The Symmetrized Bidisc and Lempert's Theorem

Let G C² be the open symmetrized bidisc, namely G = {(₁ + ₂,₁₂) : |₁| < 1, |₂| < 1}. In this paper, a proof is giventhat G is not biholomorphic to any convex domain in C². By combiningthis result with earlier work of Agler and Young, the authorshows that G is a bounded domain on which the Carathéodorydistance and the Kobayashi distance coincide, but which is notbiholomorphic to a convex set. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification32F45 (primary), 15A18 (secondary).     

A remark on the representation of Zolotarev polynomials

Zolotarev polynomials are the polynomials that have minimaldeviation from zero on [–1, 1] with respect to the norm||xⁿ – x^n–1 + a_n–2 x^n–2 + ... + a₁x+ a_n|| for given and for all a_k . This note complements the paper of F. Pehersforfer [J. LondonMath. Soc. (1) 74 (2006) 143–153] with exact (not asymptotic)construction of the Zolotarev polynomials with respect to thenorm L₁ for || < 1 and with respect to the norm L₂ for || 1 in the form of Bernstein–Szegö orthogonal polynomials.For all in L₁ and L₂ norms, the Zolotarev polynomials satisfyexactly (not asymptotically) the triple recurrence relationof the Chebyshev polynomials.     

Sharp Distortion Estimate for Locally Schlicht Bloch Functions

Let B be the space of locally schlicht Bloch functions f whichare analytic in the unit disc with f(0) = f'(0) – 1 =0 satisfying 0 < |f'(z)|(1 – |z|²) 1. For each fixedz₀ we shall determine the shape of the set {logf'(z₀): fB},that is, we shall give the sharp distortion estimate for locallyschilcht Bloch functions.     

On Extensions of Myers' Theorem

Let M be a compact Riemannian manifold, and let h be a smoothfunction on M. Let p^h(x) = inf||–₁(Ric_x(,)–2Hess(h_x(,)).Here Ric_x denotes the Ricci curvature at x and Hess(h) is theHessian of h. Then M has finite fundamental group if ^h–p^h<0. Here ^h =:+2L_h is the Bismut-Witten Laplacian. This leadsto a quick proof of recent results on extension of Myers' theoremto manifolds with mostly positive curvature. There is also asimilar result for noncompact manifolds.     

On an elliptic attractor in an asymptotically symmetric unbounded domain in RFormula

We study the positive solutions of a semilinear elliptic problemin an asymptotically symmetric unbounded domain ₊ in ⁴. Theexistence of the global attractor for the trajectory dynamicalsystem associated with this problem is proved. Based on therecent development of the De Giorgi conjecture, the symmetrizationand stabilization properties of positive solutions as |x| arealso established in the four-dimensional case.     

Extremal Properties of Contraction Semigroups on Hilbert and Banach Spaces

Let f be a unit vector and T = {T(t) = e^tA: t 0} be a (C₀)contraction semigroup generated by A on a complex Hilbert spaceX. If |T(t)f,f| 1 as t then f is an eigenvector of A correspondingto a purely imaginary eigenvalue. If one allows X to be a Banachspace, the same situation can be considered by replacing T(t)f,fby (T(t)f) where is a unit vector in X^* dual to f. If |(T(t)f)| 1, as t , is f an eigenvector of A? The answer is sometimesyes and sometimes no.     

Approximation of Ground State Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of Dirichlet Laplacians

Let be a bounded connected open set in R^N, N 2, and let –0be the Dirichlet Laplacian defined in L²(). Let > 0 be thesmallest eigenvalue of –, and let > 0 be its correspondingeigenfunction, normalized by ||||₂ = 1. For sufficiently small>0 we let R() be a connected open subset of satisfying Let – 0 be the Dirichlet Laplacian on R(), and let >0and >0 be its ground state eigenvalue and ground state eigenfunction,respectively, normalized by ||||₂=1. For functions f definedon , we let Sf denote the restriction of f to R(). For functionsg defined on R(), we let Tg be the extension of g to satisfying 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 47F05.     

