Total chromatic number of one kind of join graphs

The total chromatic number χ_T(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of colors needed to color the elements (vertices and edges) of G such that no adjacent or incident pair of elements receive the same color. G is called Type 1 if χ_T(G)=Δ(G)+1. In this paper we prove that the join of a complete inequibipartite graph K_n1,n2 and a path P_m is of Type 1.     

A result on the total colouring of powers of cycles

The total chromatic number χ_T(G) is the least number of colours needed to colour the vertices and edges of a graph G such that no incident or adjacent elements (vertices or edges) receive the same colour. The Total Colouring Conjecture (TCC) states that for every simple graph G, χ_T(G)?Δ(G)+2. This work verifies the TCC for powers of cycles even and 2<k<n/2, showing that there exists and can be polynomially constructed a (Δ(G)+2)-total colouring for these graphs.     

Local condition for planar graphs of maximum degree 7 to be 8-totally colorable

The total chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by χ^″(G), is the minimum number of colors needed to color the vertices and edges of G such that no two adjacent or incident elements get the same color. It is known that if a planar graph G has maximum degree Δ≥9, then χ^″(G)=Δ+1. In this paper, we prove that if G is a planar graph with maximum degree 7, and for every vertex v, there is an integer k_v∈{3,4,5,6} so that v is not incident with any k_v-cycle, then χ^″(G)=8.     

Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings via the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz

Let G=(V,E)be a graph andφbe a total coloring of G by using the color set{1,2,...,k}.Let f(v)denote the sum of the color of the vertex v and the colors of all incident edges of v.We say thatφis neighbor sum distinguishing if for each edge uv∈E(G),f(u)=f(v).The smallest number k is called the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number,denoted byχ′′nsd(G).Pil′sniak and Wo′zniak conjectured that for any graph G with at least two vertices,χ′′nsd(G)(G)+3.In this paper,by using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz,we show thatχ′′nsd(G)2(G)+col(G)-1,where col(G)is the coloring number of G.Moreover,we prove this assertion in its list version.     

Injective colorings of sparse graphs

Let denote the maximum average degree (over all subgraphs) of G and let χ_i(G) denote the injective chromatic number of G. We prove that if , then χ_i(G)≤Δ(G)+1; and if , then χ_i(G)=Δ(G). Suppose that G is a planar graph with girth g(G) and Δ(G)≥4. We prove that if g(G)≥9, then χ_i(G)≤Δ(G)+1; similarly, if g(G)≥13, then χ_i(G)=Δ(G).     

Total colorings of planar graphs without adjacent triangles

Let G be a planar graph without adjacent 3-cycles, that is, two cycles of length 3 are not incident with a common edge. In this paper, it is proved that the total coloring conjecture is true for G; moreover, if Δ(G)≥9, then the total chromatic number χ^″(G) of G is Δ(G)+1. Some other related results are obtained, too.     

On Vizing’s bound for the chromatic index of a multigraph

Two of the basic results on edge coloring are Vizing’s Theorem [V.G. Vizing, On an estimate of the chromatic class of a p-graph, Diskret. Analiz. 3 (1964) 25-30 (in Russian); V.G. Vizing, The chromatic class of a multigraph, Kibernetika (Kiev) 3 (1965) 29-39 (in Russian). English translation in Cybernetics 1 32-41], which states that the chromatic index χ^′(G) of a (multi)graph G with maximum degree Δ(G) and maximum multiplicity μ(G) satisfies Δ(G)≤χ^′(G)≤Δ(G)+μ(G), and Holyer’s Theorem [I. Holyer, The NP-completeness of edge-colouring, SIAM J. Comput. 10 (1981) 718-720], which states that the problem of determining the chromatic index of even a simple graph is NP-hard. Hence, a good characterization of those graphs for which Vizing’s upper bound is attained seems to be unlikely. On the other hand, Vizing noticed in the first two above-cited references that the upper bound cannot be attained if Δ(G)=2μ(G)+1≥5. In this paper we discuss the problem: For which values Δ,μ does there exist a graph G satisfying Δ(G)=Δ, μ(G)=μ, and χ^′(G)=Δ+μ.     

