Conservative extension of polyadic MV-algebras to polyadic pavelka algebras

In this paper we prove polyadic counterparts of the Hájek, Paris and Shepherdson's conservative extension theorems of Łukasiewicz predicate logic to rational Pavelka predicate logic. We also discuss the algebraic correspondents of the provability and truth degree for polyadic MV-algebras and prove a representation theorem similar to the one for polyadic Pavelka algebras.     

Completeness and interpolation of almost‐everywhere quantification over finitely additive measures

We give an axiomatization of first‐order logic enriched with the almost‐everywhere quantifier over finitely additive measures. Using an adapted version of the consistency property adequate for dealing with this generalized quantifier, we show that such a logic is both strongly complete and enjoys Craig interpolation, relying on a (countable) model existence theorem. We also discuss possible extensions of these results to the almost‐everywhere quantifier over countably additive measures.     

Quantifier elimination for the theory of algebraically closed valued fields with analytic structure

The theory of algebraically closed non‐Archimedean valued fields is proved to eliminate quantifiers in an analytic language similar to the one used by Cluckers, Lipshitz, and Robinson. The proof makes use of a uniform parameterized normalization theorem which is also proved in this paper. This theorem also has other consequences in the geometry of definable sets. The method of proving quantifier elimination in this paper for an analytic language does not require the algebraic quantifier elimination theorem of Weispfenning, unlike the customary method of proof used in similar earlier analytic quantifier elimination theorems. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The omega-rule interpretation of transfinite provability logic

Given a computable ordinal Λ, the transfinite provability logic ${\mathsf{GLP}}_{\mathrm{\Lambda }}$ has for each $\xi <\mathrm{\Lambda }$ a modality $[\xi ]$ intended to represent a provability predicate within a chain of increasing strength. One possibility is to read $[\xi ]?$ as ? is provable in T using ω-rules of depth at most ξ, where T is a second-order theory extending ${\mathrm{ACA}}_0$.In this paper we will formalize such iterations of ω-rules in second-order arithmetic and show how it is a special case of what we call uniform provability predicates. Uniform provability predicates are similar to Ignatiev's strong provability predicates except that they can be iterated transfinitely. Finally, we show that ${\mathsf{GLP}}_{\mathrm{\Lambda }}$ is sound and complete for any uniform provability predicate.     

All finitely axiomatizable subframe logics containing the provability logic CSM_{0} are decidable

In this paper we investigate those extensions of the bimodal provability logic (alias or which are subframe logics, i.e. whose general frames are closed under a certain type of substructures. Most bimodal provability logics are in this class. The main result states that all finitely axiomatizable subframe logics containing are decidable. We note that, as a rule, interesting systems in this class do not have the finite model property and are not even complete with respect to Kripke semantics. Received July 15, 1997     

Investigating Algebraic and Logical Algorithms to Solve Hopf Bifurcation Problems in Algebraic Biology

Symbolic methods to investigate Hopf bifurcation problems of vector fields arising in the context of algebraic biology have recently obtained renewed attention. However, the symbolic investigations have not been fully algorithmic but required a sequence of symbolic computations intervened with ad hoc insights and decisions made by a human. In this paper we discuss the use of algebraic and logical methods to reduce questions on the existence of Hopf bifurcations in parameterized polynomial vector fields to quantifier elimination problems over the reals combined with the use of the quantifier elimination over the reals and simplification techniques available in REDLOG. We can reconstruct most of the results given in the literature within a few seconds of computation time and extend the investigations on these systems to previously not analyzed related systems. Especially we discuss cases in which one suspects that no Hopf bifurcation fixed point exists for biologically relevant values of parameters and system variables. Here we focus on logical and algebraic techniques of finding subconditions being inconsistent with the hypothesis of the existence of Hopf bifurcation fixed points.      

A complete many-valued logic with product-conjunction

A simple complete axiomatic system is presented for the many-valued propositional logic based on the conjunction interpreted as product, the coresponding implication (Goguen's implication) and the corresponding negation (Gödel's negation). Algebraic proof methods are used. The meaning for fuzzy logic (in the narrow sense) is shortly discussed.This article was processed by the author using the LATEX style filepljorlm from Springer-Verlag.     