Correction: Abelian Varieties defined over their Fields of Moduli, I

Bull London Math. Soc, 4 (1972), 370–372. The proof of the theorem contains an error. Before giving acorrect proof, we state two lemmas. LEMMA 1. Let K/k be a cyclic Galois extension of degree m, let generate Gal (K/k), and let (A, I, ) be defined over K. Supposethat there exists an isomorphism :(A,I,) (A, I, ) over K suchthat v^m–1 ... = 1, where v is the canonical isomorphism(A^m, I^m, ^m) (A, I, ). Then (A, I, ) has a model over k, whichbecomes isomorphic to (A, I, ) over K. Proof. This follows easily from [7], as is essentially explainedon p. 371. LEMMA 2. Let G be an abelian pro-finite group and let : G Q/Z be a continuous character of G whose image has order p.Then either: (a) there exist subgroups G' and H of G such that H is cyclicof order p^m for some m, (G') = 0, and G = G' x H, or (b) for any m > 0 there exists a continuous character m ofG such that p^m _m = . Proof. If (b) is false for a given m, then there exists an element G, of order p^r for some r m, such that () ¦ 0. (Considerthe sequence dual to 0 Ker (p^m) G ^pm G). There exists an opensubgroup G_o of G such that (G₀) = 0 and has order p^r in G/G₀.Choose H to be the subgroup of G generated by , and then aneasy application to G/G₀ of the theory of finite abelian groupsshows the existence of G' (note that () ¦ 0 implies that is not a p-th. power in G). We now prove the theorem. The proof is correct up to the statement(iv) (except that (i) should read: F' k₁ F'ab). To removea minor ambiguity in the proof of (iv), choose to be an elementof Gal (F'_ab/k₂) whose image $$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$ in Gal (k₁/k₂) generates this last group. The error occursin the statement that the canonical map v : A^P A acts on pointsby sending a^p a; it, of course, sends a a. The proof is correct, however, in the case that it is possibleto choose so that ^p = 1 (in Gal (F'/k₂)). By applying Lemma 2 to G = Gal (F'_ab/k₂) and the map G Gal(k₁/k₂) one sees that only the following two cases have to beconsidered. (a) It is possible to choose so that ^pm = 1, for some m, andG = G' x H where G' acts trivially on k₁ and H is generatedby . (b) For any m > 0 there exists a field K, F'ab K k₁ k₂is a cyclic Galois extension of degree p^m. In the first case, we let K F'_ab be the fixed field of G'.Then (A, I, ), regarded as being defined over K, has a modelover k₂. Indeed, if m = 1, then this was observed above, butwhen m > 1 the same argument applies. In the second case, let : (A, I, ) (A$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$, I$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma }$$, $$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$) be an isomorphism defined over k₁ and let v ... ^p–1 = µ(R). If is replaced by for some Aut_k1((A, I, )) then is replacedby ^P. Thus, as µ(R) is finite, we may assume that ^pm–1= 1 for some m. Choose K, as in (b), to be of degree p^m overk₂. Let _m be a generator of Gal (K/k₂) whose restriction tok₁ is $$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma }$$. Then : (A, I, ) (A^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma }$$}, I^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$}, ^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma }$$} = (A^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$m}, I^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma }$$m}, ^{$$\stackrel{\&macr;}{\sigma}$$m} is an isomorphism defined over K and v ^mpm–1, ... ^m =^pm–1 = 1, and so, by) Lemma 1, (A, I, ) has a model overk₂ which becomes isomorphic to (A, I, over K. The proof may now be completed as before. Addendum: Professor Shimura has pointed out to me that the claimon lines 25 and 26 of p. 371, viz that µ(R) is a puresubgroup of _R^*t, does not hold for all rings R. Thus this condition,which appears to be essential for the validity of the theorem,should be included in the hypotheses. It holds, for example,if µ(R) is a direct summand of µ(F).     