Some relations among term rank, clique number and list chromatic number of a graph

Let G be a graph with a nonempty edge set, we denote the rank of the adjacency matrix of G and term rank of G, by rk(G) and Rk(G), respectively. van Nuffelen conjectured that for any graph G, χ(G)?rk(G). The first counterexample to this conjecture was obtained by Alon and Seymour. In 2002, Fishkind and Kotlov proved that for any graph G, χ(G)?Rk(G). Here we improve this upper bound and show that χ_l(G)?(rk(G)+Rk(G))/2, where χ_l(G) is the list chromatic number of G.     

The Erd?s-Lovász Tihany conjecture for quasi-line graphs

Erd?s and Lovász conjectured in 1968 that for every graph G with χ(G)>ω(G) and any two integers s,t≥2 with s+t=χ(G)+1, there is a partition (S,T) of the vertex set V(G) such that χ(G[S])≥s and χ(G[T])≥t. Except for a few cases, this conjecture is still unsolved. In this note we prove the conjecture for quasi-line graphs and for graphs with independence number 2.     

The edge-face coloring of graphs embedded in a surface of characteristic zero

Let G be a graph embedded in a surface of characteristic zero with maximum degree Δ. The edge-face chromatic number χ_ef(G) of G is the least number of colors such that any two adjacent edges, adjacent faces, incident edge and face have different colors. In this paper, we prove that χ_ef(G)≤Δ+1 if Δ≥13, χ_ef(G)≤Δ+2 if Δ≥12, χ_ef(G)≤Δ+3 if Δ≥4, and χ_ef(G)≤7 if Δ≤3.     

Chromatic coloring with a maximum color class

Let G be any graph, and also let Δ(G), χ(G) and α(G) denote the maximum degree, the chromatic number and the independence number of G, respectively. A chromatic coloring of G is a proper coloring of G using χ(G) colors. A color class in a proper coloring of G is maximum if it has size α(G). In this paper, we prove that if a graph G (not necessarily connected) satisfies χ(G)≥Δ(G), then there exists a chromatic coloring of G in which some color class is maximum. This cannot be guaranteed if χ(G)<Δ(G). We shall also give some other extensions.     

Independence,irredundance, degrees and chromatic number in graphs

Let β(G) and IR(G) denote the independence number and the upper irredundance number of a graph G. We prove that in any graph of order n, minimum degree δ and maximum degree Δ≠0, IR(G)⩽n/(1+δ/Δ) and IR(G)−β(G)⩽((Δ−2)/2Δ)n. The two bounds are attained by arbitrarily large graphs. The second one proves a conjecture by Rautenbach related to the case Δ=3. When the chromatic number χ of G is less than Δ, it can be improved to IR(G)−β(G)⩽((χ−2)/2χ)n in any non-empty graph of order n⩾2.     

List coloring of Cartesian products of graphs

A well-established generalization of graph coloring is the concept of list coloring. In this setting, each vertex v of a graph G is assigned a list L(v) of k colors and the goal is to find a proper coloring c of G with c(v)∈L(v). The smallest integer k for which such a coloring c exists for every choice of lists is called the list chromatic number of G and denoted by χ_l(G).We study list colorings of Cartesian products of graphs. We show that unlike in the case of ordinary colorings, the list chromatic number of the product of two graphs G and H is not bounded by the maximum of χ_l(G) and χ_l(H). On the other hand, we prove that χ_l(G×H)?min{χ_l(G)+col(H),col(G)+χ_l(H)}-1 and construct examples of graphs G and H for which our bound is tight.     