The Square of Opposition and the Paradoxes

Can an appeal to the difference between contrary and contradictory statements, generated by a non-uniform behaviour of negation, deal adequately with paradoxical cases like the sorites or the liar? This paper offers a negative answer to the question. This is done by considering alternative ways of trying to construe and justify in a useful way (in this context) the distinction between contraries and contradictories by appealing to the behaviour of negation only. There are mainly two ways to try to do so: i) by considering differences in the scope of negation, ii) by considering the possibility that negation is semantically ambiguous. Both alternatives are shown to be inapt to handle the problematic cases. In each case, it is shown that the available alternatives for motivating or grounding the distinction, in a way useful to deal with the paradoxes, are either inapplicable, or produce new versions of the paradoxes, or both. Work supported by SFRH/BPD/16678/2004 (FCT), project “On Content” POCI/FIL/55562/2004 (FCT) and project “LOGOS grupo de logica, lenguage y cognicion” HUM 2006-08236 (MEC).     

A focused approach to combining logics

We present a compact sequent calculus LKU for classical logic organized around the concept of polarization. Focused sequent calculi for classical, intuitionistic, and multiplicative-additive linear logics are derived as fragments of the host system by varying the sensitivity of specialized structural rules to polarity information. We identify a general set of criteria under which cut-elimination holds in such fragments. From cut-elimination we derive a unified proof of the completeness of focusing. Furthermore, each sublogic can interact with other fragments through cut. We examine certain circumstances, for example, in which a classical lemma can be used in an intuitionistic proof while preserving intuitionistic provability. We also examine the possibility of defining classical-linear hybrid logics.     

The eskolemization of universal quantifiers

This paper is a sequel to the papers Baaz and Iemhoff (2006, 2009) [4] and [6] in which an alternative skolemization method called eskolemization was introduced that, when restricted to strong existential quantifiers, is sound and complete for constructive theories. In this paper we extend the method to universal quantifiers and show that for theories satisfying the witness property it is sound and complete for all formulas. We obtain a Herbrand theorem from this, and apply the method to the intuitionistic theory of equality and the intuitionistic theory of monadic predicates.     

Sufficient triangular norms in many-valued logics with standard negation

In many-valued logics with the unit interval as the set of truth values, from the standard negation and the product (or, more generally, from any strict Frank t-norm) all measurable logical functions can be derived, provided that also operations with countable arity are allowed. The question remained open whether there are other t-norms with this property or whether all strict t-norms possess this property. We give a full solution to this problem (in the case of strict t-norms), together with convenient sufficient conditions. We list several families of strict t-norms having this property and provide also counterexamples (the Hamacher product is one of them). Finally, we discuss the consequences of these results for the characterization of tribes based on strict t-norms.     

Logical omniscience as infeasibility

Logical theories for representing knowledge are often plagued by the so-called Logical Omniscience Problem. The problem stems from the clash between the desire to model rational agents, which should be capable of simple logical inferences, and the fact that any logical inference, however complex, almost inevitably consists of inference steps that are simple enough. This contradiction points to the fruitlessness of trying to solve the Logical Omniscience Problem qualitatively if the rationality of agents is to be maintained. We provide a quantitative solution to the problem compatible with the two important facets of the reasoning agent: rationality and resource boundedness. More precisely, we provide a test for the logical omniscience problem in a given formal theory of knowledge. The quantitative measures we use are inspired by the complexity theory. We illustrate our framework with a number of examples ranging from the traditional implicit representation of knowledge in modal logic to the language of justification logic, which is capable of spelling out the internal inference process. We use these examples to divide representations of knowledge into logically omniscient and not logically omniscient, thus trying to determine how much information about the reasoning process needs to be present in a theory to avoid logical omniscience.     

Inference of Probabilities over a Stochastic IL-System by Quantifier Elimination

An algebraic approach based on quantifier elimination is proposed for the inference of probabilistic parameters over stochastic Lindenmayer systems with interaction, IL-systems. We are concerned with a multi-cellular organism as an instance of a stochastic IL system. The organism starts with one or a few cells, and develops different types of cells with distinct functions. We have constructed a simple model with cell-type order conservation and have assessed conditions for high cell-type diversity. This model is based on the stochastic IL-system for three types of cells. The cell-type order conservation corresponds to interaction terms in the IL-system. In our model, we have successfully inferred algebraic relations between the probabilities for cell-type diversity by using a symbolic method, quantifier elimination (QE). Surprisingly, three modes for the proliferation and transition rates emerged for various ratios of the initial cells to the developed cells. Furthermore, we have found that the high cell-type diversity pattern originates from the cell-type order conservation. Thus, QE has yielded analysis of the IL-system, which has revealed that, during the developing process of multi-cellular organisms, complex but explicit relations exist between cell-type diversity patterns and developmental rates.      