An Upper Bound for the Hyperbolic Metric of a Convex Domain

In [1], Beardon introduced the Apollonian metric defined forany domain D in Rⁿ by This metric is Möbius invariant, and for simply connectedplane domains it satisfies the inequality _D2_D, where _D denotesthe hyperbolic distance in D, and so gives a lower bound onthe hyperbolic distance. Furthermore, it is shown in [1, Theorem6.1] that for convex plane domains, the Apollonian metric satisfies, and, by considering the example of the infinite strip {x + iy:|y|<1}, that the best possibleconstant in this inequality is at least . In this paper we makethe following improvements.     

Cocroissance Des Groupes A Petite Simplification

Let be a group presented by e₁,...,e_m|r₁,...,r_k, L the freegroup generated by e₁,...,e_m, and N = Ker(L). Let c_n be thenumber of elements of length n in N. We know that c = lim sup(c_n)^1/n exists and that (2m–1) < c 2m – 1. ifN {1}. We prove that if the group satisfies a condition slightlyweaker than the small cancellation condition C^'() with <1/6, then c(2m–1) when the lengths of the relations r_itend to infinity. A consequence of this result is a theoremof Grigorchuk.     

Volume of a small Extrinsic Ball in a Submanifold

For a submanifold M^p R, we determine a two-term asymptoticformula for vol (M^p B(x)) for x M^p as 0. The second termis a quadratic curvature invariant of the second fundamentalform of the imbedding. Imbedded spheres are characterized amongcompact hypersurfaces by this term.     

Correction: on the Intersection Matrices of Curves lying on Irregular Algebraic Surfaces

Professor W. F. Hammond has kindly drawn my attention to a blunderin 4 of the above paper. He referred to the ( – 2r) xß submatrix D of the skew-symmetric matrix displayednear the top of page 181, of which it is asserted that it issquare and non-singular, and pointed out that, from the factthat the matrix of which D forms part is regular, it may onlybe deduced that the columns of D are linearly independent; thatis, it only follows that – 2r ß. The validity of the equation – 2r = ß is essentialto the succeeding argument and, fortunately, may be establishedby alternative means. Using the nomenclature of the paper, wehave on F the set ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^* of independent3-cycles (independent because they cut independent 1-cycleson the curve C), which may be completed, to form a basis forsuch cycles on F, by a further set ₁', ..., _2q–2r–pof independent 3-cycles, each of which meets C in a cycle homologousto zero on C. The cycles ₁^*, ..., ^* are invariant cycles andare independent on F so that, if > 2r + ß, thereis a non-trivial linear combination ^* of these having zero intersectionon C with each of the cycles ₁^*, ..., _2r^*, ₁^*, ..., _ß^*.Thus we have. (^* ._k^*)c = 0 = (^* ._i^*)c i.e. (^* ._k^*) = 0 = (^* ._i^* on F (1 k 2r; 1 i ß). Furthermore, (_j . C) 0 on C and we have (^* ._j .C)_C = 0 i.e. (^* ._j) = 0 on F (1 j 2q – 2r – ß). It now follows that ^* 0 on F (for it has zero intersectionwith every member of a basic set of 3-cycles on F). But thiscondradicts the assumption that ^* is a non-trivial linear combinationof the independent cycles ₁^*, ...,^*; and hence < 2r + ß.     

Lower Bounds for the Lp-Norm in Terms of the Mellin Transform

Given a measurable function f on (0, ) with Mellin transformF(s), let |f|_p denote the L^p-norm of f with respect to the measuredx/x. We prove that under certain assumptions, for instanceif f is real and non-negative and F() converges for in an openinterval and F() 0, then wherec_p (2e)^–1. We derive similar inequalities for complex-valuedf, for the L^p-norm of the derivative of f, and for the supremumof real-valued f and of its derivative. The lower bounds areeminently applicable when f is a convolution product.     

