权有附加约束的条件下的DEA有效性(C2R或C2GS2)

有关判别决策单元在权有附加约束的条件下是否DEA有效（C^2或C^2GS^2)，本文给出了一种基于权有附加约束条件下的加性模型的不同于文献[1]与[2]的约束与差别法。     

某些决策单元的EDA有效性的简便判别法

本给出了判别某些决策单元EDA有效性（C^2R或C^2GS^2）的简便方法。     

DEA效率分解与规模收益评价

使用输出DEA模型CCR、BCC、FG、ST和WY给出了整体效率的四种分解公式,并利用分解公式判别决策单元规模收益状况(包括拥挤),是对前人研究的整体效率分解公式的一种推广和应用.使用输出DEA模型CCR相对于WY的效率分解公式,可以判断决策单元是否为规模收益不变;使用BCC相对于WY的效率分解公式,可以判别是否出现拥挤.联合使用输出DEA模型FG相对于WY的效率分解公式,和ST相对于WY的效率分解公式,可以判断决策单元是否为规模收益递增、不变、递减或拥挤.     

基于偏好锥的DEA-DA模型研究

扩展的DEA-DA模型是一种结合数据包络分析(DEA)和判别分析(DA)的非参数判别分析方法。一种锥比率DEA模型C^2WH可以利用锥比率体现决策对样本指标和决策单元的偏好。因此，本将C^2WH模型和DA模型结合，建立了基于偏好锥的DEA-DA模型与方法，并就偏好锥为多面凸锥的情况给出了实例分析。结果表明，所建模型可以在判别分析过程中体现决策的偏好，从而形成主观与客观的集成评价。     

用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

基于白化值的区间DEA建模

传统数据包络分析要求输入输出数据为精确数,然而在某些实际应用中,区间形式的数据相较于精确数更容易获得.将区间数转化为白化值,并基于传统C~2R模型提出了基于白化值的区间C~2R模型.考虑到决策单元的有效性不易通过基于白化值的区间C~2R模型来判断,因此将非阿基米德无穷小概念引入到上述模型,构建了具有非阿基米德无穷小的区间C~2R模型.此外,还给出了用于判断决策单元有效性的区间目标规划方法:分别通过G_(IC~2R)模型和WG_(IC~2R)模型判断决策单元是否为区间DEA有效与区间弱DEA有效.     

广义与传统BC~2模型效率评价差异及其几何刻画

传统DEA方法相对于决策单元全体对决策单元进行评价,广义DEA方法相对于样本单元全体对决策单元进行评价.由于参照系的不同,对不同决策单元的相对效率评价结果可能不同.针对这种情况,对基于BC2模型的只有投入或只有产出的传统和广义DEA模型进行说明,并通过样本前沿面的移动对广义DEA模型中相对效率值进行几何刻画.     

使决策单元变为DEA有效(C~2R)的探讨

分别讨论了在不同的规模收益情况下使决策单元变为 DEA有效的方法     

关于综合 DEA 模型中的 DEA 有效决策单元集合的几个恒等式

DEA 模型(C~2R 模型,C~2GS~2模型,C~2W 模型和 C~2WH 模型等)是用来评价决策单元之间的相对有效性的.本文将给出关于具有更一般形式的综合 DEA 模型中的 DEA 有效决策单元集合的几个恒等式.这些等式表明在评价相对有效性时,可以将决策单元按照实际情况进行分组,先评价组内决策单元之间的相对有效性,再利用得到的信息进行不同组之间的有效决策单元的效率评价,如此等等.这种分组逐一进行评价的     

具有阶段最终产出的链式网络DEA模型

针对具有阶段最终产出的链式网络提出了阶段最终产出为期望产出和非期望产出的概念并建立了相应的网络模型.给出了网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性与阶段DEA有效性的关系,给出了判别的充分必要条件.可以判断当网络决策单元不为网络DEA有效时,它在哪个阶段出现了无效率的情况.     

