分别地利用Shapley值、加权Shapley值和Owen值对供应链系统中配送中心与各个超市进行合理的利润分配,并期望提供农产品供应链的合作与协调的激励机制设计。最后,我们也提供了一些数值算例来表明这些利润分配方案是简单且易操作的。     

三级供应链合作利润博弈与分配机制构建

基于变形需求函数建立了多向主从式三级供应链下游成员合作利润博弈模型,运用Stackelberg博弈法求解,对成员及渠道利润随合作关系程度变化进行深入的经济分析;构建了具有理性、转移性、协商性的供应链下游合作利润分配机制定量模型,其由合作利润结构性分配和合作利润运行性分配组成,阐明了之间的互动关系与内在运行方式,得出当合作关系程度高于2/3时才进行合作利润运行性分配的结论,且对分配机制的内在运行方式进行了数学解析。     

碳税政策下时变需求依赖库存与价格的供应链协调模型

研究由一个供应商和一个零售组成的二级供应链系统在碳税政策下的协调问题.对于市场需求率为时变函数且依赖于当前库存水平和销售价格的情形,建立分散式和集中式供应链决策模型.比较两种模型得出供应商和零售商合作能够提高供应链的整体利润但是也会产生更多的碳排放.分别利用批发价格契约和两部收费契约协调分散式决策模型得出供应链协调的条件.最后通过数值算例验证理论结果并分析碳税单价对供应链在两部收费契约下实现协调的影响.