Cardinal Invariants and Eventually Different Functions

In this paper we study several kinds of maximal almost disjointfamilies. In the main result of this paper we show that forsuccessor cardinals , there is an unexpected connection betweeninvariants a_e(), b() and a certain cardinal invariant m_d(⁺)on ⁺. As a corollary we get for example the following result.For a successor cardinal , even assuming that ^< = and 2= ⁺, the following is not provable in Zermelo–Fraenkelset theory. There is a ⁺-cc poset which does not collapse andwhich forces a() = ⁺ < a_e() = ⁺⁺ = 2. We also apply the ideasfrom the proofs of these results to study a = a() and non(M).2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 03E17 (primary), 03E05(secondary).     

On the ideals and singularities of secant varieties of Segre varieties

We find minimal generators for the ideals of secant varietiesof Segre varieties in the cases of _k(¹ x ⁿ x ^m) for all k, n,m, ₂(ⁿ x ^m x ^p x ^r) for all n, m, p, r (GSS conjecture for fourfactors), and ₃(ⁿ x ^m x ^p) for all n, m, p and prove they arenormal with rational singularities in the first case and arithmeticallyCohen–Macaulay in the second two cases.     

An Upper Estimate for a Heat Kernel With Neumann Boundary Condition

Using an upper solution we obtain a bound from above for theheat kernel (x,y,t) for a region which is star-shaped withrespect to one of the points, say y. The estimate is for theNeumann problem and holds for short times. The form of the boundis moreover, for x\Y(y), Here Y(y) is a closed subset of R^Nwith measure zero, d(x,y) is the minimum distance between xand y via the boundary :d(x,y) = inf_Z(|x-z| + |y-z|), and f(.,y)is a positive function, continuous away from Y, and equal tounity on .     

Singular Cardinal Problem: Shelah's Theorem on 2N{omega}

This is an expository paper giving a complete proof of a theoremof Saharon Shelah: if 2 < for all n < , then 2 < ₄.     

A Relation between Hausdorff Dimension and a Condition on Time Sets for the Image by the Brownian Sheet to Possess Interior Points

We prove that if W_{N, d} is a Brownian sheet mapping to R^d and E is a set in (0, )^N of Hausdorff dimensiongreater than , then for almost every rotation about a point x and translation _x such that _x(E) (0, )^N, the set _x(E) is such that almost surely W(E) containsinterior points. The techniques are adapted from Kahane andRosen and generalize to higher dimensional time and range.     

Relation Modules of Infinite Groups

Let F_n be the free group of rank n with basis x₁, x₂, ..., x_n,and let d(G) denote the minimal number of generators of thefinitely generated group G. Suppose that n d(G). There existsan exact sequence and wemay view the free abelian group as a right ZG-module by defining (rR')^g = r^g–1R' for allg G, where g^–1 is any preimage of g under , and = (g^–1)^–1 r(g^–1),the conjugate of r by g^–1. We call the relation module of G associated with the presentation(1), and say that has ambient rank n. Furthermore, we call the group F_n/R' the free abelianizedextension of G associated with (1). 1991 Mathematics SubjectClassification 20F05, 20C07.     

The Representation of Some Integers as a Subset Sum

Let A N. The cardinality (the sum of the elements) of A willbe denoted by |A| ((A)). Let m N and p be a prime. Let A {1, 2,...,p}. We prove thefollowing results. If |A| [(p+m–2)/m]+m, then for every integer x such that0 x p – 1, there is B A such that |B| = m and (B) x mod p. Moreover, the bound is attained. If |A| [(p+m–2)/m]+m!, then there is B A such that |B| 0 mod m and (B) = (m – 1)!p. If |A| [(p + 1)/3]+29, then for every even integer x such that4p s x p(p + 170)/48, there is S A such that x = (S). In particular,for every even integer a 2 such that p 192a – 170, thereare an integer j 0 and S A such that (S) = a^j+1.