An MOLP based procedure for finding efficient units in DEA models

In this paper a multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) problem whose feasible region is the production possibility set with variable returns to scale is proposed. By solving this MOLP problem by multicriterion simplex method, the extreme efficient Pareto points can be obtained. Then the extreme efficient units in data envelopment analysis (DEA) with variable returns to scale, considering the specified theorems and conditions, can be obtained. Therefore, by solving the proposed MOLP problem, the non-dominant units in DEA can be found. Finally, a numerical example is provided.     

用DEA估计生产力进步的探讨

有关生产力进步的概念与计算,文［１］、［２］基于规模报酬不变的生产前沿面来研究,本文推广到基于一般生产前沿面来研究．因此本文在讨论中用面向输出的Ｃ２ＧＳ２模型而不是文［１］、［２］中所用的面向输入的Ｃ２Ｒ模型．     

Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility

Super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is obtained when a decision making unit (DMU) under evaluation is excluded from the reference set. Because of the possible infeasibility of super-efficiency DEA model, the use of super-efficiency DEA model has been restricted to the situations where constant returns to scale (CRS) are assumed. It is shown that one of the input-oriented and output-oriented super-efficiency DEA models must be feasible for a any efficient DMU under evaluation if the variable returns to scale (VRS) frontier consists of increasing, constant, and decreasing returns to scale DMUs. We use both input- and output-oriented super-efficiency models to fully characterize the super-efficiency. When super-efficiency is used as an efficiency stability measure, infeasibility means the highest super-efficiency (stability). If super-efficiency is interpreted as input saving or output surplus achieved by a specific efficient DMU, infeasibility does not necessary mean the highest super-efficiency.     

使决策单元变为DEA有效的偏差和最小法

某决策单元为非 DEA有效 ( C2 R或 C2 GS2 ) ,为了将它变为 DEA有效 ,在找出其对应点附近的一些有效前沿面的基础上 ,给出了使其对应点与这些有效前沿面上的点的输入、输出的偏差和最小的方法 .     

Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models

This paper provides computationally efficient approaches for determining to which returns to scale (RTS) class a unit belongs in weight-restricted Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models. A non-traditional computational algorithm is introduced. The suggested approach is based on the calculation of certain ratios within the data set and offers obvious computational advantages over the traditional approaches involving the solution of standard DEA models. Some theorems and algorithms are given. Computational advantages of the provided results are discussed and one of the algorithms is illustrated using real world data.     

On alternative optimal solutions in the estimation of returns to scale in DEA

Zhu and Shen [European Journal of Operational Research 81 (1995) 590] show that alternative optimal solutions in the estimation of returns to scale (RTS) are caused by a particular linear dependency among a set of extreme efficient DMUs when one employs the concept of most productive scale size [European Journal of Operational Research 17 (1984) 35] in data envelopment analysis (DEA). This paper demonstrates that the presence of weakly efficient DMUs may also lead to alternative optima and extends the results of Zhu and Shen to the entire frontier. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the presence of multiple optimal solutions for constant returns to scale (CRS) DMUs are established.     

Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis

The relation between the most productive scale size (mpss) for paparticular input and output mixes and returns to scale for multiple-inputs multiple-outputs situations is explicitly developed. This relation is then employed to extend the applications of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) introduced by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) to the estimation of most productive scale sizes for convex production possibility sets. It is then shown that in addition to productive inefficiencies at the actual scale size, the CCR efficiency measure also reflects any inefficiencies due to divergence from the most productive scale size. Two illustrations of the practical applications of these results to the estimation of most productive scale sizes and returns to scale for hospitals and stem-electric generation plants are also provided emphasize the advantage of this method in examining specific segments of the efficient production surface.     

Measuring returns to scale in DEA models when the firm is regulated

In the standard framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, the returns to scale are fully characterized using the multiplier on the convexity constraint of inefficient decision making units (DMU) using the projection of the input–output vector on the frontier. In this note, we investigate how the returns to scale measurements in DEA models are affected by the presence of regulatory constraints. These additional constraints change the role played by the convexity constraint. In order to avoid biased estimation of the returns to scale, we show that the interaction between the regulatory and the convexity constraints has to be taken into account.     

技术有效的决策单元与DEA有效性(C~2GS~2)

对李光金、阎洪先生所定义的技术有效的决策单元,证明了它是DEA有效(C~2GS~2)的,而且讨论了将非有效的决策单元转变为有效.