Kripke semantics for provability logic GLP

A well-known polymodal provability logic due to Japaridze is complete w.r.t. the arithmetical semantics where modalities correspond to reflection principles of restricted logical complexity in arithmetic. This system plays an important role in some recent applications of provability algebras in proof theory. However, an obstacle in the study of is that it is incomplete w.r.t. any class of Kripke frames. In this paper we provide a complete Kripke semantics for . First, we isolate a certain subsystem of that is sound and complete w.r.t. a nice class of finite frames. Second, appropriate models for are defined as the limits of chains of finite expansions of models for . The techniques involves unions of n-elementary chains and inverse limits of Kripke models. All the results are obtained by purely modal-logical methods formalizable in elementary arithmetic.     

Around provability logic

We present some results on algebraic and modal analysis of polynomial (intrinsically definable) distortions of the standard provability predicate in Peano Arithmetic PA, and investigate three provability-like modal systems related to the Gödel-Löb modal system GL. We also present a short review of relational and topological semantics for these systems, and describe the dual category of algebraic models of our main modal system.     

Effectiveness in RPL, with applications to continuous logic

In this paper, we introduce a foundation for computable model theory of rational Pavelka logic (an extension of ?ukasiewicz logic) and continuous logic, and prove effective versions of some related theorems in model theory. We show how to reduce continuous logic to rational Pavelka logic. We also define notions of computability and decidability of a model for logics with computable, but uncountable, set of truth values; we show that provability degree of a formula with respect to a linear theory is computable, and use this to carry out an effective Henkin construction. Therefore, for any effectively given consistent linear theory in continuous logic, we effectively produce its decidable model. This is the best possible, since we show that the computable model theory of continuous logic is an extension of computable model theory of classical logic. We conclude with noting that the unique separable model of a separably categorical and computably axiomatizable theory (such as that of a probability space or an L^p Banach lattice) is decidable.     

Generalized ordinal sums and the decidability of BL-chains

We present a general construction of a family of ordinal sums of a sequence of structures and prove an elimination theorem for the class of ordinal sums in an expanded language. From this we deduce the decidability of the class of -ordinal sums of models of a decidable theory T. As an application of this result we prove that the theory of BL-chains is decidable.In Celebration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ralph N. McKenzieReceived June 9, 2002; accepted in final form June 19, 2003.     

Herbrand's theorem and term induction

We study the formal first order system TIND in the standard language of Gentzen's LK . TIND extends LK by the purely logical rule of term-induction, that is a restricted induction principle, deriving numerals instead of arbitrary terms. This rule may be conceived as the logical image of full induction.     

Modal characterisation theorems over special classes of frames

We investigate model theoretic characterisations of the expressive power of modal logics in terms of bisimulation invariance. The paradigmatic result of this kind is van Benthem’s theorem, which says that a first-order formula is invariant under bisimulation if, and only if, it is equivalent to a formula of basic modal logic. The present investigation primarily concerns ramifications for specific classes of structures. We study in particular model classes defined through conditions on the underlying frames, with a focus on frame classes that play a major role in modal correspondence theory and often correspond to typical application domains of modal logics. Classical model theoretic arguments do not apply to many of the most interesting classes-for instance, rooted frames, finite rooted frames, finite transitive frames, well-founded transitive frames, finite equivalence frames-as these are not elementary. Instead we develop and extend the game-based analysis (first-order Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé versus bisimulation games) over such classes and provide bisimulation preserving model constructions within these classes. Over most of the classes considered, we obtain finite model theory analogues of the classically expected characterisations, with new proofs also for the classical setting. The class of transitive frames is a notable exception, with a marked difference between the classical and the finite model theory of bisimulation invariant first-order properties. Over the class of all finite transitive frames in particular, we find that monadic second-order logic is no more expressive than first-order as far as bisimulation invariant properties are concerned — though both are more expressive here than basic modal logic. We obtain ramifications of the de Jongh-Sambin theorem and a new and specific analogue of the Janin-Walukiewicz characterisation of bisimulation invariant monadic second-order for finite transitive frames.     

A relative interpolation theorem for infinitary universal Horn logic and its applications

In this paper we deal with infinitary universal Horn logic both with and without equality. First, we obtain a relative Lyndon-style interpolation theorem. Using this result, we prove a non-standard preservation theorem which contains, as a particular case, a Lyndon-style theorem on surjective homomorphisms in its Makkai-style formulation. Another consequence of the preservation theorem is a theorem on bimorphisms, which, in particular, provides a tool for immediate obtaining characterizations of infinitary universal Horn classes without equality from those with equality. From the theorem on surjective homomorphisms we also derive a non-standard Beth-style preservation theorem that yields a non-standard Beth-style definability theorem, according to which implicit definability of a relation symbol in an infinitary universal Horn theory implies its explicit definability by a conjunction of atomic formulas. We also apply our theorem on surjective homomorphisms, theorem on bimorphisms and definability theorem to algebraic logic for general propositional logic.