Improvement on Brooks' chromatic bound for a class of graphs

Brooks' Theorem says that if for a graph G,Δ(G)=n, then G is n-colourable, unless (1) n=2 and G has an odd cycle as a component, or (2) n>2 and K_n+1 is a component of G. In this paper we prove that if a graph G has none of some three graphs (K_1,3;K₅?e and H) as an induced subgraph and if Δ(G)?6 and d(G)<Δ(G), then χ(G)<Δ(G). Also we give examples to show that the hypothesis Δ(G)?6 can not be non-trivially relaxed and the graph K₅?e can not be removed from the hypothesis. Moreover, for a graph G with none of K_1,3;K₅?e and H as an induced subgraph, we verify Borodin and Kostochka's conjecture that if for a graph G,Δ(G)?9 and d(G)<Δ(G), then χ(G)<Δ(G).     

Injective coloring of planar graphs

A coloring of a graph G is injective if its restriction to the neighborhood of any vertex is injective. The injective chromatic numberχ_i(G) of a graph G is the least k such that there is an injective k-coloring. In this paper we prove that if G is a planar graph with girth g and maximum degree Δ, then (1) χ_i(G)=Δ if either g≥20 and Δ≥3, or g≥7 and Δ≥71; (2) χ_i(G)≤Δ+1 if g≥11; (3) χ_i(G)≤Δ+2 if g≥8.     

Total chromatic number of graphs with small genus

Given a graph G, a total k-coloring of G is a simultaneous coloring of the vertices and edges of G with k colors. Denote χ_ve (G) the total chromatic number of G, and c(Σ) the Euler characteristic of a surfase Σ. In this paper, we prove that for any simple graph G which can be embedded in a surface Σ with Euler characteristic c(Σ), χ_ve (G) = Δ (G) + 1 if c(Σ) > 0 and Δ (G) ≥ 13, or, if c(Σ) = 0 and Δ (G) ≥ 14. This result generalizes results in [3], [4], [5] by Borodin.     

A sufficient condition for planar graphs with maximum degree 8 to be 9-totally colorable

A total k-coloring of a graph G is a coloring of V(G) ∪ E(G) using k colors such that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. The total chromatic number χ'(G) is the smallest integer k such that G has a total k-coloring. It is known that if a planar graph G has maximum degree Δ≥ 9, then χ'(G) = Δ + 1. In this paper, we prove that if G is a planar graph with maximum degree 8 and without a fan of four adjacent 3-cycles, then χ'(G) = 9.     

A constructive characterization of total domination vertex critical graphs

Let G be a graph of order n and maximum degree Δ(G) and let γ_t(G) denote the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of a graph G. A graph G with no isolated vertex is the total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, the total domination number of G−v is less than the total domination number of G. We call these graphs γ_t-critical. For any γ_t-critical graph G, it can be shown that n≤Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1. In this paper, we prove that: Let G be a connected γ_t-critical graph of order n (n≥3), then n=Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1 if and only if G is regular and, for each v∈V(G), there is an A⊆V(G)−{v} such that N(v)∩A=0?, the subgraph induced by A is 1-regular, and every vertex in V(G)−A−{v} has exactly one neighbor in A.     

Planar graphs without 5-cycles or without 6-cycles

Let G be a planar graph without 5-cycles or without 6-cycles. In this paper, we prove that if G is connected and δ(G)≥2, then there exists an edge xy∈E(G) such that d(x)+d(y)≤9, or there is a 2-alternating cycle. By using the above result, we obtain that (1) its linear 2-arboricity , (2) its list total chromatic number is Δ(G)+1 if Δ(G)≥8, and (3) its list edge chromatic number is Δ(G) if Δ(G)≥8.     

The Chromatic Index of a Graph Whose Core is a Cycle of Order at Most 13

Let G be a graph. The core of G, denoted by G _Δ, is the subgraph of G induced by the vertices of degree Δ(G), where Δ(G) denotes the maximum degree of G. A k -edge coloring of G is a function f : E(G) → L such that |L| = k and f (e ₁) ≠ f (e ₂) for all two adjacent edges e ₁ and e ₂ of G. The chromatic index of G, denoted by χ′(G), is the minimum number k for which G has a k-edge coloring. A graph G is said to be Class 1 if χ′(G) = Δ(G) and Class 2 if χ′(G) = Δ(G) + 1. In this paper it is shown that every connected graph G of even order whose core is a cycle of order at most 13 is Class 1.